The John Kennedy assassination ..who's who on the Grassy Knoll

[Soupnazi630]

Yes I have the AR proves it and proves you wrong and it IS evidence

NO BULLET ENTERED THE REAR.

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there.

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear.

Yes the bullet entered from above and behind that is proven.

There is no exit wound where you claim there is one

How could the exit not be in the rear when that's where the AR reported it was?

The AR reported no such thing

The AR reported the exit wound was in the rear of the skull on the right side.

Missile Wounds

1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into the
temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.


JFK Lancer

No they did not report that the wound was an exit wound.

They proved the bullet entered from above and behind

 

[7forever]

NO BULLET ENTERED THE REAR.

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there.

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear.

Yes the bullet entered from above and behind that is proven.

There is no exit wound where you claim there is one

How could the exit not be in the rear when that's where the AR reported it was?

The AR reported no such thing

The AR reported the exit wound was in the rear of the skull on the right side.

Missile Wounds

1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into the
temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.


JFK Lancer

No they did not report that the wound was an exit wound.

They proved the bullet entered from above and behind

The AR does not independently prove anything. They came to two conclusions, only one of which can be confirmed. A massive blow-out at the rear considered to be an exit wound is a fact. The entrance wound was on the opposiste side of the skull, consistent with fragments found in the right front.

 

[7forever]

Seeing the back of his head blow off at the moment it happened could only be an exit wound.

Whipped you with facts again you lying retard, by using Clint Hill.

From 'Mrs Kennedy and Me" by Clint Hill' Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

"In the same instant, blood, brain matter and bone fragments exploded from the back of the President's head... and splattered all over me - on my face, my clothes, in my hair."

Wrong

The skull typically bursts open regardless of entry point.

The facts add kicking your azz as always

You falsely claimed that a bullet could enter and explode at the same time and provided no evidence because it's false. The bullet that hit jfk in the right forehead exited and blew out the rear of his skull.

“I heard the shot. The third shot,” he wrote. “The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting something hollow – like the sound of a melon shattering onto the cement. In the same instant, blood, brain matter, and bone fragments exploded from the back of the president’s head. The president’s blood, parts of his skull, bits of his brain were splattered all over me – on my face, my clothes, in my hair.”

For Hill to have seen brain matter explode out of JFK’s head, the wound at the back of the president’s was definitely an exit wound. Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

No bullet entered the front it entered from above and behind and it is common for such sounds to burst in a violent manner.

You are simply wrong and the evidence proves it

The back of his head blew off which indicates an exit wound. Nothing will ever change that. If it was common then you could offer some evidence, but you can't because it's not common and did not happen to jfk.

https://www.causes.com/causes/308048...ut-in-the-back

SAMUEL A. KINNEY was the driver of the follow-up car on 11/22/63.

it was the right rear part of his head...because
that's the part I saw blow out. I saw hair come out, the piece blow out,
then the skin went back in- an explosion in and out". Elaborating
further, Sam said, after telling him that that's where the Parkland
doctors saw the wound, "I would say that, too...it involved half his
head".

"sam says nothing that's not consistent with the autopsy findings.

Kinney's eyewitness account is 100% consistent with the AR and Hill's account. The rear of the skull blew out. That was the exit wound.

The back of jfk's head is gaped open. Is the entrance wound somewhere inside that hole? SN will never call Hill a liar or claim he was mistaken because to do so would be laughable.

“I heard the shot. The third shot,” he wrote. “The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting something hollow – like the sound of a melon shattering onto the cement. In the same instant, blood, brain matter, and bone fragments exploded from the back of the president’s head. The president’s blood, parts of his skull, bits of his brain were splattered all over me – on my face, my clothes, in my hair.”

For Hill to have seen brain matter explode out of JFK’s head, the wound at the back of the president’s was definitely an exit wound. Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

 

[7forever]

NO evidence proves the bullet entered from above and behind that is fact no matter how much you stamp your feet and scream otherwise.

You have presented no evidence of an entrance wound to the rear skull.

Yes I have the AR proves it and proves you wrong and it IS evidence

NO BULLET ENTERED THE REAR.

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there.

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear.

Yes the bullet entered from above and behind that is proven.

There is no exit wound where you claim there is one

From 'Mrs Kennedy and Me" by Clint Hill' Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

If the rear blow-out was not an exit wound, then what was it?

"In the same instant, blood, brain matter and bone fragments exploded from the back of the President's head... and splattered all over me - on my face, my clothes, in my hair."

It was.the skull bursting open from a bullet which entered from above and behind

So, you're going with the crazy nonsense that one bullet caused the gaping hole at the rear. That is contradicted by frame 313 and many others that depict an exit in the right front. The red blob represents what is supposed to be an exit that surely was faked to confuse and cover the actual location of entry to the skull.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Yes the bullet entered from above and behind that is proven.

There is no exit wound where you claim there is one

How could the exit not be in the rear when that's where the AR reported it was?

The AR reported no such thing

The AR reported the exit wound was in the rear of the skull on the right side.

Missile Wounds

1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into the
temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.


JFK Lancer

No they did not report that the wound was an exit wound.

They proved the bullet entered from above and behind

The AR does not independently prove anything. They came to two conclusions, only one of which can be confirmed. A massive blow-out at the rear considered to be an exit wound is a fact. The entrance wound was on the opposiste side of the skull, consistent with fragments found in the right front.

You are quote wrong they independently proved that the bullet entered from above and behind.

They did NOT come to two conclusions.

There was no exit wound in the back and there is no evidence of one.

Nor was there an entrance wound in the front of the skull.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong

The skull typically bursts open regardless of entry point.

The facts add kicking your azz as always

You falsely claimed that a bullet could enter and explode at the same time and provided no evidence because it's false. The bullet that hit jfk in the right forehead exited and blew out the rear of his skull.

“I heard the shot. The third shot,” he wrote. “The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting something hollow – like the sound of a melon shattering onto the cement. In the same instant, blood, brain matter, and bone fragments exploded from the back of the president’s head. The president’s blood, parts of his skull, bits of his brain were splattered all over me – on my face, my clothes, in my hair.”

For Hill to have seen brain matter explode out of JFK’s head, the wound at the back of the president’s was definitely an exit wound. Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

No bullet entered the front it entered from above and behind and it is common for such sounds to burst in a violent manner.

You are simply wrong and the evidence proves it

The back of his head blew off which indicates an exit wound. Nothing will ever change that. If it was common then you could offer some evidence, but you can't because it's not common and did not happen to jfk.

https://www.causes.com/causes/308048...ut-in-the-back

SAMUEL A. KINNEY was the driver of the follow-up car on 11/22/63.

it was the right rear part of his head...because
that's the part I saw blow out. I saw hair come out, the piece blow out,
then the skin went back in- an explosion in and out". Elaborating
further, Sam said, after telling him that that's where the Parkland
doctors saw the wound, "I would say that, too...it involved half his
head".

"sam says nothing that's not consistent with the autopsy findings.

Kinney's eyewitness account is 100% consistent with the AR and Hill's account. The rear of the skull blew out. That was the exit wound.

The back of jfk's head is gaped open. Is the entrance wound somewhere inside that hole? SN will never call Hill a liar or claim he was mistaken because to do so would be laughable.

“I heard the shot. The third shot,” he wrote. “The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting something hollow – like the sound of a melon shattering onto the cement. In the same instant, blood, brain matter, and bone fragments exploded from the back of the president’s head. The president’s blood, parts of his skull, bits of his brain were splattered all over me – on my face, my clothes, in my hair.”

For Hill to have seen brain matter explode out of JFK’s head, the wound at the back of the president’s was definitely an exit wound. Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

Wrong the bullet entered from above and behind and Kinney stated nothing which contradicts that fact.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Yes I have the AR proves it and proves you wrong and it IS evidence

NO BULLET ENTERED THE REAR.

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there.

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear.

Yes the bullet entered from above and behind that is proven.

There is no exit wound where you claim there is one

From 'Mrs Kennedy and Me" by Clint Hill' Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

If the rear blow-out was not an exit wound, then what was it?

"In the same instant, blood, brain matter and bone fragments exploded from the back of the President's head... and splattered all over me - on my face, my clothes, in my hair."

It was.the skull bursting open from a bullet which entered from above and behind

So, you're going with the crazy nonsense that one bullet caused the gaping hole at the rear. That is contradicted by frame 313 and many others that depict an exit in the right front. The red blob represents what is supposed to be an exit that surely was faked to confuse and cover the actual location of entry to the skull.

There is nothing crazy about a bullet entering from above and behind causing that wound.

It is proven that the bullet entered from above and behind

 

[7forever]

The Zfilm shows the President being shot in the forehead and the back of the head literally popping off. This visual fact is corroborated by multiple eyewitnesses. I've included three, two of which were SS agents in the follow-up car. Nobody has or will ever honestly make a case for one bullet entering the rear and creating a large exit in the rear.

As 50th Anniversary Of Assassination Approaches, Surgeon Who Treated JFK Remembers « CBS Philly

Two other doctors were already treating Kennedy, Dr. Perry and Dr. Jenkins, and they ordered Dr. McClelland to hold the patient’s head.
So, he stood, holding the bleeding, injured head of the President of the United States. The wound was huge, gaping.

“My first reaction was, ‘My God, have you seen the back of the President’s head?’” McClelland says. They hadn’t.

In hindsight, Dr. McClelland says that he always believed the wound at the back of President Kennedy’s head was the exit wound. But it wasn’t until years later, when he saw the famous Abraham Zapruder video on television, that the doctor became convinced of it.

“That firmed up my thought that it was the exit wound,” he says, pointing to the backwards motion of the President’s body after he was shot, as well as the size of the hole in the back of JFK’s skull, as proof he was shot from the front.

He is, however, sure of some things: "There were at least two shooters (“absolutely”) and the assassination was likely a conspiracy involving government “elements.”

 

[Faun]

Yes I have the AR proves it and proves you wrong and it IS evidence

NO BULLET ENTERED THE REAR.

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there.

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear.

Yes the bullet entered from above and behind that is proven.

There is no exit wound where you claim there is one

From 'Mrs Kennedy and Me" by Clint Hill' Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

If the rear blow-out was not an exit wound, then what was it?

"In the same instant, blood, brain matter and bone fragments exploded from the back of the President's head... and splattered all over me - on my face, my clothes, in my hair."

It was.the skull bursting open from a bullet which entered from above and behind

So, you're going with the crazy nonsense that one bullet caused the gaping hole at the rear. That is contradicted by frame 313 and many others that depict an exit in the right front. The red blob represents what is supposed to be an exit that surely was faked to confuse and cover the actual location of entry to the skull.

Your brain is fake.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The Zfilm shows the President being shot in the forehead and the back of the head literally popping off. This visual fact is corroborated by multiple eyewitnesses. I've included three, two of which were SS agents in the follow-up car. Nobody has or will ever honestly make a case for one bullet entering the rear and creating a large exit in the rear.

As 50th Anniversary Of Assassination Approaches, Surgeon Who Treated JFK Remembers « CBS Philly

Two other doctors were already treating Kennedy, Dr. Perry and Dr. Jenkins, and they ordered Dr. McClelland to hold the patient’s head.
So, he stood, holding the bleeding, injured head of the President of the United States. The wound was huge, gaping.

“My first reaction was, ‘My God, have you seen the back of the President’s head?’” McClelland says. They hadn’t.

In hindsight, Dr. McClelland says that he always believed the wound at the back of President Kennedy’s head was the exit wound. But it wasn’t until years later, when he saw the famous Abraham Zapruder video on television, that the doctor became convinced of it.

“That firmed up my thought that it was the exit wound,” he says, pointing to the backwards motion of the President’s body after he was shot, as well as the size of the hole in the back of JFK’s skull, as proof he was shot from the front.

He is, however, sure of some things: "There were at least two shooters (“absolutely”) and the assassination was likely a conspiracy involving government “elements.”

The zapruder film shows no such thing.

The bullet is not visible in the film and no entrance or exit wound is captured by the film.

The physical evidence and autopsy both prove that the bullet entered from above and behind. The eyewitnesses do not refute that fact.

The doctors at parkland were treating a patient as opposed to performing an autopsy. Their casual observations are not evidence against the conclusion of the autopsy.

You still have nothing

 

[Faun]

The Zfilm shows the President being shot in the forehead and the back of the head literally popping off. This visual fact is corroborated by multiple eyewitnesses. I've included three, two of which were SS agents in the follow-up car. Nobody has or will ever honestly make a case for one bullet entering the rear and creating a large exit in the rear.

As 50th Anniversary Of Assassination Approaches, Surgeon Who Treated JFK Remembers « CBS Philly

Two other doctors were already treating Kennedy, Dr. Perry and Dr. Jenkins, and they ordered Dr. McClelland to hold the patient’s head.
So, he stood, holding the bleeding, injured head of the President of the United States. The wound was huge, gaping.

“My first reaction was, ‘My God, have you seen the back of the President’s head?’” McClelland says. They hadn’t.

In hindsight, Dr. McClelland says that he always believed the wound at the back of President Kennedy’s head was the exit wound. But it wasn’t until years later, when he saw the famous Abraham Zapruder video on television, that the doctor became convinced of it.

“That firmed up my thought that it was the exit wound,” he says, pointing to the backwards motion of the President’s body after he was shot, as well as the size of the hole in the back of JFK’s skull, as proof he was shot from the front.

He is, however, sure of some things: "There were at least two shooters (“absolutely”) and the assassination was likely a conspiracy involving government “elements.”

WTF??

How can the "Zfilm" show the president getting shot in the forehead when you claim those frames were "faked"?

Do you think before you post?

 

[Faun]

The Zfilm shows the President being shot in the forehead and the back of the head literally popping off. This visual fact is corroborated by multiple eyewitnesses. I've included three, two of which were SS agents in the follow-up car. Nobody has or will ever honestly make a case for one bullet entering the rear and creating a large exit in the rear.

As 50th Anniversary Of Assassination Approaches, Surgeon Who Treated JFK Remembers « CBS Philly

Two other doctors were already treating Kennedy, Dr. Perry and Dr. Jenkins, and they ordered Dr. McClelland to hold the patient’s head.
So, he stood, holding the bleeding, injured head of the President of the United States. The wound was huge, gaping.

“My first reaction was, ‘My God, have you seen the back of the President’s head?’” McClelland says. They hadn’t.

In hindsight, Dr. McClelland says that he always believed the wound at the back of President Kennedy’s head was the exit wound. But it wasn’t until years later, when he saw the famous Abraham Zapruder video on television, that the doctor became convinced of it.

“That firmed up my thought that it was the exit wound,” he says, pointing to the backwards motion of the President’s body after he was shot, as well as the size of the hole in the back of JFK’s skull, as proof he was shot from the front.

He is, however, sure of some things: "There were at least two shooters (“absolutely”) and the assassination was likely a conspiracy involving government “elements.”

WTF??

How can the "Zfilm" show the president getting shot in the forehead when you claim those frames were "faked"?

Do you think before you post?

How can the "Zfilm" show the president getting shot in the forehead when you claim those frames were "faked"?

Because the back of the head blown off in Zapruder is corroborated by 40 eyewitnesses, and the AR. The most logical reason for the red blob addition was to cover up the bullet's entry. We know there wasn't a large wound in the right front because the AR excludes it, and no witness reported anything missing there. The film was altered, but not enough to keep the truth from being realized. FRAME 327 provides a fake loss of skull and brain in the right front.

Putz... you said that frame was fake. Now you're claiming it proves he was shot in the forehead. You're such a raging imbecile, you don't even realize how moronic your inconsistencies are.

 

[7forever]

The Zfilm shows the President being shot in the forehead and the back of the head literally popping off. This visual fact is corroborated by multiple eyewitnesses. I've included three, two of which were SS agents in the follow-up car. Nobody has or will ever honestly make a case for one bullet entering the rear and creating a large exit in the rear.

As 50th Anniversary Of Assassination Approaches, Surgeon Who Treated JFK Remembers « CBS Philly

Two other doctors were already treating Kennedy, Dr. Perry and Dr. Jenkins, and they ordered Dr. McClelland to hold the patient’s head.
So, he stood, holding the bleeding, injured head of the President of the United States. The wound was huge, gaping.

“My first reaction was, ‘My God, have you seen the back of the President’s head?’” McClelland says. They hadn’t.

In hindsight, Dr. McClelland says that he always believed the wound at the back of President Kennedy’s head was the exit wound. But it wasn’t until years later, when he saw the famous Abraham Zapruder video on television, that the doctor became convinced of it.

“That firmed up my thought that it was the exit wound,” he says, pointing to the backwards motion of the President’s body after he was shot, as well as the size of the hole in the back of JFK’s skull, as proof he was shot from the front.

He is, however, sure of some things: "There were at least two shooters (“absolutely”) and the assassination was likely a conspiracy involving government “elements.”

The zapruder film shows no such thing.

The bullet is not visible in the film and no entrance or exit wound is captured by the film.

The physical evidence and autopsy both prove that the bullet entered from above and behind. The eyewitnesses do not refute that fact.

The doctors at parkland were treating a patient as opposed to performing an autopsy. Their casual observations are not evidence against the conclusion of the autopsy.

You still have nothing

The zapruder film shows a massive hole at the rear.

The bullet is not really visible in the film and only a real exit wound is captured by the film in the right rear. The right front blob was faked.

The physical evidence and autopsy both prove that a massive exit hole was in the right rear. The eyewitnesses confirm this fact.

The doctors at parkland were treating a patient as opposed to performing an autopsy. Their observations are definite evidence against the conclusion of any rear skull entry.

You still are a delusional jackass.

 

[7forever]

The Zfilm shows the President being shot in the forehead and the back of the head literally popping off. This visual fact is corroborated by multiple eyewitnesses. I've included three, two of which were SS agents in the follow-up car. Nobody has or will ever honestly make a case for one bullet entering the rear and creating a large exit in the rear.

As 50th Anniversary Of Assassination Approaches, Surgeon Who Treated JFK Remembers « CBS Philly

Two other doctors were already treating Kennedy, Dr. Perry and Dr. Jenkins, and they ordered Dr. McClelland to hold the patient’s head.
So, he stood, holding the bleeding, injured head of the President of the United States. The wound was huge, gaping.

“My first reaction was, ‘My God, have you seen the back of the President’s head?’” McClelland says. They hadn’t.

In hindsight, Dr. McClelland says that he always believed the wound at the back of President Kennedy’s head was the exit wound. But it wasn’t until years later, when he saw the famous Abraham Zapruder video on television, that the doctor became convinced of it.

“That firmed up my thought that it was the exit wound,” he says, pointing to the backwards motion of the President’s body after he was shot, as well as the size of the hole in the back of JFK’s skull, as proof he was shot from the front.

He is, however, sure of some things: "There were at least two shooters (“absolutely”) and the assassination was likely a conspiracy involving government “elements.”

WTF??

How can the "Zfilm" show the president getting shot in the forehead when you claim those frames were "faked"?

Do you think before you post?

How can the "Zfilm" show the president getting shot in the forehead when you claim those frames were "faked"? I ANSWERED THIS SILLY QUESTION AS FOLLOWS:

Because the back of the head blown off in Zapruder is corroborated by 40 eyewitnesses, and the AR. The most logical reason for the red blob addition was to cover up the bullet's entry and provide an exit wound in a logical location to the supposed entrance. We know there wasn't a large wound in the right front because the AR and photos exclude it, and no eyewitness reported anything missing there. The film was altered, but not enough to keep the truth from being realized. FRAME 327 provides a fake loss of skull and brain in the right front.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The Zfilm shows the President being shot in the forehead and the back of the head literally popping off. This visual fact is corroborated by multiple eyewitnesses. I've included three, two of which were SS agents in the follow-up car. Nobody has or will ever honestly make a case for one bullet entering the rear and creating a large exit in the rear.

As 50th Anniversary Of Assassination Approaches, Surgeon Who Treated JFK Remembers « CBS Philly

Two other doctors were already treating Kennedy, Dr. Perry and Dr. Jenkins, and they ordered Dr. McClelland to hold the patient’s head.
So, he stood, holding the bleeding, injured head of the President of the United States. The wound was huge, gaping.

“My first reaction was, ‘My God, have you seen the back of the President’s head?’” McClelland says. They hadn’t.

In hindsight, Dr. McClelland says that he always believed the wound at the back of President Kennedy’s head was the exit wound. But it wasn’t until years later, when he saw the famous Abraham Zapruder video on television, that the doctor became convinced of it.

“That firmed up my thought that it was the exit wound,” he says, pointing to the backwards motion of the President’s body after he was shot, as well as the size of the hole in the back of JFK’s skull, as proof he was shot from the front.

He is, however, sure of some things: "There were at least two shooters (“absolutely”) and the assassination was likely a conspiracy involving government “elements.”

The zapruder film shows no such thing.

The bullet is not visible in the film and no entrance or exit wound is captured by the film.

The physical evidence and autopsy both prove that the bullet entered from above and behind. The eyewitnesses do not refute that fact.

The doctors at parkland were treating a patient as opposed to performing an autopsy. Their casual observations are not evidence against the conclusion of the autopsy.

You still have nothing

The zapruder film shows a massive hole at the rear.

The bullet is not really visible in the film and only a real exit wound is captured by the film in the right rear. The right front blob was faked.

The physical evidence and autopsy both prove that a massive exit hole was in the right rear. The eyewitnesses confirm this fact.

The doctors at parkland were treating a patient as opposed to performing an autopsy. Their observations are definite evidence against the conclusion of any rear skull entry.

You still are a delusional jackass.

A massive hole is a massive hole the film does not shot an entrance or exit wound as you claimed.

A wound is captured in the film and it is not an exit wound nor can exit or entrance wounds be judged by films.

There is no evidence what so ever that any part of it was faked.

A massive hole does not prove an entrance or exit wound and once again you are wrong.

The observations of doctors performing emergency procedures are not definitive evidence against the autopsy whatsoever.

You are crushed and beaten as always

 

[7forever]

The Zfilm shows the President being shot in the forehead and the back of the head literally popping off. This visual fact is corroborated by multiple eyewitnesses. I've included three, two of which were SS agents in the follow-up car. Nobody has or will ever honestly make a case for one bullet entering the rear and creating a large exit in the rear.

As 50th Anniversary Of Assassination Approaches, Surgeon Who Treated JFK Remembers « CBS Philly

Two other doctors were already treating Kennedy, Dr. Perry and Dr. Jenkins, and they ordered Dr. McClelland to hold the patient’s head.
So, he stood, holding the bleeding, injured head of the President of the United States. The wound was huge, gaping.

“My first reaction was, ‘My God, have you seen the back of the President’s head?’” McClelland says. They hadn’t.

In hindsight, Dr. McClelland says that he always believed the wound at the back of President Kennedy’s head was the exit wound. But it wasn’t until years later, when he saw the famous Abraham Zapruder video on television, that the doctor became convinced of it.

“That firmed up my thought that it was the exit wound,” he says, pointing to the backwards motion of the President’s body after he was shot, as well as the size of the hole in the back of JFK’s skull, as proof he was shot from the front.

He is, however, sure of some things: "There were at least two shooters (“absolutely”) and the assassination was likely a conspiracy involving government “elements.”

The zapruder film shows no such thing.

The bullet is not visible in the film and no entrance or exit wound is captured by the film.

The physical evidence and autopsy both prove that the bullet entered from above and behind. The eyewitnesses do not refute that fact.

The doctors at parkland were treating a patient as opposed to performing an autopsy. Their casual observations are not evidence against the conclusion of the autopsy.

You still have nothing

The zapruder film shows a massive hole at the rear.

The bullet is not really visible in the film and only a real exit wound is captured by the film in the right rear. The right front blob was faked.

The physical evidence and autopsy both prove that a massive exit hole was in the right rear. The eyewitnesses confirm this fact.

The doctors at parkland were treating a patient as opposed to performing an autopsy. Their observations are definite evidence against the conclusion of any rear skull entry.

You still are a delusional jackass.

A massive hole is a massive hole the film does not shot an entrance or exit wound as you claimed.

A wound is captured in the film and it is not an exit wound nor can exit or entrance wounds be judged by films.

There is no evidence what so ever that any part of it was faked.

A massive hole does not prove an entrance or exit wound and once again you are wrong.

The observations of doctors performing emergency procedures are not definitive evidence against the autopsy whatsoever.

You are crushed and beaten as always

A massive hole in the film does show an exit wound as most of the evidence confirms.

An exit wound is captured in the film and is in the right rear.

The red blob was faked because no exit wound was there.

A massive hole does prove an exit wound and once again the AR was right.

The observations of doctors performing emergency procedures is definitive evidence against the autopsy concluding a low entrance to the skull.

You are crushed and mocked as always.

 

[shadow355]

911 was not the only outrage carried out in broad daylight on American soil..

Feedback says: Good coverage, my understanding of Howard Hunt's deathbed confession, was that the trigger man who was on the grassy knoll was a man named James Files.. have you researched this possibility?

Reply I believe that the whole James Files situ is a red herring designed to distract, notwithstanding the wickedness of Files, and that Wim Dankbaar and Jim Marrs are deliberately muddying the waters with this type of material.

The JFK debate is riddled with false flag websites and sham forums, Mr Dankbaar is a polite and co operative man, despite he has banned me from participating in his on line forum at jfkmurdersolved.com!

The same cannot be said of Marrs, whose deportment at Waco Texas in 1993 during the siege of Mount Carmel, that resulted in the deaths of as many as eighty eight Branch Davidians, was reprehensible.

Vernon Howell aka David Koresh had pleaded with the Press Corps for a fair hearing, the ATF had entered shooting, and he fired back in defense of his household, Marrs led the response which was mockery and chanting!

Someone indirectly connected to Johnson ( Later President Johnson ) in my opinion ; as he had the most to benefit. I don't believe it to be a mob or a Cuban hit - I honestly believe that "someone" ( Hint - Hint ) connected to Johnson done it......hired through a third party. The Mob killed his brother ( Attorney General ) no doubt. But Johnson wanted the Presidency.....and he got it. But he paid handsomely fort it though.

Just my opinion

Jack Ruby Killed Oswald.......But why? Why did Ruby kill Oswald, and why did it not happen in a more discrete place, WHY DID it occur in public? Hmmmmm. Could they have not gotten to Oswald in jail....IF THEY wanted to? Just who was Ruby connected to? Ruby was dying, so what did he get...from killing Oswald? Ruby died allegedly from a pulmonary embolism.....much earlier than what he would have from the Cancer.....so was the embolism "Initiated", or did it really occur due to his medical condition?

To many answers and far way to many possibilities. Questions that can only be answered......by those whom are deceased.

---------------------------------

Lady Diana.....also assassinated - I believe. Time, Place ( look at the pics of crash location ) and especially the location ( to prevent inadvertently being seen ). Whom done that one? The press caused Diana's death? Who would gain...or more importantly keep info better concealed, if she were deceased? I done security for some time......and I am not that ignorant.

Previous political leaders and those formerly exiled, that died just a short time later ( what a coincidence ) after being exiled from their country , what about those? The numerous people exiled that within weeks to a few months......died.

Makes one wonder though huh? Sometimes the wondering and trying to piece together information, even a small discussion while playing cards with friends......can be fun, and/or...enlightening.

Shadow 355

 

[Soupnazi630]

The Zfilm shows the President being shot in the forehead and the back of the head literally popping off. This visual fact is corroborated by multiple eyewitnesses. I've included three, two of which were SS agents in the follow-up car. Nobody has or will ever honestly make a case for one bullet entering the rear and creating a large exit in the rear.

As 50th Anniversary Of Assassination Approaches, Surgeon Who Treated JFK Remembers « CBS Philly

Two other doctors were already treating Kennedy, Dr. Perry and Dr. Jenkins, and they ordered Dr. McClelland to hold the patient’s head.
So, he stood, holding the bleeding, injured head of the President of the United States. The wound was huge, gaping.

“My first reaction was, ‘My God, have you seen the back of the President’s head?’” McClelland says. They hadn’t.

In hindsight, Dr. McClelland says that he always believed the wound at the back of President Kennedy’s head was the exit wound. But it wasn’t until years later, when he saw the famous Abraham Zapruder video on television, that the doctor became convinced of it.

“That firmed up my thought that it was the exit wound,” he says, pointing to the backwards motion of the President’s body after he was shot, as well as the size of the hole in the back of JFK’s skull, as proof he was shot from the front.

He is, however, sure of some things: "There were at least two shooters (“absolutely”) and the assassination was likely a conspiracy involving government “elements.”

The zapruder film shows no such thing.

The bullet is not visible in the film and no entrance or exit wound is captured by the film.

The physical evidence and autopsy both prove that the bullet entered from above and behind. The eyewitnesses do not refute that fact.

The doctors at parkland were treating a patient as opposed to performing an autopsy. Their casual observations are not evidence against the conclusion of the autopsy.

You still have nothing

The zapruder film shows a massive hole at the rear.

The bullet is not really visible in the film and only a real exit wound is captured by the film in the right rear. The right front blob was faked.

The physical evidence and autopsy both prove that a massive exit hole was in the right rear. The eyewitnesses confirm this fact.

The doctors at parkland were treating a patient as opposed to performing an autopsy. Their observations are definite evidence against the conclusion of any rear skull entry.

You still are a delusional jackass.

A massive hole is a massive hole the film does not shot an entrance or exit wound as you claimed.

A wound is captured in the film and it is not an exit wound nor can exit or entrance wounds be judged by films.

There is no evidence what so ever that any part of it was faked.

A massive hole does not prove an entrance or exit wound and once again you are wrong.

The observations of doctors performing emergency procedures are not definitive evidence against the autopsy whatsoever.

You are crushed and beaten as always

A massive hole in the film does show an exit wound as most of the evidence confirms.

An exit wound is captured in the film and is in the right rear.

The red blob was faked because no exit wound was there.

A massive hole does prove an exit wound and once again the AR was right.

The observations of doctors performing emergency procedures is definitive evidence against the autopsy concluding a low entrance to the skull.

You are crushed and mocked as always.

A massive hole is a massive hole and does not prove exit or entrance poi9nt that is fact.

No evidence proves it is an exit wound as all of your posts shows.

You have totally failed to produce a speck of evidence to support this idiotic idea.

There is no exit wound captured on film only a wound no matter how much you scream otherwise.

There is no evidence of anything being faked.

The AR was correct and proves that the bullet entered from above and behind.

Casual observations are not evidence against a professional autopsy.

You are beaten as always.

 

[Soupnazi630]

911 was not the only outrage carried out in broad daylight on American soil..

Feedback says: Good coverage, my understanding of Howard Hunt's deathbed confession, was that the trigger man who was on the grassy knoll was a man named James Files.. have you researched this possibility?

Reply I believe that the whole James Files situ is a red herring designed to distract, notwithstanding the wickedness of Files, and that Wim Dankbaar and Jim Marrs are deliberately muddying the waters with this type of material.

The JFK debate is riddled with false flag websites and sham forums, Mr Dankbaar is a polite and co operative man, despite he has banned me from participating in his on line forum at jfkmurdersolved.com!

The same cannot be said of Marrs, whose deportment at Waco Texas in 1993 during the siege of Mount Carmel, that resulted in the deaths of as many as eighty eight Branch Davidians, was reprehensible.

Vernon Howell aka David Koresh had pleaded with the Press Corps for a fair hearing, the ATF had entered shooting, and he fired back in defense of his household, Marrs led the response which was mockery and chanting!

Someone indirectly connected to Johnson ( Later President Johnson ) in my opinion ; as he had the most to benefit. I don't believe it to be a mob or a Cuban hit - I honestly believe that "someone" ( Hint - Hint ) connected to Johnson done it......hired through a third party. The Mob killed his brother ( Attorney General ) no doubt. But Johnson wanted the Presidency.....and he got it. But he paid handsomely fort it though.

Just my opinion

Jack Ruby Killed Oswald.......But why? Why did Ruby kill Oswald, and why did it not happen in a more discrete place, WHY DID it occur in public? Hmmmmm. Could they have not gotten to Oswald in jail....IF THEY wanted to? Just who was Ruby connected to? Ruby was dying, so what did he get...from killing Oswald? Ruby died allegedly from a pulmonary embolism.....much earlier than what he would have from the Cancer.....so was the embolism "Initiated", or did it really occur due to his medical condition?

To many answers and far way to many possibilities. Questions that can only be answered......by those whom are deceased.

---------------------------------

Lady Diana.....also assassinated - I believe. Time, Place ( look at the pics of crash location ) and especially the location ( to prevent inadvertently being seen ). Whom done that one? The press caused Diana's death? Who would gain...or more importantly keep info better concealed, if she were deceased? I done security for some time......and I am not that ignorant.

Previous political leaders and those formerly exiled, that died just a short time later ( what a coincidence ) after being exiled from their country , what about those? The numerous people exiled that within weeks to a few months......died.

Makes one wonder though huh? Sometimes the wondering and trying to piece together information, even a small discussion while playing cards with friends......can be fun, and/or...enlightening.

Shadow 355

That is all speculation which is wrecked by the evidence.

The evidence proves Oswald acted alone and so did Ruby. Ruby gave his reasons for shooting Oswald they are not a mystery.

 

[shadow355]

911 was not the only outrage carried out in broad daylight on American soil..

Feedback says: Good coverage, my understanding of Howard Hunt's deathbed confession, was that the trigger man who was on the grassy knoll was a man named James Files.. have you researched this possibility?

Reply I believe that the whole James Files situ is a red herring designed to distract, notwithstanding the wickedness of Files, and that Wim Dankbaar and Jim Marrs are deliberately muddying the waters with this type of material.

The JFK debate is riddled with false flag websites and sham forums, Mr Dankbaar is a polite and co operative man, despite he has banned me from participating in his on line forum at jfkmurdersolved.com!

The same cannot be said of Marrs, whose deportment at Waco Texas in 1993 during the siege of Mount Carmel, that resulted in the deaths of as many as eighty eight Branch Davidians, was reprehensible.

Vernon Howell aka David Koresh had pleaded with the Press Corps for a fair hearing, the ATF had entered shooting, and he fired back in defense of his household, Marrs led the response which was mockery and chanting!

Someone indirectly connected to Johnson ( Later President Johnson ) in my opinion ; as he had the most to benefit. I don't believe it to be a mob or a Cuban hit - I honestly believe that "someone" ( Hint - Hint ) connected to Johnson done it......hired through a third party. The Mob killed his brother ( Attorney General ) no doubt. But Johnson wanted the Presidency.....and he got it. But he paid handsomely fort it though.

Just my opinion

Jack Ruby Killed Oswald.......But why? Why did Ruby kill Oswald, and why did it not happen in a more discrete place, WHY DID it occur in public? Hmmmmm. Could they have not gotten to Oswald in jail....IF THEY wanted to? Just who was Ruby connected to? Ruby was dying, so what did he get...from killing Oswald? Ruby died allegedly from a pulmonary embolism.....much earlier than what he would have from the Cancer.....so was the embolism "Initiated", or did it really occur due to his medical condition?

To many answers and far way to many possibilities. Questions that can only be answered......by those whom are deceased.

---------------------------------

Lady Diana.....also assassinated - I believe. Time, Place ( look at the pics of crash location ) and especially the location ( to prevent inadvertently being seen ). Whom done that one? The press caused Diana's death? Who would gain...or more importantly keep info better concealed, if she were deceased? I done security for some time......and I am not that ignorant.

Previous political leaders and those formerly exiled, that died just a short time later ( what a coincidence ) after being exiled from their country , what about those? The numerous people exiled that within weeks to a few months......died.

Makes one wonder though huh? Sometimes the wondering and trying to piece together information, even a small discussion while playing cards with friends......can be fun, and/or...enlightening.

Shadow 355

That is all speculation which is wrecked by the evidence.

The evidence proves Oswald acted alone and so did Ruby. Ruby gave his reasons for shooting Oswald they are not a mystery.

Some people mislead others.....and police almost....or every day.

People commit perjury.....almost everyday.

Oswald committed his crime, then soon after Ruby committed his act. Timely and quick if you ask me.

I am not stating proof positive.....I am simply noting my thoughts and the possibilities that exist - with some certain facts.

I am playing F.Lee Bailey ( A disbarred Lawyer )......and inserting doubt into the readers post ; giving way to maybe another possibility that the event could have occurred ( and in my thoughts ) . One possibility that the reader(s) did not consider - or research. Maybe I can sway the readers to my level and way of thinking, thereby discrediting the published report ( and witnesses ) as best as possible, in an effort to prove my case beyond a shadow of a doubt.....IF THAT makes any sense.

Shadow 355