The John Kennedy assassination ..who's who on the Grassy Knoll


There is plenty of good, solid, reliable, credible ACTUAL evidence of Oswald's involvement.

That's called a reality-based FACTUALLY accurate statement.

You can post all the bullshit you wish. The Oswald SHOT has been proven impossible.

Have you or anyone else on the RETARDS side conducted such experiments?....NO! You know why??....because you are afraid of being proved wrong and further being exposed as a greater idiot.:cuckoo: Kennedy was shot from the front which was proven over 36 years ago.:eusa_whistle:
jfkheadsnapzap.gif

WallPaint489.jpg
 
In reality, the glint of sunlight off the passenger's hair is clearly very fake, always was and not remotely surprising. Sunlight does not recoil.:lol:

There is plenty of good, solid, reliable, credible ACTUAL evidence of Oswald's involvement.

That's called a reality-based FACTUALLY accurate statement.

Unfortunately you are wrong.
No reasoning of any kind points to Oswald as a shooter.

In fact no one thinking in a reasonable manner believes such tripe.:cuckoo:

There is no evidence that Oswald or anyone besides Greer shot Kennedy. You have wasted posts without providing any evidence or challenge whatsoever.

You continuously have to claim ( again without any evidence ) that the film is authentic but it was obviously altered to hide Greer shooting.

This is necessary because the film clearly shows Greer did fire a weapon.

Unfortunately for your dumb ass it was retouched and altered and it proves you wrong.

I also have Greer's lengthy testimony that proves he lied.

Your lack of proof is your only evidence which is typical of juvenile naive and brainwashed government idiots.:lol:

Any reasonable person knows you are full of BS and A ******* MORON.
jack_h_GIFSoupcom.gif
 
In reality, the glint of sunlight off the passenger's hair is clearly very fake, always was and not remotely surprising. Sunlight does not recoil.:lol:

There is plenty of good, solid, reliable, credible ACTUAL evidence of Oswald's involvement.

That's called a reality-based FACTUALLY accurate statement.

Unfortunately you are wrong.

Incorrect. It is neither fortunate nor unfortunate. It merely "is." Your empty and totally baseless denial doesn't amount to a hill of warm spit.

The FACTS remain the facts and the facts include the evidence of Oswald's palmprint on the weapon recovered from the book depository; the ballstics' confirmation that it was the Carcano used to fire some of the recovered rounds in the Kennedy limo from his stretcher at Parkland; and the computer / forensic analysis that shows conclusively that the shot was fired from that window in the book depository; and Oswald's own historical background including his employment AT the depository and the fact that only HE of all employees there left moments after the assassination.

There is actually no doubt at all in the real world that Oswald was a part of that assassination.

What there Is room for doubt about to this day (the Warren Commission report notwithstanding) is whether he acted "alone" or whether there were other assassins.

No reasoning of any kind points to Oswald as a shooter.

False, for all the foregoing reasons. Ignoring evidence doesn't make it "go away," child.

In fact no one thinking in a reasonable manner believes such tripe.:cuckoo:

Wrong. All reasonable people consider ALL of the evidence, unlike you, and thus are perfectly willing to acknowledge minimally that Oswald was clearly involved.

There is no evidence that Oswald or anyone besides Greer shot Kennedy. You have wasted posts without providing any evidence or challenge whatsoever.

False. As you knew when you posted that lie, I have shown the evidence and some of the analysis. Unlike you, I don't need to resort to creative fiction.

You continuously have to claim ( again without any evidence ) that the film is authentic but it was obviously altered to hide Greer shooting.

There is no credible evidence that the film was altered. And if it had been, YOU would be able to show SOMETHING at least marginally persuasive for your silly position. You haven't because you can't and you can't because there is no credible evidence for your absurd claim

This is necessary because the film clearly shows Greer did fire a weapon.

Nope. It is necessary for you to support your baseless claim. No film "clearly" shows that Greer fired anything. No film shows any such thing, in fact, unclearly or clearly. Your claim is ridiculous on its face and remains totally unsupported by you and your ilk.

Unfortunately for your dumb ass it was retouched and altered and it proves you wrong.

Wrong. There is no credible evidence of any alteration, as you knew when you chose to post that lie.

I also have Greer's lengthy testimony that proves he lied.

It proves no such thing.

Your lack of proof is your only evidence which is typical of juvenile naive and brainwashed government idiots.:lol:

The "evidence" I have pointed to, unlike the looney crap you rely on, is real and not subject to reasonable doubts; and certainly no reasonable doubts predicated on your fantasies.

Any reasonable person knows you are full of BS and A ******* MORON.

Wrong. Only utter laughable assholes, like you, would believe that baseless claim.

:cool:

There. I have refuted and rebutted every single one of your baseless claims and all of your petty ad hominem crap as easily as you muttered them.

I see that your prior alteration of my earlier post did not survive official scrutiny.

So much for your credibility, ya dick lick.
 
There is plenty of good, solid, reliable, credible ACTUAL evidence of Oswald's involvement.

That's called a reality-based FACTUALLY accurate statement.

Unfortunately you are wrong.

.



False, for all the foregoing reasons. Ignoring evidence doesn't make it "go away," child.



Wrong. All reasonable people consider ALL of the evidence, unlike you, and thus are perfectly willing to acknowledge minimally that Oswald was clearly involved.





Unfortunately for your dumb ass it was retouched and altered and it proves you wrong.


Any reasonable person knows you are full of BS and A ******* MORON.

:

There. I have refuted and rebutted every single one of your baseless claims and all of your petty ad hominem crap as easily as you muttered them.

.

You can't refute something you haven't addressed.:cuckoo: How did jfk get shot from the rear when he was shot from the front? You're wasting your time writing your nonsense. It means nothing but you are an angry and defeated idiot. Answer the question. Jfk was shot from the front. Oswald is not guilty based on that fact alone. Once you graduate to the reality of NO rear shot, then you go to the right side versus the front shot by the driver. That's where this case is and will remain. WC crazies are the most deluded and volatile losers. You will never discuss specifics because you cannot support what you supposedly believe.:eusa_liar:

You would have to show a man going backward from a rear shot, which of course is impossible. That's your case, an impossible and debunked rear shot.:cuckoo:
jfkheadsnapzap.gif

In the real world a man goes forward from a rear shot to the head.
slow-musso_h_GIFSoupcom.gif
 
Last edited:
Watch the back of the head gape and close up and compare to frames 313 and 337.
front-smoke-zap_h_GIFSoupcom.gif

500gaped.jpg

WallPaint441-1.jpg
 

Altering quotes is a violation of the TOS, you dishonest dipshit.

Give immediate thought to correcting the violation you just performed, you moron.
cryingbaby.gif

YOU WITTLE CRY BABY *****
bcl_h_GIFSoupcom.gif

great post.that describes them to a tee.all they can do is cry in and sling shit in defeat like the monkey trolls they are while THEY are the ones that post bullshit as me and you and they as well all know.:lol::lol:
 
The gaping exit and skull detaching appears between 312-313, 313-314, and 316-317. They did their best to hide the hole but slow motion exposes it and the attempts to hide that hole.

In between 316-317 a ghost-like image shows the white lane through jfk's head. That hole closes up by 317. Note the double image of fake flap on right temple.
316317-1.jpg

316317-ghost-image_h_GIFSoupcom.gif

‪JFK last shot Slow Motion Zapruder Film frames 310 to 328‬‏ - YouTube
Bullshit-5.jpg

yep thats all you trolls ever post,complete utter bullshit and cry and run away in defeat.:lol:
 

There is plenty of good, solid, reliable, credible ACTUAL evidence of Oswald's involvement.

That's called a reality-based FACTUALLY accurate statement.

You can post all the bullshit you wish. The Oswald SHOT has been proven impossible.

Have you or anyone else on the RETARDS side conducted such experiments?....NO! You know why??....because you are afraid of being proved wrong and further being exposed as a greater idiot.:cuckoo: Kennedy was shot from the front which was proven over 36 years ago.:eusa_whistle:
jfkheadsnapzap.gif

WallPaint489.jpg
http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/jfk-insi...
 
9/11 Rim-job / 7foreskin - why don't the two of you get a jar of vaseline, check into a hotel and call it a day.

Thanks.
 
m2paruk said:
@7forever
just like to tell you that i appreciate all the work you have put into this so thanks

You're welcome. Thank you!
 
m2paruk said:
@7forever
just like to tell you that i appreciate all the work you have put into this so thanks

You're welcome. Thank you!

cool to see some others out there who are not afraid of the truth and dont only see what they want to see.btw,thought I would send over a few posts of a couple of other intelligent posters out there as well seven.these two guys below and that other poster you just posted the words of,are about the only posters that belong on this thread besides us.




After all these years I have come full circle and agree that in all likelihood Greer did fire the JFK execution shot, as verified by Greers raised arm in Nix, which was not seen in the altered Ztoon. There is a huge disinfo effort out there that asserts the fatal shot was from the grassy Knoll.....not a chance, as it would have blown out the left side of JFKs head... the only bullet pathway that works with the multiple witness documented right rear exit is an entrance hole above the right eye and above the hairline from Greers revolver, shooting straight at the presidents head from a few feet away. JFKs head was tilted down and his forehead was more or less perpendicular to Greer. This would produce a wound pathway above the hairline that would result in the right rear blow out.
Also..
Greer and Kellerman stayed with JFK right thru the execution process, delivery to Parkland, Body Theft from Parkland, Frantic loading of Body to AF#1, Delivery to Andrews AF Base, Delivery to Bethesda, Participation in Autopsy, Delivery of Corpse to White House...and then storage of JFKs bloody clothes in Greers own friggin locker.
Greer was a hired right wing executioner friendly with the right wing Harriman family, who did not like JFK at all. Greer was just another cog in the killing machine and his participation in this brutal public execution has had to be avoided because it shows direct collusion with the Secret Service who are supposed to protect the guy we elect, not murder him.
The top planners like Bundy and Phillips and Angleton are who we should really focus on...

Cheers, William


Re: The driver shot kennedy
I too was dubious of the "Greer did it" theory long before Bill Cooper said it when I read the then unpublished "Murder From Within" by Newcomb & Adams from a researcher. But things always bothered me about Greer denying looking around a second time in back of the limo in his Warren Commission testimony' statements & interviews ( one phone audio interview"Bill Greer Speaks" on Vince Palamara's YouTube channel in fact). Looking at the blow-up of the limo in the NIX film shows a major inconsistency between it & the Z film proving some type of alteration and the MAIN REASON behind such an alteration. Add in the fact that both Greer & Kellerman never shouted back to the occupants in the back of the limo to "Get DOWN NOW!" when aware of shots have been fired and Gov Connally was wounded raises more flags. The splatter effect has been analyzed by notable JFK assassination researcher Sherry Gutierrez Fiester at the JFK Lancer forum and her analysis is that the shot came from the left not the grassy knoll at all. IMHO looking at the Z-film or should I say Z-toon JFK's head does indeed go backward but slumps to the left where his head was leaning towards before the shot plus the weight of his left side brain was heavier than the missing brain on the right side. The old "Glare on Kellerman's head" response is what the film alterers wanted you to believe; if you dig deeper you find the Grassy knoll shooter responsible for the head shot sounds more & more like the govt's magic bullet theory.


Felix,
Thanks for posting the fine gif and getting the Nix slowed down as well. IMO frame 313of the Ztoon was painted over with the weird looking red/orange faux blood in order to obscure an entrance wound from Greers bullet. The forgers had a hard time getting all the snipping, pasting and repainting done in such a way that the timing of the characters in the "film" are strangely out of sync with everyday normal actions...ie...Greers superhuman head turns, Brehm's son appearing too quickly from behind and clapping...others are stiff and frozen looking, Jean Hill and Mary Moorman, plus Altgens too. As well, the large grouping of people prior to the Stemmons sign are mostly unmoving, totally unrealistic with normal crowds behavior upon seeing Jacky and JFK.
I agree that it is Z that has been most heavily edited and the difference in the location and movements of Greers arms between N and Z proves alteration. This alone should be enough to start an investigation by a normal prosecutor, upon seeing impossible differences between two films of the same Murder.
The chilling thing here is really that the planners and current power structure that keeps covering this sick execution up are daring us to do something about it and feel in control enough that they are confident we wont try it, or will get sidetracked into a useless HSCA type scenario in the 70s which the planners controlled to get the desired results.
You are really skilled at getting those gifs, carry on !!!!!!

Cheers, Jay
 
Last edited:
so much for the lone nut theorists theory that oswald fired the rilfe.as I said before,a photograph taken 30 seconds before the assassination of the sixth floor window shows no rifle,and no man in it.Like he said,they fail.

Here's your problem...you have to prove he was on the 6th floor of the TSBD at 12:25 CST and that he fired the weapon. Paraffin test on Oswald's face and cheeks were negative...indicating he did not fire the rifle.

You continue to fail....


then there is this-

As anyone knows, prints on a murder weapon on not conclusive evidence. The weapon WAS oswalds, so yes, his prints were on it, that doesn't mean he fired it at the president.

He was a patsy from the beginning, do you think the one's behind Kennedy's assassination wouldn't make sure his prints were on the gun?

and then there is THIS as well-

Close to his neck doesn't work... there was a HOLE in JFK's back and a hole in JFK's neck, not in his back and a hole his chest.

You really need to understand the laws of physics...

As a matter of FACT...HERE is how the Warren Report got around this problem...they LIED.


Warren Commission Exhibits CE385 and CE386

It's not about a conspiracy, it is about the truth. If the evidence supported Oswald as the lone assassin, I wouldn't have a problem with it. But it doesn't.

yep thats what the lone nut theorists do when confronted with truth just like he said below.

gave you plenty of evidence that you wouldn't or couldn't address. You ignored it, ran and hid, and then you QUIT...I didn't try to belittle you...

BTW. I already KNOW what the Warren Commission said. But you are unable to explain ANY of the discrepancies. You won't even listen to what 2 subsequent government investigations concluded...

You really turned out to be an asshole...

so much for the THEORY that oswald fired the rifle.lol

We don't have any proof that Oswald fired the rifle. No one has been able to put him in that building with a gun in his hand."

—Dallas Police Chief Jesse Curry, quoted by United Press International, November 5, 1969


__________________
 
Last edited:
JFK: Inside the Target Car: 3rd Missed Shot : Video : Discovery News
http://news.discovery.com/videos/jfk-ins...


JFK: Inside the Target Car: Grassy Knoll Field Test : Video : Discovery Channel
http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/jfk-insi...


SORRY ABOUT THE BAD LINKS TRY THIS:‪JFK: Inside the Target Car - Grassy Knoll Field Test‬‏ - YouTube

the only thing you proved is that a riflerman can hit a non moving target with one bullet.:lol::lol::lol: nice rebuttal to my post.:lol:like always,you never even try to refute anything.:lol:
 
OPEN AND SHUT CASE JFK'S MURDER WAS A HOME GROWN PLOT AND RIFLE FOUND ON 6TH FLOOR WAS NOT OSWALDS.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QyvRfeLDsB4]‪Two Men In Dallas - Part 1‬‏ - YouTube[/ame]




 
Last edited by a moderator:
15th post
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6vXeg50rjs]‪Two Men In Dallas - Part 4‬‏ - YouTube[/ame]


 
Last edited by a moderator:
JFK: Inside the Target Car: 3rd Missed Shot : Video : Discovery News
http://news.discovery.com/videos/jfk-ins...


JFK: Inside the Target Car: Grassy Knoll Field Test : Video : Discovery Channel
http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/jfk-insi...


SORRY ABOUT THE BAD LINKS TRY THIS:‪JFK: Inside the Target Car - Grassy Knoll Field Test‬‏ - YouTube

the only thing you proved is that a riflerman can hit a non moving target with one bullet.:lol::lol::lol: nice rebuttal to my post.:lol:like always,you never even try to refute anything.:lol:
you have presented nothing that needs refuting ..why
because it's all a steaming bowl of:
shit.jpg
 
7forever + 9/11theory + jar of vasaline + hotel room = their idea of a relaxing evening.
 
Back
Top Bottom