The liberal march towards EXTREME fascism

[P@triot]

Says here fascism is far-right ultra-nationalist authoritarianism:
Opposed to liberalism, Marxism, and anarchism, fascism is placed on the far-right within the traditional left–right spectrum.[4][5][6]

Yale philosopher explains it.

Says here that you’re a ******* imbecile.

I’ll take a polisci PhD over a ******* philosopher ( ) any day...

 

[P@triot]

Says here fascism is far-right ultra-nationalist authoritarianism

The Tea Party is to the right of the Republican Party because they believe in smaller, less powerful government than the Republican Party. The Libertarian Party is to the right of the Tea Party because they believe in smaller, less powerful government than the Tea Party. Sovereign Citizens are to the right of libertarians because they believe that government has absolutely 0 authority/power over them.

Now please explain to the class, in a rational logical way, how fascism (unlimited government power with total control) is to the right of all of that. Take your time. We’re all happy to wait on this one.

 

[dudmuck]

Says here fascism is far-right ultra-nationalist authoritarianism

The Tea Party is to the right of the Republican Party because they believe in smaller, less powerful government than the Republican Party. The Libertarian Party is to the right of the Tea Party because they believe in smaller, less powerful government than the Tea Party. Sovereign Citizens are to the right of libertarians because they believe that government has absolutely 0 authority/power over them.

Now please explain to the class, in a rational logical way, how fascism (unlimited government power with total control) is to the right of all of that. Take your time. We’re all happy to wait on this one.

Limited government is only one part of the moderate right.
Right wing politics primary characteristic is that social hierarchy is natural/normal/desirable/inevitable. Also known as inequality. associated with competition in market economies.

(I) the reactionary right sought a return to aristocracy and established religion;
(II) the moderate right distrusted intellectuals and sought limited government;
(III) the radical right favored a romantic and aggressive form of nationalism;
(IV) the extreme right proposed anti-immigration policies and implicit racism;
and
(V) the neo-liberal right sought to combine a market economy and economic deregulation with the traditional right-wing beliefs in patriotism, elitism and law and order

Far-right politics are politics further on the right of the left–right spectrum than the standard political right, particularly in terms of extreme nationalism, nativist ideologies, and authoritarian tendencies.

The reason fascism is associated with far-right is that the primary characteristic of fascism is ultranationalism, and typically authoritarianism is associated with this to force this nationalism.
One example is the nazis: they opposed communism and opposed liberalism, and apposed anarchism. All three. Highly authoritarian and fascist, and based on the above, far-right.

 

[bripat9643]

Says here fascism is far-right ultra-nationalist authoritarianism

The Tea Party is to the right of the Republican Party because they believe in smaller, less powerful government than the Republican Party. The Libertarian Party is to the right of the Tea Party because they believe in smaller, less powerful government than the Tea Party. Sovereign Citizens are to the right of libertarians because they believe that government has absolutely 0 authority/power over them.

Now please explain to the class, in a rational logical way, how fascism (unlimited government power with total control) is to the right of all of that. Take your time. We’re all happy to wait on this one.

Limited government is only one part of the moderate right.
Right wing politics primary characteristic is that social hierarchy is natural/normal/desirable/inevitable. Also known as inequality. associated with competition in market economies.

(I) the reactionary right sought a return to aristocracy and established religion;
(II) the moderate right distrusted intellectuals and sought limited government;
(III) the radical right favored a romantic and aggressive form of nationalism;
(IV) the extreme right proposed anti-immigration policies and implicit racism;
and
(V) the neo-liberal right sought to combine a market economy and economic deregulation with the traditional right-wing beliefs in patriotism, elitism and law and order

Far-right politics are politics further on the right of the left–right spectrum than the standard political right, particularly in terms of extreme nationalism, nativist ideologies, and authoritarian tendencies.

The reason fascism is associated with far-right is that the primary characteristic of fascism is ultranationalism, and typically authoritarianism is associated with this to force this nationalism.
One example is the nazis: they opposed communism and opposed liberalism, and apposed anarchism. All three. Highly authoritarian and fascist, and based on the above, far-right.

You are such a commie.

 

[basquebromance]

to what extent is this entire resistance movement simply a Trojan Horse whose belly is full with red Marxist socioeconomic doctrine?

 

[P@triot]

Limited government is only one part of the moderate right.

And it is the part which proves that fascism (a totalitarian ideology) is exclusively left-wing. You cannot have small, limited totalitarianism. Period.

 

[P@triot]

(II) the moderate right distrusted intellectuals and sought limited government

Exactly. You cannot have "limited" totalitarian government. That is an oxymoron.

(III) the radical right favored a romantic and aggressive form of nationalism

And? What does that have to do with totalitarianism? One cannot force someone to love their nation and in fact doing so is likely to cause one to hate their nation.

(IV) the extreme right proposed anti-immigration policies and implicit racism;
and

Ehhhhh. Wrong. That is left-wing. It was the Dumbocrat Party that founded the KKK in Tennessee in 1865. It was the Dumbocrat Party that attacked the United States in order to keep slavery. It was the Dumbocrat Party that rounded up Japanese people and place them in camps during WWII.

(V) the neo-liberal right sought to combine a market economy and economic deregulation with the traditional right-wing beliefs in patriotism, elitism and law and order

Key phrase: "economic deregulation". The polar opposite of totalitarianism.

I'm a fair man. Would you like another shot?

 

[Cecilie1200]

Says here fascism is far-right ultra-nationalist authoritarianism

The Tea Party is to the right of the Republican Party because they believe in smaller, less powerful government than the Republican Party. The Libertarian Party is to the right of the Tea Party because they believe in smaller, less powerful government than the Tea Party. Sovereign Citizens are to the right of libertarians because they believe that government has absolutely 0 authority/power over them.

Now please explain to the class, in a rational logical way, how fascism (unlimited government power with total control) is to the right of all of that. Take your time. We’re all happy to wait on this one.

Limited government is only one part of the moderate right.
Right wing politics primary characteristic is that social hierarchy is natural/normal/desirable/inevitable. Also known as inequality. associated with competition in market economies.

(I) the reactionary right sought a return to aristocracy and established religion;
(II) the moderate right distrusted intellectuals and sought limited government;
(III) the radical right favored a romantic and aggressive form of nationalism;
(IV) the extreme right proposed anti-immigration policies and implicit racism;
and
(V) the neo-liberal right sought to combine a market economy and economic deregulation with the traditional right-wing beliefs in patriotism, elitism and law and order

Far-right politics are politics further on the right of the left–right spectrum than the standard political right, particularly in terms of extreme nationalism, nativist ideologies, and authoritarian tendencies.

The reason fascism is associated with far-right is that the primary characteristic of fascism is ultranationalism, and typically authoritarianism is associated with this to force this nationalism.
One example is the nazis: they opposed communism and opposed liberalism, and apposed anarchism. All three. Highly authoritarian and fascist, and based on the above, far-right.

You are such a commie.

And not very bright, if he thinks anyone is going to accept his assertions about what the conservative right does and doesn't think, when 1) we know he's never spent any time talking to anyone on the right and listening to their answers, 2) we know no one on the right would deign to waste their time talking to him seriously as though he was a person, and 3) everyone knows he's a drooling halfwit.

 

[Regent23]

Patriot, how is your campaign coming that changes fascism
from a far right ideology to left wing? It sounds from the responses that it's sort of a failure. I guess it's all of those books on Ideologies that claim
Fascism is right wing and all the claims of Fascist nation that they were right wing. But keep trying.

 

[P@triot]

Patriot, how is your campaign coming that changes fascism from a far right ideology to left wing? It sounds from the responses that it's sort of a failure. I guess it's all of those books on Ideologies that claim Fascism is right wing and all the claims of Fascist nation that they were right wing. But keep trying.

Regent’s post are dripping with frustration. She realizes now that there is no possible way to continue with her outrageous claim that totalitarian fascism is somehow a small, limited government, right-wing ideology.

Incidentally regent, how is your campaign to convince everyone you’re a 98 year old woman using the internet who also served on the front line infantry during World War II, coming?

 

[P@triot]

I guess it's all of those books on Ideologies that claim Fascism is right wing and all the claims of Fascist nation that they were right wing.

Apparently you haven’t read many books - fascism is not a proper noun. Therefore, it is not capitalized unless it starts a sentence.

And as stated many times already, every academic (and their books) in the world recognizes fascism as a left-wing ideology. Friedrich Hayek held 3 PhD’s (in law, in economics, and in political science) and his book The Road to Serfdom clearly outlines how fascism is left-wing (lest any imbecile forget that Nazi stood for National Socialists).

 

[P@triot]

Is it any surprise that a team committed to censorship has ties to George Soros? The hard-core leftist (ahem, regent) who called working for Adolf Hitler and the Nazis “the time of my life”.

 

[P@triot]

Been saying it for more than a decade now, and the left continues to prove me right

We all know how this bullshit of “safetyism” works on the fascist left. You fascists accuse someone you disagree with of making you or POC’s or whoever feel “unsafe,” and suddenly expression that speech become “violence” and that physical act of violent speech must be blacklisted and canceled.

Meanwhile, according to the left, the terrorists in Black Lives Matter and Antifa who are burning, looting marauding, and toppling are not committing violence. Their actual violence is speech.

The left fully embraces the most extreme end of the fascist spectrum. Even Adolf Hitler would find the today's left too extreme.

Nolte: Men’s Health Wants Joe Rogan Blacklisted for ‘Vile Transphobia’

Men’s Health is looking to get podcaster Joe Rogan blacklisted because he’s “putting lives in danger.” Gimme a break...

www.breitbart.com

 

[IM2]

(II) the moderate right distrusted intellectuals and sought limited government

Exactly. You cannot have "limited" totalitarian government. That is an oxymoron.

(III) the radical right favored a romantic and aggressive form of nationalism

And? What does that have to do with totalitarianism? One cannot force someone to love their nation and in fact doing so is likely to cause one to hate their nation.

(IV) the extreme right proposed anti-immigration policies and implicit racism;
and

Ehhhhh. Wrong. That is left-wing. It was the Dumbocrat Party that founded the KKK in Tennessee in 1865. It was the Dumbocrat Party that attacked the United States in order to keep slavery. It was the Dumbocrat Party that rounded up Japanese people and place them in camps during WWII.

(V) the neo-liberal right sought to combine a market economy and economic deregulation with the traditional right-wing beliefs in patriotism, elitism and law and order

Key phrase: "economic deregulation". The polar opposite of totalitarianism.

I'm a fair man. Would you like another shot?

Democrats did not attack America. The Confederate States as a nation had no democratic party.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

(II) the moderate right distrusted intellectuals and sought limited government

Exactly. You cannot have "limited" totalitarian government. That is an oxymoron.

(III) the radical right favored a romantic and aggressive form of nationalism

And? What does that have to do with totalitarianism? One cannot force someone to love their nation and in fact doing so is likely to cause one to hate their nation.

(IV) the extreme right proposed anti-immigration policies and implicit racism;
and

Ehhhhh. Wrong. That is left-wing. It was the Dumbocrat Party that founded the KKK in Tennessee in 1865. It was the Dumbocrat Party that attacked the United States in order to keep slavery. It was the Dumbocrat Party that rounded up Japanese people and place them in camps during WWII.

(V) the neo-liberal right sought to combine a market economy and economic deregulation with the traditional right-wing beliefs in patriotism, elitism and law and order

Key phrase: "economic deregulation". The polar opposite of totalitarianism.

I'm a fair man. Would you like another shot?

Democrats did not attack America. The Confederate States as a nation had no democratic party.

The democrat Party, now American Taliban, ran the Southern States

 

[Pogo]

(II) the moderate right distrusted intellectuals and sought limited government

Exactly. You cannot have "limited" totalitarian government. That is an oxymoron.

(III) the radical right favored a romantic and aggressive form of nationalism

And? What does that have to do with totalitarianism? One cannot force someone to love their nation and in fact doing so is likely to cause one to hate their nation.

(IV) the extreme right proposed anti-immigration policies and implicit racism;
and

Ehhhhh. Wrong. That is left-wing. It was the Dumbocrat Party that founded the KKK in Tennessee in 1865. It was the Dumbocrat Party that attacked the United States in order to keep slavery. It was the Dumbocrat Party that rounded up Japanese people and place them in camps during WWII.

(V) the neo-liberal right sought to combine a market economy and economic deregulation with the traditional right-wing beliefs in patriotism, elitism and law and order

Key phrase: "economic deregulation". The polar opposite of totalitarianism.

I'm a fair man. Would you like another shot?

Democrats did not attack America. The Confederate States as a nation had no democratic party.

Indeed, the CSA had no political parties at all.

 

[Pogo]

I guess it's all of those books on Ideologies that claim Fascism is right wing and all the claims of Fascist nation that they were right wing.

Apparently you haven’t read many books - fascism is not a proper noun. Therefore, it is not capitalized unless it starts a sentence.

And as stated many times already, every academic (and their books) in the world recognizes fascism as a left-wing ideology. Friedrich Hayek held 3 PhD’s (in law, in economics, and in political science) and his book The Road to Serfdom clearly outlines how fascism is left-wing (lest any imbecile forget that Nazi stood for National Socialists).

It's in the name huh Buttsoiler?

Quick cognizance test for ya. How many grapes and how many nuts are in this package?

Pathetic little ****.

 

[Pogo]

(II) the moderate right distrusted intellectuals and sought limited government

Exactly. You cannot have "limited" totalitarian government. That is an oxymoron.

(III) the radical right favored a romantic and aggressive form of nationalism

And? What does that have to do with totalitarianism? One cannot force someone to love their nation and in fact doing so is likely to cause one to hate their nation.

(IV) the extreme right proposed anti-immigration policies and implicit racism;
and

Ehhhhh. Wrong. That is left-wing. It was the Dumbocrat Party that founded the KKK in Tennessee in 1865. It was the Dumbocrat Party that attacked the United States in order to keep slavery. It was the Dumbocrat Party that rounded up Japanese people and place them in camps during WWII.

WRONG.
WRONG
and WRONG.

The KKK, was indeed founded in Tennessee in 1865, by six ex-soldiers who had NO political affiliations and NO political purpose, in a time and place where neither the Democratic Party, nor any other party, EXISTED. And I can prove it all day, with names, dates, places and pictures. Don't sit here and lie your ass off and expect it won't be called out, you pathetic ****.

Oh and as already mentioned the short-lived Confederate States of America never had any political parties anyway, dumbass.

 

[there4eyeM]

Further discussion of oxymoronic terminology. Truly "left" or "liberal" people could not be fascist. Fascists are not "liberal" nor "left". Fascists are just fascists and justly to be criticized. Anything that sets the state at the center of being is an error to be avoided.

 

[bripat9643]

Further discussion of oxymoronic terminology. Truly "left" or "liberal" people could not be fascist. Fascists are not "liberal" nor "left". Fascists are just fascists and justly to be criticized. Anything that sets the state at the center of being is an error to be avoided.

Liberals set the state at the center of being, moron.