The "No Evidence" Crowd Seems To Have Become Silent

Soupnazi630

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
7,908
Reaction score
1,198
Points
265
I read more than you do and your claim is false
No, it's actually been posted more than once in more than one thread-

but, just for your tender eyes

“Petitioners appear to have a viable claim that the mail-in ballot procedures set forth in Act 77 contravene Pa. Const. Article VII Section 14 as the plain language of that constitutional provision is at odds with the mail-in provisions of Act 77.”– PA Judge Patricia McCullough

On election eve Monday, Nov 3 a California judge ruled that Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) overstepped his authority when he issued an executive order amending state election law and thus required mail-in ballots to be sent to every registered voter amid the COVID-19 pan-panic.

In her ruling, Sutter County Superior Court Judge, Sarah Heckman, said that Newsom’s order was “an unconstitutional exercise of legislative power.”

In March, Newsom, like many officials in other states, declared a state of emergency in CA due to the alleged spreading of COVID-19. Three months later, in June, Newsom issued a blanket executive order to send mail-in ballots to all registered California voters. Overall, Newsom issued more than fifty orders that changed a number of state laws under the auspices of the California Emergency Services Act (CESA). That law gives the governor the authority to issue orders and rules while suspending certain laws during a declared state of emergency.
APPEARS to have a viable claim.

Which means it is not proven.

A governor has no legislative power. A governor is head of the EXECUTIVE branch

MAssive failure for you and your claim is proven false
All these mail-in voter schemes are unconstitutional since they weren't approved by the legislature.
Perhaps so but still irrelevant and not evidence of cheating. Even if one strictly counts the polling station votes Trump lost California
 

Care4all

Warrior Princess
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Messages
56,672
Reaction score
15,082
Points
2,220
Location
Maine
Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."



Redstate.com??? A rabid, right wing conspiracy site???

  • Overall, we rate RedState borderline Questionable and strongly Right Biased, based on story selection that always favors the right and use of emotionally loaded (sensationalized) headlines. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to poor sourcing of information and a few failed fact checks.



When you can't deny the facts, low-lives like you carp about the source.

That after every one of your media sources hid the Hunter Biden Laptop scandal.

1606749170167.png


nypost.com

Emails reveal how Hunter Biden tried to cash in big on behalf of family with Chinese firm
Hunter Biden pursued lucrative deals involving China’s largest private energy company — including one that he said would be “interesting for me and my family,” emails obtained by The Post show. One…
nypost.com
nypost.com
So this was all AFTER Biden left office, was no longer VP?

What's the issue, then?
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
102,895
Reaction score
37,429
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
Seems to me every liberal on this board is still going with the NO EVIDENCE narrative.

Just as they would if the names were reversed. :rolleyes:

They are willingly ignorant. They know the truth. A stolen win is all they want.
Most people on the right are more liberal than I am including you.

The fact is there is no evidence of widespread fraud which would steal the election.

That is not partisan or political it is simple fact. The efforts to prove the election was stolen are ALL disproven by lack of evidence.

That is the truth
Just saying it does not mean shit.

There is evidence of fraud all over the fucking place.

You are straight up lying.
No YOU are the one lying

You cannot cite any such evidence.

There is no evidence ANYWHERE of massive fraud which would swing the election that is fact which proves you are the liar and you are the only repeating bullshit claim

How about you just from 'Soup' from your avi.....?
How about you cite some of this evidence which you claim exists but NO ONE has ever revealed?


Well, at least you are now admitting that there is evidence.


So I was correct about all your earlier posts being lies.


Keep on.
 

Soupnazi630

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
7,908
Reaction score
1,198
Points
265
No evidence has been found or produced of large scale fraud
Don't read a lot, do you? Ca and Pa have had judges tell them they violated their state constitutions- that, dear one, is "large scale fraud"- especially when they knowingly perpetrated their fraud-
I read more than you do and your claim is false


Wow.....yet another 'is not, isssssss nooottttttt!!!" response from a lying Leftist.
You are more of a leftist than I am

I am actually right of you on the political spectrum. In fact you are a marxist progressive compared to me.

I am stating fact you cannot cite evidence of fraud which stole the election

You are proven a liar and full of three kinds of bullshit. That is FACT

It is not about left right it is about butthurt sore losers like you proven to be lying and unable to post or cite evidence
 

Soupnazi630

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
7,908
Reaction score
1,198
Points
265
Seems to me every liberal on this board is still going with the NO EVIDENCE narrative.

Just as they would if the names were reversed. :rolleyes:

They are willingly ignorant. They know the truth. A stolen win is all they want.
Most people on the right are more liberal than I am including you.

The fact is there is no evidence of widespread fraud which would steal the election.

That is not partisan or political it is simple fact. The efforts to prove the election was stolen are ALL disproven by lack of evidence.

That is the truth
Just saying it does not mean shit.

There is evidence of fraud all over the fucking place.

You are straight up lying.
No YOU are the one lying

You cannot cite any such evidence.

There is no evidence ANYWHERE of massive fraud which would swing the election that is fact which proves you are the liar and you are the only repeating bullshit claim

How about you just from 'Soup' from your avi.....?
How about you cite some of this evidence which you claim exists but NO ONE has ever revealed?


Well, at least you are now admitting that there is evidence.


So I was correct about all your earlier posts being lies.


Keep on.
I have admitted no such thing.

No oen has revealled it because there is none

It is this simple.

Yoou cannot produce a shred of evidence proving you aqre the lying POS
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
102,895
Reaction score
37,429
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.

In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.

Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????


Maybe this?

"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.

As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.

Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:

1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?

2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.


3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”

4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.

5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."



Redstate.com??? A rabid, right wing conspiracy site???

  • Overall, we rate RedState borderline Questionable and strongly Right Biased, based on story selection that always favors the right and use of emotionally loaded (sensationalized) headlines. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to poor sourcing of information and a few failed fact checks.



When you can't deny the facts, low-lives like you carp about the source.

That after every one of your media sources hid the Hunter Biden Laptop scandal.

1606749170167.png


nypost.com

Emails reveal how Hunter Biden tried to cash in big on behalf of family with Chinese firm
Hunter Biden pursued lucrative deals involving China’s largest private energy company — including one that he said would be “interesting for me and my family,” emails obtained by The Post show. One…
nypost.com
nypost.com
So this was all AFTER Biden left office, was no longer VP?

What's the issue, then?



So you are stating that you voted for the candidate who was bought and paid for by Communist China, but pretended to be incensed when Trump was charges with being 'a Russian asset'???

You just revealed yourself as a low-life, huh?
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
102,895
Reaction score
37,429
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
No evidence has been found or produced of large scale fraud
Don't read a lot, do you? Ca and Pa have had judges tell them they violated their state constitutions- that, dear one, is "large scale fraud"- especially when they knowingly perpetrated their fraud-
I read more than you do and your claim is false


Wow.....yet another 'is not, isssssss nooottttttt!!!" response from a lying Leftist.
You are more of a leftist than I am

I am actually right of you on the political spectrum. In fact you are a marxist progressive compared to me.

I am stating fact you cannot cite evidence of fraud which stole the election

You are proven a liar and full of three kinds of bullshit. That is FACT

It is not about left right it is about butthurt sore losers like you proven to be lying and unable to post or cite evidence

Here's your remedial:


The Founders, classical liberals, conservatives....Americans
a. individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


Fascists, Nazis, Liberals, Progressives, Socialists, Communists....Democrats.....LIARS.
b. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.


None of the totalitarian forms of political plague have the slightest concern for human life: not communism (gulags), not Nazism (concentration camps), not Liberalism (abortion), not Progressivism (eugenics), not socialism (theft), not fascism (murder).

They only differ in the final outcome: slavery, serfdom, or death.

They all follow Trotsky: "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
102,895
Reaction score
37,429
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
Seems to me every liberal on this board is still going with the NO EVIDENCE narrative.

Just as they would if the names were reversed. :rolleyes:

They are willingly ignorant. They know the truth. A stolen win is all they want.
Most people on the right are more liberal than I am including you.

The fact is there is no evidence of widespread fraud which would steal the election.

That is not partisan or political it is simple fact. The efforts to prove the election was stolen are ALL disproven by lack of evidence.

That is the truth
Just saying it does not mean shit.

There is evidence of fraud all over the fucking place.

You are straight up lying.
No YOU are the one lying

You cannot cite any such evidence.

There is no evidence ANYWHERE of massive fraud which would swing the election that is fact which proves you are the liar and you are the only repeating bullshit claim
You can do a duck duck go search on 2020 voter fraud and there are dozens of examples.

If you only get your news from the dinosaur media, you need to open your mind.

You are lying or retarded.
Wrong.

You can search with any engine you like and find dozens of ACCUSATIONS.

\You cannnot find any evidence.

I am stating fact and it is you who is outright lying.

There is no evidence and you cannhot cite any
Liar. You know its out there. You are just not willing to look.

If Trump won and it was Biden claiming fraud, would you claim there was no fraud?

Did Trump and Putin steal the 2016 election?


"Liar" appears not to be an insult to the Leftists.

It's simply resume enhancement.....what they're good at.
You are the liar here as are all the other itios claiming there is evidence.

You have yet to cite any evidence and you cannot cite any


Every reader of these posts knows you are lying again.
 

Soupnazi630

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
7,908
Reaction score
1,198
Points
265
Seems to me every liberal on this board is still going with the NO EVIDENCE narrative.

Just as they would if the names were reversed. :rolleyes:

They are willingly ignorant. They know the truth. A stolen win is all they want.
Most people on the right are more liberal than I am including you.

The fact is there is no evidence of widespread fraud which would steal the election.

That is not partisan or political it is simple fact. The efforts to prove the election was stolen are ALL disproven by lack of evidence.

That is the truth
Just saying it does not mean shit.

There is evidence of fraud all over the fucking place.

You are straight up lying.
No YOU are the one lying

You cannot cite any such evidence.

There is no evidence ANYWHERE of massive fraud which would swing the election that is fact which proves you are the liar and you are the only repeating bullshit claim
You can do a duck duck go search on 2020 voter fraud and there are dozens of examples.

If you only get your news from the dinosaur media, you need to open your mind.

You are lying or retarded.
Wrong.

You can search with any engine you like and find dozens of ACCUSATIONS.

\You cannnot find any evidence.

I am stating fact and it is you who is outright lying.

There is no evidence and you cannhot cite any
Liar. You know its out there. You are just not willing to look.

If Trump won and it was Biden claiming fraud, would you claim there was no fraud?

Did Trump and Putin steal the 2016 election?


"Liar" appears not to be an insult to the Leftists.

It's simply resume enhancement.....what they're good at.
You are the liar here as are all the other itios claiming there is evidence.

You have yet to cite any evidence and you cannot cite any


Every reader of these posts knows you are lying again.
Wrong they know I am stating fact which is why you keep refusing to cite any evidence.

There is none

Post some evidence or STFU
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
102,895
Reaction score
37,429
Points
2,260
Location
Brooklyn, NY
Seems to me every liberal on this board is still going with the NO EVIDENCE narrative.

Just as they would if the names were reversed. :rolleyes:

They are willingly ignorant. They know the truth. A stolen win is all they want.
Most people on the right are more liberal than I am including you.

The fact is there is no evidence of widespread fraud which would steal the election.

That is not partisan or political it is simple fact. The efforts to prove the election was stolen are ALL disproven by lack of evidence.

That is the truth
Just saying it does not mean shit.

There is evidence of fraud all over the fucking place.

You are straight up lying.
No YOU are the one lying

You cannot cite any such evidence.

There is no evidence ANYWHERE of massive fraud which would swing the election that is fact which proves you are the liar and you are the only repeating bullshit claim
You can do a duck duck go search on 2020 voter fraud and there are dozens of examples.

If you only get your news from the dinosaur media, you need to open your mind.

You are lying or retarded.
Wrong.

You can search with any engine you like and find dozens of ACCUSATIONS.

\You cannnot find any evidence.

I am stating fact and it is you who is outright lying.

There is no evidence and you cannhot cite any
Liar. You know its out there. You are just not willing to look.

If Trump won and it was Biden claiming fraud, would you claim there was no fraud?

Did Trump and Putin steal the 2016 election?


"Liar" appears not to be an insult to the Leftists.

It's simply resume enhancement.....what they're good at.
You are the liar here as are all the other itios claiming there is evidence.

You have yet to cite any evidence and you cannot cite any


Every reader of these posts knows you are lying again.
Wrong they know I am stating fact which is why you keep refusing to cite any evidence.

There is none

Post some evidence or STFU

Then let's leave it to our reader......liar.
 

Soupnazi630

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
7,908
Reaction score
1,198
Points
265
Seems to me every liberal on this board is still going with the NO EVIDENCE narrative.

Just as they would if the names were reversed. :rolleyes:

They are willingly ignorant. They know the truth. A stolen win is all they want.
Most people on the right are more liberal than I am including you.

The fact is there is no evidence of widespread fraud which would steal the election.

That is not partisan or political it is simple fact. The efforts to prove the election was stolen are ALL disproven by lack of evidence.

That is the truth
Just saying it does not mean shit.

There is evidence of fraud all over the fucking place.

You are straight up lying.
No YOU are the one lying

You cannot cite any such evidence.

There is no evidence ANYWHERE of massive fraud which would swing the election that is fact which proves you are the liar and you are the only repeating bullshit claim
You can do a duck duck go search on 2020 voter fraud and there are dozens of examples.

If you only get your news from the dinosaur media, you need to open your mind.

You are lying or retarded.
Wrong.

You can search with any engine you like and find dozens of ACCUSATIONS.

\You cannnot find any evidence.

I am stating fact and it is you who is outright lying.

There is no evidence and you cannhot cite any
Liar. You know its out there. You are just not willing to look.

If Trump won and it was Biden claiming fraud, would you claim there was no fraud?

Did Trump and Putin steal the 2016 election?


"Liar" appears not to be an insult to the Leftists.

It's simply resume enhancement.....what they're good at.
You are the liar here as are all the other itios claiming there is evidence.

You have yet to cite any evidence and you cannot cite any


Every reader of these posts knows you are lying again.
Wrong they know I am stating fact which is why you keep refusing to cite any evidence.

There is none

Post some evidence or STFU

Then let's leave it to our reader......liar.
Post some evidence coward

Oh thats right you cannot because there is none.

Only a lying POS keeps saying there is evidence but never posts it.

You keep saying there is evidence but never post any
 

Gdjjr

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2019
Messages
8,751
Reaction score
4,368
Points
260
Location
Texas
Wrong they know I am stating fact which is why you keep refusing to cite any evidence.
There is a lot of circumstantial evidence posted- none of it has been refuted. That would make it factual.
 

Soupnazi630

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
7,908
Reaction score
1,198
Points
265
Wrong they know I am stating fact which is why you keep refusing to cite any evidence.
There is a lot of circumstantial evidence posted- none of it has been refuted. That would make it factual.
There has nogt been any evidence posted and all of the claims of evidence have been proven false.

All of your theories from JFK to Israel to this stupidity have been debunked and disproven

It is too easy crushing and destroying an uneducated tool like you
 

Gdjjr

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2019
Messages
8,751
Reaction score
4,368
Points
260
Location
Texas
There has nogt been any evidence posted and all of the claims of evidence have been proven false.

All of your theories from JFK to Israel to this stupidity have been debunked and disproven

It is too easy crushing and destroying an uneducated tool like you
No, differing opinions have been posted- that is the fact- you may have alternative theories, but, their sources are known liars-
 

Soupnazi630

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
7,908
Reaction score
1,198
Points
265
Only a lying POS keeps saying there is evidence but never posts it.
She has posted- but, you're failure to prepare (read all there is to read) somehow constitutes and emergency on whose part?
SHe has not posted evidence

Posting repeats of the same lies is not evidence

I have read more of this than you.

As with all conspiracy FOOLS you selectively cherry pick whatever supports your claim and ignore it when it is debunked
 

Soupnazi630

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
7,908
Reaction score
1,198
Points
265
There has nogt been any evidence posted and all of the claims of evidence have been proven false.

All of your theories from JFK to Israel to this stupidity have been debunked and disproven

It is too easy crushing and destroying an uneducated tool like you
No, differing opinions have been posted- that is the fact- you may have alternative theories, but, their sources are known liars-
Wrong.

I have posted facts destroying your opinion

You are not smart enough to know the difference between opinion and fact
 

JimH52

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2007
Messages
31,732
Reaction score
6,212
Points
1,170
Location
US
trump is a lying baby....nuff said....
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top