The Muslim mass exodus has begun

[Hypatia415]

Official Court documents from the UK. You can access them from the Public Records Office.

And have you done so? In which case you can cite them and quote from them.

 

[westwall]

And have you done so? In which case you can cite them and quote from them.

Feel free. I'm on my phone so don't have the ability to do so.

But it is well documented. You just have to go to the PRO.

 

[Hypatia415]

Feel free. I'm on my phone so don't have the ability to do so.

The Office for National Statistics does not bear out your claim

 

[westwall]

The Office for National Statistics does not bear out your claim

That's not who I said.

DURRRRRR

 

[Hypatia415]

That's not who I said.

DURRRRRR

Sexual violence in the UK by ethnicity - Office for National Statistics

 

[westwall]

Sexual violence in the UK by ethnicity - Office for National Statistics

The PRO has the court records

 

[Hypatia415]

The PRO has the court records

Yes it has records but they do not contain what you allege they contain.

You might also like to read this: https://assets.publishing.service.g...ation_in_the_community__Literature_review.pdf

 

[westwall]

Yes it has records but they do not contain what you allege they contain.

You might also like to read this: https://assets.publishing.service.g...ation_in_the_community__Literature_review.pdf

Why would I want to look at propaganda?

 

[Hypatia415]

Why would I want to look at propaganda?

Oh of course, anything that challenges your bigotry must be propaganda.

 

[westwall]

Oh of course, anything that challenges your bigotry must be propaganda.

No, there is no bigotry. The court records which the British government tried desperately to hide show that 87% of the rape convictions were Muslims.

There has been a government wide effort to suppress that information for decades.

Your welcome.

 

[Hypatia415]

No, there is no bigotry. The court records which the British government tried desperately to hide show that 87% of the rape convictions were Muslims.

So you keep writing but you have yet to produce an iota of attested evidence.

 

[westwall]

So you keep writing but you have yet to produce an iota of attested evidence.

It's out there. Look.

 

[Hypatia415]

It's out there. Look.

The source you seem to referencing is Mr Lowe's less than reliable report.

 

[westwall]

The source you seem to referencing is Mr Lowe's less than reliable report.

Mr. Lowes reporting is quite good. It took him quite a long time to find the relevant details that the government had been hiding for decades.

Just like that 12 year old Scottish girl who was vilified by your apologists in the media, she was vindicated, the pervert she was defending herself from was convicted, along with his sister, and I hope that girls family sues the shit out of all of those people who slandered her.

 

[Hypatia415]

Mr. Lowes reporting is quite good. It took him quite a long time to find the relevant details that the government had been hiding for decades.

His report has some serious misinformation within it.

Rape Gang Inquiry Report.docx – Fact Check

The submitted text is a long, politically charged report-style document making numerous factual assertions about: (i) the existence and conduct of a “Rape...

www.ukfactcheck.com

Unverified Claims

• That the ‘Rape Gang Inquiry’ report text provided is authentic, final, and published in the form presented (no reliable primary publication of the full report was located in this run).
• That ‘at the very least, 250,000 young white girls have been subjected to repeated rape…’ as a minimum national estimate attributable to robust official measurement (available official sources emphasise major data limits; the 250,000 figure is presented in the text as an extrapolation from a parliamentary remark rather than an official count).
• That ‘around 87% of those convicted in these group-based CSE cases bore distinctively Muslim names’ as a reliably derived statistic across ‘court records and official inquiries’ (name-based inference is methodologically disputed and not confirmed here from primary datasets).
• That the first recorded case of ‘specifically Pakistani rape gangs’ dates to 1955 as described, and that this marks the beginning of a continuous phenomenon ‘since the 1950s’ (not verified from primary archive material in this run).
• That the Casey 2025 audit ‘stated’ specific proportions of convicted offenders as ‘Pakistani and/or Muslim’ in the manner summarised in the article (the audit notes disproportionate representation in some contexts but careful wording and scope matter; this exact framing was not verified line-by-line here).
• That the Mayor of London ‘repeatedly insisted there were no grooming gangs operating in the city’ and that he had ‘direct access to HMIC documents’ and ‘read the files yet continued to deny’ (these are specific allegations requiring primary evidence; only the ITV/Standard-style reporting of his characterisation was verified, not the ‘read files’ claim).
• That ‘Operation Beaconport’ was launched to examine ‘thousands more files nationwide’ and that ‘London forms a significant part of this backlog’ as asserted (Operation Beaconport exists; the specific scale and London share as stated were not confirmed from primary NCA releases in this run).
• That ‘Labour MPs voted en masse against a Conservative amendment’ with the exact tally ‘364 to 111’ on a national statutory inquiry amendment in ‘January 2025’ (no primary parliamentary division record was retrieved in this run).
• That Scotland ‘finally caved in February 2026’ to a dedicated inquiry and that Scotland ‘continues to fail to record offender ethnicity’ (not verified from Scottish Government/Police Scotland primary documents in this run).
• The many incident-level claims in victim and whistleblower testimonies (e.g., specific police officer statements, named operations, alleged murders, alleged staff abuses, medical non-referrals) cannot be confirmed from public primary records here and remain unverified anecdotes absent corroborating documentation.

Disputed / False Claims

• The claim that ‘84%/87%/90%’ type headline ethnicity-or-name proportions establish an unequivocal national offender profile is disputed in reputable secondary commentary because of dataset selection, definitional ambiguity (‘group-based’ vs ‘grooming gangs’), and name-based inference limitations; however, it is not scored as False here because this run did not assemble the required primary source or two dated reputable secondary sources to conclusively falsify the specific percentages used in the article.

Bias & Presentation​

Detected Biases:

• Strong political partisanship (assigns ‘primary responsibility’ to a named political party; uses accusatory framing and sweeping generalisations).
• Ethno-religious essentialism (frequent attribution of criminality to ‘Muslim’/‘Pakistani Muslim’ identity with theological determinism).
• Selective evidentiary emphasis (foregrounds contested secondary statistics; relies heavily on anecdotes/testimony while presenting conclusions as settled).
• Inflammatory and dehumanising rhetoric (e.g., ‘demonic’, ‘rotting stain’, ‘barbarism’, ‘industrial-scale’, ‘imported sub-cultures’), which risks persuasion over precision.

Language Patterns

Emotional manipulation: 0.83

Just like that 12 year old Scottish girl who was vilified by your apologists in the media,

You are making this rather personal.

 

[westwall]

His report has some serious misinformation within it.

Rape Gang Inquiry Report.docx – Fact Check

The submitted text is a long, politically charged report-style document making numerous factual assertions about: (i) the existence and conduct of a “Rape...

www.ukfactcheck.com

Unverified Claims

• That the ‘Rape Gang Inquiry’ report text provided is authentic, final, and published in the form presented (no reliable primary publication of the full report was located in this run).
• That ‘at the very least, 250,000 young white girls have been subjected to repeated rape…’ as a minimum national estimate attributable to robust official measurement (available official sources emphasise major data limits; the 250,000 figure is presented in the text as an extrapolation from a parliamentary remark rather than an official count).
• That ‘around 87% of those convicted in these group-based CSE cases bore distinctively Muslim names’ as a reliably derived statistic across ‘court records and official inquiries’ (name-based inference is methodologically disputed and not confirmed here from primary datasets).
• That the first recorded case of ‘specifically Pakistani rape gangs’ dates to 1955 as described, and that this marks the beginning of a continuous phenomenon ‘since the 1950s’ (not verified from primary archive material in this run).
• That the Casey 2025 audit ‘stated’ specific proportions of convicted offenders as ‘Pakistani and/or Muslim’ in the manner summarised in the article (the audit notes disproportionate representation in some contexts but careful wording and scope matter; this exact framing was not verified line-by-line here).
• That the Mayor of London ‘repeatedly insisted there were no grooming gangs operating in the city’ and that he had ‘direct access to HMIC documents’ and ‘read the files yet continued to deny’ (these are specific allegations requiring primary evidence; only the ITV/Standard-style reporting of his characterisation was verified, not the ‘read files’ claim).
• That ‘Operation Beaconport’ was launched to examine ‘thousands more files nationwide’ and that ‘London forms a significant part of this backlog’ as asserted (Operation Beaconport exists; the specific scale and London share as stated were not confirmed from primary NCA releases in this run).
• That ‘Labour MPs voted en masse against a Conservative amendment’ with the exact tally ‘364 to 111’ on a national statutory inquiry amendment in ‘January 2025’ (no primary parliamentary division record was retrieved in this run).
• That Scotland ‘finally caved in February 2026’ to a dedicated inquiry and that Scotland ‘continues to fail to record offender ethnicity’ (not verified from Scottish Government/Police Scotland primary documents in this run).
• The many incident-level claims in victim and whistleblower testimonies (e.g., specific police officer statements, named operations, alleged murders, alleged staff abuses, medical non-referrals) cannot be confirmed from public primary records here and remain unverified anecdotes absent corroborating documentation.

Disputed / False Claims

• The claim that ‘84%/87%/90%’ type headline ethnicity-or-name proportions establish an unequivocal national offender profile is disputed in reputable secondary commentary because of dataset selection, definitional ambiguity (‘group-based’ vs ‘grooming gangs’), and name-based inference limitations; however, it is not scored as False here because this run did not assemble the required primary source or two dated reputable secondary sources to conclusively falsify the specific percentages used in the article.

Bias & Presentation​

Detected Biases:

• Strong political partisanship (assigns ‘primary responsibility’ to a named political party; uses accusatory framing and sweeping generalisations).
• Ethno-religious essentialism (frequent attribution of criminality to ‘Muslim’/‘Pakistani Muslim’ identity with theological determinism).
• Selective evidentiary emphasis (foregrounds contested secondary statistics; relies heavily on anecdotes/testimony while presenting conclusions as settled).
• Inflammatory and dehumanising rhetoric (e.g., ‘demonic’, ‘rotting stain’, ‘barbarism’, ‘industrial-scale’, ‘imported sub-cultures’), which risks persuasion over precision.

Language Patterns

Emotional manipulation: 0.83




You are making this rather personal.

No, his report has a bunch of dishonest hacks making spurious claims against it because he has exposed the corruption in the police forces that has been going on for years.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

87% of the rape convictions are muslim.

and 100% of those who defend them are leftists.


Can you just imagine how these idiots would respond if groups of chavs were running loose all over Britain raping Muslim girls? They would be downright apoplectic.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Emotional manipulation: 0.83




You are making this rather personal.

You are defending Muslim men raping British children. OF COURSE it gets personal.

Are you Muslim and just defending your turf, here?

 

[westwall]

You are defending Muslim men raping British children. OF COURSE it gets personal.

Are you Muslim and just defending your turf, here?

Yes

 

[Hypatia415]

No, his report has a bunch of dishonest hacks making spurious claims against it because he has exposed the corruption in the police forces that has been going on for years.

No he hasn't. Bigots remain bigots.