The law MUST be applied EQUALLY

[P@triot]

It's a fetus, so how can he be tried for murder? He should be given a misdemeanor at the most. Liberal's are Looney.

If it were up to me, putting ANY drug in anybody's food or drink for ANY reason should be punishable by death. I don't care if it's the father of a child, a cook at your restaurant, or some horny creepy young guy.

Then that should apply to women as well. If you have a right to kill a father's baby, you absolutely have the right to kill a mother's baby. The law must be applied equally. The U.S. Constitution says so.

The fetus has no constitutional rights as a person.

So then there is no problem with the father killing the baby. And Welden's indictment is 100% unconstitutional. I'm glad we agree.

 

[NYcarbineer]

It's a fetus, so how can he be tried for murder? He should be given a misdemeanor at the most. Liberal's are Looney.

If it were up to me, putting ANY drug in anybody's food or drink for ANY reason should be punishable by death. I don't care if it's the father of a child, a cook at your restaurant, or some horny creepy young guy.

Then that should apply to women as well. If you have a right to kill a father's baby, you absolutely have the right to kill a mother's baby. The law must be applied equally. The U.S. Constitution says so.

The US Constitution protects the right of a woman to choose abortion. It does protect the right of someone else to force her to have an abortion.

It's a fetus, so he shouldn't be charged in any way of murder. By liberal standards, if you were consistent.

Roe v Wade allows states some say in what the status of a fetus is.

 

[jknowgood]

It's a fetus, so how can he be tried for murder? He should be given a misdemeanor at the most. Liberal's are Looney.

If it were up to me, putting ANY drug in anybody's food or drink for ANY reason should be punishable by death. I don't care if it's the father of a child, a cook at your restaurant, or some horny creepy young guy.

Then that should apply to women as well. If you have a right to kill a father's baby, you absolutely have the right to kill a mother's baby. The law must be applied equally. The U.S. Constitution says so.

The fetus has no constitutional rights as a person.

Then how can he be charged with murder or manslaughter?

 

[jknowgood]

It's a fetus, so how can he be tried for murder? He should be given a misdemeanor at the most. Liberal's are Looney.

If it were up to me, putting ANY drug in anybody's food or drink for ANY reason should be punishable by death. I don't care if it's the father of a child, a cook at your restaurant, or some horny creepy young guy.

Then that should apply to women as well. If you have a right to kill a father's baby, you absolutely have the right to kill a mother's baby. The law must be applied equally. The U.S. Constitution says so.

The US Constitution protects the right of a woman to choose abortion. It does protect the right of someone else to force her to have an abortion.

It's a fetus, so he shouldn't be charged in any way of murder. By liberal standards, if you were consistent.

Roe v Wade allows states some say in what the status of a fetus is.

Is it a fetus or a baby? It's either one or the other. You can't have it both ways.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Liberals refuse to apply the law equally or apply their beliefs consistently. They only apply it when it is advantageous to them and reject it when it isn't advantageous to them. Here is another perfect example...

Remee Lee was elated when she became pregnant, but those feelings quickly turned into a nightmare that won't let go of her. Her boyfriend wasn't happy about the pregnancy, but it was Lee's dream to have a child. Until her boyfriend, John Andrew Welden, took that dream away. This week, Welden, 28, pleaded guilty to killing their unborn baby. How? He tricked Lee into taking an abortion pill, causing her to miscarry.

Man tricks pregnant girlfriend into taking abortion pill - CNN.com

If it is ok and legal for a woman to have an abortion that it is absolutely ok and legal for a man to have an abortion. Anything less than that is an injustice. The law applies to all citizens equally. There is no way that a man can be charged with a crime for doing the exact same thing that any woman is legally permitted to do.

"Welden was sentenced almost a year ago to 13 years and eight months in prison on charges of product tampering and conspiracy to commit mail fraud."

Show us where women are legally permitted to commit product tampering and mail fraud.

Dude...you are a pathological liar. That is not what he was charged with. At all. There was no "product tampering" nor did he commit "mail fraud".

Right from the CNN article: This week, Welden, 28, pleaded guilty to killing their unborn baby. How? He tricked Lee into taking an abortion pill, causing her to miscarry.

When a liberal can't dispute the facts - they resort to lying.

Lazzara sentenced him to 13 years and eight months — likely to be served in a minimum-security work camp — on charges of product tampering and conspiracy to commit mail fraud.

He was initially charged with first-degree murder under the Unborn Victims of Violence Act, punishable by life in prison, but he pleaded guilty to lesser charges in September.

Welden gets nearly 14 years in Tampa abortion pill case

Go argue with them, asshole.

Hey "asshole" - there was no pill tampering and you know it. You're lying through your teeth. Game. Set. Match.

Nice meltdown.

 

[Care4all]

And caving in the skull or vacuuming off their body parts is also an attack on another human being.

You're acting like a liberal here Ray. You're not applying the law equally. Either it's ok to have an abortion or it's not. If it's ok - then men have every right to have one as well.

Yes they would, if they were carrying the baby. But in the natural process of birth, the baby is part of the woman's body--not the mans. That's not to say it's not his, but he can't attack the body of another person because of his desires.

That's a false narrative and you know it. He did not "attack" her body. She is 100% just fine. He used a methods that millions of women use wihout any negative consequences to them.

He had an abortion. If a woman is allowed to have one without the man's consent, then by law - a man must absolutely be able to have an abortion without the woman's consent. Period.

he's NOT having an abortion, dummy.... men can't have abortions....but you have to know that...? your argument FAILS.... your comparison fails

 

[NYcarbineer]

It's a fetus, so how can he be tried for murder? He should be given a misdemeanor at the most. Liberal's are Looney.

If it were up to me, putting ANY drug in anybody's food or drink for ANY reason should be punishable by death. I don't care if it's the father of a child, a cook at your restaurant, or some horny creepy young guy.

Then that should apply to women as well. If you have a right to kill a father's baby, you absolutely have the right to kill a mother's baby. The law must be applied equally. The U.S. Constitution says so.

The fetus has no constitutional rights as a person.

Then how can he be charged with murder or manslaughter?

I doubt it's been challenged in court.

 

[P@triot]

"Welden was sentenced almost a year ago to 13 years and eight months in prison on charges of product tampering and conspiracy to commit mail fraud."

This is evidence right here of what a bunch lying, disingenuous asshats liberals are. He was charged with murder. He pleaded to a lesser charge because it was mutually beneficial to both the prosecution and the defendant (i.e. the prosecution realized they didn't have a Constitutional case and he realized that this agreement was much better than being found guilty for murder).

Right from your article you lying piece of shit:

"He was initially charged with first-degree murder under the Unborn Victims of Violence Act, punishable by life in prison, but he pleaded guilty to lesser charges in September."

He pleaded down. He was charged with murder. That was the charge. Would you like to try again, liar?

 

[NYcarbineer]

And caving in the skull or vacuuming off their body parts is also an attack on another human being.

You're acting like a liberal here Ray. You're not applying the law equally. Either it's ok to have an abortion or it's not. If it's ok - then men have every right to have one as well.

Yes they would, if they were carrying the baby. But in the natural process of birth, the baby is part of the woman's body--not the mans. That's not to say it's not his, but he can't attack the body of another person because of his desires.

That's a false narrative and you know it. He did not "attack" her body. She is 100% just fine. He used a methods that millions of women use wihout any negative consequences to them.

He had an abortion. If a woman is allowed to have one without the man's consent, then by law - a man must absolutely be able to have an abortion without the woman's consent. Period.

he's NOT having an abortion, dummy.... men can't have abortions....but you have to know that...? your argument FAILS.... your comparison fails

This is a wornout anti-choice argument that some idiots still latch onto.

 

[P@triot]

And caving in the skull or vacuuming off their body parts is also an attack on another human being.

You're acting like a liberal here Ray. You're not applying the law equally. Either it's ok to have an abortion or it's not. If it's ok - then men have every right to have one as well.

Yes they would, if they were carrying the baby. But in the natural process of birth, the baby is part of the woman's body--not the mans. That's not to say it's not his, but he can't attack the body of another person because of his desires.

That's a false narrative and you know it. He did not "attack" her body. She is 100% just fine. He used a methods that millions of women use wihout any negative consequences to them.

He had an abortion. If a woman is allowed to have one without the man's consent, then by law - a man must absolutely be able to have an abortion without the woman's consent. Period.

he's NOT having an abortion, dummy.... men can't have abortions....but you have to know that...? your argument FAILS.... your comparison fails

Why can't they have abortions?!?

 

[NYcarbineer]

"Welden was sentenced almost a year ago to 13 years and eight months in prison on charges of product tampering and conspiracy to commit mail fraud."

This is evidence right here of what a bunch lying, disingenuous asshats liberals are. He was charged with murder. He pleaded to a lesser charge because it was mutually beneficial to both the prosecution and the defendant (i.e. the prosecution realized they didn't have a Constitutional case and he realized that this agreement was much better than being found guilty for murder).

Right from your article you lying piece of shit:

"He was initially charged with first-degree murder under the Unborn Victims of Violence Act, punishable by life in prison, but he pleaded guilty to lesser charges in September."

He pleaded down. He was charged with murder. That was the charge. Would you like to try again, liar?

That's proof you lied, fuckwit.

 

[P@triot]

This is a wornout anti-choice argument that some idiots still latch onto.

Bwahahahaha! In other words - you can't explain away your contradictions of your own position. Got it!

 

[NYcarbineer]

And caving in the skull or vacuuming off their body parts is also an attack on another human being.

You're acting like a liberal here Ray. You're not applying the law equally. Either it's ok to have an abortion or it's not. If it's ok - then men have every right to have one as well.

Yes they would, if they were carrying the baby. But in the natural process of birth, the baby is part of the woman's body--not the mans. That's not to say it's not his, but he can't attack the body of another person because of his desires.

That's a false narrative and you know it. He did not "attack" her body. She is 100% just fine. He used a methods that millions of women use wihout any negative consequences to them.

He had an abortion. If a woman is allowed to have one without the man's consent, then by law - a man must absolutely be able to have an abortion without the woman's consent. Period.

he's NOT having an abortion, dummy.... men can't have abortions....but you have to know that...? your argument FAILS.... your comparison fails

Why can't they have abortions?!?

uh, because they can't get pregnant?

(did he really just ask that question?)

 

[P@triot]

"Welden was sentenced almost a year ago to 13 years and eight months in prison on charges of product tampering and conspiracy to commit mail fraud."

This is evidence right here of what a bunch lying, disingenuous asshats liberals are. He was charged with murder. He pleaded to a lesser charge because it was mutually beneficial to both the prosecution and the defendant (i.e. the prosecution realized they didn't have a Constitutional case and he realized that this agreement was much better than being found guilty for murder).

Right from your article you lying piece of shit:

"He was initially charged with first-degree murder under the Unborn Victims of Violence Act, punishable by life in prison, but he pleaded guilty to lesser charges in September."

He pleaded down. He was charged with murder. That was the charge. Would you like to try again, liar?

That's proof you lied, fuckwit.

He was charged with murder you lying "fuckwit". The only thing that it's proof of is that you are a pathological liar!

 

[jillian]

Liberals refuse to apply the law equally or apply their beliefs consistently. They only apply it when it is advantageous to them and reject it when it isn't advantageous to them. Here is another perfect example...

Remee Lee was elated when she became pregnant, but those feelings quickly turned into a nightmare that won't let go of her. Her boyfriend wasn't happy about the pregnancy, but it was Lee's dream to have a child. Until her boyfriend, John Andrew Welden, took that dream away. This week, Welden, 28, pleaded guilty to killing their unborn baby. How? He tricked Lee into taking an abortion pill, causing her to miscarry.

Man tricks pregnant girlfriend into taking abortion pill - CNN.com

If it is ok and legal for a woman to have an abortion that it is absolutely ok and legal for a man to have an abortion. Anything less than that is an injustice. The law applies to all citizens equally. There is no way that a man can be charged with a crime for doing the exact same thing that any woman is legally permitted to do.

it's HER CHOICE. HER BODY.

poor winger

 

[NYcarbineer]

This is a wornout anti-choice argument that some idiots still latch onto.

Bwahahahaha! In other words - you can't explain away your contradictions of your own position. Got it!

I have no contradictions.

 

[P@triot]

And caving in the skull or vacuuming off their body parts is also an attack on another human being.

You're acting like a liberal here Ray. You're not applying the law equally. Either it's ok to have an abortion or it's not. If it's ok - then men have every right to have one as well.

Yes they would, if they were carrying the baby. But in the natural process of birth, the baby is part of the woman's body--not the mans. That's not to say it's not his, but he can't attack the body of another person because of his desires.

That's a false narrative and you know it. He did not "attack" her body. She is 100% just fine. He used a methods that millions of women use wihout any negative consequences to them.

He had an abortion. If a woman is allowed to have one without the man's consent, then by law - a man must absolutely be able to have an abortion without the woman's consent. Period.

he's NOT having an abortion, dummy.... men can't have abortions....but you have to know that...? your argument FAILS.... your comparison fails

Why can't they have abortions?!?

uh, because they can't get pregnant?

(did he really just ask that question?)

They can't? Men can't have children? Really?

Also, why do women say "WE are pregnant" when they announce pregnancies?

 

[jillian]

And caving in the skull or vacuuming off their body parts is also an attack on another human being.

You're acting like a liberal here Ray. You're not applying the law equally. Either it's ok to have an abortion or it's not. If it's ok - then men have every right to have one as well.

Yes they would, if they were carrying the baby. But in the natural process of birth, the baby is part of the woman's body--not the mans. That's not to say it's not his, but he can't attack the body of another person because of his desires.

That's a false narrative and you know it. He did not "attack" her body. She is 100% just fine. He used a methods that millions of women use wihout any negative consequences to them.

He had an abortion. If a woman is allowed to have one without the man's consent, then by law - a man must absolutely be able to have an abortion without the woman's consent. Period.

he's NOT having an abortion, dummy.... men can't have abortions....but you have to know that...? your argument FAILS.... your comparison fails

Why can't they have abortions?!?

uh, because they can't get pregnant?

(did he really just ask that question?)

yep. he isn't near as bright as he thinks he is.

 

[P@triot]

Liberals refuse to apply the law equally or apply their beliefs consistently. They only apply it when it is advantageous to them and reject it when it isn't advantageous to them. Here is another perfect example...

Remee Lee was elated when she became pregnant, but those feelings quickly turned into a nightmare that won't let go of her. Her boyfriend wasn't happy about the pregnancy, but it was Lee's dream to have a child. Until her boyfriend, John Andrew Welden, took that dream away. This week, Welden, 28, pleaded guilty to killing their unborn baby. How? He tricked Lee into taking an abortion pill, causing her to miscarry.

Man tricks pregnant girlfriend into taking abortion pill - CNN.com

If it is ok and legal for a woman to have an abortion that it is absolutely ok and legal for a man to have an abortion. Anything less than that is an injustice. The law applies to all citizens equally. There is no way that a man can be charged with a crime for doing the exact same thing that any woman is legally permitted to do.

it's HER CHOICE. HER BODY.

poor winger

It's not her body you buffoon. We've already established that you misandrist pig. She didn't die. The fetus did. Nothing happened to her body. That's a typical false narrative by a desperate libtard who can't explain away why she contradicts her own position.

But I'll let you try again if you're up for it.

 

[Unkotare]

.....

it's HER CHOICE. HER BODY......

And someone else's body, someone else's life, as well.