The last time...

[EMH]

Continent specific ice age starts at top of Northern Canada. 70k years is not long enough for the ice to reach Chicago, much less be 2.5 miles thick.

Cool story.
Are you going to post your evidence?

GREENLAND
ANTARCTICA

TEST CASES for continent specific ice ages

Greenland's ice started up north and took AT LEAST over 500k years to get to the Southern Tip.

The Greenland ice age is at least 500k years old, more likely over 1 million. No part of it is yet 2 miles thick. You claim 70k years from the start of an ice age in NORTHERN CANADA put 2.5 mile thick glaciers in Chicago. THAT is PATHETIC. THAT is Dennis Quaide McBullshit cycle nonsense.

Northern Canada spent 30-50 million years in that "within 600 miles to the pole" and Ellesmere is still there.

Antarctic ice age is 40+ million years old, and IT DOES HAVE 2.5 mile thick ice.....

So how old was the 2.5 mile thick ice covering Chicago???


Answer - AT LEAST 30 million years

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

GREENLAND
ANTARCTICA

TEST CASES for continent specific ice ages

Greenland's ice started up north and took AT LEAST over 500k years to get to the Southern Tip.

The Greenland ice age is at least 500k years old, more likely over 1 million. No part of it is yet 2 miles thick. You claim 70k years from the start of an ice age in NORTHERN CANADA put 2.5 mile thick glaciers in Chicago. THAT is PATHETIC. THAT is Dennis Quaide McBullshit cycle nonsense.

Northern Canada spent 30-50 million years in that "within 600 miles to the pole" and Ellesmere is still there.

Antarctic ice age is 40+ million years old, and IT DOES HAVE 2.5 mile thick ice.....

So how old was the 2.5 mile thick ice covering Chicago???


Answer - AT LEAST 30 million years

You claim 70k years from the start of an ice age in NORTHERN CANADA put 2.5 mile thick glaciers in Chicago.

I don't claim it. If you have evidence it wasn't, provide it.

So how old was the 2.5 mile thick ice covering Chicago???


Answer - AT LEAST 30 million years

Post your evidence. From a real source i.e. not you.

 

[EMH]

I don't claim it.

So you don't agree that the Laurentine Ice Sheet was 70k years in duration??

You cited that...

LOL!!!


We have two ongoing continent specific ice ages to use as references to extrapolate past ones.

And all Toddster will "settle for" is parroting another conflicted taxpayer funded liar like the ones who fudged the atmospheric temp data...

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So you don't agree that the Laurentine Ice Sheet was 70k years in duration??

You cited that...

LOL!!!


We have two ongoing continent specific ice ages to use as references to extrapolate past ones.

And all Toddster will "settle for" is parroting another conflicted taxpayer funded liar like the ones who fudged the atmospheric temp data...

So you don't agree that the Laurentine Ice Sheet was 70k years in duration??

What was the duration? Post your evidence.

 

[EMH]

So you don't agree that the Laurentine Ice Sheet was 70k years in duration??

What was the duration? Post your evidence.

600 times

700 times

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

600 times

700 times

Thanks for the map.

Where does it say 30 million years?

 

[EMH]

Thanks for the map.

Where does it say 30 million years?

Actually it says 50 million for the "earlier glaciation" area....

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Actually it says 50 million for the "earlier glaciation" area....

Show me where it says 50 million years on that map.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Please show us where purschasing ICE vehicles is a protected freedom.

Such a greentwat.