Ray From Cleveland
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2015
- 97,215
- 37,440
- 2,290
When you only have two choices, it is always going to swing back.
There were three in yesterdays VA race.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When you only have two choices, it is always going to swing back.
The lack of self-awareness is hilarious. This crap is a big part of why they lost.
There were three in yesterdays VA race.
Honestly I would say Pelosi is quietly breathing easier.
She would like nothing else than the Democrat party to go back to being the way it was before the progressive madness
It wasn't just Virginia. While the Dems / progressives won a couple of things, their agenda pretty much got destroyed across the country.
Pelosi and the Democrats must be in panic mode over the prospects for 2022. Chances are, they will say they lost these issues because they didn't focus on Trump and racism enough . The left is going to go crazy now.
OHHHH God. Last night and this morn is the first time since 911 I watched CNN
GD are they mad!!!!!..............................LOLOLOL
Hear that disgusting pos black bitch howling.BAWWWEHAHAHA
One of the best features of last night is when voters overwhelmingly voted down getting rid of their police department in Minneapolis. That had to hurt any commie.
You can never guess what those 'swedish meatballs' in MN. are gonna do.
Were there three legit choices?
And the end of the Defund The Police bullshitOne of the best features of last night is when voters overwhelmingly voted down getting rid of their police department in Minneapolis. That had to hurt any commie.
Whenever you move towards communism, you pretty much hate the country, imo.
I don't know. I guess it would all depend what you consider legit. She didn't get diddly in the way of votes like most third party candidates.
So in the end there were really only two choices as every has been programed since 1992 that they have to vote for one of the duopoly or it will be the end of the world.
and as thus, the "other" party will always be back in power within 4 to 8 years.
And what's wrong with that? It's obviously what most voters want.
Since they have been programed to want that for the last 30 years, it is clearly what they want now. The programing has been very successful.
So in the end there were really only two choices as every has been programed since 1992 that they have to vote for one of the duopoly or it will be the end of the world.
and as thus, the "other" party will always be back in power within 4 to 8 years.
Dems don't handle rejection well. Or my rubbing their noses in it. AND THE DEM GOES DOWN FOR THE COUNT (knockout punch) (makes L sign at Dems)CNN - "This is about culture, and the Republicans "white message" won. (keeping in mind the Lt. Gov is black)
MSNBC - "This is dangerous, the Republican Party is dangerous. We have to rally together, better"
CNN - "Trumpism has won in VA"
Holy shit. I'll just stand over here and LMFAO. Good Lord.
I voted for perot in 92. He had the most percentage of any party to date vs the other two.
Programmed how? The candidates run and people pick who they want. People don't bother with third party because they don't have a chance at hell in winning and voters want their vote to count. It has nothing to do with being programmed.