The liberal march towards EXTREME fascism

[hadit]

why resort to implied powers when express powers cover all contingencies.

Exactly!!! Why do you keep resorting to the “General Welfare” clause claiming it has “implied powers” that it doesn’t have when the U.S. Constitution clearly defines explicit powers for all “contingencies”?!?

Game Over. You just admitted that the “General Welfare” clause does not mean what you’ve tried to convince people it means!

Good one. Very, very good one.

 

[danielpalos]

Where are the express powers for a wall?

We have no immigration clause.

 

[P@triot]

Where are the express powers for a wall?

Uh....Article 1, Section 8

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence

Why don't you get the U.S. Constitution on audiobooks?

We have no immigration clause.

Uh...yes we do. Also Article 1, Section 8

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization

Could you be any dumber???

 

[danielpalos]

Where are the express powers for a wall?

Uh....Article 1, Section 8

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence

Why don't you get the U.S. Constitution on audiobooks?

We have no immigration clause.

Uh...yes we do. Also Article 1, Section 8

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization

Could you be any dumber???

Our general welfare clause is general and there is no wall building power.

And, naturalization is not immigration.

 

[P@triot]

Our general welfare clause is general

So then why are you whining about the "war" on crime, drugs, and terror? Now you're back to claiming that the "general welfare" clause grants board powers to our elected officials.

As such, our elected officials have deemed that is it in the "general welfare" of the people to wage a war on crime, drugs, and terror. So sit down and shut up. It's the government you created through your ignorance of the U.S. Constitution.

 

[P@triot]

and there is no wall building power.

I just proved there was. Article 1, Section 8 which grants the federal government defense powers as well as immigration powers.

 

[P@triot]

And, naturalization is not immigration.

That's exactly what it is, dumb shit.

Could you be any dumber???

 

[danielpalos]

Our general welfare clause is general

So then why are you whining about the "war" on crime, drugs, and terror? Now you're back to claiming that the "general welfare" clause grants board powers to our elected officials.

As such, our elected officials have deemed that is it in the "general welfare" of the people to wage a war on crime, drugs, and terror. So sit down and shut up. It's the government you created through your ignorance of the U.S. Constitution.

you confuse a general welfare clause with a general warfare clause. our Constitution is Express.

 

[danielpalos]

and there is no wall building power.

I just proved there was. Article 1, Section 8 which grants the federal government defense powers as well as immigration powers.

there is no common defense issue on our border; it is a refugee issue.

 

[danielpalos]

And, naturalization is not immigration.

That's exactly what it is, dumb shit.

View attachment 241033

Could you be any dumber???

It has an Establishment clause.

 

[regent]

So, Patriot, how's your campaign going that makes liberal into fascism? I notice the books and manuals on political ideologies have not changed one word of their definitions.
In fact, no one has even mentioned your campaign. Maybe you would be better off changing the definition of hot to cold?

 

[P@triot]

Our general welfare clause is general

So then why are you whining about the "war" on crime, drugs, and terror? Now you're back to claiming that the "general welfare" clause grants board powers to our elected officials.

As such, our elected officials have deemed that is it in the "general welfare" of the people to wage a war on crime, drugs, and terror. So sit down and shut up. It's the government you created through your ignorance of the U.S. Constitution.

you confuse a general welfare clause with a general warfare clause.

Why do you continue to argue with yourself?

Our elected officials have deemed that is it in the "general welfare" of the people to wage a war on crime, drugs, and terror.

It’s the system you wanted. Don’t whine about it.

 

[P@triot]

I notice the books and manuals on political ideologies have not changed one word of their definitions.

I noticed that as well! Here is the original text from F. A. Hayek’s “The Road to Serfdom”:

“fascism and communism are merely variants of the same totalitarianism which central control of all economic activity tends to produce, this has become almost a commonplace”

So to recap...

• When challenged to explain how in the fuck fascism could possibly be to the right of libertarianism, you replied “I don’t have to” (because you couldn’t)

• All credible books on political science recognize that fascism is totalitarianism and totalitarianism is exclusively left-wing

We’re good here. We’re all on the same page. I guess the question remains though - if you’re so ashamed of being associated with fascism, why do you subscribe to the oppressive doctrine of the left-wing ideology?

 

[P@triot]

In fact, no one has even mentioned your campaign.

You’re frustration is palpable. It’s the result of being forced to confront a truth that you don’t want to be true. As with all things, over time, that extreme frustration will subside a little (unless you are a closed-minded fascist).

 

[P@triot]

So, Patriot, how's your campaign going that makes liberal into fascism?

You do realize that only propagandists consider simply speaking the truth to be a “campaign”, don’t you? I think the better question is how is your campaign to convince people that Thomas Jefferson was a big-government progressive, going? Last I saw, it wasn’t going so well for you.

 

[danielpalos]

Our general welfare clause is general

So then why are you whining about the "war" on crime, drugs, and terror? Now you're back to claiming that the "general welfare" clause grants board powers to our elected officials.

As such, our elected officials have deemed that is it in the "general welfare" of the people to wage a war on crime, drugs, and terror. So sit down and shut up. It's the government you created through your ignorance of the U.S. Constitution.

you confuse a general welfare clause with a general warfare clause.

Why do you continue to argue with yourself?

Our elected officials have deemed that is it in the "general welfare" of the people to wage a war on crime, drugs, and terror.

It’s the system you wanted. Don’t whine about it.

Promoting the general welfare is in our preamble. wars on crime, drugs, and terror fall under promoting the general warfare not the general welfare.

 

[P@triot]

Promoting the general welfare is in our preamble.

The preamble is not a power...

 

[P@triot]

And, naturalization is not immigration.

That's exactly what it is, dumb shit.

View attachment 241033

Could you be any dumber???

It has an Establishment clause.

Snowflake...please stop mentioning “clauses” when I just proved for like the thirty-fifth time that you don’t even know basic definitions. You’re illiterate. You read and write on a 4th grade level.

 

[hadit]

And, naturalization is not immigration.

That's exactly what it is, dumb shit.

View attachment 241033

Could you be any dumber???

It has an Establishment clause.

Snowflake...please stop mentioning “clauses” when I just proved for like the thirty-fifth time that you don’t even know basic definitions. You’re illiterate. You read and write on a 4th grade level.

You're insulting 4th graders.

 

[danielpalos]

Promoting the general welfare is in our preamble.

The preamble is not a power...

the term is still enumerated. we must promote the general welfare not the general warfare at every opportunity.