The John Kennedy assassination ..who's who on the Grassy Knoll

[7forever]

He saw back the back of jfk's blow off, you piece of shit. That the was the exit wound, ON THE REAR.

Secret Service Agent Clint Hill wrote a 2012 book, “Mrs. Kennedy and Me,” in which he describes his experience during the JFK assassination.

“I heard the shot. The third shot,” he wrote. “The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting something hollow – like the sound of a melon shattering onto the cement. In the same instant, blood, brain matter, and bone fragments exploded from the back of the president’s head. The president’s blood, parts of his skull, bits of his brain were splattered all over me – on my face, my clothes, in my hair.”

“As I peered into the backseat of the car,” Hill recalled. “I saw the president’s head in [Jackie’s] lap. His eyes were fixed, and I could see inside the back of his head. I could see inside the back of the president’s head.” Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

He never said he saw the back of the head blown off ( you lie about what he said ) and the wound he saw was not an exit wound.

Secret Service Agent Clint Hill wrote a 2012 book, “Mrs. Kennedy and Me,” in which he describes his experience during the JFK assassination.

He saw the back of jfk's head blow off, you piece of WORTHLESS SHIT. That was the exit wound ON THE RIGHT REAR. You're a fun joke.

“I heard the shot. The third shot,” he wrote. “The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting something hollow – like the sound of a melon shattering onto the cement. In the same instant, blood, brain matter, and bone fragments exploded from the back of the president’s head. The president’s blood, parts of his skull, bits of his brain were splattered all over me – on my face, my clothes, in my hair.”

“As I peered into the backseat of the car,” Hill recalled. “I saw the president’s head in [Jackie’s] lap. His eyes were fixed, and I could see inside the back of his head. I could see inside the back of the president’s head.” Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

More intenional misrepresentation.

There was a rifle found on the sixth floor, but a handgun was witnessed in the limo and fired at Kennedy's face. Was Oswald driving the limo or was that ss agent Bill Greer?

What's so great about a case like this is the plethora of evidence and the web that provides access to it all. Hugh Betzer saw Hickey's rifle, which was not fired, and the driver's handgun, the weapon that killed the President. That's powerful corroboration by just one witness.

Betzner confirms that two guns were in the motorcade, one being the handgun that the driver used to assassinate the President and the other pulled by an agent in the follow-up car. The firecracker reference is a subtle way of saying a shot was fired in the limo.

JFK: Eyewitness statements, assassination of President John F. Kennedy, murder of J. D. Tippit and arrest of Lee Harvey Oswald: Hugh William Betzner

I looked down the street and I could see the President's car and another one and they looked like the cars were stopped. Then I saw a a flash of pink like someone standing up and then sitting back down in the car. Then I ran around so I could look over the back of a monument and I either saw the following then or when I was standing back down on the corner of Elm Street. I cannot remember exactly where I was when I saw the following: I heard at least two shots fired and I saw what looked like a firecracker going off in the president's car. My assumption for this was because I saw fragments going up in the air. I also saw a man in either the President's car or the car behind his and someone down in one of those cars pulled out what looked like a rifle.

I also remember seeing what looked like a nickel revolver in someone's hand in the President's car or somewhere immediately around his car. Then the President's car sped on under the underpass.

No witness saw a gun fired at Kennedy or even saw one in his limo..

No one is seen holding a gun in any of the films

The driver was seen a with a handgun and shooting back at toward jfk.

Hugh Betzner debunks your simple stupidity. He saw both guns.

JFK: Eyewitness statements, assassination of President John F. Kennedy, murder of J. D. Tippit and arrest of Lee Harvey Oswald: Hugh William Betzner

I saw what looked like a firecracker going off in the president's car. My assumption for this was because I saw fragments going up in the air. I also saw a man in either the President's car or the car behind his and someone down in one of those cars pulled out what looked like a rifle.

I also remember seeing what looked like a nickel revolver in someone's hand in the President's car or somewhere immediately around his car. Then the President's car sped on under the underpass.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Seeing the back of the head with a gaping wound proves only a wound it does not prove an entrance wound.

Whipped you with facts again boy

Seeing the back of his head blow off at the moment it happened could only be an exit wound.

Whipped you with facts again you lying retard, by using Clint Hill.

From 'Mrs Kennedy and Me" by Clint Hill' Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

"In the same instant, blood, brain matter and bone fragments exploded from the back of the President's head... and splattered all over me - on my face, my clothes, in my hair."

Wrong

The skull typically bursts open regardless of entry point.

The facts add kicking your azz as always

You falsely claimed that a bullet could enter and explode at the same time and provided no evidence because it's false. The bullet that hit jfk in the right forehead exited and blew out the rear of his skull.

“I heard the shot. The third shot,” he wrote. “The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting something hollow – like the sound of a melon shattering onto the cement. In the same instant, blood, brain matter, and bone fragments exploded from the back of the president’s head. The president’s blood, parts of his skull, bits of his brain were splattered all over me – on my face, my clothes, in my hair.”

For Hill to have seen brain matter explode out of JFK’s head, the wound at the back of the president’s was definitely an exit wound. Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

No bullet entered the front it entered from above and behind and it is common for such sounds to burst in a violent manner.

You are simply wrong and the evidence proves it

The back of his head blew off which indicates an exit wound. Nothing will ever change that. If it was common then you could some evidence, but you can't because it's not common and did not happen to jfk.

https://www.causes.com/causes/308048...ut-in-the-back

SAMUEL A. KINNEY was the driver of the follow-up car on 11/22/63.

it was the right rear part of his head...because
that's the part I saw blow out. I saw hair come out, the piece blow out,
then the skin went back in- an explosion in and out". Elaborating
further, Sam said, after telling him that that's where the Parkland
doctors saw the wound, "I would say that, too...it involved half his
head".

The gaping wound indicates a gaping wo

Seeing the back of the head with a gaping wound proves only a wound it does not prove an entrance wound.

Whipped you with facts again boy

Seeing the back of his head blow off at the moment it happened could only be an exit wound.

Whipped you with facts again you lying retard, by using Clint Hill.

From 'Mrs Kennedy and Me" by Clint Hill' Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

"In the same instant, blood, brain matter and bone fragments exploded from the back of the President's head... and splattered all over me - on my face, my clothes, in my hair."

Wrong

The skull typically bursts open regardless of entry point.

The facts add kicking your azz as always

You falsely claimed that a bullet could enter and explode at the same time and provided no evidence because it's false. The bullet that hit jfk in the right forehead exited and blew out the rear of his skull.

“I heard the shot. The third shot,” he wrote. “The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting something hollow – like the sound of a melon shattering onto the cement. In the same instant, blood, brain matter, and bone fragments exploded from the back of the president’s head. The president’s blood, parts of his skull, bits of his brain were splattered all over me – on my face, my clothes, in my hair.”

For Hill to have seen brain matter explode out of JFK’s head, the wound at the back of the president’s was definitely an exit wound. Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

No bullet entered the front it entered from above and behind and it is common for such sounds to burst in a violent manner.

You are simply wrong and the evidence proves it

The back of his head blew off which indicates an exit wound. Nothing will ever change that. If it was common then you could offer some evidence, but you can't because it's not common and did not happen to jfk.

https://www.causes.com/causes/308048...ut-in-the-back

SAMUEL A. KINNEY was the driver of the follow-up car on 11/22/63.

it was the right rear part of his head...because
that's the part I saw blow out. I saw hair come out, the piece blow out,
then the skin went back in- an explosion in and out". Elaborating
further, Sam said, after telling him that that's where the Parkland
doctors saw the wound, "I would say that, too...it involved half his
head".

Indications do not PROVE anything.

The evidence which was examined by the doctors at the autopsy PROVES that the bullet entered from above and behind.

No evidence supports your claim.

Yes JFK was shot by Oswald who was above and behind him.

That is fact you have failed miserably top refute

 

[Soupnazi630]

He never said he saw the back of the head blown off ( you lie about what he said ) and the wound he saw was not an exit wound.

Secret Service Agent Clint Hill wrote a 2012 book, “Mrs. Kennedy and Me,” in which he describes his experience during the JFK assassination.

He saw the back of jfk's head blow off, you piece of WORTHLESS SHIT. That was the exit wound ON THE RIGHT REAR. You're a fun joke.

“I heard the shot. The third shot,” he wrote. “The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting something hollow – like the sound of a melon shattering onto the cement. In the same instant, blood, brain matter, and bone fragments exploded from the back of the president’s head. The president’s blood, parts of his skull, bits of his brain were splattered all over me – on my face, my clothes, in my hair.”

“As I peered into the backseat of the car,” Hill recalled. “I saw the president’s head in [Jackie’s] lap. His eyes were fixed, and I could see inside the back of his head. I could see inside the back of the president’s head.” Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

More intenional misrepresentation.

There was a rifle found on the sixth floor, but a handgun was witnessed in the limo and fired at Kennedy's face. Was Oswald driving the limo or was that ss agent Bill Greer?

What's so great about a case like this is the plethora of evidence and the web that provides access to it all. Hugh Betzer saw Hickey's rifle, which was not fired, and the driver's handgun, the weapon that killed the President. That's powerful corroboration by just one witness.

Betzner confirms that two guns were in the motorcade, one being the handgun that the driver used to assassinate the President and the other pulled by an agent in the follow-up car. The firecracker reference is a subtle way of saying a shot was fired in the limo.

JFK: Eyewitness statements, assassination of President John F. Kennedy, murder of J. D. Tippit and arrest of Lee Harvey Oswald: Hugh William Betzner

I looked down the street and I could see the President's car and another one and they looked like the cars were stopped. Then I saw a a flash of pink like someone standing up and then sitting back down in the car. Then I ran around so I could look over the back of a monument and I either saw the following then or when I was standing back down on the corner of Elm Street. I cannot remember exactly where I was when I saw the following: I heard at least two shots fired and I saw what looked like a firecracker going off in the president's car. My assumption for this was because I saw fragments going up in the air. I also saw a man in either the President's car or the car behind his and someone down in one of those cars pulled out what looked like a rifle.

I also remember seeing what looked like a nickel revolver in someone's hand in the President's car or somewhere immediately around his car. Then the President's car sped on under the underpass.

No witness saw a gun fired at Kennedy or even saw one in his limo..

No one is seen holding a gun in any of the films

The driver was seen a with a handgun and shooting back at toward jfk.

Hugh Betzner debunks your simple stupidity. He saw both guns.

JFK: Eyewitness statements, assassination of President John F. Kennedy, murder of J. D. Tippit and arrest of Lee Harvey Oswald: Hugh William Betzner

I saw what looked like a firecracker going off in the president's car. My assumption for this was because I saw fragments going up in the air. I also saw a man in either the President's car or the car behind his and someone down in one of those cars pulled out what looked like a rifle.

I also remember seeing what looked like a nickel revolver in someone's hand in the President's car or somewhere immediately around his car. Then the President's car sped on under the underpass.

He did not say he saw it in the drivers hand nor was he sure where it was.

The evidence proves no one in the presidential limo drew a gun.

 

[7forever]

Secret Service Agent Clint Hill wrote a 2012 book, “Mrs. Kennedy and Me,” in which he describes his experience during the JFK assassination.

He saw the back of jfk's head blow off, you piece of WORTHLESS SHIT. That was the exit wound ON THE RIGHT REAR. You're a fun joke.

“I heard the shot. The third shot,” he wrote. “The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting something hollow – like the sound of a melon shattering onto the cement. In the same instant, blood, brain matter, and bone fragments exploded from the back of the president’s head. The president’s blood, parts of his skull, bits of his brain were splattered all over me – on my face, my clothes, in my hair.”

“As I peered into the backseat of the car,” Hill recalled. “I saw the president’s head in [Jackie’s] lap. His eyes were fixed, and I could see inside the back of his head. I could see inside the back of the president’s head.” Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

More intenional misrepresentation.

There was a rifle found on the sixth floor, but a handgun was witnessed in the limo and fired at Kennedy's face. Was Oswald driving the limo or was that ss agent Bill Greer?

What's so great about a case like this is the plethora of evidence and the web that provides access to it all. Hugh Betzer saw Hickey's rifle, which was not fired, and the driver's handgun, the weapon that killed the President. That's powerful corroboration by just one witness.

Betzner confirms that two guns were in the motorcade, one being the handgun that the driver used to assassinate the President and the other pulled by an agent in the follow-up car. The firecracker reference is a subtle way of saying a shot was fired in the limo.

JFK: Eyewitness statements, assassination of President John F. Kennedy, murder of J. D. Tippit and arrest of Lee Harvey Oswald: Hugh William Betzner

I looked down the street and I could see the President's car and another one and they looked like the cars were stopped. Then I saw a a flash of pink like someone standing up and then sitting back down in the car. Then I ran around so I could look over the back of a monument and I either saw the following then or when I was standing back down on the corner of Elm Street. I cannot remember exactly where I was when I saw the following: I heard at least two shots fired and I saw what looked like a firecracker going off in the president's car. My assumption for this was because I saw fragments going up in the air. I also saw a man in either the President's car or the car behind his and someone down in one of those cars pulled out what looked like a rifle.

I also remember seeing what looked like a nickel revolver in someone's hand in the President's car or somewhere immediately around his car. Then the President's car sped on under the underpass.

No witness saw a gun fired at Kennedy or even saw one in his limo..

No one is seen holding a gun in any of the films

The driver was seen a with a handgun and shooting back at toward jfk.

Hugh Betzner debunks your simple stupidity. He saw both guns.

JFK: Eyewitness statements, assassination of President John F. Kennedy, murder of J. D. Tippit and arrest of Lee Harvey Oswald: Hugh William Betzner

I saw what looked like a firecracker going off in the president's car. My assumption for this was because I saw fragments going up in the air. I also saw a man in either the President's car or the car behind his and someone down in one of those cars pulled out what looked like a rifle.

I also remember seeing what looked like a nickel revolver in someone's hand in the President's car or somewhere immediately around his car. Then the President's car sped on under the underpass.

He did not say he saw it in the drivers hand nor was he sure where it was.

The evidence proves no one in the presidential limo drew a gun.

It was in his hand. It wasn't in anyone else's hand.

 

[7forever]

Seeing the back of his head blow off at the moment it happened could only be an exit wound.

Whipped you with facts again you lying retard, by using Clint Hill.

From 'Mrs Kennedy and Me" by Clint Hill' Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

"In the same instant, blood, brain matter and bone fragments exploded from the back of the President's head... and splattered all over me - on my face, my clothes, in my hair."

Wrong

The skull typically bursts open regardless of entry point.

The facts add kicking your azz as always

You falsely claimed that a bullet could enter and explode at the same time and provided no evidence because it's false. The bullet that hit jfk in the right forehead exited and blew out the rear of his skull.

“I heard the shot. The third shot,” he wrote. “The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting something hollow – like the sound of a melon shattering onto the cement. In the same instant, blood, brain matter, and bone fragments exploded from the back of the president’s head. The president’s blood, parts of his skull, bits of his brain were splattered all over me – on my face, my clothes, in my hair.”

For Hill to have seen brain matter explode out of JFK’s head, the wound at the back of the president’s was definitely an exit wound. Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

No bullet entered the front it entered from above and behind and it is common for such sounds to burst in a violent manner.

You are simply wrong and the evidence proves it

The back of his head blew off which indicates an exit wound. Nothing will ever change that. If it was common then you could some evidence, but you can't because it's not common and did not happen to jfk.

https://www.causes.com/causes/308048...ut-in-the-back

SAMUEL A. KINNEY was the driver of the follow-up car on 11/22/63.

it was the right rear part of his head...because
that's the part I saw blow out. I saw hair come out, the piece blow out,
then the skin went back in- an explosion in and out". Elaborating
further, Sam said, after telling him that that's where the Parkland
doctors saw the wound, "I would say that, too...it involved half his
head".

The gaping wound indicates a gaping wo

Seeing the back of his head blow off at the moment it happened could only be an exit wound.

Whipped you with facts again you lying retard, by using Clint Hill.

From 'Mrs Kennedy and Me" by Clint Hill' Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

"In the same instant, blood, brain matter and bone fragments exploded from the back of the President's head... and splattered all over me - on my face, my clothes, in my hair."

Wrong

The skull typically bursts open regardless of entry point.

The facts add kicking your azz as always

You falsely claimed that a bullet could enter and explode at the same time and provided no evidence because it's false. The bullet that hit jfk in the right forehead exited and blew out the rear of his skull.

“I heard the shot. The third shot,” he wrote. “The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting something hollow – like the sound of a melon shattering onto the cement. In the same instant, blood, brain matter, and bone fragments exploded from the back of the president’s head. The president’s blood, parts of his skull, bits of his brain were splattered all over me – on my face, my clothes, in my hair.”

For Hill to have seen brain matter explode out of JFK’s head, the wound at the back of the president’s was definitely an exit wound. Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

No bullet entered the front it entered from above and behind and it is common for such sounds to burst in a violent manner.

You are simply wrong and the evidence proves it

The back of his head blew off which indicates an exit wound. Nothing will ever change that. If it was common then you could offer some evidence, but you can't because it's not common and did not happen to jfk.

https://www.causes.com/causes/308048...ut-in-the-back

SAMUEL A. KINNEY was the driver of the follow-up car on 11/22/63.

it was the right rear part of his head...because
that's the part I saw blow out. I saw hair come out, the piece blow out,
then the skin went back in- an explosion in and out". Elaborating
further, Sam said, after telling him that that's where the Parkland
doctors saw the wound, "I would say that, too...it involved half his
head".

Indications do not PROVE anything.

The evidence which was examined by the doctors at the autopsy PROVES that the bullet entered from above and behind.

No evidence supports your claim.

Yes JFK was shot by Oswald who was above and behind him.

That is fact you have failed miserably top refute

The back of the head being blown off is an exit wound and nothing else. That simple fact excludes your delusions of an entry in the rear.

The back of his head blew off which indicates an exit wound. Nothing will ever change that. If it was common then you could offer some evidence, but you can't because it's not common and did not happen to jfk.

https://www.causes.com/causes/308048...ut-in-the-back

SAMUEL A. KINNEY was the driver of the follow-up car on 11/22/63.

it was the right rear part of his head...because
that's the part I saw blow out. I saw hair come out, the piece blow out,
then the skin went back in- an explosion in and out". Elaborating
further, Sam said, after telling him that that's where the Parkland
doctors saw the wound, "I would say that, too...it involved half his
head".

The evidence which was examined by the doctors at the autopsy documented a right rear blow out.

No evidence supports an entry wound in that area of the skull.

Yes JFK was shot from the front.

That is fact you have failed miserably to even challenge.

 

[Soupnazi630]

More intenional misrepresentation.

There was a rifle found on the sixth floor, but a handgun was witnessed in the limo and fired at Kennedy's face. Was Oswald driving the limo or was that ss agent Bill Greer?

What's so great about a case like this is the plethora of evidence and the web that provides access to it all. Hugh Betzer saw Hickey's rifle, which was not fired, and the driver's handgun, the weapon that killed the President. That's powerful corroboration by just one witness.

Betzner confirms that two guns were in the motorcade, one being the handgun that the driver used to assassinate the President and the other pulled by an agent in the follow-up car. The firecracker reference is a subtle way of saying a shot was fired in the limo.

JFK: Eyewitness statements, assassination of President John F. Kennedy, murder of J. D. Tippit and arrest of Lee Harvey Oswald: Hugh William Betzner

I looked down the street and I could see the President's car and another one and they looked like the cars were stopped. Then I saw a a flash of pink like someone standing up and then sitting back down in the car. Then I ran around so I could look over the back of a monument and I either saw the following then or when I was standing back down on the corner of Elm Street. I cannot remember exactly where I was when I saw the following: I heard at least two shots fired and I saw what looked like a firecracker going off in the president's car. My assumption for this was because I saw fragments going up in the air. I also saw a man in either the President's car or the car behind his and someone down in one of those cars pulled out what looked like a rifle.

I also remember seeing what looked like a nickel revolver in someone's hand in the President's car or somewhere immediately around his car. Then the President's car sped on under the underpass.

No witness saw a gun fired at Kennedy or even saw one in his limo..

No one is seen holding a gun in any of the films

The driver was seen a with a handgun and shooting back at toward jfk.

Hugh Betzner debunks your simple stupidity. He saw both guns.

JFK: Eyewitness statements, assassination of President John F. Kennedy, murder of J. D. Tippit and arrest of Lee Harvey Oswald: Hugh William Betzner

I saw what looked like a firecracker going off in the president's car. My assumption for this was because I saw fragments going up in the air. I also saw a man in either the President's car or the car behind his and someone down in one of those cars pulled out what looked like a rifle.

I also remember seeing what looked like a nickel revolver in someone's hand in the President's car or somewhere immediately around his car. Then the President's car sped on under the underpass.

He did not say he saw it in the drivers hand nor was he sure where it was.

The evidence proves no one in the presidential limo drew a gun.

It was in his hand. It wasn't in anyone else's hand.

No one saw it in his hand and it was not in hid hand.

Every film of the assassination shows he never held a gun

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong

The skull typically bursts open regardless of entry point.

The facts add kicking your azz as always

You falsely claimed that a bullet could enter and explode at the same time and provided no evidence because it's false. The bullet that hit jfk in the right forehead exited and blew out the rear of his skull.

“I heard the shot. The third shot,” he wrote. “The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting something hollow – like the sound of a melon shattering onto the cement. In the same instant, blood, brain matter, and bone fragments exploded from the back of the president’s head. The president’s blood, parts of his skull, bits of his brain were splattered all over me – on my face, my clothes, in my hair.”

For Hill to have seen brain matter explode out of JFK’s head, the wound at the back of the president’s was definitely an exit wound. Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

No bullet entered the front it entered from above and behind and it is common for such sounds to burst in a violent manner.

You are simply wrong and the evidence proves it

The back of his head blew off which indicates an exit wound. Nothing will ever change that. If it was common then you could some evidence, but you can't because it's not common and did not happen to jfk.

https://www.causes.com/causes/308048...ut-in-the-back

SAMUEL A. KINNEY was the driver of the follow-up car on 11/22/63.

it was the right rear part of his head...because
that's the part I saw blow out. I saw hair come out, the piece blow out,
then the skin went back in- an explosion in and out". Elaborating
further, Sam said, after telling him that that's where the Parkland
doctors saw the wound, "I would say that, too...it involved half his
head".

The gaping wound indicates a gaping wo

Wrong

The skull typically bursts open regardless of entry point.

The facts add kicking your azz as always

You falsely claimed that a bullet could enter and explode at the same time and provided no evidence because it's false. The bullet that hit jfk in the right forehead exited and blew out the rear of his skull.

“I heard the shot. The third shot,” he wrote. “The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting something hollow – like the sound of a melon shattering onto the cement. In the same instant, blood, brain matter, and bone fragments exploded from the back of the president’s head. The president’s blood, parts of his skull, bits of his brain were splattered all over me – on my face, my clothes, in my hair.”

For Hill to have seen brain matter explode out of JFK’s head, the wound at the back of the president’s was definitely an exit wound. Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

No bullet entered the front it entered from above and behind and it is common for such sounds to burst in a violent manner.

You are simply wrong and the evidence proves it

The back of his head blew off which indicates an exit wound. Nothing will ever change that. If it was common then you could offer some evidence, but you can't because it's not common and did not happen to jfk.

https://www.causes.com/causes/308048...ut-in-the-back

SAMUEL A. KINNEY was the driver of the follow-up car on 11/22/63.

it was the right rear part of his head...because
that's the part I saw blow out. I saw hair come out, the piece blow out,
then the skin went back in- an explosion in and out". Elaborating
further, Sam said, after telling him that that's where the Parkland
doctors saw the wound, "I would say that, too...it involved half his
head".

Indications do not PROVE anything.

The evidence which was examined by the doctors at the autopsy PROVES that the bullet entered from above and behind.

No evidence supports your claim.

Yes JFK was shot by Oswald who was above and behind him.

That is fact you have failed miserably top refute

The back of the head being blown off is an exit wound and nothing else. That simple fact excludes your delusions of an entry in the rear.

The back of his head blew off which indicates an exit wound. Nothing will ever change that. If it was common then you could offer some evidence, but you can't because it's not common and did not happen to jfk.

https://www.causes.com/causes/308048...ut-in-the-back

SAMUEL A. KINNEY was the driver of the follow-up car on 11/22/63.

it was the right rear part of his head...because
that's the part I saw blow out. I saw hair come out, the piece blow out,
then the skin went back in- an explosion in and out". Elaborating
further, Sam said, after telling him that that's where the Parkland
doctors saw the wound, "I would say that, too...it involved half his
head".

What you claim about head wounds is not a fact it is only your claim and assertion which the evidence proves false

 

[Soupnazi630]

No witness saw a gun fired at Kennedy or even saw one in his limo..

No one is seen holding a gun in any of the films

The driver was seen a with a handgun and shooting back at toward jfk.

Hugh Betzner debunks your simple stupidity. He saw both guns.

JFK: Eyewitness statements, assassination of President John F. Kennedy, murder of J. D. Tippit and arrest of Lee Harvey Oswald: Hugh William Betzner

I saw what looked like a firecracker going off in the president's car. My assumption for this was because I saw fragments going up in the air. I also saw a man in either the President's car or the car behind his and someone down in one of those cars pulled out what looked like a rifle.

I also remember seeing what looked like a nickel revolver in someone's hand in the President's car or somewhere immediately around his car. Then the President's car sped on under the underpass.

He did not say he saw it in the drivers hand nor was he sure where it was.

The evidence proves no one in the presidential limo drew a gun.

It was in his hand. It wasn't in anyone else's hand.

No one saw it in his hand and it was not in hid hand.

Every film of the assassination shows he never held a gun

They did and Greer shot jfk.

No they did not and greer shot no one as the evidence proves.

 

[7forever]

The driver was seen a with a handgun and shooting back at toward jfk.

Hugh Betzner debunks your simple stupidity. He saw both guns.

JFK: Eyewitness statements, assassination of President John F. Kennedy, murder of J. D. Tippit and arrest of Lee Harvey Oswald: Hugh William Betzner

I saw what looked like a firecracker going off in the president's car. My assumption for this was because I saw fragments going up in the air. I also saw a man in either the President's car or the car behind his and someone down in one of those cars pulled out what looked like a rifle.

I also remember seeing what looked like a nickel revolver in someone's hand in the President's car or somewhere immediately around his car. Then the President's car sped on under the underpass.

He did not say he saw it in the drivers hand nor was he sure where it was.

The evidence proves no one in the presidential limo drew a gun.

It was in his hand. It wasn't in anyone else's hand.

No one saw it in his hand and it was not in hid hand.

Every film of the assassination shows he never held a gun

They did and Greer shot jfk.

No they did not and greer shot no one as the evidence proves.

The driver was seen a with a handgun and shooting back at toward jfk.

Hugh Betzner debunks your simple stupidity. He saw both guns.

JFK: Eyewitness statements, assassination of President John F. Kennedy, murder of J. D. Tippit and arrest of Lee Harvey Oswald: Hugh William Betzner

I saw what looked like a firecracker going off in the president's car. My assumption for this was because I saw fragments going up in the air. I also saw a man in either the President's car or the car behind his and someone down in one of those cars pulled out what looked like a rifle.

I also remember seeing what looked like a nickel revolver in someone's hand in the President's car or somewhere immediately around his car. Then the President's car sped on under the underpass.

 

[Soupnazi630]

He did not say he saw it in the drivers hand nor was he sure where it was.

The evidence proves no one in the presidential limo drew a gun.

It was in his hand. It wasn't in anyone else's hand.

No one saw it in his hand and it was not in hid hand.

Every film of the assassination shows he never held a gun

They did and Greer shot jfk.

No they did not and greer shot no one as the evidence proves.

The driver was seen a with a handgun and shooting back at toward jfk.

Hugh Betzner debunks your simple stupidity. He saw both guns.

JFK: Eyewitness statements, assassination of President John F. Kennedy, murder of J. D. Tippit and arrest of Lee Harvey Oswald: Hugh William Betzner

I saw what looked like a firecracker going off in the president's car. My assumption for this was because I saw fragments going up in the air. I also saw a man in either the President's car or the car behind his and someone down in one of those cars pulled out what looked like a rifle.

I also remember seeing what looked like a nickel revolver in someone's hand in the President's car or somewhere immediately around his car. Then the President's car sped on under the underpass.

Nothing in those excerpts says " the driver " and nothing says " shooting ".

You are lying about what Betzner said.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong

The skull typically bursts open regardless of entry point.

The facts add kicking your azz as always

You falsely claimed that a bullet could enter and explode at the same time and provided no evidence because it's false. The bullet that hit jfk in the right forehead exited and blew out the rear of his skull.

“I heard the shot. The third shot,” he wrote. “The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting something hollow – like the sound of a melon shattering onto the cement. In the same instant, blood, brain matter, and bone fragments exploded from the back of the president’s head. The president’s blood, parts of his skull, bits of his brain were splattered all over me – on my face, my clothes, in my hair.”

For Hill to have seen brain matter explode out of JFK’s head, the wound at the back of the president’s was definitely an exit wound. Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

No bullet entered the front it entered from above and behind and it is common for such sounds to burst in a violent manner.

You are simply wrong and the evidence proves it

The back of his head blew off which indicates an exit wound. Nothing will ever change that. If it was common then you could some evidence, but you can't because it's not common and did not happen to jfk.

https://www.causes.com/causes/308048...ut-in-the-back

SAMUEL A. KINNEY was the driver of the follow-up car on 11/22/63.

it was the right rear part of his head...because
that's the part I saw blow out. I saw hair come out, the piece blow out,
then the skin went back in- an explosion in and out". Elaborating
further, Sam said, after telling him that that's where the Parkland
doctors saw the wound, "I would say that, too...it involved half his
head".

The gaping wound indicates a gaping wo

Wrong

The skull typically bursts open regardless of entry point.

The facts add kicking your azz as always

You falsely claimed that a bullet could enter and explode at the same time and provided no evidence because it's false. The bullet that hit jfk in the right forehead exited and blew out the rear of his skull.

“I heard the shot. The third shot,” he wrote. “The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting something hollow – like the sound of a melon shattering onto the cement. In the same instant, blood, brain matter, and bone fragments exploded from the back of the president’s head. The president’s blood, parts of his skull, bits of his brain were splattered all over me – on my face, my clothes, in my hair.”

For Hill to have seen brain matter explode out of JFK’s head, the wound at the back of the president’s was definitely an exit wound. Rare Zapruder footage: Multiple JFK assassins

No bullet entered the front it entered from above and behind and it is common for such sounds to burst in a violent manner.

You are simply wrong and the evidence proves it

The back of his head blew off which indicates an exit wound. Nothing will ever change that. If it was common then you could offer some evidence, but you can't because it's not common and did not happen to jfk.

https://www.causes.com/causes/308048...ut-in-the-back

SAMUEL A. KINNEY was the driver of the follow-up car on 11/22/63.

it was the right rear part of his head...because
that's the part I saw blow out. I saw hair come out, the piece blow out,
then the skin went back in- an explosion in and out". Elaborating
further, Sam said, after telling him that that's where the Parkland
doctors saw the wound, "I would say that, too...it involved half his
head".

Indications do not PROVE anything.

The evidence which was examined by the doctors at the autopsy PROVES that the bullet entered from above and behind.

No evidence supports your claim.

Yes JFK was shot by Oswald who was above and behind him.

That is fact you have failed miserably top refute

The back of the head being blown off is an exit wound and nothing else. That simple fact excludes your delusions of an entry in the rear.

The back of his head blew off which indicates an exit wound. Nothing will ever change that. If it was common then you could offer some evidence, but you can't because it's not common and did not happen to jfk.

https://www.causes.com/causes/308048...ut-in-the-back

SAMUEL A. KINNEY was the driver of the follow-up car on 11/22/63.

it was the right rear part of his head...because
that's the part I saw blow out. I saw hair come out, the piece blow out,
then the skin went back in- an explosion in and out". Elaborating
further, Sam said, after telling him that that's where the Parkland
doctors saw the wound, "I would say that, too...it involved half his
head".

The evidence which was examined by the doctors at the autopsy documented a right rear blow out.

No evidence supports an entry wound in that area of the skull.

Yes JFK was shot from the front.

That is fact you have failed miserably to even challenge.

They proved the opposite of what you claim and the AR clearly states that fact.

Yes the AR documented evidence that the bullet entered from above and behind.

There was no entry wound in the front.

Those are facts which you have failed miserably to refute

 

[Soupnazi630]

No bullet entered the front it entered from above and behind and it is common for such sounds to burst in a violent manner.

You are simply wrong and the evidence proves it

The back of his head blew off which indicates an exit wound. Nothing will ever change that. If it was common then you could some evidence, but you can't because it's not common and did not happen to jfk.

https://www.causes.com/causes/308048...ut-in-the-back

SAMUEL A. KINNEY was the driver of the follow-up car on 11/22/63.

it was the right rear part of his head...because
that's the part I saw blow out. I saw hair come out, the piece blow out,
then the skin went back in- an explosion in and out". Elaborating
further, Sam said, after telling him that that's where the Parkland
doctors saw the wound, "I would say that, too...it involved half his
head".

The gaping wound indicates a gaping wo

No bullet entered the front it entered from above and behind and it is common for such sounds to burst in a violent manner.

You are simply wrong and the evidence proves it

The back of his head blew off which indicates an exit wound. Nothing will ever change that. If it was common then you could offer some evidence, but you can't because it's not common and did not happen to jfk.

https://www.causes.com/causes/308048...ut-in-the-back

SAMUEL A. KINNEY was the driver of the follow-up car on 11/22/63.

it was the right rear part of his head...because
that's the part I saw blow out. I saw hair come out, the piece blow out,
then the skin went back in- an explosion in and out". Elaborating
further, Sam said, after telling him that that's where the Parkland
doctors saw the wound, "I would say that, too...it involved half his
head".

Indications do not PROVE anything.

The evidence which was examined by the doctors at the autopsy PROVES that the bullet entered from above and behind.

No evidence supports your claim.

Yes JFK was shot by Oswald who was above and behind him.

That is fact you have failed miserably top refute

The back of the head being blown off is an exit wound and nothing else. That simple fact excludes your delusions of an entry in the rear.

The back of his head blew off which indicates an exit wound. Nothing will ever change that. If it was common then you could offer some evidence, but you can't because it's not common and did not happen to jfk.

https://www.causes.com/causes/308048...ut-in-the-back

SAMUEL A. KINNEY was the driver of the follow-up car on 11/22/63.

it was the right rear part of his head...because
that's the part I saw blow out. I saw hair come out, the piece blow out,
then the skin went back in- an explosion in and out". Elaborating
further, Sam said, after telling him that that's where the Parkland
doctors saw the wound, "I would say that, too...it involved half his
head".

What you claim about head wounds is not a fact it is only your claim and assertion which the evidence proves false

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear. That's not what you're really saying, is it? Frame 313 clearly shows the hole In the rear.

Yes it could

 

[7forever]

It was in his hand. It wasn't in anyone else's hand.

No one saw it in his hand and it was not in hid hand.

Every film of the assassination shows he never held a gun

They did and Greer shot jfk.

No they did not and greer shot no one as the evidence proves.

The driver was seen a with a handgun and shooting back at toward jfk.

Hugh Betzner debunks your simple stupidity. He saw both guns.

JFK: Eyewitness statements, assassination of President John F. Kennedy, murder of J. D. Tippit and arrest of Lee Harvey Oswald: Hugh William Betzner

I saw what looked like a firecracker going off in the president's car. My assumption for this was because I saw fragments going up in the air. I also saw a man in either the President's car or the car behind his and someone down in one of those cars pulled out what looked like a rifle.

I also remember seeing what looked like a nickel revolver in someone's hand in the President's car or somewhere immediately around his car. Then the President's car sped on under the underpass.

Nothing in those excerpts says " the driver " and nothing says " shooting ".

You are lying about what Betzner said.

You are lying about what Betzner saw. LOL

I also remember seeing what looked like a nickel revolver in someone's hand in the President's car or somewhere immediately around his car. Then the President's car sped on under the underpass.

 

[Soupnazi630]

No one saw it in his hand and it was not in hid hand.

Every film of the assassination shows he never held a gun

They did and Greer shot jfk.

No they did not and greer shot no one as the evidence proves.

The driver was seen a with a handgun and shooting back at toward jfk.

Hugh Betzner debunks your simple stupidity. He saw both guns.

JFK: Eyewitness statements, assassination of President John F. Kennedy, murder of J. D. Tippit and arrest of Lee Harvey Oswald: Hugh William Betzner

I saw what looked like a firecracker going off in the president's car. My assumption for this was because I saw fragments going up in the air. I also saw a man in either the President's car or the car behind his and someone down in one of those cars pulled out what looked like a rifle.

I also remember seeing what looked like a nickel revolver in someone's hand in the President's car or somewhere immediately around his car. Then the President's car sped on under the underpass.

Nothing in those excerpts says " the driver " and nothing says " shooting ".

You are lying about what Betzner said.

You are lying about what Betzner saw. LOL

I also remember seeing what looked like a nickel revolver in someone's hand in the President's car or somewhere immediately around his car. Then the President's car sped on under the underpass.

It is you who has been lying.

The word " someone " in his statement is not specific.

You claim he said he saw " the driver " sorry but his own words prove it is you lying

 

[Soupnazi630]

The gaping wound indicates a gaping wo
Indications do not PROVE anything.

The evidence which was examined by the doctors at the autopsy PROVES that the bullet entered from above and behind.

No evidence supports your claim.

Yes JFK was shot by Oswald who was above and behind him.

That is fact you have failed miserably top refute

The back of the head being blown off is an exit wound and nothing else. That simple fact excludes your delusions of an entry in the rear.

The back of his head blew off which indicates an exit wound. Nothing will ever change that. If it was common then you could offer some evidence, but you can't because it's not common and did not happen to jfk.

https://www.causes.com/causes/308048...ut-in-the-back

SAMUEL A. KINNEY was the driver of the follow-up car on 11/22/63.

it was the right rear part of his head...because
that's the part I saw blow out. I saw hair come out, the piece blow out,
then the skin went back in- an explosion in and out". Elaborating
further, Sam said, after telling him that that's where the Parkland
doctors saw the wound, "I would say that, too...it involved half his
head".

What you claim about head wounds is not a fact it is only your claim and assertion which the evidence proves false

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear. That's not what you're really saying, is it? Frame 313 clearly shows the hole In the rear.

Yes it could

No one ever argued that, you kook.LOL Frame 313 shows the rear hole and indicates a right front exit that was faked.

It indicates no such thing and no one ever faked any such thing

 

[Soupnazi630]

I never made any such claim at all I clearly stated he never said he saw a gun in the drivers hand and was not sure WHERE he saw a gun.

You are now lying about what I said and about what he said

 

[Soupnazi630]

What you claim about head wounds is not a fact it is only your claim and assertion which the evidence proves false

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear. That's not what you're really saying, is it? Frame 313 clearly shows the hole In the rear.

Yes it could

No one ever argued that, you kook.LOL Frame 313 shows the rear hole and indicates a right front exit that was faked.

It indicates no such thing and no one ever faked any such thing

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there. You are crazy.LOL

No there is not an exit wound there. You are not an expert pathologist and the expert pathologists who performed the autopsy prove you wrong

 

[Soupnazi630]

What you claim about head wounds is not a fact it is only your claim and assertion which the evidence proves false

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear. That's not what you're really saying, is it? Frame 313 clearly shows the hole In the rear.

Yes it could

No one ever argued that, you kook.LOL Frame 313 shows the rear hole and indicates a right front exit that was faked.

It indicates no such thing and no one ever faked any such thing

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there. You are crazy.LOL

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear. That's not what you're really saying, is it? Frame 313 clearly shows the hole In the rear.

Yes head wounds typically burst and leave irregular messes regardless of where the bullet enters.

 

[7forever]

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear. That's not what you're really saying, is it? Frame 313 clearly shows the hole In the rear.

Yes it could

No one ever argued that, you kook.LOL Frame 313 shows the rear hole and indicates a right front exit that was faked.

It indicates no such thing and no one ever faked any such thing

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there. You are crazy.LOL

No there is not an exit wound there. You are not an expert pathologist and the expert pathologists who performed the autopsy prove you wrong

The AR said the right rear was blown out. Why are lying about your own evidence? LOL

 

[7forever]

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear. That's not what you're really saying, is it? Frame 313 clearly shows the hole In the rear.

Yes it could

No one ever argued that, you kook.LOL Frame 313 shows the rear hole and indicates a right front exit that was faked.

It indicates no such thing and no one ever faked any such thing

There's an exit wound on the right rear and you can't prove one entered there. You are crazy.LOL

A bullet could not enter the rear and blow out the rear. That's not what you're really saying, is it? Frame 313 clearly shows the hole In the rear.

Yes head wounds typically burst and leave irregular messes regardless of where the bullet enters.

You have no evidence of that, you kook. It bursts at the exit point. In this case, the right rear.