The Neg Rep Rule Petition (in the form of a poll)

[uscitizen]

engrish prease....

ohh well another hint.
Do you wear a condom for a hat?

no...

Do you? That's weird...

lmao!

 

[manifold]

What if instead of getting the rep death penalty for a 2in48 violation, the perp simply has his/her rep power zero'd out?

Just a thought...

 

[del]

What if instead of getting the rep death penalty for a 2in48 violation, the perp simply has his/her rep power zero'd out?

Just a thought...

too rational

 

[MeBelle]

* * * *
You are the biggest * * * *

^ Crack_Mabel's endless whining motherfucking stupid shit snipped for the sake of my amusement!



Crack_Mabel will now whine some more.

Dammitol Liability, I already done told you!

negged

 

[Sarah G]

What if instead of getting the rep death penalty for a 2in48 violation, the perp simply has his/her rep power zero'd out?

Just a thought...

Why not just kill his neg rep ability?

 

[L.K.Eder]

ohh well another hint.
Do you wear a condom for a hat?

no...

Do you? That's weird...

lmao!

why are you laughing?

he TOTALLY destroyed you.

 

[Toro]

no...

Do you? That's weird...

lmao!

why are you laughing?

he TOTALLY destroyed you.

No, YOU!

 

[Noomi]

I am not voting, although I think it is rather lame that someone would feel the need to neg the same person repeatedly. Is there any need for it? Okay, maybe for some people there is, but surely y'all can be patient and wait a couple days to neg the same person?

I admit that there seem to be some here who are addicted to negging, lol.

 

[Liability]

No, it's not whining however I didn't like the wording of the no option so I didn't vote..

Is that whining?

Yes. Of COURSE it's whing. There's no doubt about it.

"Waaah. I didn't like the wording."

boo fuckin' hoo.

Well that freaking thing looked like Rasmussen questions. I'm telling ya..

It was a ackseedent I tellz ya!

Huh?

 

[Liability]

I must admit I'm somewhat flattered that Liarbility took my idea (repealing this dopey rule) and started a poll with that intent.

Liability didn't take any idea from Ravi.

Ravi has no original ideas.

That resolved, let's move on.

The Rule should fall flat, like all of Ravi's efforts to be witty.

 

[Liability]

question: is this board a democracy?

tissue?

peace out.

Question:

Do you think it has to be a democracy for members to submit a petition?

Peas and carrots.

 

[Liability]

question: is this board a democracy?

tissue?

peace out.

Nope it is not and were Gunney still around several would be banned over this.

Gumby is not around, so get off your knees you whining little snot. Your prayers for my banishment will not be granted -- at least not for this poll/petition thing.

 

[Truthmatters]

so much ado about nothing.

rep is meaningless

 

[Ravi]

so much ado about nothing.

rep is meaningless

It is, but if you really believed it was meaningless you'd never have turned yours off to begin with.

 

[Liability]

Gunney rule 1:
Never openly question the mods actions on the board.
Penalty:
Smacked with Ban hammer.

Ok, that's true.

It helps to keep the board from turning into a whinefest and having usless whiney threads like this one.

I recommend this post for anybody who has an irony deficiency.

And I can actually spell useless: it's "u s c i t i z e n."

 

[Liability]

This "poll" is actually a petition, but it's a petition where both sides get to be heard.

It is not an anonymous poll/petition, however.

This is USMB where your voice COUNTS.

So, be heard.

PETITION:

For the betterment of the USMB membership, we the members voting "yes" in this poll, hereby petition the Administration of this Board to reverse the neg rep 48 rule and all sanction associated with it and return us to USMB life as it used to be. (We don't needz no steenkin 48 hour countdown COCK!)

Some members of the fabled USMB community might disagree. Dip shits. By voting "no," they are arguing against the very thing this petition seeks. Fuckin' jerks.

But the intelligent members hereby vote "yes."

I hardly ever neg, and probably would never break this rule, but I want to get rid of it so people will stop whinging.

With or without the rule, you will never eradicate whining. Or whinging.

Too many libs here live on it.

 

[Liability]

I am not voting, although I think it is rather lame that someone would feel the need to neg the same person repeatedly. Is there any need for it? Okay, maybe for some people there is, but surely y'all can be patient and wait a couple days to neg the same person?

I admit that there seem to be some here who are addicted to negging, lol.

negged

 

[Liability]

so much ado about nothing.

rep is meaningless

Not always. For example, your formerly displayed FIVE Red Medals were a warning sign to others that you are an idiot and have nothing intelligent, useful, funny or coherent to offer.

It was a beacon of accuracy in those regards.

 

[Truthmatters]

I never had a rep that looked that way out of site members neg repping

 

[Truthmatters]

http://www.usmessageboard.com/members/truthmatters.html

go look at rats screen shot of my rep at my page