Contrary to all the BS being peddled by some here, the majority of grooming gangs in the UK are organised and operated by white men.
The fact is that men abuse women and have done for centuries.
“Contrary to all the BS being peddled by some here, the majority of grooming gangs in the UK are organised and operated by white men.”
No the formal inquiries have made that clear. That does not exonerate those Muslim men who have been involved in such practices but it puts the whole grooming scandal in the UK into perspective.
“No the formal inquiries have made that clear.”
There is no mention in the Hebrew text as to the particular variety of the fruit. And of course in that same creation myth Adam ate it as well.
You can read them online if you can be bothered to do so.
The ones you can’t be bothered to present?
Whatever I can afford. And you ?
You would know. However pointing out that a bunch of paki's have been raping girls for years is factual, not bigotry.
The image is an image. The video states that Muslims are leaving western countries. Do you dispute that ?
Sounds biased. Those on the left like to present studies to "prove" their point, expecting that everyone will be bound by whatever the study says. Some have validity while hundreds have been found to be a joke (Ex. the Stephens/Davidowitz racism study)What backgrounds are those gangs from? Is that X/tweet suggesting they are all Muslim?
Granted it is from 2020 but the following should be of interest.
Analysis: A new Home Office report admits grooming gangs are not a ‘Muslim problem'
The study finds no credible evidence for a far-right stereotype that has spread widely in the media, writes Dr Ella Cockbain (UCL Security & Crime Science) in an article co-authored with Dr Waqas Tufail for The Guardian.www.ucl.ac.uk
The two-year study by the Home Office makes very clear that there are no grounds for asserting that Muslim or Pakistani-heritage men are disproportionately engaged in such crimes, and, citing our research, it confirmed the unreliability of the Quilliam claim.
The horrific and widely reported crimes committed in places such as Rochdale, Oxford and Telford were real: but racist stereotyping and demonisation deflected from that.
It might be tempting to think that, if nothing else, a decade of outrage had stimulated wider concern about child sexual exploitation. In truth, it has diverted resources and effort into wasteful paths while opportunities to address systemic barriers to prevention and improve victim support have been missed.
The claims that “grooming gangs” were not properly investigated due to “political correctness” and a fear of being accused of racism are heavily undermined by decades of research highlighting the consistent over-policing of minority communities. What’s more, the whole history of the UK’s responses to child sexual exploitation and abuse is littered with failings – as shown by the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse, Operation Yewtree and numerous other investigations and inquiries. There were also regrettable consequences for child protection, since victims and offenders who don’t fit the stereotype can be overlooked.
This misdirected focus can be found in the Home Office report itself. Its title and executive summary both imply it covers “group-based child sexual exploitation” in the whole. But it fails to include a whole range of problems that might reasonably fit into that category, such as abuse that occurs online, and in schools, care homes and other institutions. Instead, it follows the crowd by dwelling on child sexual exploitation “in the community”. This construct is vaguely defined and poorly justified, although certainly more acceptable sounding than “grooming gangs” – the broadly equivalent term that has no legal meaning but plenty of racial and political baggage.
Because it challenges your bigotry?
My goodness you are gullible. Why should the image prove that Muslims are leaving the UK?
