The John Kennedy assassination ..who's who on the Grassy Knoll

Chuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "slaughter".​

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZrHmcpRAZNs]Hitler Finds out Chuck Norris is Coming - [Episode Four] - YouTube[/ame]


:rofl:
 
PressTV - New studies: ?Conspiracy theorists? sane; government dupes crazy, hostile

Recent studies by psychologists and social scientists in the US and UK suggest that contrary to mainstream media stereotypes, those labeled “conspiracy theorists” appear to be saner than those who accept the official versions of contested events.

Quote:
Jul 12, 2013

The most recent study was published on July 8th by psychologists Michael J. Wood and Karen M. Douglas of the University of Kent (UK). Entitled “What about Building 7? A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories,” the study compared “conspiracist” (pro-conspiracy theory) and “conventionalist” (anti-conspiracy) comments at news websites.

The authors were surprised to discover that it is now more conventional to leave so-called conspiracist comments than conventionalist ones: “Of the 2174 comments collected, 1459 were coded as conspiracist and 715 as conventionalist.” In other words, among people who comment on news articles, those who disbelieve government accounts of such events as 9/11 and the JFK assassination outnumber believers by more than two to one. That means it is the pro-conspiracy commenters who are expressing what is now the conventional wisdom, while the anti-conspiracy commenters are becoming a small, beleaguered minority.

Perhaps because their supposedly mainstream views no longer represent the majority, the anti-conspiracy commenters often displayed anger and hostility: “The research… showed that people who favoured the official account of 9/11 were generally more hostile when trying to persuade their rivals.”

Additionally, it turned out that the anti-conspiracy people were not only hostile, but fanatically attached to their own conspiracy theories as well. According to them, their own theory of 9/11 - a conspiracy theory holding that 19 Arabs, none of whom could fly planes with any proficiency, pulled off the crime of the century under the direction of a guy on dialysis in a cave in Afghanistan - was indisputably true. The so-called conspiracists, on the other hand, did not pretend to have a theory that completely explained the events of 9/11: “For people who think 9/11 was a government conspiracy, the focus is not on promoting a specific rival theory, but in trying to debunk the official account.”

In short, the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist - a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory - accurately describes the people who defend the official account of 9/11, not those who dispute it.

Additionally, the study found that so-called conspiracists discuss historical context (such as viewing the JFK assassination as a precedent for 9/11) more than anti-conspiracists. It also found that the so-called conspiracists to not like to be called “conspiracists” or “conspiracy theorists.”

Both of these findings are amplified in the new book Conspiracy Theory in America by political scientist Lance deHaven-Smith, published earlier this year by the University of Texas Press. Professor deHaven-Smith explains why people don’t like being called “conspiracy theorists”: The term was invented and put into wide circulation by the CIA to smear and defame people questioning the JFK assassination! “The CIA’s campaign to popularize the term ‘conspiracy theory’ and make conspiracy belief a target of ridicule and hostility must be credited, unfortunately, with being one of the most successful propaganda initiatives of all time.”

In other words, people who use the terms “conspiracy theory” and “conspiracy theorist” as an insult are doing so as the result of a well-documented, undisputed, historically-real conspiracy by the CIA to cover up the JFK assassination. That campaign, by the way, was completely illegal, and the CIA officers involved were criminals; the CIA is barred from all domestic activities, yet routinely breaks the law to conduct domestic operations ranging from propaganda to assassinations.

DeHaven-Smith also explains why those who doubt official explanations of high crimes are eager to discuss historical context. He points out that a very large number of conspiracy claims have turned out to be true, and that there appear to be strong relationships between many as-yet-unsolved “state crimes against democracy.” An obvious example is the link between the JFK and RFK assassinations, which both paved the way for presidencies that continued the Vietnam War. According to DeHaven-Smith, we should always discuss the “Kennedy assassinations” in the plural, because the two killings appear to have been aspects of the same larger crime.

Psychologist Laurie Manwell of the University of Guelph agrees that the CIA-designed “conspiracy theory” label impedes cognitive function. She points out, in an article published in American Behavioral Scientist (2010), that anti-conspiracy people are unable to think clearly about such apparent state crimes against democracy as 9/11 due to their inability to process information that conflicts with pre-existing belief.

In the same issue of ABS, University of Buffalo professor Steven Hoffman adds that anti-conspiracy people are typically prey to strong “confirmation bias” - that is, they seek out information that confirms their pre-existing beliefs, while using irrational mechanisms (such as the “conspiracy theory” label) to avoid conflicting information.

The extreme irrationality of those who attack “conspiracy theories” has been ably exposed by Communications professors Ginna Husting and Martin Orr of Boise State University. In a 2007 peer-reviewed article entitled “Dangerous Machinery: ‘Conspiracy Theorist’ as a Transpersonal Strategy of Exclusion,” they wrote:

Quote:
“If I call you a conspiracy theorist, it matters little whether you have actually claimed that a conspiracy exists or whether you have simply raised an issue that I would rather avoid… By labeling you, I strategically exclude you from the sphere where public speech, debate, and conflict occur.”
But now, thanks to the internet, people who doubt official stories are no longer excluded from public conversation; the CIA’s 44-year-old campaign to stifle debate using the “conspiracy theory” smear is nearly worn-out. In academic studies, as in comments on news articles, pro-conspiracy voices are now more numerous - and more rational - than anti-conspiracy ones.

:clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2:
 
Who's who on the Grassy Knoll. Cont.

So, you don't know the guy's name?
Who?
The guy on the grassy knoll.
Who.
The guy you were talking about.
Who!
I'm asking YOU, what's the name of the guy on the grassy knoll?
No, What's the name of the guy on the bridge.
I don't know!
He's behind the motorcade.
How did I get to the guy behind the motorcade?
You mentioned his name.
Who?
No, Who is the guy on the Grassy Knoll.
I don't know.
He's behind the motorcade.
 
Last edited:
Who's who on the Grassy Knoll cont.

I'm asking YOU who's on the grassy knoll?
That's the man's name.
That's who's name?
Yes.
Well go ahead and tell me.
That's it.
That's who?
Yes.
Look, someone was on the grassy knoll?
Certainly.
Who was there?
That's right.
When you say some one shot from the grassy knoll, who was the one that took the shot?
That's what we believe.
All I'm trying to find out is what's the fellow's name on the grassy knoll.
No. What is on the bridge.
I'm not asking you who's on the bridge.
Who's on the grassy knoll.
Look, let's stay in one spot.
I'm not changing anything!
I'm only asking you, who's the guy on the grassy knoll?
That's right.
 
Look under 'Beats Fists Against Car'. "The third shot he heard might have been a Secret Service man returning the fire, he said."The Senator was two or three cars behind Jfk's, with LBJ. Look above 'could smell gunpowder'. He smelled gunpowder all the way to the hospital because the fatal shot came from the driver and the wind, according to Gary Mack was blowing back eastward. The motorcade was traveling west.

Senatorseesdrivershootjfk.jpg
 
Look under 'Beats Fists Against Car'. "The third shot he heard might have been a Secret Service man returning the fire, he said."The Senator was two or three cars behind Jfk's, with LBJ. Look above 'could smell gunpowder'. He smelled gunpowder all the way to the hospital because the fatal shot came from the driver and the wind, according to Gary Mack was blowing back eastward. The motorcade was traveling west.

Senatorseesdrivershootjfk.jpg
 
Look, it's really quite simple. Kennedy shot himself from the grassy knoll.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6naJ08Tskk&feature=player_embedded]JFK assination - Red Dwarf - BBC comedy - YouTube[/ame]
 
Who's who on the grassy knoll cont.

Look was there someone else shooting?
We believe so yes.
Whats his name?
Yes.
What?
That's right.
What's right?
Yes.
We please tell me.
I told you.
You told me what?
Yes.
Ok, ok, ok. There was a guy on the grassy gnoll and a guy on the bridge, you said there was also a guy behind the motorcade?
Yes, up in the book depository building.
What was his name?
No, What is the name of the guy on the bridge.
I don't know.
No, he's behind the motorcade.
Who's behind the motorcade?
No, Who's on the grassy gnoll.
 
The reflection was proven fake long ago. It only appears in the Zapruder film. That means it wasn't added to three other recordings where it must be present if it were real.

-Mary Moorman took her polaroid at Zapruder frame 309, and in it the white blob was not added.
-The Muchmore Film is important and a bonus for proving Greer the real assassin. The capture below is the moment of the headshot and no fake reflection was added to Roy's head either.
-And finally, the all-important Nix Film provides a double whammy. Not only is it missing the white blob, but Roy's heads snaps back far enough to where his forehead faces the sky. Apparently they were able to curtail that movement in Zapruder. His head moves perfectly with the white blob in Zapruder, but they didn't bother adding any fake imagery to these three other recordings.

-In Nix, Greer's left arm raises to the level of his right shoulder and retracts after the shot. THAT'S THE SMOKING GUN.

WallPaint615.jpg

frame309mary.jpg

jfkmuchmorenoreflection.jpg

no-fake-reflection_h_GIFSoupcom.gif
 
The reflection was proven fake long ago. It only appears in the Zapruder film. That means it wasn't added to three other recordings where it must be present if it were real.

-Mary Moorman took her polaroid at Zapruder frame 309, and in it the white blob was not added.
-The Muchmore Film is important and a bonus for proving Greer the real assassin. The capture below is the moment of the headshot and no fake reflection was added to Roy's head either.
-And finally, the all-important Nix Film provides a double whammy. Not only is it missing the white blob, but Roy's heads snaps back far enough to where his forehead faces the sky. Apparently they were able to curtail that movement in Zapruder. His head moves perfectly with the white blob in Zapruder, but they didn't bother adding any fake imagery to these three other recordings.

-In Nix, Greer's left arm raises to the level of his right shoulder and retracts after the shot. THAT'S THE SMOKING GUN.

363-bruce-willis-cool-story-bro-image.png
 
I think we can now answer who was on the grassy knoll.

It was none other than................Grandpa Zimmerman!
 
15th post
7. James Altgens: (photographer, south curb of Elm):“The last shot sounded like it came from the left side of the car, if it was close range because, if it were a pistol it would have to be fired at close range for any degree of accuracy," 7WCH518.

8. Hugh Betzner, Jr. (south curb of Elm, nr junction with Houston): “I cannot remember exactly where I was when I saw the following: I heard at least two shots fired and I saw what looked like a firecracker going off in the president's car. My assumption for this was because I saw fragments going up in the air,” I also remember seeing what looked like a nickel revolver in someone's hand in the President's car or somewhere immediately around his car 19WCH467

James Altgens (the man on right) was a press photographer and shared some mighty fine testimony that supports Greer's shot from the driver's seat. The pistol mention doesn't come from left field.


 
7. James Altgens: (photographer, south curb of Elm):“The last shot sounded like it came from the left side of the car, if it was close range because, if it were a pistol it would have to be fired at close range for any degree of accuracy," 7WCH518.

8. Hugh Betzner, Jr. (south curb of Elm, nr junction with Houston): “I cannot remember exactly where I was when I saw the following: I heard at least two shots fired and I saw what looked like a firecracker going off in the president's car. My assumption for this was because I saw fragments going up in the air,” I also remember seeing what looked like a nickel revolver in someone's hand in the President's car or somewhere immediately around his car 19WCH467

James Altgens (the man on right) was a press photographer and shared some mighty fine testimony that supports Greer's shot from the driver's seat. The pistol mention doesn't come from left field.

3cd8a33a.png
 
These old copies show the same recoil/jolt backward with video fakery. The second gif shows Roy's head functioning as the gun with emitting muzzle blast smoke before it extends in sync with the front right entrance and fake mist. The gun was really at the level of his right shoulder hidden by Kellerman's head. Also, notice the all-important splice in Zapruder after the shot. Greer's extended elbow can be seen forming by the door.LOL Connally's looking right at Greer after the shot, which explains why he hit the floor horrified.

jolt_h_GIFSoupcom-1.gif

elbow-greer_h_GIFSoupcom.gif
 
Back
Top Bottom