The John Kennedy assassination ..who's who on the Grassy Knoll

[Soupnazi630]

Yes it could

No one ever argued that, you kook.LOL Frame 313 shows the rear hole and indicates a right front exit that was faked.

It indicates no such thing and no one ever faked any such thing

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there. You are crazy.LOL

No there is not an exit wound there. You are not an expert pathologist and the expert pathologists who performed the autopsy prove you wrong

The AR said the right rear was blown out. Why are lying about your own evidence? LOL

No it did not you are lying about the AR

 

[Soupnazi630]

Yes it could

No one ever argued that, you kook.LOL Frame 313 shows the rear hole and indicates a right front exit that was faked.

It indicates no such thing and no one ever faked any such thing

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there. You are crazy.LOL

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear. That's not what you're really saying, is it? Frame 313 clearly shows the hole In the rear.

Yes head wounds typically burst and leave irregular messes regardless of where the bullet enters.

You have no evidence of that, you kook. It bursts at the exit point. In this case, the right rear.

Yes I do and it has been proven to you over and over.

 

[Soupnazi630]

It indicates no such thing and no one ever faked any such thing

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there. You are crazy.LOL

No there is not an exit wound there. You are not an expert pathologist and the expert pathologists who performed the autopsy prove you wrong

The AR said the right rear was blown out. Why are lying about your own evidence? LOL

No it did not you are lying about the AR

How am I lying about, ya kook? The rear was blown out. That was the exit wound.

Nope the bullet entered from above and behind which the AR proves

 

[Soupnazi630]

It indicates no such thing and no one ever faked any such thing

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there. You are crazy.LOL

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear. That's not what you're really saying, is it? Frame 313 clearly shows the hole In the rear.

Yes head wounds typically burst and leave irregular messes regardless of where the bullet enters.

You have no evidence of that, you kook. It bursts at the exit point. In this case, the right rear.

Yes I do and it has been proven to you over and over.

You claimed something false, something you do over and over.

No I did not and you cannot prove it is false.

I have the evidence on my side you do not which is why you have to lie about the evidence

 

[Soupnazi630]

No there is not an exit wound there. You are not an expert pathologist and the expert pathologists who performed the autopsy prove you wrong

The AR said the right rear was blown out. Why are lying about your own evidence? LOL

No it did not you are lying about the AR

How am I lying about, ya kook? The rear was blown out. That was the exit wound.

Nope the bullet entered from above and behind which the AR proves

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there.

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear.

There is no exit wound on the right rear

 

[7forever]

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there. You are crazy.LOL

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear. That's not what you're really saying, is it? Frame 313 clearly shows the hole In the rear.

Yes head wounds typically burst and leave irregular messes regardless of where the bullet enters.

You have no evidence of that, you kook. It bursts at the exit point. In this case, the right rear.

Yes I do and it has been proven to you over and over.

You claimed something false, something you do over and over.

No I did not and you cannot prove it is false.

I have the evidence on my side you do not which is why you have to lie about the evidence

NO BULLET ENTERED THE REAR.

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there.

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear.

 

[7forever]

The AR said the right rear was blown out. Why are lying about your own evidence? LOL

No it did not you are lying about the AR

How am I lying about, ya kook? The rear was blown out. That was the exit wound.

Nope the bullet entered from above and behind which the AR proves

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there.

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear.

There is no exit wound on the right rear

NO BULLET ENTERED THE REAR.

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there.

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Yes head wounds typically burst and leave irregular messes regardless of where the bullet enters.

You have no evidence of that, you kook. It bursts at the exit point. In this case, the right rear.

Yes I do and it has been proven to you over and over.

You claimed something false, something you do over and over.

No I did not and you cannot prove it is false.

I have the evidence on my side you do not which is why you have to lie about the evidence

NO BULLET ENTERED THE REAR.

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there.

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear.

All of the evidence proves the bullet entered from above and behind that is fact no matter how much you stamp your feet and scream otherwise.

You have presented no evidence of an exit wound

 

[Soupnazi630]

Yes I do and it has been proven to you over and over.

You claimed something false, something you do over and over.

No I did not and you cannot prove it is false.

I have the evidence on my side you do not which is why you have to lie about the evidence

NO BULLET ENTERED THE REAR.

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there.

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear.

All of the evidence proves the bullet entered from above and behind that is fact no matter how much you stamp your feet and scream otherwise.

You have presented no evidence of an exit wound

NO BULLET ENTERED THE REAR.

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there.

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear.

Yes the bullet to the head entered the right rear as the evidence shows.

You have failed to prove an exit wound there .

Those are the facts

 

[Soupnazi630]

Yes I do and it has been proven to you over and over.

You claimed something false, something you do over and over.

No I did not and you cannot prove it is false.

I have the evidence on my side you do not which is why you have to lie about the evidence

NO BULLET ENTERED THE REAR.

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there.

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear.

All of the evidence proves the bullet entered from above and behind that is fact no matter how much you stamp your feet and scream otherwise.

You have presented no evidence of an exit wound

NO evidence proves the bullet entered from above and behind that is fact no matter how much you stamp your feet and scream otherwise.

You have presented no evidence of an entrance wound to the rear skull.

Yes I have the AR proves it and proves you wrong and it IS evidence

 

[7forever]

You claimed something false, something you do over and over.

No I did not and you cannot prove it is false.

I have the evidence on my side you do not which is why you have to lie about the evidence

NO BULLET ENTERED THE REAR.

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there.

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear.

All of the evidence proves the bullet entered from above and behind that is fact no matter how much you stamp your feet and scream otherwise.

You have presented no evidence of an exit wound

NO evidence proves the bullet entered from above and behind that is fact no matter how much you stamp your feet and scream otherwise.

You have presented no evidence of an entrance wound to the rear skull.

Yes I have the AR proves it and proves you wrong and it IS evidence

NO BULLET ENTERED THE REAR.

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there.

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear.

 

[Soupnazi630]

No I did not and you cannot prove it is false.

I have the evidence on my side you do not which is why you have to lie about the evidence

NO BULLET ENTERED THE REAR.

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there.

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear.

All of the evidence proves the bullet entered from above and behind that is fact no matter how much you stamp your feet and scream otherwise.

You have presented no evidence of an exit wound

NO evidence proves the bullet entered from above and behind that is fact no matter how much you stamp your feet and scream otherwise.

You have presented no evidence of an entrance wound to the rear skull.

Yes I have the AR proves it and proves you wrong and it IS evidence

NO BULLET ENTERED THE REAR.

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there.

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear.

Yes the bullet entered from above and behind that is proven.

There is no exit wound where you claim there is one

 

[Soupnazi630]

No I did not and you cannot prove it is false.

I have the evidence on my side you do not which is why you have to lie about the evidence

NO BULLET ENTERED THE REAR.

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there.

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear.

All of the evidence proves the bullet entered from above and behind that is fact no matter how much you stamp your feet and scream otherwise.

You have presented no evidence of an exit wound

NO BULLET ENTERED THE REAR.

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there.

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear.

Yes the bullet to the head entered the right rear as the evidence shows.

You have failed to prove an exit wound there .

Those are the facts

Where does the AR say the hole is located?

The AR clearly proved that the bullet entered from above and behind

 

[Soupnazi630]

All of the evidence proves the bullet entered from above and behind that is fact no matter how much you stamp your feet and scream otherwise.

You have presented no evidence of an exit wound

NO BULLET ENTERED THE REAR.

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there.

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear.

Yes the bullet to the head entered the right rear as the evidence shows.

You have failed to prove an exit wound there .

Those are the facts

Where does the AR say the hole is located?

The AR clearly proved that the bullet entered from above and behind

Where does the AR say the hole is located?

The AR clearly proves that the bullet entered from above and behind

 

[Soupnazi630]

All of the evidence proves the bullet entered from above and behind that is fact no matter how much you stamp your feet and scream otherwise.

You have presented no evidence of an exit wound

NO evidence proves the bullet entered from above and behind that is fact no matter how much you stamp your feet and scream otherwise.

You have presented no evidence of an entrance wound to the rear skull.

Yes I have the AR proves it and proves you wrong and it IS evidence

NO BULLET ENTERED THE REAR.

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there.

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear.

Yes the bullet entered from above and behind that is proven.

There is no exit wound where you claim there is one

How could the exit not be in the rear when that's where the AR reported it was?

The AR reported no such thing

 

[Soupnazi630]

All of the evidence proves the bullet entered from above and behind that is fact no matter how much you stamp your feet and scream otherwise.

You have presented no evidence of an exit wound

NO evidence proves the bullet entered from above and behind that is fact no matter how much you stamp your feet and scream otherwise.

You have presented no evidence of an entrance wound to the rear skull.

Yes I have the AR proves it and proves you wrong and it IS evidence

NO BULLET ENTERED THE REAR.

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there.

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear.

Yes the bullet entered from above and behind that is proven.

There is no exit wound where you claim there is one

How could the exit not be in the rear when that's where the AR reported it was?

You are out right lying the AR never reported the exit was in the rear

 

[7forever]

NO BULLET ENTERED THE REAR.

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there.

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear.

All of the evidence proves the bullet entered from above and behind that is fact no matter how much you stamp your feet and scream otherwise.

You have presented no evidence of an exit wound

NO evidence proves the bullet entered from above and behind that is fact no matter how much you stamp your feet and scream otherwise.

You have presented no evidence of an entrance wound to the rear skull.

Yes I have the AR proves it and proves you wrong and it IS evidence

NO BULLET ENTERED THE REAR.

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there.

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear.

Yes the bullet entered from above and behind that is proven.

There is no exit wound where you claim there is one

From 'Mrs Kennedy and Me" by Clint Hill' Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

If the rear blow-out was not an exit wound, then what was it?

"In the same instant, blood, brain matter and bone fragments exploded from the back of the President's head... and splattered all over me - on my face, my clothes, in my hair."

 

[7forever]

NO evidence proves the bullet entered from above and behind that is fact no matter how much you stamp your feet and scream otherwise.

You have presented no evidence of an entrance wound to the rear skull.

Yes I have the AR proves it and proves you wrong and it IS evidence

NO BULLET ENTERED THE REAR.

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there.

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear.

Yes the bullet entered from above and behind that is proven.

There is no exit wound where you claim there is one

How could the exit not be in the rear when that's where the AR reported it was?

The AR reported no such thing

The AR reported the exit wound was in the rear of the skull on the right side.

Missile Wounds

1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into the
temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.


JFK Lancer

 

[daws101]

Seeing the back of the head with a gaping wound proves only a wound it does not prove an entrance wound.

Whipped you with facts again boy

Seeing the back of his head blow off at the moment it happened could only be an exit wound.

Whipped you with facts again you lying retard, by using Clint Hill.

From 'Mrs Kennedy and Me" by Clint Hill' Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

"In the same instant, blood, brain matter and bone fragments exploded from the back of the President's head... and splattered all over me - on my face, my clothes, in my hair."

Wrong

The skull typically bursts open regardless of entry point.

The facts add kicking your azz as always

You falsely claimed that a bullet could enter and explode at the same time and provided no evidence because it's false. The bullet that hit jfk in the right forehead exited and blew out the rear of his skull.

“I heard the shot. The third shot,” he wrote. “The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting something hollow – like the sound of a melon shattering onto the cement. In the same instant, blood, brain matter, and bone fragments exploded from the back of the president’s head. The president’s blood, parts of his skull, bits of his brain were splattered all over me – on my face, my clothes, in my hair.”

For Hill to have seen brain matter explode out of JFK’s head, the wound at the back of the president’s was definitely an exit wound. Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

No bullet entered the front it entered from above and behind and it is common for such sounds to burst in a violent manner.

You are simply wrong and the evidence proves it

The back of his head blew off which indicates an exit wound. Nothing will ever change that. If it was common then you could offer some evidence, but you can't because it's not common and did not happen to jfk.

https://www.causes.com/causes/308048...ut-in-the-back

SAMUEL A. KINNEY was the driver of the follow-up car on 11/22/63.

it was the right rear part of his head...because
that's the part I saw blow out. I saw hair come out, the piece blow out,
then the skin went back in- an explosion in and out". Elaborating
further, Sam said, after telling him that that's where the Parkland
doctors saw the wound, "I would say that, too...it involved half his
head".

"sam says nothing that's not consistent with the autopsy findings.

 

[Soupnazi630]

All of the evidence proves the bullet entered from above and behind that is fact no matter how much you stamp your feet and scream otherwise.

You have presented no evidence of an exit wound

NO evidence proves the bullet entered from above and behind that is fact no matter how much you stamp your feet and scream otherwise.

You have presented no evidence of an entrance wound to the rear skull.

Yes I have the AR proves it and proves you wrong and it IS evidence

NO BULLET ENTERED THE REAR.

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there.

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear.

Yes the bullet entered from above and behind that is proven.

There is no exit wound where you claim there is one

From 'Mrs Kennedy and Me" by Clint Hill' Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

If the rear blow-out was not an exit wound, then what was it?

"In the same instant, blood, brain matter and bone fragments exploded from the back of the President's head... and splattered all over me - on my face, my clothes, in my hair."

It was.the skull bursting open from a bullet which entered from above and behind