martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 93,313
- 43,570
- 2,300
I don't see the problem as science has worked the issue out.
You reference science as some sort of talisman or saint. It isn't "science", It is studies, theses, and assumptions.
There are theories and procedures for correlating the data to CO2 PPM, but assuming it is 100% accurate is more faith than science.