The Muslim mass exodus has begun

[protectionist]

Yes finally it is happening. Even in the UK where bonehead Brits have allowed rambunctious Muslims to take over cities, and transform them into mini-foreign countries, the population has finally risen up against the bullying, and Muslims are feeling the heat.

Here in the US, in cities like New York where Muslims have already taken over, and 5 times a day, the sickening call to prayer blasts in everyone's ears over public loudspeakers, residents need to do 3 things
1. Vote out any Muslim politicians you have in power
2. Don't give social welfare freebies to Muslims (when that stops, they leave)
3. If Muslims are self-deporting give them assistance - even financial if necessary

Don't miss this important video. >>

 

[jacksonlamb]

1. Vote out any Muslim politicians you have in power
2. Don't give social welfare freebies to Muslims (when that stops, they leave)
3. If Muslims are self-deporting give them assistance - even financial if necessary

 

[Gabe Lackmann]

What a load of shit.
Muslims have grown 80-fold (500K to 45M) in Europe and 30-fold (500 K to 15 M) in the US since the start of the 'War on Terror'.
The goal, as it always had been, was to flood the West with these people.
That's one of the main reasons why the Twin Towers were bombed. That and to fight wars for Israel.
Israel's power expands, and the West gets the Jews' Muslim shock troops to weaken the West further.

 

[luiza]

A great shame that the UK did not spot the disaster that has become America much earlier.

Sad to see so many Muncher Mericans desperately trying to Deflect from their own appalling situation .

 

[Votto]

Yes finally it is happening. Even in the UK where bonehead Brits have allowed rambunctious Muslims to take over cities, and transform them into mini-foreign countries, the population has finally risen up against the bullying, and Muslims are feeling the heat.

Here in the US, in cities like New York where Muslims have already taken over, and 5 times a day, the sickening call to prayer blasts in everyone's ears over public loudspeakers, residents need to do 3 things

1. Vote out any Muslim politicians you have in power
2. Don't give social welfare freebies to Muslims (when that stops, they leave)
3. If Muslims are self-deporting give them assistance - even financial if necessary

Don't miss this important video. >>

It is very telling that the state took out prayer at schools over the intercom every morning because of their claim that it violated the separation of church and state, but they will allow Muslims to shout out prayers in the morning in large cities that everyone must listen too.

And it is all because they elected a Muslim Mayor.

 

[Hypatia415]

Yes finally it is happening. Even in the UK where bonehead Brits have allowed rambunctious Muslims to take over cities, and transform them into mini-foreign countries, the population has finally risen up against the bullying, and Muslims are feeling the heat.

Here in the US, in cities like New York where Muslims have already taken over, and 5 times a day, the sickening call to prayer blasts in everyone's ears over public loudspeakers, residents need to do 3 things

1. Vote out any Muslim politicians you have in power
2. Don't give social welfare freebies to Muslims (when that stops, they leave)
3. If Muslims are self-deporting give them assistance - even financial if necessary

Don't miss this important video. >>

As a Muslim who has rejected his religion is Mr Sultan also returning to his country of birth, Pakistan?

The image of the crowd of Muslims is rather disingenous. What is the source? Why are several carrying bunches of flowers and carrier bags if they are leaving the country? Where are the suitcases? When was the image taken?

 

[JohnDB]

 

[Hypatia415]

What backgrounds are those gangs from? Is that X/tweet suggesting they are all Muslim?

Granted it is from 2020 but the following should be of interest.

Analysis: A new Home Office report admits grooming gangs are not a ‘Muslim problem'

The study finds no credible evidence for a far-right stereotype that has spread widely in the media, writes Dr Ella Cockbain (UCL Security & Crime Science) in an article co-authored with Dr Waqas Tufail for The Guardian.

www.ucl.ac.uk

The two-year study by the Home Office makes very clear that there are no grounds for asserting that Muslim or Pakistani-heritage men are disproportionately engaged in such crimes, and, citing our research, it confirmed the unreliability of the Quilliam claim.

The horrific and widely reported crimes committed in places such as Rochdale, Oxford and Telford were real: but racist stereotyping and demonisation deflected from that.

It might be tempting to think that, if nothing else, a decade of outrage had stimulated wider concern about child sexual exploitation. In truth, it has diverted resources and effort into wasteful paths while opportunities to address systemic barriers to prevention and improve victim support have been missed.

The claims that “grooming gangs” were not properly investigated due to “political correctness” and a fear of being accused of racism are heavily undermined by decades of research highlighting the consistent over-policing of minority communities. What’s more, the whole history of the UK’s responses to child sexual exploitation and abuse is littered with failings – as shown by the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse, Operation Yewtree and numerous other investigations and inquiries. There were also regrettable consequences for child protection, since victims and offenders who don’t fit the stereotype can be overlooked.

This misdirected focus can be found in the Home Office report itself. Its title and executive summary both imply it covers “group-based child sexual exploitation” in the whole. But it fails to include a whole range of problems that might reasonably fit into that category, such as abuse that occurs online, and in schools, care homes and other institutions. Instead, it follows the crowd by dwelling on child sexual exploitation “in the community”. This construct is vaguely defined and poorly justified, although certainly more acceptable sounding than “grooming gangs” – the broadly equivalent term that has no legal meaning but plenty of racial and political baggage.

 

[JohnDB]

Why is it that these muslims only think and want one thing?

Other than that stupid loudspeaker

 

[JohnDB]

What backgrounds are those gangs from? Is that X/tweet suggesting they are all Muslim?

Granted it is from 2020 but the following should be of interest.

Analysis: A new Home Office report admits grooming gangs are not a ‘Muslim problem'

The study finds no credible evidence for a far-right stereotype that has spread widely in the media, writes Dr Ella Cockbain (UCL Security & Crime Science) in an article co-authored with Dr Waqas Tufail for The Guardian.

www.ucl.ac.uk

The two-year study by the Home Office makes very clear that there are no grounds for asserting that Muslim or Pakistani-heritage men are disproportionately engaged in such crimes, and, citing our research, it confirmed the unreliability of the Quilliam claim.

The horrific and widely reported crimes committed in places such as Rochdale, Oxford and Telford were real: but racist stereotyping and demonisation deflected from that.

It might be tempting to think that, if nothing else, a decade of outrage had stimulated wider concern about child sexual exploitation. In truth, it has diverted resources and effort into wasteful paths while opportunities to address systemic barriers to prevention and improve victim support have been missed.

The claims that “grooming gangs” were not properly investigated due to “political correctness” and a fear of being accused of racism are heavily undermined by decades of research highlighting the consistent over-policing of minority communities. What’s more, the whole history of the UK’s responses to child sexual exploitation and abuse is littered with failings – as shown by the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse, Operation Yewtree and numerous other investigations and inquiries. There were also regrettable consequences for child protection, since victims and offenders who don’t fit the stereotype can be overlooked.

This misdirected focus can be found in the Home Office report itself. Its title and executive summary both imply it covers “group-based child sexual exploitation” in the whole. But it fails to include a whole range of problems that might reasonably fit into that category, such as abuse that occurs online, and in schools, care homes and other institutions. Instead, it follows the crowd by dwelling on child sexual exploitation “in the community”. This construct is vaguely defined and poorly justified, although certainly more acceptable sounding than “grooming gangs” – the broadly equivalent term that has no legal meaning but plenty of racial and political baggage.

No....new study coming out that the MPs do not really want discussed and out there. (Freedom of speech is gone in the UK....they arrest more people for social media posts than anyone in the world)

 

[JohnDB]

 

[JohnDB]

 

[Hypatia415]

No....new study coming out that the MPs do not really want discussed and out there. (Freedom of speech is gone in the UK....they arrest more people for social media posts than anyone in the world)

Where is the official report to which Mr Lowe alludes? You do know he is a former member of Reform and has started another break-away alt-Right group Restore Britain? Would you expect honesty on minorities from someone with that political viewpoint?

 

[LibertyWeeps]

So much for any respect I had for Scotland Yard and Interpol.
I guess they've tucked tail and bowed down too, since NOBODY is even trying to exterminate the massive invasion of psychopathic murderers.

 

[JohnDB]

Where is the official report to which Mr Lowe alludes? You do know he is a former member of Reform and has started another break-away alt-Right group Restore Britain? Would you expect honesty on minorities from someone with that political viewpoint?

Theres several links there.....one is for the report as a bit. File.

 

[Hypatia415]

Theres several links there.....one is for the report as a bit. File.

Hmmm...

Rape Gang Inquiry Report.docx – Fact Check

The submitted text is a long, politically charged report-style document making numerous factual assertions about: (i) the existence and conduct of a “Rape...

www.ukfactcheck.com

Unverified Claims

• That the ‘Rape Gang Inquiry’ report text provided is authentic, final, and published in the form presented (no reliable primary publication of the full report was located in this run).
• That ‘at the very least, 250,000 young white girls have been subjected to repeated rape…’ as a minimum national estimate attributable to robust official measurement (available official sources emphasise major data limits; the 250,000 figure is presented in the text as an extrapolation from a parliamentary remark rather than an official count).
• That ‘around 87% of those convicted in these group-based CSE cases bore distinctively Muslim names’ as a reliably derived statistic across ‘court records and official inquiries’ (name-based inference is methodologically disputed and not confirmed here from primary datasets).
• That the first recorded case of ‘specifically Pakistani rape gangs’ dates to 1955 as described, and that this marks the beginning of a continuous phenomenon ‘since the 1950s’ (not verified from primary archive material in this run).
• That the Casey 2025 audit ‘stated’ specific proportions of convicted offenders as ‘Pakistani and/or Muslim’ in the manner summarised in the article (the audit notes disproportionate representation in some contexts but careful wording and scope matter; this exact framing was not verified line-by-line here).
• That the Mayor of London ‘repeatedly insisted there were no grooming gangs operating in the city’ and that he had ‘direct access to HMIC documents’ and ‘read the files yet continued to deny’ (these are specific allegations requiring primary evidence; only the ITV/Standard-style reporting of his characterisation was verified, not the ‘read files’ claim).
• That ‘Operation Beaconport’ was launched to examine ‘thousands more files nationwide’ and that ‘London forms a significant part of this backlog’ as asserted (Operation Beaconport exists; the specific scale and London share as stated were not confirmed from primary NCA releases in this run).
• That ‘Labour MPs voted en masse against a Conservative amendment’ with the exact tally ‘364 to 111’ on a national statutory inquiry amendment in ‘January 2025’ (no primary parliamentary division record was retrieved in this run).
• That Scotland ‘finally caved in February 2026’ to a dedicated inquiry and that Scotland ‘continues to fail to record offender ethnicity’ (not verified from Scottish Government/Police Scotland primary documents in this run).
• The many incident-level claims in victim and whistleblower testimonies (e.g., specific police officer statements, named operations, alleged murders, alleged staff abuses, medical non-referrals) cannot be confirmed from public primary records here and remain unverified anecdotes absent corroborating documentation.

Disputed / False Claims

• The claim that ‘84%/87%/90%’ type headline ethnicity-or-name proportions establish an unequivocal national offender profile is disputed in reputable secondary commentary because of dataset selection, definitional ambiguity (‘group-based’ vs ‘grooming gangs’), and name-based inference limitations; however, it is not scored as False here because this run did not assemble the required primary source or two dated reputable secondary sources to conclusively falsify the specific percentages used in the article.

Bias & Presentation​

Detected Biases:

• Strong political partisanship (assigns ‘primary responsibility’ to a named political party; uses accusatory framing and sweeping generalisations).
• Ethno-religious essentialism (frequent attribution of criminality to ‘Muslim’/‘Pakistani Muslim’ identity with theological determinism).
• Selective evidentiary emphasis (foregrounds contested secondary statistics; relies heavily on anecdotes/testimony while presenting conclusions as settled).
• Inflammatory and dehumanising rhetoric (e.g., ‘demonic’, ‘rotting stain’, ‘barbarism’, ‘industrial-scale’, ‘imported sub-cultures’), which risks persuasion over precision.

Language Patterns

Emotional manipulation: 0.83

Confidence​

Level: Medium

Medium confidence in the adjudication of the highest-priority institutional/process claims because they were checked against official UK Government, parliamentary, BBC, and NCA sources. Lower confidence for the overall trust score because the article contains a very large number of granular claims (many testimonial and motive-based) that cannot be verified from public primary sources in a single pass; under the guardrails they remain Unverified rather than False, depressing overall trust while leaving uncertainty about the proportion of true-but-unverifiable statements.

 

[westwall]

What backgrounds are those gangs from? Is that X/tweet suggesting they are all Muslim?

Granted it is from 2020 but the following should be of interest.

Analysis: A new Home Office report admits grooming gangs are not a ‘Muslim problem'

The study finds no credible evidence for a far-right stereotype that has spread widely in the media, writes Dr Ella Cockbain (UCL Security & Crime Science) in an article co-authored with Dr Waqas Tufail for The Guardian.

www.ucl.ac.uk

The two-year study by the Home Office makes very clear that there are no grounds for asserting that Muslim or Pakistani-heritage men are disproportionately engaged in such crimes, and, citing our research, it confirmed the unreliability of the Quilliam claim.

The horrific and widely reported crimes committed in places such as Rochdale, Oxford and Telford were real: but racist stereotyping and demonisation deflected from that.

It might be tempting to think that, if nothing else, a decade of outrage had stimulated wider concern about child sexual exploitation. In truth, it has diverted resources and effort into wasteful paths while opportunities to address systemic barriers to prevention and improve victim support have been missed.

The claims that “grooming gangs” were not properly investigated due to “political correctness” and a fear of being accused of racism are heavily undermined by decades of research highlighting the consistent over-policing of minority communities. What’s more, the whole history of the UK’s responses to child sexual exploitation and abuse is littered with failings – as shown by the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse, Operation Yewtree and numerous other investigations and inquiries. There were also regrettable consequences for child protection, since victims and offenders who don’t fit the stereotype can be overlooked.

This misdirected focus can be found in the Home Office report itself. Its title and executive summary both imply it covers “group-based child sexual exploitation” in the whole. But it fails to include a whole range of problems that might reasonably fit into that category, such as abuse that occurs online, and in schools, care homes and other institutions. Instead, it follows the crowd by dwelling on child sexual exploitation “in the community”. This construct is vaguely defined and poorly justified, although certainly more acceptable sounding than “grooming gangs” – the broadly equivalent term that has no legal meaning but plenty of racial and political baggage.

87% of the rape convictions are muslim.

 

[luiza]

American Munchers still trying to find ways to Deflect from their society falling to pieces -- all in front of its economic collapse looking more and more certain .

The apocryphal tale of Nero seems highly pertinent except our dear old posters here will think that is a reference to Italian coffee !!

 

[Hypatia415]

87% of the rape convictions are muslim.

And where is your evidence?

 

[westwall]

And where is your evidence?

Official Court documents from the UK. You can access them from the Public Records Office.