The Kraken Kracks

[playtime]

In Detroit - By five o’clock on Wednesday morning, it was apparent Trump’s lead would not hold.
Deprogramming Confederates Part 4
It was clear Trump was running far more competitively than they’d anticipated; he was on track to win Florida, Ohio and North Carolina, three states that tally their ballots quickly, meaning the spotlight would abruptly shift to the critical, slow-counting battlegrounds of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.

The Inside Story of Michigan’s Fake Voter Fraud Scandal​

Everyone here knew this had been a possibility, but it wasn’t until midnight that the urgency of the situation crashed o over Republicans. Trump had built a lead of nearly 300,000 votes on the strength of same-day ballots that were disproportionately favorable to him. Now, with the eyes of the nation—and of the president—fixed on their state, Michigan Republicans scrambled to protect that lead. Laura Cox, chair of the state party, began dialing prominent lawmakers, attorneys and activists, urging them to get down to the TCF Center, the main hub of absentee vote counting in Detroit. She was met with some confusion; there were already plenty of Republicans there, as scheduled, working their shifts as poll challengers. It didn’t matter, Cox told them. It was time to flood the zone.​

“This was all so predictable,” said Josh Venable, who ran Election Day operations for the Michigan GOP during five different cycles. “Detroit has been the boogeyman for Republicans since before I was born. It’s always been the white suburbs vs. Detroit, the white west side of the state vs. Detroit. There’s always this rallying cry from Republicans—‘We win everywhere else, but lose Wayne County’—that creates paranoia. I still remember hearing, back on my first campaign in 2002, that Wayne County always releases its votes last so that Detroit can see how many votes Democrats need to win the state. That’s what a lot of Republicans here believe.”​

As things picked up at the TCF Center, with more and more white Republicans filing into the complex to supervise the activity of mostly Black poll workers, Chris Thomas noticed a shift in the environment. Having been brought out of retirement to help supervise the counting in Detroit—a decision met with cheers from Republicans and Democrats alike—Thomas had been “thrilled” with the professionalism he’d witnessed during Monday’s pre-processing session and Tuesday’s vote tabulating. Now, in the early morning hours of Wednesday, things were going sideways. Groups of Republican poll challengers were clustering around individual counting tables in violation of the rules. People were raising objections—such as to the transferring of military absentees onto ballots that could be read by machines, a standard practice—that betrayed a lack of preparation.​

​

“Reading these affidavits afterward from these Republican poll challengers, I was just amazed at how misunderstood the election process was to them,” Thomas chuckled. “The things they said were going on—it’s like ‘Yeah, that’s exactly what was going on. That’s what’s supposed to happen.’” (The Trump team’s much celebrated lawsuit against Detroit was recently withdrawn after being pummeled in local courtrooms; his campaign has to date won one case and lost 35.)​

​

At one point, around 3:30 in the morning, Thomas supervised the receiving of Detroit’s final large batch of absentee ballots. They arrived in a passenger van. Thomas confirmed the numbers he’d verified over the phone: 45 trays, each tray holding roughly 300 ballots, for a total of between 13,000 and 14,000 ballots. Not long after, Charlie Spies, an attorney for the U.S. Senate campaign of Republican John James, approached Thomas inside the TCF Center. He wanted to know about the 38,000 absentee ballots that had just materialized. Thomas told him there were not 38,000 ballots; that at most it might have been close to 15,000.​

​

“I was told the number was 38,000,” Spies replied.​

​

By five o’clock on Wednesday morning, it was apparent Trump’s lead would not hold.​

View attachment 471321View attachment 471323 Fiction

that's STILL not a thing, toober.

 

[rightwinger]

Sidney Powell is a real piece of work...

She is going to be a broke piece of work

& she'll need to find a new line of work - 'cause i'm not seeing her having an active license to practice law anymore either.

maybe she can get a job in housekeeping or laundry down at mar a lago.

She will be forced to settle

I would imagine Dominion requiring a public admittance that all her claims are false and permanent resignation from the bar

 

[playtime]

The president asked them about allegations of fraud, and the legislators told him about various probes they had authorized to look into reports of irregularities. But Trump, perhaps sensing the nervous reticence of his guests, did not make the ask they feared. As the meeting went on, it became apparent to some people in the room that more than anything, Trump had called his Michigan allies to Washington to get an honest assessment of what had happened there. He wanted to know if there was any pathway to victory. They told him there was not.

“I don’t get it,” the president said, venting confusion and frustration. “All these other Republicans, all over the country, they all win their races. And I’m the only guy that loses?”

View attachment 471408SEND OVER TO THE View attachment 471409PURE FICTION SECTION

lol ... your needle is stuck.

 

[whutTHEYsay]

But the headlines says.........and, and, Soros!

To No One's Surprise - Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson Is A Product of a George Soros Secretary of State Program from 2010 | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

To no one’s surprise, Michigan’s Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson was backed for her current position by a George Soros connected entity. Michigan Secretary of State, Jocelyn Benson, has a storied history of ‘questionable’ activity. We first heard of her when she misprinted military ballots...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

The Soros fearmongering by Bensons Republican opponent in 2009 is as to be expected a political cheap shot and lie. ..

​

“Most of Benson’s contributions,” Sen. Cameron Brown told the audience, “come from out of state and from George Soros.”​

In an interview with the Michigan Messenger, Benson denied that.​

“More than half of our contributions have come from inside the state of Michigan,” noted Benson. “People in 50 of 83 counties in Michigan have donated money to our campaign — 1,200 individuals in all, which is more than any of my Republican opponents.”​

As for the alleged ties to Soros, Benson said, “I’ve never met George Soros and I doubt he knows who I am. The Secretary of State project is a national PAC that has talked about our campaign, but he has never given me any money and I’ve never met him. I’m running because I’ve spent a career working to protect voting rights. No one handpicked me to run. The only people who I hope pick me to run are the voters.”​

Benson said she is concerned about election fraud as well, but that the GOP candidates are looking in the wrong place.​

“Any fraud harms the integrity of the process and it’s the job of the Secretary of State to address any of those issues,” she said. “What a federal court has found is that there’s widespread fraud in our ballot initiative process, where voters are lied to about what a ballot initiative is about or what a recall petition is about, and we need to address that kind of fraud that we know exists. There has not been a single clear case of voter impersonation in the state of Michigan, so let’s start with addressing the fraud that we know exists.​

Benson lost in 2009 - There were no reports of ties to Soros in her later campaign that she won and is now serving.

Republicans are filthy rotten liars and made worse under the most filthy rotten liar of all - Donald J Trump.

 

[playtime]

PURE FICTION

I will ask you again. Is it true that 60% of Michigan voters voted by mail? Is it also true that Republicans rejected Democrat request to start counting absentee ballots prior to the election.

That obstruction is what caused the anomaly because it takes much longer time to count absentee ballots. Let me know if You think any of that is fiction. If you think it is you’re just a goldang liar.

PURE FICTION View attachment 471520View attachment 471521One item blamed on the GOP and only 24 or more other things yet to go!

 

[playtime]

The government, the institutions are corrupt. The election proved it. Period.

Exactly. Why should we even bother to vote in future elections.

by all means, stay home!!!!

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Scamming Sydney Powell said in her defense that the Trump cult are dumber than a sack of hammers.

Yet, here we are, the Trump cult defending her!

lol

Proving that she's totally correct.

Sorry, the liars that say there was no fraud are the nails for tyranny's hammer. You blatantly lie about a massive fraud that was blacked out on media. Your only choice was to call people traitors because the fraud was so obvious.

The election will go down in history as a fraudulent one. Revisionists will just justify it by saying Trump was so bad the country had to abandon ethics, honesty and freedoms to get rid of him. You guys are scumbags.

No. No historian will say the past election was fraudulent. They will remember a corrupt, incompetent, in-over-his head reality TV show host who folded like a cheap suit the moment his competency was put to the test. He lost his re-election bid and then attempted to use every underhanded method including egging on and fomenting a violent insurrection to overturn it. And right by his side were the willing lemmings like you to help him undermine the very foundations of what this country was built on. I mean, he telegraphed it for six months that if he lost the results were fraudulent. And his followers swallowed it hook, line, and sinker. The guy used you (and continues to do so) and now you look like the cancers we knew you were. All for what? Make America White Again???..Yikes.

67 lower court cases, 3 Supreme Court cases, porn shop pressers, hotel lobby "hearings", and a violent attempt to overthrow our government.
Sidney Powell, Guliani, and every member of Trump's D-Team need to be charge with fraud, sedition, and treason....now.

 

[whutTHEYsay]

Biden Won Ohio if Trump Won Michigan

Deprogramming Confederates Part 7

vote counting stopped for a few hours, then all of a sudden

Dominion needs to be held accountable.

"He"

Science and statistics proves Dems cheated and stole the election.

Its just who controls the message.

Worse, when they're lying, scum, demonRATS to begin with.

Stupid goat,

Blatant and massive election fraud.

An election is stolen and most of America doesn't care. Wow, just wow!

The late Hugo Chavez

And where is your commentary in the OP?

thats how it happened

With regard to the BLUE and RED Mirage

What Blue And Red ‘Shifts’ Looked Like In Every State

Do you Confederate morons wish to trade Trump’s win in Ohio for Bidens’s win in Michigan based on stopped counting of votes while one candidate is ahead?

TRUMP STILL LOSES!

 

[Faun]

The government, the institutions are corrupt. The election proved it. Period.

Exactly. Why should we even bother to vote in future elections.

You shouldn't. There's no point.

 

[whutTHEYsay]

Patriotic people did. Dominion needs to be held accountable.

What does Dominion need to be held accountable for?

 

[emilynghiem]

No. No historian will say the past election was fraudulent. They will remember a corrupt, incompetent, in-over-his head reality TV show host who folded like a cheap suit the moment his competency was put to the test. He lost his re-election bid and then attempted to use every underhanded method including egging on and fomenting a violent insurrection to overturn it. And right by his side were the willing lemmings like you to help him undermine the very foundations of what this country was built on. I mean, he telegraphed it for six months that if he lost the results were fraudulent. And his followers swallowed it hook, line, and sinker. The guy used you (and continues to do so) and now you look like the cancers we knew you were. All for what? Make America White Again???..Yikes.

67 lower court cases, 3 Supreme Court cases, porn shop pressers, hotel lobby "hearings", and a violent attempt to overthrow our government.
Sidney Powell, Guliani, and every member of Trump's D-Team need to be charge with fraud, sedition, and treason....now.

The election results were FAITH BASED due to lack of Notarization for millions of mailin ballots counted under contested rule changes never voted on by State Legislatures as required for public consensus.

Without consensus, govt establishing faith based policy against the beliefs and consent of citizens taxpayers and public affected is nonconstitutional. It contradicts both the First Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment and/or Civil Rights on equal protections of the law of all persons without discrimination by creed but requiring public accommodations by all public institutions "regardless of belief or creed", and violates the Code of Ethics for Govt Service by imposing a partisan bias in beliefs about the election laws, changes and results.

Faith based. Not proven to agreed public standards due to
* lack of notarized votes to prove validity legally and
* lack of vote by states to prove citizens and reps consented to the rule changes omitting notarization as a requirement for legal proof under penalty of law on mailin ballots.

So JackOfNoTrades
What becomes fraud is misrepresenting the votes or election results as "proven" when this is patently false.

***We can prove there were no notarized signatures on enough of the millions of mailin ballots that the results are not legally proven but remain FAITH BASED.***

Then we can prove that enough citizens and reps do not approve or consent to the rule changes that caused millions of mailin ballots to be submitted and counted without notarized signatures which would have been agreed to as valid legal standards of proof by the contesting citizens and state reps.

It can be argued as fraud to misrepresent to voters that these rule changes and results were Constitutional.

They are arguably faith based and either nonconstitutional and or unconstitutional if agreement can be reached on recognizing the faith based nature of the votes and election results not proven by Constitutionally agreed standards but currently forced by govt establishing faith based results.

Misrepresenting this can be argued as fraudulent similar to complaints and charges against Powell and Linwood.

Two wrongs don't make it right.
Both sides can be equally argued as promoting fraudulent misrepresentation to deprive the public of a fair Constitutional election and democratic process corrupted and abused by partisan biases in faith based beliefs.

I see both sides as faith based, neither can be established by govt against the consent and beliefs of the other sides' beliefs, and the election can be proven to be faith based and not proven by legally agreed standards requiring notarization of signatures on votes by valid eligible voters and legislative votes by elected state reps on the rule changes affecting mailin ballots.

 

[jc456]

What does Dominion need to be held accountable for?

Nothing to see here move along

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

She will be forced to settle

I would imagine Dominion requiring a public admittance that all her claims are false and permanent resignation from the bar

The judge should force her to record and release a 30-second PSA denouncing all of her lies and admitting she told the lies to make money off of Trump and his supporters. And that she has never seen a shred of evidence of vote fraud.

 

[otto105]

The election results were FAITH BASED due to lack of Notarization for millions of mailin ballots counted under contested rule changes never voted on by State Legislatures as required for public consensus.

Without consensus, govt establishing faith based policy against the beliefs and consent of citizens taxpayers and public affected is nonconstitutional. It contradicts both the First Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment and/or Civil Rights on equal protections of the law of all persons without discrimination by creed but requiring public accommodations by all public institutions "regardless of belief or creed", and violates the Code of Ethics for Govt Service by imposing a partisan bias in beliefs about the election laws, changes and results.

Faith based. Not proven to agreed public standards due to
* lack of notarized votes to prove validity legally and
* lack of vote by states to prove citizens and reps consented to the rule changes omitting notarization as a requirement for legal proof under penalty of law on mailin ballots.

So JackOfNoTrades
What becomes fraud is misrepresenting the votes or election results as "proven" when this is patently false.

***We can prove there were no notarized signatures on enough of the millions of mailin ballots that the results are not legally proven but remain FAITH BASED.***

Then we can prove that enough citizens and reps do not approve or consent to the rule changes that caused millions of mailin ballots to be submitted and counted without notarized signatures which would have been agreed to as valid legal standards of proof by the contesting citizens and state reps.

It can be argued as fraud to misrepresent to voters that these rule changes and results were Constitutional.

They are arguably faith based and either nonconstitutional and or unconstitutional if agreement can be reached on recognizing the faith based nature of the votes and election results not proven by Constitutionally agreed standards but currently forced by govt establishing faith based results.

Misrepresenting this can be argued as fraudulent similar to complaints and charges against Powell and Linwood.

Two wrongs don't make it right.
Both sides can be equally argued as promoting fraudulent misrepresentation to deprive the public of a fair Constitutional election and democratic process corrupted and abused by partisan biases in faith based beliefs.

I see both sides as faith based, neither can be established by govt against the consent and beliefs of the other sides' beliefs, and the election can be proven to be faith based and not proven by legally agreed standards requiring notarization of signatures on votes by valid eligible voters and legislative votes by elected state reps on the rule changes affecting mailin ballots.

50 State Certification says nooooooo

 

[jc456]

50 State Certification says nooooooo

The cheat was real, I don’t need anything from you to make my judgment of what I watched and followed. Only legislators can change a federal election! That’s merely a fact! It’s in the constitution

 

[otto105]

The cheat was real, I don’t need anything from you to make my judgment of what I watched and followed. Only legislators can change a federal election! That’s merely a fact! It’s in the constitution

50 State Certification says nooooo

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The election results were FAITH BASED due to lack of Notarization for millions of mailin ballots counted under contested rule changes never voted on by State Legislatures as required for public consensus.

Without consensus, govt establishing faith based policy against the beliefs and consent of citizens taxpayers and public affected is nonconstitutional. It contradicts both the First Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment and/or Civil Rights on equal protections of the law of all persons without discrimination by creed but requiring public accommodations by all public institutions "regardless of belief or creed", and violates the Code of Ethics for Govt Service by imposing a partisan bias in beliefs about the election laws, changes and results.

Faith based. Not proven to agreed public standards due to
* lack of notarized votes to prove validity legally and
* lack of vote by states to prove citizens and reps consented to the rule changes omitting notarization as a requirement for legal proof under penalty of law on mailin ballots.

So JackOfNoTrades
What becomes fraud is misrepresenting the votes or election results as "proven" when this is patently false.

***We can prove there were no notarized signatures on enough of the millions of mailin ballots that the results are not legally proven but remain FAITH BASED.***

Then we can prove that enough citizens and reps do not approve or consent to the rule changes that caused millions of mailin ballots to be submitted and counted without notarized signatures which would have been agreed to as valid legal standards of proof by the contesting citizens and state reps.

It can be argued as fraud to misrepresent to voters that these rule changes and results were Constitutional.

They are arguably faith based and either nonconstitutional and or unconstitutional if agreement can be reached on recognizing the faith based nature of the votes and election results not proven by Constitutionally agreed standards but currently forced by govt establishing faith based results.

Misrepresenting this can be argued as fraudulent similar to complaints and charges against Powell and Linwood.

Two wrongs don't make it right.
Both sides can be equally argued as promoting fraudulent misrepresentation to deprive the public of a fair Constitutional election and democratic process corrupted and abused by partisan biases in faith based beliefs.

I see both sides as faith based, neither can be established by govt against the consent and beliefs of the other sides' beliefs, and the election can be proven to be faith based and not proven by legally agreed standards requiring notarization of signatures on votes by valid eligible voters and legislative votes by elected state reps on the rule changes affecting mailin ballots.

What a bunch of desperate idiotic lies.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

The election results were FAITH BASED due to lack of Notarization for millions of mailin ballots counted under contested rule changes never voted on by State Legislatures as required for public consensus.

Without consensus, govt establishing faith based policy against the beliefs and consent of citizens taxpayers and public affected is nonconstitutional. It contradicts both the First Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment and/or Civil Rights on equal protections of the law of all persons without discrimination by creed but requiring public accommodations by all public institutions "regardless of belief or creed", and violates the Code of Ethics for Govt Service by imposing a partisan bias in beliefs about the election laws, changes and results.

Faith based. Not proven to agreed public standards due to
* lack of notarized votes to prove validity legally and
* lack of vote by states to prove citizens and reps consented to the rule changes omitting notarization as a requirement for legal proof under penalty of law on mailin ballots.

So JackOfNoTrades
What becomes fraud is misrepresenting the votes or election results as "proven" when this is patently false.

***We can prove there were no notarized signatures on enough of the millions of mailin ballots that the results are not legally proven but remain FAITH BASED.***

Then we can prove that enough citizens and reps do not approve or consent to the rule changes that caused millions of mailin ballots to be submitted and counted without notarized signatures which would have been agreed to as valid legal standards of proof by the contesting citizens and state reps.

It can be argued as fraud to misrepresent to voters that these rule changes and results were Constitutional.

They are arguably faith based and either nonconstitutional and or unconstitutional if agreement can be reached on recognizing the faith based nature of the votes and election results not proven by Constitutionally agreed standards but currently forced by govt establishing faith based results.

Misrepresenting this can be argued as fraudulent similar to complaints and charges against Powell and Linwood.

Two wrongs don't make it right.
Both sides can be equally argued as promoting fraudulent misrepresentation to deprive the public of a fair Constitutional election and democratic process corrupted and abused by partisan biases in faith based beliefs.

I see both sides as faith based, neither can be established by govt against the consent and beliefs of the other sides' beliefs, and the election can be proven to be faith based and not proven by legally agreed standards requiring notarization of signatures on votes by valid eligible voters and legislative votes by elected state reps on the rule changes affecting mailin ballots.

Here is your answer. Redress for allegations of fraud in an election are handled in the courts. Short of that, there are other methods available immediate such as recounts and audits.
So far, we've had over 70 court cases filed. Not one has even seen the light of day. Most due to lack of evidence. All recounts, all audits have upheld the results..even giving the victor more votes in some cases.
I see NOTHING even remotely faith-based about these results. The fact that we are still talking about this election almost a year after its conclusion..is downright pathetic and a pointless waste of time.
There is nothing anyone can say at this point to convince the true believers that Biden won. That part, IS all faith based for Trump supporters.

There is no state in our union that does not require some form of identification to vote and that does not have signature matching and verification on their mail-in ballots.
I have yet to see one post on these boards that disproves this.

 

[Synthaholic]

 

[whitehall]

We may be on the verge of war with Russia, we are running out of oil, diseased illegals are massing at the border but lefties are busy sifting through statements about a year old election. No wonder they elected a doddering old fool.