- May 20, 2009
- 144,283
- 66,619
- 2,330
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
The "No Evidence" Crowd Seems To Have Become Silent
- Thread starter PoliticalChic
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Thread starter
- #182
Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.
In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.
Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????
Maybe this?
"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.
As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.
Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:
1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?
2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.
3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”
4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.
5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."
Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers
How do you reconcile all this?redstate.com
if there is silence it is because people have spent weeks asking for evidence of massive fraud and no evidence has been produced
Of course it has, liar.
Lots of it.......that's why your sort is so worried.
"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.
As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.
Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:
1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?
2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.
3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”
4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.
5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."
Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers
How do you reconcile all this?
redstate.com
None has and do not call people a liar when the term applies to you
No evidence has been found or produced of large scale fraud. You cited supposed IRREGULARITIES. WHich is evidence of NOTHING
You're a liar.
Inserting the phrase 'large scale' proves it.
If you hurry, you might be able to change your avi to "BigFatLiar" before anyone else snatches it up.
- Dec 9, 2013
- 16,819
- 4,777
- 265
Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.
In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.
Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????
Maybe this?
"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.
As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.
Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:
1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?
2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.
3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”
4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.
5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."
Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers
How do you reconcile all this?
if there is silence it is because people have spent weeks asking for evidence of massive fraud and no evidence has been produced
Of course it has, liar.
Lots of it.......that's why your sort is so worried.
"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.
As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.
Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:
1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?
2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.
3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”
4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.
5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."
Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers
How do you reconcile all this?
redstate.com
None has and do not call people a liar when the term applies to you
No evidence has been found or produced of large scale fraud. You cited supposed IRREGULARITIES. WHich is evidence of NOTHING
You're a liar.
Inserting the phrase 'large scale' proves it.
If you hurry, you might be able to change your avi to "BigFatLiar" before anyone else snatches it up.
You are ther liar not me and you are a moral coward.
The fact si you have not produced evidence of large scale fraud. Small time fraud at the local level happens in every election. In this case it HAS to be large scale to swing the elction
Neither you nor anyone else has ever produced A FUCKING SHRED of evidence of any significant fraud
That is fact you cannot refute.
Suck it up and deal with it junior
ColonelAngus
Diamond Member
- Feb 25, 2015
- 52,063
- 51,978
- 3,615
Seems to me every liberal on this board is still going with the NO EVIDENCE narrative.
Just as they would if the names were reversed.
They are willingly ignorant. They know the truth. A stolen win is all they want.
Just as they would if the names were reversed.
They are willingly ignorant. They know the truth. A stolen win is all they want.
Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.
In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.
Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????
Maybe this?
"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.
As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.
Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:
1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?
2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.
3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”
4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.
5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."
Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers
How do you reconcile all this?
We're just tired of engaging in this pointless conversation over all of your right wing conspiracy theories...and most of us have moved on.
Trump lost. Biden won. Deal with it.
Nah......the scam has been exposed and you have egg on your face, sucker.
But don't wipe it off......it's an improvement.
PC, RedState? Really?
The US judicial systems (including Trump appointees) are waiting for evidence. Thus all of the lawsuits getting tossed.
Did the facts get in your way, again? Try again cultist.
- Dec 9, 2013
- 16,819
- 4,777
- 265
Most people on the right are more liberal than I am including you.Seems to me every liberal on this board is still going with the NO EVIDENCE narrative.
Just as they would if the names were reversed.
They are willingly ignorant. They know the truth. A stolen win is all they want.
The fact is there is no evidence of widespread fraud which would steal the election.
That is not partisan or political it is simple fact. The efforts to prove the election was stolen are ALL disproven by lack of evidence.
That is the truth
ColonelAngus
Diamond Member
- Feb 25, 2015
- 52,063
- 51,978
- 3,615
Most people on the right are more liberal than I am including you.Seems to me every liberal on this board is still going with the NO EVIDENCE narrative.
Just as they would if the names were reversed.
They are willingly ignorant. They know the truth. A stolen win is all they want.
The fact is there is no evidence of widespread fraud which would steal the election.
That is not partisan or political it is simple fact. The efforts to prove the election was stolen are ALL disproven by lack of evidence.
That is the truth
Just saying it does not mean shit.
There is evidence of fraud all over the fucking place.
You are straight up lying.
Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.
In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.
Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????
Maybe this?
"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.
As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.
Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:
1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?
2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.
3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”
4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.
5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."
Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers
How do you reconcile all this?
We're just tired of engaging in this pointless conversation over all of your right wing conspiracy theories...and most of us have moved on.
Trump lost. Biden won. Deal with it.
Nah......the scam has been exposed and you have egg on your face, sucker.
But don't wipe it off......it's an improvement.
1-37 in lawsuits right now. Judges (some of them Trump appointees) tossing every lawsuit for lack of evidence.
I'm sorry, I haven't needed to wipe any egg off my face. Tired of losing yet?...or would you like a wet towel?..you know, to wipe the egg off your face.
Trump lost. Biden won. Deal with it.
- Dec 9, 2013
- 16,819
- 4,777
- 265
Most people on the right are more liberal than I am including you.Seems to me every liberal on this board is still going with the NO EVIDENCE narrative.
Just as they would if the names were reversed.
They are willingly ignorant. They know the truth. A stolen win is all they want.
The fact is there is no evidence of widespread fraud which would steal the election.
That is not partisan or political it is simple fact. The efforts to prove the election was stolen are ALL disproven by lack of evidence.
That is the truth
Just saying it does not mean shit.
There is evidence of fraud all over the fucking place.
You are straight up lying.
No YOU are the one lying
You cannot cite any such evidence.
There is no evidence ANYWHERE of massive fraud which would swing the election that is fact which proves you are the liar and you are the only repeating bullshit claim
ColonelAngus
Diamond Member
- Feb 25, 2015
- 52,063
- 51,978
- 3,615
Most people on the right are more liberal than I am including you.Seems to me every liberal on this board is still going with the NO EVIDENCE narrative.
Just as they would if the names were reversed.
They are willingly ignorant. They know the truth. A stolen win is all they want.
The fact is there is no evidence of widespread fraud which would steal the election.
That is not partisan or political it is simple fact. The efforts to prove the election was stolen are ALL disproven by lack of evidence.
That is the truth
Just saying it does not mean shit.
There is evidence of fraud all over the fucking place.
You are straight up lying.
No YOU are the one lying
You cannot cite any such evidence.
There is no evidence ANYWHERE of massive fraud which would swing the election that is fact which proves you are the liar and you are the only repeating bullshit claim
You can do a duck duck go search on 2020 voter fraud and there are dozens of examples.
If you only get your news from the dinosaur media, you need to open your mind.
You are lying or retarded.
- Dec 9, 2013
- 16,819
- 4,777
- 265
Wrong.Most people on the right are more liberal than I am including you.Seems to me every liberal on this board is still going with the NO EVIDENCE narrative.
Just as they would if the names were reversed.
They are willingly ignorant. They know the truth. A stolen win is all they want.
The fact is there is no evidence of widespread fraud which would steal the election.
That is not partisan or political it is simple fact. The efforts to prove the election was stolen are ALL disproven by lack of evidence.
That is the truth
Just saying it does not mean shit.
There is evidence of fraud all over the fucking place.
You are straight up lying.
No YOU are the one lying
You cannot cite any such evidence.
There is no evidence ANYWHERE of massive fraud which would swing the election that is fact which proves you are the liar and you are the only repeating bullshit claim
You can do a duck duck go search on 2020 voter fraud and there are dozens of examples.
If you only get your news from the dinosaur media, you need to open your mind.
You are lying or retarded.
You can search with any engine you like and find dozens of ACCUSATIONS.
\You cannnot find any evidence.
I am stating fact and it is you who is outright lying.
There is no evidence and you cannhot cite any
Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.
In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.
Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????
Maybe this?
"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.
As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.
Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:
1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?
2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.
3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”
4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.
5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."
Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers
How do you reconcile all this?
Redstate.com??? A rabid, right wing conspiracy site???
- Overall, we rate RedState borderline Questionable and strongly Right Biased, based on story selection that always favors the right and use of emotionally loaded (sensationalized) headlines. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to poor sourcing of information and a few failed fact checks.
RedState - Bias and Credibility
RIGHT BIAS These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may
mediabiasfactcheck.com
ColonelAngus
Diamond Member
- Feb 25, 2015
- 52,063
- 51,978
- 3,615
These PA poll workers are not social distancing!
ColonelAngus
Diamond Member
- Feb 25, 2015
- 52,063
- 51,978
- 3,615
Wrong.Most people on the right are more liberal than I am including you.Seems to me every liberal on this board is still going with the NO EVIDENCE narrative.
Just as they would if the names were reversed.
They are willingly ignorant. They know the truth. A stolen win is all they want.
The fact is there is no evidence of widespread fraud which would steal the election.
That is not partisan or political it is simple fact. The efforts to prove the election was stolen are ALL disproven by lack of evidence.
That is the truth
Just saying it does not mean shit.
There is evidence of fraud all over the fucking place.
You are straight up lying.
No YOU are the one lying
You cannot cite any such evidence.
There is no evidence ANYWHERE of massive fraud which would swing the election that is fact which proves you are the liar and you are the only repeating bullshit claim
You can do a duck duck go search on 2020 voter fraud and there are dozens of examples.
If you only get your news from the dinosaur media, you need to open your mind.
You are lying or retarded.
You can search with any engine you like and find dozens of ACCUSATIONS.
\You cannnot find any evidence.
I am stating fact and it is you who is outright lying.
There is no evidence and you cannhot cite any
Liar. You know its out there. You are just not willing to look.
If Trump won and it was Biden claiming fraud, would you claim there was no fraud?
Did Trump and Putin steal the 2016 election?
- Banned
- #195
Don't read a lot, do you? Ca and Pa have had judges tell them they violated their state constitutions- that, dear one, is "large scale fraud"- especially when they knowingly perpetrated their fraud-No evidence has been found or produced of large scale fraud
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,005
- 47,205
- 2,180
Gee, those Bidenistas who laughed about the complaints about vote counts in those four or five swing states, seems to have become ominously quiet.
In fact, they seem be finger-crossing rather than gloating.
Oh, dear.....what could the matter be????
Maybe this?
"....while Biden supposedly won more votes than anyone in history (despite not being able to get out people to fill his circles in anemic events), he “won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008.” But supposedly had more total votes. What that says is the increase was where it needed to be, not across the board, in what one would have to say was very unusual.
As I’ve written before, the non-polling metrics had all been going to Trump including party registrations trends; the respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate. So you would have to believe that all these historically accurate measures all suddenly were wrong to believe that Trump lost.
Basham also points to a variety of different irregularities that require answers including:
1. Why late on election night did swing states stop counting votes when Trump was way ahead? Why were some observers stopped from getting to viably observe the counting?
2. Unusual vote counts coming in batches of hundreds of thousands with unusually high numbers for Biden.
3. “Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting.”
4. Witnesses reporting ballots in pristine condition (not folded), missing votes, invalid residential addresses.
5.In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened."
Here Are Some More Troubling Questions About the Election Numbers
How do you reconcile all this?
What a carload of crap.
Much ado about nothing.
The courts (most of them Republican appointees) have heard all this rubbish time-and-again and you have been laughed out of court over it.
The election is over.
Your Orange Baboon-God has lost.
Go home.
Drink wine.
Cry.
Pass out.
Sleep.
Then wake up, and begin figuring-out how to do better next time.
Hint for 2024: "Right message, wrong messenger" .
We understand that you believe election fraud is "nothing." That's why you are a Dim.
- Dec 9, 2013
- 16,819
- 4,777
- 265
Wrong.Most people on the right are more liberal than I am including you.Seems to me every liberal on this board is still going with the NO EVIDENCE narrative.
Just as they would if the names were reversed.
They are willingly ignorant. They know the truth. A stolen win is all they want.
The fact is there is no evidence of widespread fraud which would steal the election.
That is not partisan or political it is simple fact. The efforts to prove the election was stolen are ALL disproven by lack of evidence.
That is the truth
Just saying it does not mean shit.
There is evidence of fraud all over the fucking place.
You are straight up lying.
No YOU are the one lying
You cannot cite any such evidence.
There is no evidence ANYWHERE of massive fraud which would swing the election that is fact which proves you are the liar and you are the only repeating bullshit claim
You can do a duck duck go search on 2020 voter fraud and there are dozens of examples.
If you only get your news from the dinosaur media, you need to open your mind.
You are lying or retarded.
You can search with any engine you like and find dozens of ACCUSATIONS.
\You cannnot find any evidence.
I am stating fact and it is you who is outright lying.
There is no evidence and you cannhot cite any
Liar. You know its out there. You are just not willing to look.
If Trump won and it was Biden claiming fraud, would you claim there was no fraud?
Worng. I have looked and it is NOT out there proving YOU are the liar.
Youc annot cite any evidence it is THATY simple. Because there is none for you to cite.
Anyone who is nogt a lying sack of shit would have already posted evidence with link.
Wrong.Wrong.Most people on the right are more liberal than I am including you.Seems to me every liberal on this board is still going with the NO EVIDENCE narrative.
Just as they would if the names were reversed.
They are willingly ignorant. They know the truth. A stolen win is all they want.
The fact is there is no evidence of widespread fraud which would steal the election.
That is not partisan or political it is simple fact. The efforts to prove the election was stolen are ALL disproven by lack of evidence.
That is the truth
Just saying it does not mean shit.
There is evidence of fraud all over the fucking place.
You are straight up lying.
No YOU are the one lying
You cannot cite any such evidence.
There is no evidence ANYWHERE of massive fraud which would swing the election that is fact which proves you are the liar and you are the only repeating bullshit claim
You can do a duck duck go search on 2020 voter fraud and there are dozens of examples.
If you only get your news from the dinosaur media, you need to open your mind.
You are lying or retarded.
You can search with any engine you like and find dozens of ACCUSATIONS.
\You cannnot find any evidence.
I am stating fact and it is you who is outright lying.
There is no evidence and you cannhot cite any
Liar. You know its out there. You are just not willing to look.
If Trump won and it was Biden claiming fraud, would you claim there was no fraud?
Did Trump and Putin steal the 2016 election?
You are the proven lliar.
There is no evidence out there and none can be found. You cannot cite any evidence and will not do so.
Yes I would say the same thing had Biden won as I did in 2016 when Trump won and even in 2000 when Bush won a fair election.
You cannot cite ANY evidence of large scale cheating which would constitute stealing the election.
That is fact you LIAR
- Banned
- #198
Ca and Pa "judicial systems" have, in fact, told the governors of each state they violated their state constitutions- that alone nullifies the "system" used, i.e., fraud-The US judicial systems (including Trump appointees) are waiting for evidence. Thus all of the lawsuits getting tossed.
- Dec 9, 2013
- 16,819
- 4,777
- 265
I read more than you do and your claim is falseDon't read a lot, do you? Ca and Pa have had judges tell them they violated their state constitutions- that, dear one, is "large scale fraud"- especially when they knowingly perpetrated their fraud-No evidence has been found or produced of large scale fraud
- Dec 9, 2013
- 16,819
- 4,777
- 265
No they have not told the governors thatCa and Pa "judicial systems" have, in fact, told the governors of each state they violated their state constitutions- that alone nullifies the "system" used, i.e., fraud-The US judicial systems (including Trump appointees) are waiting for evidence. Thus all of the lawsuits getting tossed.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 3
- Views
- 79
- Replies
- 28
- Views
- 462
- Replies
- 7
- Views
- 367
- Replies
- 7
- Views
- 211
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 14
- Views
- 101
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8054
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 469
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-