i gainsay your contention.Snowflake...please stop mentioning “clauses” when I just proved for like the thirty-fifth time that you don’t even know basic definitions. You’re illiterate. You read and write on a 4th grade level.It has an Establishment clause.
Might check out Social Security based on the general welfare clause. Helvering v Davis.The preamble is not a power...
Might check out the U.S. Constitution. Notice how I point to the law in the actual document itself while you point to a ruling (by political activists)? Well, everyone else does.Might check out Social Security based on the general welfare clause. Helvering v Davis.The preamble is not a power...
No, I pointed out a ruling by the Supreme Court.Might check out the U.S. Constitution. Notice how I point to the law in the actual document itself while you point to a ruling (by political activists)? Well, everyone else does.Might check out Social Security based on the general welfare clause. Helvering v Davis.The preamble is not a power...
Exactly. And you know why? Because the law proves you’re wrong. So you’re forced to point to something else.No, I pointed out a ruling by the Supreme Court.Might check out the U.S. Constitution. Notice how I point to the law in the actual document itself while you point to a ruling (by political activists)? Well, everyone else does.Might check out Social Security based on the general welfare clause. Helvering v Davis.The preamble is not a power...
The power to tax for the general welfare is express. The right wing refuses to acknowledge the gravity of our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror, with really grave, war time tax rates. They must be fake.That includes the “contingency” for a war on drugs, crime, and terror. You just contradicted yourself for like the twelve-hundredth time.
So if the Supreme Court decides a case by creating a decision, is that decision superior to the law? Might check out the Helvering v Davis decision once more.Exactly. And you know why? Because the law proves you’re wrong. So you’re forced to point to something else.No, I pointed out a ruling by the Supreme Court.Might check out the U.S. Constitution. Notice how I point to the law in the actual document itself while you point to a ruling (by political activists)? Well, everyone else does.Might check out Social Security based on the general welfare clause. Helvering v Davis.The preamble is not a power...
Phew! Thank God. Otherwise MaObama would have been elected twice and spent 8 years in the White House shredding the U.S. Constitution and destroying this nation. But thanks to your heroics of taking part in protests, that didn’t happen. Oh, wait...
Phew! Thank God. Otherwise MaObama would have been elected twice and spent 8 years in the White House shredding the U.S. Constitution and destroying this nation. But thanks to your heroics of taking part in protests, that didn’t happen. Oh, wait...
Phew! Thank God. Otherwise MaObama would have been elected twice and spent 8 years in the White House shredding the U.S. Constitution and destroying this nation. But thanks to your heroics of taking part in protests, that didn’t happen. Oh, wait...
Phew! Thank God. Otherwise MaObama would have been elected twice and spent 8 years in the White House shredding the U.S. Constitution and destroying this nation. But thanks to your heroics of taking part in protests, that didn’t happen. Oh, wait...
Yeah....um...that’s exactly what you did in post #2554. I merely called you out on it. #Hypocrisy. #Irony. #Projecting.
I merely asked what you’ve done to prevent the “70 years of horrifying human torture and abuse” under the Kim regimes of North Korea? You brought it up. Whatever you’ve done to prevent it, it’s been ineffective because as you noted yourself, it’s been going on for 70 years.
Obama as not a bigot, racist, hate monger, fraud, business cheat, liar, adulterer, woman assaulter.
How did Obama destroy the Constitution? Can't wait to hear it.
Only to racists who hate white people.
Show me where Obama showed hate toward white people?
