read the post above for further proof Tesh!
That would be an example, but I believe the post Midcan made that Elvis responded to was the same one that generated my initial post that he changed the subject and attacked.
Elvis chose to pick up the gauntlet and engage Midcan instead of calling him on the tactic like I did. The whole series between them is off-topic to this thread.
Based on your response to my question, I don't think I made my initial point well enough.
This is Midcan's post on the topic of the left's response to the Sykes' comments:
Where was your moral high ground when Bush joked about the cause of so many American deaths? Hypocrisy thy name is WillowTree.
The subject is now changed to Bush and comments that he apparently made about American deaths with video of same. This is supposedly to attack the credibility of the poster of the OP. Or, more simply put, an ad hominem attack on the poster of the OP.
This is the kind of tactic I'm talking about. Maybe some of the ones you cited rise to the same level for you. If so, which ones?