The liberal march towards EXTREME fascism

(II) the moderate right distrusted intellectuals and sought limited government
Exactly. You cannot have "limited" totalitarian government. That is an oxymoron.
(III) the radical right favored a romantic and aggressive form of nationalism
And? What does that have to do with totalitarianism? One cannot force someone to love their nation and in fact doing so is likely to cause one to hate their nation.
(IV) the extreme right proposed anti-immigration policies and implicit racism;
and
Ehhhhh. Wrong. That is left-wing. It was the Dumbocrat Party that founded the KKK in Tennessee in 1865. It was the Dumbocrat Party that attacked the United States in order to keep slavery. It was the Dumbocrat Party that rounded up Japanese people and place them in camps during WWII.
(V) the neo-liberal right sought to combine a market economy and economic deregulation with the traditional right-wing beliefs in patriotism, elitism and law and order
Key phrase: "economic deregulation". The polar opposite of totalitarianism.

I'm a fair man. Would you like another shot?
Democrats did not attack America. The Confederate States as a nation had no democratic party.

The democrat Party, now American Taliban, ran the Southern States

Not until way after the Civil War.

Go ahead. Look it up.
The democrat Party ran the Southern States and precipitated the first American Civil War.

The second formally starts November 4, 2020.

The democrats, now American Taliban, will start that one too, and they'll lose again. Their record will be 0-2 in Civil War. Then one day in the future, they will say that the parties once again switched side and Antifa and BLM were Republican run organizations


Rated dumb.
 
The CSA never had any political parties at all Buttsoiler.
Oh Homo...the Dumbocrat Party was founded in 1828. The Civil War started in 1861.

The Republicans were lead by President Abraham Lincoln and opposed slavery. The Dumbocrat Party supported slavery and thus formed the “Confederate States”.

Hang in there, little queer boy. If you just go back to school and pay attention, things will get better for you.:itsok:
 
The democrats, now American Taliban, will start that one too, and they'll lose again. Their record will be 0-2 in Civil War. Then one day in the future, they will say that the parties once again switched side and Antifa and BLM were Republican run organizations
CrusaderFrank probably just made the post of 2020 on USMB. He’s absolutely spot-on. I guarantee this will happen as it’s just what the left does. They employ propaganda in an attempt to distance themselves from their own fascism.
 
(II) the moderate right distrusted intellectuals and sought limited government
Exactly. You cannot have "limited" totalitarian government. That is an oxymoron.
(III) the radical right favored a romantic and aggressive form of nationalism
And? What does that have to do with totalitarianism? One cannot force someone to love their nation and in fact doing so is likely to cause one to hate their nation.
(IV) the extreme right proposed anti-immigration policies and implicit racism;
and
Ehhhhh. Wrong. That is left-wing. It was the Dumbocrat Party that founded the KKK in Tennessee in 1865. It was the Dumbocrat Party that attacked the United States in order to keep slavery. It was the Dumbocrat Party that rounded up Japanese people and place them in camps during WWII.
(V) the neo-liberal right sought to combine a market economy and economic deregulation with the traditional right-wing beliefs in patriotism, elitism and law and order
Key phrase: "economic deregulation". The polar opposite of totalitarianism.

I'm a fair man. Would you like another shot?
Democrats did not attack America. The Confederate States as a nation had no democratic party.

The democrat Party, now American Taliban, ran the Southern States

Not until way after the Civil War.

Go ahead. Look it up.
The democrat Party [sic] ran the Southern States and precipitated the first American Civil War.

Nope, they absolutely did not, even if we correct your spelling. I done told you to look it up.

The Democratic Party didn't even exist, in the South or elsewhere, until the 1830s, And in that time they were opposed by the Whigs. Van Buren (from New York) who organized the party was defeated by a southerner (Harrison) who was a Whig and his succeeding VP, both from Virginia. Democrats got back in with one Tennesseean, Polk, who was then succeeded by Taylor (another Southerner and another Whig). After that you had Pierce (New Hamster) and Buchanan (Pennsylvania). I make that one (1) Democrat POTUS from the South.

I think what you're trying to say is that Southerners dominated the federal gummint, which is true. But they were mostly Democratic-Republicans or Whigs, when they had a party at all.

In the election of 1860, the last one before the infamous Civil War, the Democratic POTUS candidate (from Illinois) got the same number of electoral votes from what would become the Confederacy, as Lincoln did, which was zero. And Lincoln wasn't even on ballots while Douglas was. After he lost, Douglas went on a speaking tour, the media blitz of the day, to try to talk states out of secession, and when that failed, advised Lincoln on how to defeat them.

Meanwhile Lincoln took a Democrat for his VP.

The Democratic Party domination in the South didn't get a foothold until well after that, and not all at the same time. In Virginia for instance, home of Taylor, Tyler and Harrison as well as Jefferson, Madison and Monroe, none of whom were Democrats, the Readjuster Party dominated the state until around 1900.
 
Last edited:
The CSA never had any political parties at all Buttsoiler.
Oh Homo...the Dumbocrat Party was founded in 1828. The Civil War started in 1861.

The Republicans were lead by President Abraham Lincoln and opposed slavery. The Dumbocrat Party supported slavery and thus formed the “Confederate States”.

Hang in there, little queer boy. If you just go back to school and pay attention, things will get better for you.:itsok:

Don't know about that but the Democratic Party was organized in the 1830s by Martin van Buren out of the loose body of Jackson supporters called for lack of any other name "Jacksonians".

And the Confederate States of America, for the short time it lived, mouth these words as you read them so they'll sink into your dense cranium, NEVER ESTABLISHED ANY POLITICAL PARTIES AT ALL. PERIOD.

Go ahead Buttsoiler. Just try to prove me wrong. Bring evidence of any such parties. Right here, right now.

Fucking ignorant twat.

Oh wait, I'm sorry. I already challenged you on this exact same thing back in post 3355. You ran away.
Whiny little bitch.

Oh and speaking of schooling Dumbass --- "the Republicans were lead by Lincoln" were they? Heavy, dude.
 
The CSA never had any political parties at all Buttsoiler.
Oh Homo...the Dumbocrat Party was founded in 1828. The Civil War started in 1861.

The Republicans were lead by President Abraham Lincoln and opposed slavery. The Dumbocrat Party supported slavery and thus formed the “Confederate States”.

Hang in there, little queer boy. If you just go back to school and pay attention, things will get better for you.:itsok:

Things did 60 years ago. The Democratic Party split with those racist bastards and they flocked to the republic one. A merican nazis's will tell anyone who listens that trump has helped them like no other president.

Currently, a republic president defends the confederacy and all it's whiteness.
 
(II) the moderate right distrusted intellectuals and sought limited government
Exactly. You cannot have "limited" totalitarian government. That is an oxymoron.
(III) the radical right favored a romantic and aggressive form of nationalism
And? What does that have to do with totalitarianism? One cannot force someone to love their nation and in fact doing so is likely to cause one to hate their nation.
(IV) the extreme right proposed anti-immigration policies and implicit racism;
and
Ehhhhh. Wrong. That is left-wing. It was the Dumbocrat Party that founded the KKK in Tennessee in 1865. It was the Dumbocrat Party that attacked the United States in order to keep slavery. It was the Dumbocrat Party that rounded up Japanese people and place them in camps during WWII.
(V) the neo-liberal right sought to combine a market economy and economic deregulation with the traditional right-wing beliefs in patriotism, elitism and law and order
Key phrase: "economic deregulation". The polar opposite of totalitarianism.

I'm a fair man. Would you like another shot?
The history of the USA and GOP shows that in 1912, the republican party began an ideological shift to the right. Following the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the party's core base shifted, with Southern states becoming more reliably Republican in presidential politics
Which means that due to southern strategy during Nixon's campaign, the vast majority of racists shifted to the republican party.

 
Anyone whose brain is not completely stuck up his ass knows that fascism is extreme right-wing. Ask yourselves how many neo-Nazis voted for Obama or Hillary. That gives you your answer. Of course, given that this board is full of right-wing revisionist I expect them to lie to this easy question.
Only people who have been thoroughly brainwashed "know" that.

Tell us, how many Neo-nazis voted for Obama or Hillary?
The answer is obvious to anyone whose brain is larger than a pea.
In other words, you have no fucking clue how man voted for them.
In other words you are too afraid to admit the truth.

Here: I am posting a video for you. It is being posted purely for the purposes to show who Neo-Nazis supported for President in 2016. It is really quite sad that I had to actually post something that would be obvious to some one with the IQ of Jethro Bodine. There are numerous published articles on this topic as well, but those require actual reading.


Hezbollah supports Biden. So do pedophiles and convicted felons.


And now you know why trump loves the lower educated.

Trump loves the lower educated because Hezbollah, pedophiles and convicted felons support Biden?
 
(II) the moderate right distrusted intellectuals and sought limited government
Exactly. You cannot have "limited" totalitarian government. That is an oxymoron.
(III) the radical right favored a romantic and aggressive form of nationalism
And? What does that have to do with totalitarianism? One cannot force someone to love their nation and in fact doing so is likely to cause one to hate their nation.
(IV) the extreme right proposed anti-immigration policies and implicit racism;
and
Ehhhhh. Wrong. That is left-wing. It was the Dumbocrat Party that founded the KKK in Tennessee in 1865. It was the Dumbocrat Party that attacked the United States in order to keep slavery. It was the Dumbocrat Party that rounded up Japanese people and place them in camps during WWII.
(V) the neo-liberal right sought to combine a market economy and economic deregulation with the traditional right-wing beliefs in patriotism, elitism and law and order
Key phrase: "economic deregulation". The polar opposite of totalitarianism.

I'm a fair man. Would you like another shot?
The history of the USA and GOP shows that in 1912, the republican party began an ideological shift to the right. Following the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the party's core base shifted, with Southern states becoming more reliably Republican in presidential politics
Which means that due to southern strategy during Nixon's campaign, the vast majority of racists shifted to the republican party.

Dim talking point. It's been shot down 1000 times.
 
(II) the moderate right distrusted intellectuals and sought limited government
Exactly. You cannot have "limited" totalitarian government. That is an oxymoron.
(III) the radical right favored a romantic and aggressive form of nationalism
And? What does that have to do with totalitarianism? One cannot force someone to love their nation and in fact doing so is likely to cause one to hate their nation.
(IV) the extreme right proposed anti-immigration policies and implicit racism;
and
Ehhhhh. Wrong. That is left-wing. It was the Dumbocrat Party that founded the KKK in Tennessee in 1865. It was the Dumbocrat Party that attacked the United States in order to keep slavery. It was the Dumbocrat Party that rounded up Japanese people and place them in camps during WWII.
(V) the neo-liberal right sought to combine a market economy and economic deregulation with the traditional right-wing beliefs in patriotism, elitism and law and order
Key phrase: "economic deregulation". The polar opposite of totalitarianism.

I'm a fair man. Would you like another shot?
The history of the USA and GOP shows that in 1912, the republican party began an ideological shift to the right. Following the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the party's core base shifted, with Southern states becoming more reliably Republican in presidential politics
Which means that due to southern strategy during Nixon's campaign, the vast majority of racists shifted to the republican party.


You know Ike proposed a Civil Rights Act in 1957, that LBJ held up in the Senate, right?
 
Last edited:
(II) the moderate right distrusted intellectuals and sought limited government
Exactly. You cannot have "limited" totalitarian government. That is an oxymoron.
(III) the radical right favored a romantic and aggressive form of nationalism
And? What does that have to do with totalitarianism? One cannot force someone to love their nation and in fact doing so is likely to cause one to hate their nation.
(IV) the extreme right proposed anti-immigration policies and implicit racism;
and
Ehhhhh. Wrong. That is left-wing. It was the Dumbocrat Party that founded the KKK in Tennessee in 1865. It was the Dumbocrat Party that attacked the United States in order to keep slavery. It was the Dumbocrat Party that rounded up Japanese people and place them in camps during WWII.
(V) the neo-liberal right sought to combine a market economy and economic deregulation with the traditional right-wing beliefs in patriotism, elitism and law and order
Key phrase: "economic deregulation". The polar opposite of totalitarianism.

I'm a fair man. Would you like another shot?
Democrats did not attack America. The Confederate States as a nation had no democratic party.

The democrat Party, now American Taliban, ran the Southern States

Not until way after the Civil War.

Go ahead. Look it up.
The democrat Party [sic] ran the Southern States and precipitated the first American Civil War.

Nope, they absolutely did not, even if we correct your spelling. I done told you to look it up.

The Democratic Party didn't even exist, in the South or elsewhere, until the 1830s, And in that time they were opposed by the Whigs. Van Buren (from New York) who organized the party was defeated by a southerner (Harrison) who was a Whig and his succeeding VP, both from Virginia. Democrats got back in with one Tennesseean, Polk, who was then succeeded by Taylor (another Southerner and another Whig). After that you had Pierce (New Hamster) and Buchanan (Pennsylvania). I make that one (1) Democrat POTUS from the South.

I think what you're trying to say is that Southerners dominated the federal gummint, which is true. But they were mostly Democratic-Republicans or Whigs, when they had a party at all.

In the election of 1860, the last one before the infamous Civil War, the Democratic POTUS candidate (from Illinois) got the same number of electoral votes from what would become the Confederacy, as Lincoln did, which was zero. And Lincoln wasn't even on ballots while Douglas was. After he lost, Douglas went on a speaking tour, the media blitz of the day, to try to talk states out of secession, and when that failed, advised Lincoln on how to defeat them.

Meanwhile Lincoln took a Democrat for his VP.

The Democratic Party domination in the South didn't get a foothold until well after that, and not all at the same time. In Virginia for instance, home of Taylor, Tyler and Harrison as well as Jefferson, Madison and Monroe, none of whom were Democrats, the Readjuster Party dominated the state until around 1900.
(II) the moderate right distrusted intellectuals and sought limited government
Exactly. You cannot have "limited" totalitarian government. That is an oxymoron.
(III) the radical right favored a romantic and aggressive form of nationalism
And? What does that have to do with totalitarianism? One cannot force someone to love their nation and in fact doing so is likely to cause one to hate their nation.
(IV) the extreme right proposed anti-immigration policies and implicit racism;
and
Ehhhhh. Wrong. That is left-wing. It was the Dumbocrat Party that founded the KKK in Tennessee in 1865. It was the Dumbocrat Party that attacked the United States in order to keep slavery. It was the Dumbocrat Party that rounded up Japanese people and place them in camps during WWII.
(V) the neo-liberal right sought to combine a market economy and economic deregulation with the traditional right-wing beliefs in patriotism, elitism and law and order
Key phrase: "economic deregulation". The polar opposite of totalitarianism.

I'm a fair man. Would you like another shot?
The history of the USA and GOP shows that in 1912, the republican party began an ideological shift to the right. Following the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the party's core base shifted, with Southern states becoming more reliably Republican in presidential politics
Which means that due to southern strategy during Nixon's campaign, the vast majority of racists shifted to the republican party.


You know Ike proposed a Civil Rights Act in 1957, that LBJ held up in the Senate, right?
It was actually 60 years Previously that Republicans put that language forward but Democrats refuseD to take it up
 
This is the current march of the Communist Democrats going into the November 3rd Elections

2376936-0175006112-leapi.gif
 
The CSA never had any political parties at all Buttsoiler.
Oh Homo...the Dumbocrat Party was founded in 1828. The Civil War started in 1861.

The Republicans were lead by President Abraham Lincoln and opposed slavery. The Dumbocrat Party supported slavery and thus formed the “Confederate States”.

Hang in there, little queer boy. If you just go back to school and pay attention, things will get better for you.:itsok:

Things did 60 years ago. The Democratic Party split with those racist bastards and they flocked to the republic one. A merican nazis's will tell anyone who listens that trump has helped them like no other president.

Currently, a republic president defends the confederacy and all it's whiteness.

"They flocked to the Republican Party, I just KNOW it, even though I can't actually name any who did so." *yawn*

Thanks for clarifying that racism really IS related to be an uneducated halfwit, bigot. Now begone, because I don't allow racist lowlifes on my screen.

FLUSH!
 
(II) the moderate right distrusted intellectuals and sought limited government
Exactly. You cannot have "limited" totalitarian government. That is an oxymoron.
(III) the radical right favored a romantic and aggressive form of nationalism
And? What does that have to do with totalitarianism? One cannot force someone to love their nation and in fact doing so is likely to cause one to hate their nation.
(IV) the extreme right proposed anti-immigration policies and implicit racism;
and
Ehhhhh. Wrong. That is left-wing. It was the Dumbocrat Party that founded the KKK in Tennessee in 1865. It was the Dumbocrat Party that attacked the United States in order to keep slavery. It was the Dumbocrat Party that rounded up Japanese people and place them in camps during WWII.
(V) the neo-liberal right sought to combine a market economy and economic deregulation with the traditional right-wing beliefs in patriotism, elitism and law and order
Key phrase: "economic deregulation". The polar opposite of totalitarianism.

I'm a fair man. Would you like another shot?
The history of the USA and GOP shows that in 1912, the republican party began an ideological shift to the right. Following the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the party's core base shifted, with Southern states becoming more reliably Republican in presidential politics
Which means that due to southern strategy during Nixon's campaign, the vast majority of racists shifted to the republican party.


Ah, Wikipedia and Quora, where people who can't learn REAL facts go to pretend they aren't drooling morons.

Stepped on your johnson again.
 
(II) the moderate right distrusted intellectuals and sought limited government
Exactly. You cannot have "limited" totalitarian government. That is an oxymoron.
(III) the radical right favored a romantic and aggressive form of nationalism
And? What does that have to do with totalitarianism? One cannot force someone to love their nation and in fact doing so is likely to cause one to hate their nation.
(IV) the extreme right proposed anti-immigration policies and implicit racism;
and
Ehhhhh. Wrong. That is left-wing. It was the Dumbocrat Party that founded the KKK in Tennessee in 1865. It was the Dumbocrat Party that attacked the United States in order to keep slavery. It was the Dumbocrat Party that rounded up Japanese people and place them in camps during WWII.
(V) the neo-liberal right sought to combine a market economy and economic deregulation with the traditional right-wing beliefs in patriotism, elitism and law and order
Key phrase: "economic deregulation". The polar opposite of totalitarianism.

I'm a fair man. Would you like another shot?
Democrats did not attack America. The Confederate States as a nation had no democratic party.

The democrat Party, now American Taliban, ran the Southern States
Today the south is republican.
 
The CSA never had any political parties at all Buttsoiler.
Oh Homo...the Dumbocrat Party was founded in 1828. The Civil War started in 1861.

The Republicans were lead by President Abraham Lincoln and opposed slavery. The Dumbocrat Party supported slavery and thus formed the “Confederate States”.

Hang in there, little queer boy. If you just go back to school and pay attention, things will get better for you.:itsok:

Things did 60 years ago. The Democratic Party split with those racist bastards and they flocked to the republic one. A merican nazis's will tell anyone who listens that trump has helped them like no other president.

Currently, a republic president defends the confederacy and all it's whiteness.

"They flocked to the Republican Party, I just KNOW it, even though I can't actually name any who did so." *yawn*

Thanks for clarifying that racism really IS related to be an uneducated halfwit, bigot. Now begone, because I don't allow racist lowlifes on my screen.

FLUSH!
Strom Thurmond, Jesse Helms and most of the south. It is todays republican party who is defending the confederacy. Pick up your clit and move on.
 
(II) the moderate right distrusted intellectuals and sought limited government
Exactly. You cannot have "limited" totalitarian government. That is an oxymoron.
(III) the radical right favored a romantic and aggressive form of nationalism
And? What does that have to do with totalitarianism? One cannot force someone to love their nation and in fact doing so is likely to cause one to hate their nation.
(IV) the extreme right proposed anti-immigration policies and implicit racism;
and
Ehhhhh. Wrong. That is left-wing. It was the Dumbocrat Party that founded the KKK in Tennessee in 1865. It was the Dumbocrat Party that attacked the United States in order to keep slavery. It was the Dumbocrat Party that rounded up Japanese people and place them in camps during WWII.
(V) the neo-liberal right sought to combine a market economy and economic deregulation with the traditional right-wing beliefs in patriotism, elitism and law and order
Key phrase: "economic deregulation". The polar opposite of totalitarianism.

I'm a fair man. Would you like another shot?
Democrats did not attack America. The Confederate States as a nation had no democratic party.

The democrat Party, now American Taliban, ran the Southern States
Today the south is republican.

And the democrat Party is still the racist Party
 
Democrats did not attack America. The Confederate States as a nation had no democratic party.
The left sure loves their bizarre propaganda. Son, the confederate states were run by Democrats. :eusa_doh:
Son, today the republican party is supporting the memory of the confederacy. So if republicans are so anti confederacy, support taking down confederate monuments and abolish the confederate flag..
 
(II) the moderate right distrusted intellectuals and sought limited government
Exactly. You cannot have "limited" totalitarian government. That is an oxymoron.
(III) the radical right favored a romantic and aggressive form of nationalism
And? What does that have to do with totalitarianism? One cannot force someone to love their nation and in fact doing so is likely to cause one to hate their nation.
(IV) the extreme right proposed anti-immigration policies and implicit racism;
and
Ehhhhh. Wrong. That is left-wing. It was the Dumbocrat Party that founded the KKK in Tennessee in 1865. It was the Dumbocrat Party that attacked the United States in order to keep slavery. It was the Dumbocrat Party that rounded up Japanese people and place them in camps during WWII.
(V) the neo-liberal right sought to combine a market economy and economic deregulation with the traditional right-wing beliefs in patriotism, elitism and law and order
Key phrase: "economic deregulation". The polar opposite of totalitarianism.

I'm a fair man. Would you like another shot?
Democrats did not attack America. The Confederate States as a nation had no democratic party.

The democrat Party, now American Taliban, ran the Southern States
Today the south is republican.

And the democrat Party is still the racist Party
You guys prove that wrong every day.
 

Forum List

Back
Top