The John Kennedy assassination ..who's who on the Grassy Knoll

[7forever]

The Zfilm shows the President being shot in the forehead and the back of the head literally popping off. This visual fact is corroborated by multiple eyewitnesses. I've included three, two of which were SS agents in the follow-up car. Nobody has or will ever honestly make a case for one bullet entering the rear and creating a large exit in the rear.

As 50th Anniversary Of Assassination Approaches, Surgeon Who Treated JFK Remembers « CBS Philly

Two other doctors were already treating Kennedy, Dr. Perry and Dr. Jenkins, and they ordered Dr. McClelland to hold the patient’s head.
So, he stood, holding the bleeding, injured head of the President of the United States. The wound was huge, gaping.

“My first reaction was, ‘My God, have you seen the back of the President’s head?’” McClelland says. They hadn’t.

In hindsight, Dr. McClelland says that he always believed the wound at the back of President Kennedy’s head was the exit wound. But it wasn’t until years later, when he saw the famous Abraham Zapruder video on television, that the doctor became convinced of it.

“That firmed up my thought that it was the exit wound,” he says, pointing to the backwards motion of the President’s body after he was shot, as well as the size of the hole in the back of JFK’s skull, as proof he was shot from the front.

He is, however, sure of some things: "There were at least two shooters (“absolutely”) and the assassination was likely a conspiracy involving government “elements.”

The zapruder film shows no such thing.

The bullet is not visible in the film and no entrance or exit wound is captured by the film.

The physical evidence and autopsy both prove that the bullet entered from above and behind. The eyewitnesses do not refute that fact.

The doctors at parkland were treating a patient as opposed to performing an autopsy. Their casual observations are not evidence against the conclusion of the autopsy.

You still have nothing

The zapruder film shows a massive hole at the rear.

The bullet is not really visible in the film and only a real exit wound is captured by the film in the right rear. The right front blob was faked.

The physical evidence and autopsy both prove that a massive exit hole was in the right rear. The eyewitnesses confirm this fact.

The doctors at parkland were treating a patient as opposed to performing an autopsy. Their observations are definite evidence against the conclusion of any rear skull entry.

You still are a delusional jackass.

A massive hole is a massive hole the film does not shot an entrance or exit wound as you claimed.

A wound is captured in the film and it is not an exit wound nor can exit or entrance wounds be judged by films.

There is no evidence what so ever that any part of it was faked.

A massive hole does not prove an entrance or exit wound and once again you are wrong.

The observations of doctors performing emergency procedures are not definitive evidence against the autopsy whatsoever.

You are crushed and beaten as always

A massive hole in the film does show an exit wound as most of the evidence confirms.

An exit wound is captured in the film and is in the right rear.

The red blob was faked because no exit wound was there.

A massive hole does prove an exit wound and once again the AR was right.

The observations of doctors performing emergency procedures is definitive evidence against the autopsy concluding a low entrance to the skull.

You are crushed and mocked as always.

A massive hole is a massive hole and does not prove exit or entrance poi9nt that is fact.

No evidence proves it is an exit wound as all of your posts shows.

You have totally failed to produce a speck of evidence to support this idiotic idea.

There is no exit wound captured on film only a wound no matter how much you scream otherwise.

There is no evidence of anything being faked.

The AR was correct and proves that the bullet entered from above and behind.

Casual observations are not evidence against a professional autopsy.

You are beaten as always.

A massive hole is proof of nothing other than an exit wound and you can't provide anything to suggest otherwise.

No evidence proves that a small hole was in the rear. Just a massive hole.

You have totally failed to produce a speck of evidence to support the idiotic idea that a bullet entered the rear and blew out the rear.

There was an exit wound captured on film and no entrance can be proven from the AR no matter how badly you want it there.

If the red blob in the right front was not fake then what was it?

The AR was correct and proves that a large exit was at the rear.

Only a schmuck of your ilk would continue to lie in the face of reality. The back of his head was blasted off and that was an exit wound. Nothing could possibly change that well known fact.

3) Dr. Robert Nelson McClelland, Attending Surgeon:

a) WR 526-527 / 17 H 11-12 / CE 392: report written 11/22/63---" a
massive gunshot wound of the head with a fragment wound of the
trachea The cause of death was due to massive head and brain injury from
a gunshot wound of the left temple.";
b) "St. Louis Post-Dispatch", 12/1/63---"This [the neck wound] did
appear to be an entrance wound."
c)e) 6 H 33-34, 35, 37 / testimony---" I could very closely examine the
head wound, and I noted that the right posterior portion of the skull
had been extremely blasted probably a third or so, at least, of the
brain tissue, posterior cerebral tissue and some of the cerebellar
tissue had been blasted out "; " there was definitely a piece of
cerebellum that extruded from the wound "; " the loss of cerebral and
cerebellar tissues were so great massive head injuries with loss of
large amounts of cerebral and cerebellar tissues "; "The initial
impression that we had was that perhaps the wound in the neck, the
anterior part of the neck, was an entrance wound and that it had perhaps
taken a trajectory off the anterior vertebral body and again into the
skull itself, exiting out the back, to produce the massive injury in the
head.";

 

[Soupnazi630]

The zapruder film shows no such thing.

The bullet is not visible in the film and no entrance or exit wound is captured by the film.

The physical evidence and autopsy both prove that the bullet entered from above and behind. The eyewitnesses do not refute that fact.

The doctors at parkland were treating a patient as opposed to performing an autopsy. Their casual observations are not evidence against the conclusion of the autopsy.

You still have nothing

The zapruder film shows a massive hole at the rear.

The bullet is not really visible in the film and only a real exit wound is captured by the film in the right rear. The right front blob was faked.

The physical evidence and autopsy both prove that a massive exit hole was in the right rear. The eyewitnesses confirm this fact.

The doctors at parkland were treating a patient as opposed to performing an autopsy. Their observations are definite evidence against the conclusion of any rear skull entry.

You still are a delusional jackass.

A massive hole is a massive hole the film does not shot an entrance or exit wound as you claimed.

A wound is captured in the film and it is not an exit wound nor can exit or entrance wounds be judged by films.

There is no evidence what so ever that any part of it was faked.

A massive hole does not prove an entrance or exit wound and once again you are wrong.

The observations of doctors performing emergency procedures are not definitive evidence against the autopsy whatsoever.

You are crushed and beaten as always

A massive hole in the film does show an exit wound as most of the evidence confirms.

An exit wound is captured in the film and is in the right rear.

The red blob was faked because no exit wound was there.

A massive hole does prove an exit wound and once again the AR was right.

The observations of doctors performing emergency procedures is definitive evidence against the autopsy concluding a low entrance to the skull.

You are crushed and mocked as always.

A massive hole is a massive hole and does not prove exit or entrance poi9nt that is fact.

No evidence proves it is an exit wound as all of your posts shows.

You have totally failed to produce a speck of evidence to support this idiotic idea.

There is no exit wound captured on film only a wound no matter how much you scream otherwise.

There is no evidence of anything being faked.

The AR was correct and proves that the bullet entered from above and behind.

Casual observations are not evidence against a professional autopsy.

You are beaten as always.

A massive hole is proof of nothing other than an exit wound and you can't provide anything to suggest otherwise.

No evidence proves that a small hole was in the rear. Just a massive hole.

You have totally failed to produce a speck of evidence to support the idiotic idea that a bullet entered the rear and blew out the rear.

There was an exit wound captured on film and no entrance can be proven from the AR no matter how badly you want it there.

If the red blob in the right front was not fake then what was it?

The AR was correct and proves that a large exit was at the rear.

Only a schmuck of your ilk would continue to lie in the face of reality. The back of his head was blasted off and that was an exit wound. Nothing could possibly change that well known fact.

3) Dr. Robert Nelson McClelland, Attending Surgeon:

a) WR 526-527 / 17 H 11-12 / CE 392: report written 11/22/63---" a
massive gunshot wound of the head with a fragment wound of the
trachea The cause of death was due to massive head and brain injury from
a gunshot wound of the left temple.";
b) "St. Louis Post-Dispatch", 12/1/63---"This [the neck wound] did
appear to be an entrance wound."
c)e) 6 H 33-34, 35, 37 / testimony---" I could very closely examine the
head wound, and I noted that the right posterior portion of the skull
had been extremely blasted probably a third or so, at least, of the
brain tissue, posterior cerebral tissue and some of the cerebellar
tissue had been blasted out "; " there was definitely a piece of
cerebellum that extruded from the wound "; " the loss of cerebral and
cerebellar tissues were so great massive head injuries with loss of
large amounts of cerebral and cerebellar tissues "; "The initial
impression that we had was that perhaps the wound in the neck, the
anterior part of the neck, was an entrance wound and that it had perhaps
taken a trajectory off the anterior vertebral body and again into the
skull itself, exiting out the back, to produce the massive injury in the
head.";

A massive hole does not prove an exit wound and that is fact no matter how much you wish otherwise.

You have never ordered any proof that a uthing was faked.

The evidence proves that the bullet entered from above and behind.

The only fool here is you who Cries and whines because the evidence proves you are a fool.

You are beaten ahain

 

[skye]

 

[Soupnazi630]

Too bad the evidence proves Oswald acted alone

 

[7forever]

The Zfilm shows the President being shot in the forehead and the back of the head literally popping off. This visual fact is corroborated by multiple eyewitnesses. I've included three, two of which were SS agents in the follow-up car. Nobody has or will ever honestly make a case for one bullet entering the rear and creating a large exit in the rear.

As 50th Anniversary Of Assassination Approaches, Surgeon Who Treated JFK Remembers « CBS Philly

Two other doctors were already treating Kennedy, Dr. Perry and Dr. Jenkins, and they ordered Dr. McClelland to hold the patient’s head.
So, he stood, holding the bleeding, injured head of the President of the United States. The wound was huge, gaping.

“My first reaction was, ‘My God, have you seen the back of the President’s head?’” McClelland says. They hadn’t.

In hindsight, Dr. McClelland says that he always believed the wound at the back of President Kennedy’s head was the exit wound. But it wasn’t until years later, when he saw the famous Abraham Zapruder video on television, that the doctor became convinced of it.

“That firmed up my thought that it was the exit wound,” he says, pointing to the backwards motion of the President’s body after he was shot, as well as the size of the hole in the back of JFK’s skull, as proof he was shot from the front.

He is, however, sure of some things: "There were at least two shooters (“absolutely”) and the assassination was likely a conspiracy involving government “elements.”

WTF??

How can the "Zfilm" show the president getting shot in the forehead when you claim those frames were "faked"?

Do you think before you post?

How can the "Zfilm" show the president getting shot in the forehead when you claim those frames were "faked"?

Because the back of the head blown off in Zapruder is corroborated by 40 eyewitnesses, and the AR. The most logical reason for the red blob addition was to cover up the bullet's entry. We know there wasn't a large wound in the right front because the AR excludes it, and no witness reported anything missing there. The film was altered, but not enough to keep the truth from being realized. FRAME 327 provides a fake loss of skull and brain in the right front.

Now you're claiming it proves he was shot in the forehead.

Dr. Crenshaw told it exactly like it was. It entered his head through the front and blew out the rear.

V. Palamara Medical Reference book excerpt

9) Dr. Charles A. Crenshaw, Resident Surgeon:
a) "Conspiracy of Silence" (1992), p. 86 (and throughout [inc. photos of
himself])---"I walked to the President's head to get a closer look. His
entire right cerebral hemisphere appeared to be gone. It looked like a
crater---an empty cavity From the damage I saw, there was no doubt in my
mind that the bullet had entered his head through the front, and as it
surgically passed through his cranium, the missile obliterated part of
the temporal and all the parietal and occipital lobes before it
lacerated the cerebellum."; [p. 79] "I also identified a small opening
about the diameter of a pencil at the midline of his throat to be an
entry bullet hole. There was no doubt in my mind about that wound.";
b) "High Treason 2", pp. 110-115 and 549 (interviews of 7/12/80 [90?]
and 9/21/91)---" it was in the parietal-occipital area"; thinks the
body was tampered with at Bethesda;
c) WC references to his presence on 11/22/63: 6 H 40 (Baxter), 6 H 31-32
(McClelland), 6 H 80-81 (Salyer), 6 H 141 (Henchcliffe), 6 H 60
(Curtis)+15 H 761: index;
d) Completely overlooked WC reference to his presence on 11/24/63: 21 H
265(report by Parkland Administrator Charles Price)---"Dr. Charles
Crenshaw was in the corridor and said they had been alerted. He said,
'You're not going to put him [Oswald] in the same room the President was
in, are you?' told him I surely was glad he had thought of it and by
all means, not to.";

 

[Soupnazi630]

The Zfilm shows the President being shot in the forehead and the back of the head literally popping off. This visual fact is corroborated by multiple eyewitnesses. I've included three, two of which were SS agents in the follow-up car. Nobody has or will ever honestly make a case for one bullet entering the rear and creating a large exit in the rear.

As 50th Anniversary Of Assassination Approaches, Surgeon Who Treated JFK Remembers « CBS Philly

Two other doctors were already treating Kennedy, Dr. Perry and Dr. Jenkins, and they ordered Dr. McClelland to hold the patient’s head.
So, he stood, holding the bleeding, injured head of the President of the United States. The wound was huge, gaping.

“My first reaction was, ‘My God, have you seen the back of the President’s head?’” McClelland says. They hadn’t.

In hindsight, Dr. McClelland says that he always believed the wound at the back of President Kennedy’s head was the exit wound. But it wasn’t until years later, when he saw the famous Abraham Zapruder video on television, that the doctor became convinced of it.

“That firmed up my thought that it was the exit wound,” he says, pointing to the backwards motion of the President’s body after he was shot, as well as the size of the hole in the back of JFK’s skull, as proof he was shot from the front.

He is, however, sure of some things: "There were at least two shooters (“absolutely”) and the assassination was likely a conspiracy involving government “elements.”

WTF??

How can the "Zfilm" show the president getting shot in the forehead when you claim those frames were "faked"?

Do you think before you post?

How can the "Zfilm" show the president getting shot in the forehead when you claim those frames were "faked"?

Because the back of the head blown off in Zapruder is corroborated by 40 eyewitnesses, and the AR. The most logical reason for the red blob addition was to cover up the bullet's entry. We know there wasn't a large wound in the right front because the AR excludes it, and no witness reported anything missing there. The film was altered, but not enough to keep the truth from being realized. FRAME 327 provides a fake loss of skull and brain in the right front.

Now you're claiming it proves he was shot in the forehead.

Dr. Crenshaw told it exactly like it was. It entered his head through the front and blew out the rear.

V. Palamara Medical Reference book excerpt

9) Dr. Charles A. Crenshaw, Resident Surgeon:
a) "Conspiracy of Silence" (1992), p. 86 (and throughout [inc. photos of
himself])---"I walked to the President's head to get a closer look. His
entire right cerebral hemisphere appeared to be gone. It looked like a
crater---an empty cavity From the damage I saw, there was no doubt in my
mind that the bullet had entered his head through the front, and as it
surgically passed through his cranium, the missile obliterated part of
the temporal and all the parietal and occipital lobes before it
lacerated the cerebellum."; [p. 79] "I also identified a small opening
about the diameter of a pencil at the midline of his throat to be an
entry bullet hole. There was no doubt in my mind about that wound.";
b) "High Treason 2", pp. 110-115 and 549 (interviews of 7/12/80 [90?]
and 9/21/91)---" it was in the parietal-occipital area"; thinks the
body was tampered with at Bethesda;
c) WC references to his presence on 11/22/63: 6 H 40 (Baxter), 6 H 31-32
(McClelland), 6 H 80-81 (Salyer), 6 H 141 (Henchcliffe), 6 H 60
(Curtis)+15 H 761: index;
d) Completely overlooked WC reference to his presence on 11/24/63: 21 H
265(report by Parkland Administrator Charles Price)---"Dr. Charles
Crenshaw was in the corridor and said they had been alerted. He said,
'You're not going to put him [Oswald] in the same room the President was
in, are you?' told him I surely was glad he had thought of it and by
all means, not to.";

He did not tell it like it is he stated opinion and that's all.

The evidence proves that bullet entered Kennedy's head from above and behind

 

[7forever]

The Zfilm shows the President being shot in the forehead and the back of the head literally popping off. This visual fact is corroborated by multiple eyewitnesses. I've included three, two of which were SS agents in the follow-up car. Nobody has or will ever honestly make a case for one bullet entering the rear and creating a large exit in the rear.

As 50th Anniversary Of Assassination Approaches, Surgeon Who Treated JFK Remembers « CBS Philly

Two other doctors were already treating Kennedy, Dr. Perry and Dr. Jenkins, and they ordered Dr. McClelland to hold the patient’s head.
So, he stood, holding the bleeding, injured head of the President of the United States. The wound was huge, gaping.

“My first reaction was, ‘My God, have you seen the back of the President’s head?’” McClelland says. They hadn’t.

In hindsight, Dr. McClelland says that he always believed the wound at the back of President Kennedy’s head was the exit wound. But it wasn’t until years later, when he saw the famous Abraham Zapruder video on television, that the doctor became convinced of it.

“That firmed up my thought that it was the exit wound,” he says, pointing to the backwards motion of the President’s body after he was shot, as well as the size of the hole in the back of JFK’s skull, as proof he was shot from the front.

He is, however, sure of some things: "There were at least two shooters (“absolutely”) and the assassination was likely a conspiracy involving government “elements.”

WTF??

How can the "Zfilm" show the president getting shot in the forehead when you claim those frames were "faked"?

Do you think before you post?

How can the "Zfilm" show the president getting shot in the forehead when you claim those frames were "faked"?

Because the back of the head blown off in Zapruder is corroborated by 40 eyewitnesses, and the AR. The most logical reason for the red blob addition was to cover up the bullet's entry. We know there wasn't a large wound in the right front because the AR excludes it, and no witness reported anything missing there. The film was altered, but not enough to keep the truth from being realized. FRAME 327 provides a fake loss of skull and brain in the right front.

Now you're claiming it proves he was shot in the forehead.

Dr. Crenshaw told it exactly like it was. It entered his head through the front and blew out the rear.

V. Palamara Medical Reference book excerpt

9) Dr. Charles A. Crenshaw, Resident Surgeon:
a) "Conspiracy of Silence" (1992), p. 86 (and throughout [inc. photos of
himself])---"I walked to the President's head to get a closer look. His
entire right cerebral hemisphere appeared to be gone. It looked like a
crater---an empty cavity From the damage I saw, there was no doubt in my
mind that the bullet had entered his head through the front, and as it
surgically passed through his cranium, the missile obliterated part of
the temporal and all the parietal and occipital lobes before it
lacerated the cerebellum."; [p. 79] "I also identified a small opening
about the diameter of a pencil at the midline of his throat to be an
entry bullet hole. There was no doubt in my mind about that wound.";
b) "High Treason 2", pp. 110-115 and 549 (interviews of 7/12/80 [90?]
and 9/21/91)---" it was in the parietal-occipital area"; thinks the
body was tampered with at Bethesda;
c) WC references to his presence on 11/22/63: 6 H 40 (Baxter), 6 H 31-32
(McClelland), 6 H 80-81 (Salyer), 6 H 141 (Henchcliffe), 6 H 60
(Curtis)+15 H 761: index;
d) Completely overlooked WC reference to his presence on 11/24/63: 21 H
265(report by Parkland Administrator Charles Price)---"Dr. Charles
Crenshaw was in the corridor and said they had been alerted. He said,
'You're not going to put him [Oswald] in the same room the President was
in, are you?' told him I surely was glad he had thought of it and by
all means, not to.";

He did not tell it like it is he stated opinion and that's all.

The evidence proves that bullet entered Kennedy's head from above and behind

He stated facts which you can't refute.

Dr. Crenshaw told it exactly like it was. It entered his head through the front and blew out the rear.

V. Palamara Medical Reference book excerpt

9) Dr. Charles A. Crenshaw, Resident Surgeon:
a) "Conspiracy of Silence" (1992), p. 86 (and throughout [inc. photos of
himself])---"I walked to the President's head to get a closer look. His
entire right cerebral hemisphere appeared to be gone. It looked like a
crater---an empty cavity From the damage I saw, there was no doubt in my
mind that the bullet had entered his head through the front, and as it
surgically passed through his cranium, the missile obliterated part of
the temporal and all the parietal and occipital lobes before it
lacerated the cerebellum."; [p. 79] "I also identified a small opening
about the diameter of a pencil at the midline of his throat to be an
entry bullet hole. There was no doubt in my mind about that wound.";
b) "High Treason 2", pp. 110-115 and 549 (interviews of 7/12/80 [90?]
and 9/21/91)---" it was in the parietal-occipital area"; thinks the
body was tampered with at Bethesda;
c) WC references to his presence on 11/22/63: 6 H 40 (Baxter), 6 H 31-32
(McClelland), 6 H 80-81 (Salyer), 6 H 141 (Henchcliffe), 6 H 60
(Curtis)+15 H 761: index;
d) Completely overlooked WC reference to his presence on 11/24/63: 21 H
265(report by Parkland Administrator Charles Price)---"Dr. Charles
Crenshaw was in the corridor and said they had been alerted. He said,
'You're not going to put him [Oswald] in the same room the President was
in, are you?' told him I surely was glad he had thought of it and by
all means, not to.";

 

[7forever]

Too bad the evidence proves Oswald acted alone

Oswald was a patsy. He achieved more in life than you ever will. At least he told the truth.

 

[Soupnazi630]

He stated opinion nothing more he did not state fact and that is a fact.

The evidence refutes it and also refutes every post you have ever made and that is also a fact.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Too bad the evidence proves Oswald acted alone

Oswald was a patsy. He achieved more in life than you ever will. At least he told the truth.

He was not a patsy as the evidence proves.

If you consider murder of the president an achievement then he's he did

 

[7forever]

Too bad the evidence proves Oswald acted alone

Oswald was a patsy. He achieved more in life than you ever will. At least he told the truth.

He was not a patsy as the evidence proves.

If you consider murder of the president an achievement then he's he did

He was stupid little joke like you. He shot no one and did nothing wrong. He told the truth. He was a patsy, nothing more.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The zapruder film shows no such thing.

The bullet is not visible in the film and no entrance or exit wound is captured by the film.

The physical evidence and autopsy both prove that the bullet entered from above and behind. The eyewitnesses do not refute that fact.

The doctors at parkland were treating a patient as opposed to performing an autopsy. Their casual observations are not evidence against the conclusion of the autopsy.

You still have nothing

The zapruder film shows a massive hole at the rear.

The bullet is not really visible in the film and only a real exit wound is captured by the film in the right rear. The right front blob was faked.

The physical evidence and autopsy both prove that a massive exit hole was in the right rear. The eyewitnesses confirm this fact.

The doctors at parkland were treating a patient as opposed to performing an autopsy. Their observations are definite evidence against the conclusion of any rear skull entry.

You still are a delusional jackass.

A massive hole is a massive hole the film does not shot an entrance or exit wound as you claimed.

A wound is captured in the film and it is not an exit wound nor can exit or entrance wounds be judged by films.

There is no evidence what so ever that any part of it was faked.

A massive hole does not prove an entrance or exit wound and once again you are wrong.

The observations of doctors performing emergency procedures are not definitive evidence against the autopsy whatsoever.

You are crushed and beaten as always

A massive hole in the film does show an exit wound as most of the evidence confirms.

An exit wound is captured in the film and is in the right rear.

The red blob was faked because no exit wound was there.

A massive hole does prove an exit wound and once again the AR was right.

The observations of doctors performing emergency procedures is definitive evidence against the autopsy concluding a low entrance to the skull.

You are crushed and mocked as always.

A massive hole is a massive hole and does not prove exit or entrance poi9nt that is fact.

No evidence proves it is an exit wound as all of your posts shows.

You have totally failed to produce a speck of evidence to support this idiotic idea.

There is no exit wound captured on film only a wound no matter how much you scream otherwise.

There is no evidence of anything being faked.

The AR was correct and proves that the bullet entered from above and behind.

Casual observations are not evidence against a professional autopsy.

You are beaten as always.

If the exit wound wasn't in the rear, then the rear would not have blown off, but it did. The exit wound was in the rear.

The exit wound was not the rear the bullet entered from above and behind and exited the side.

That is fact proven by evidence and the skull bursting open from such a wound does not refute the facts or dictate another scenario is

 

[Soupnazi630]

Too bad the evidence proves Oswald acted alone

Oswald was a patsy. He achieved more in life than you ever will. At least he told the truth.

He was not a patsy as the evidence proves.

If you consider murder of the president an achievement then he's he did

He was stupid little joke like you. He shot no one and did nothing wrong. He told the truth. He was a patsy, nothing more.

Wrong boy the evidence proves he shot Kennedy you lose every time

 

[Soupnazi630]

He stated opinion nothing more he did not state fact and that is a fact.

The evidence refutes it and also refutes every post you have ever made and that is also a fact.

He was there and saw the blow out in rear. The exit wound was in the rear.

The bullet entered from above and behind which the evidence proves and his opinion does not change that anymore than your retarded fantasies change it

 

[7forever]

He stated opinion nothing more he did not state fact and that is a fact.

The evidence refutes it and also refutes every post you have ever made and that is also a fact.

He was there and saw the blow out in rear. The exit wound was in the rear.

The bullet entered from above and behind which the evidence proves and his opinion does not change that anymore than your retarded fantasies change it

The bullet entered from the front which the evidence proves and your delusions do not change that anymore than your retarded fantasies.

 

[7forever]

The zapruder film shows a massive hole at the rear.

The bullet is not really visible in the film and only a real exit wound is captured by the film in the right rear. The right front blob was faked.

The physical evidence and autopsy both prove that a massive exit hole was in the right rear. The eyewitnesses confirm this fact.

The doctors at parkland were treating a patient as opposed to performing an autopsy. Their observations are definite evidence against the conclusion of any rear skull entry.

You still are a delusional jackass.

A massive hole is a massive hole the film does not shot an entrance or exit wound as you claimed.

A wound is captured in the film and it is not an exit wound nor can exit or entrance wounds be judged by films.

There is no evidence what so ever that any part of it was faked.

A massive hole does not prove an entrance or exit wound and once again you are wrong.

The observations of doctors performing emergency procedures are not definitive evidence against the autopsy whatsoever.

You are crushed and beaten as always

A massive hole in the film does show an exit wound as most of the evidence confirms.

An exit wound is captured in the film and is in the right rear.

The red blob was faked because no exit wound was there.

A massive hole does prove an exit wound and once again the AR was right.

The observations of doctors performing emergency procedures is definitive evidence against the autopsy concluding a low entrance to the skull.

You are crushed and mocked as always.

A massive hole is a massive hole and does not prove exit or entrance poi9nt that is fact.

No evidence proves it is an exit wound as all of your posts shows.

You have totally failed to produce a speck of evidence to support this idiotic idea.

There is no exit wound captured on film only a wound no matter how much you scream otherwise.

There is no evidence of anything being faked.

The AR was correct and proves that the bullet entered from above and behind.

Casual observations are not evidence against a professional autopsy.

You are beaten as always.

If the exit wound wasn't in the rear, then the rear would not have blown off, but it did. The exit wound was in the rear.

The exit wound was not the rear the bullet entered from above and behind and exited the side.

That is fact proven by evidence and the skull bursting open from such a wound does not refute the facts or dictate another scenario is

It exited the rear and that is proven by the AR alone. No need for any corroboration.

 

[7forever]

The zapruder film shows a massive hole at the rear.

The bullet is not really visible in the film and only a real exit wound is captured by the film in the right rear. The right front blob was faked.

The physical evidence and autopsy both prove that a massive exit hole was in the right rear. The eyewitnesses confirm this fact.

The doctors at parkland were treating a patient as opposed to performing an autopsy. Their observations are definite evidence against the conclusion of any rear skull entry.

You still are a delusional jackass.

A massive hole is a massive hole the film does not shot an entrance or exit wound as you claimed.

A wound is captured in the film and it is not an exit wound nor can exit or entrance wounds be judged by films.

There is no evidence what so ever that any part of it was faked.

A massive hole does not prove an entrance or exit wound and once again you are wrong.

The observations of doctors performing emergency procedures are not definitive evidence against the autopsy whatsoever.

You are crushed and beaten as always

A massive hole in the film does show an exit wound as most of the evidence confirms.

An exit wound is captured in the film and is in the right rear.

The red blob was faked because no exit wound was there.

A massive hole does prove an exit wound and once again the AR was right.

The observations of doctors performing emergency procedures is definitive evidence against the autopsy concluding a low entrance to the skull.

You are crushed and mocked as always.

A massive hole is a massive hole and does not prove exit or entrance poi9nt that is fact.

No evidence proves it is an exit wound as all of your posts shows.

You have totally failed to produce a speck of evidence to support this idiotic idea.

There is no exit wound captured on film only a wound no matter how much you scream otherwise.

There is no evidence of anything being faked.

The AR was correct and proves that the bullet entered from above and behind.

Casual observations are not evidence against a professional autopsy.

You are beaten as always.

If the exit wound wasn't in the rear, then the rear would not have blown off, but it did. The exit wound was in the rear.

The exit wound was not the rear the bullet entered from above and behind and exited the side.

That is fact proven by evidence and the skull bursting open from such a wound does not refute the facts or dictate another scenario is

The rear blew out and you can't offer any evidence it could have entered there, because you know it didn't.

If the exit wound wasn't in the rear, then the rear would not have blown off, but it did. The exit wound was in the rear.

 

[Soupnazi630]

He stated opinion nothing more he did not state fact and that is a fact.

The evidence refutes it and also refutes every post you have ever made and that is also a fact.

He was there and saw the blow out in rear. The exit wound was in the rear.

The bullet entered from above and behind which the evidence proves and his opinion does not change that anymore than your retarded fantasies change it

The bullet entered from from the front which the evidence proves and your delusions do not change that anymore than your retarded fantasies change it.

Wrong the evidence proves it entered from above and behind and you are the retard ignoring the evidence because your idiotic claim about Greer has been shredded in every possible way.

And you know it boy.

Stop being joke you truly are one.

 

[Soupnazi630]

A massive hole is a massive hole the film does not shot an entrance or exit wound as you claimed.

A wound is captured in the film and it is not an exit wound nor can exit or entrance wounds be judged by films.

There is no evidence what so ever that any part of it was faked.

A massive hole does not prove an entrance or exit wound and once again you are wrong.

The observations of doctors performing emergency procedures are not definitive evidence against the autopsy whatsoever.

You are crushed and beaten as always

A massive hole in the film does show an exit wound as most of the evidence confirms.

An exit wound is captured in the film and is in the right rear.

The red blob was faked because no exit wound was there.

A massive hole does prove an exit wound and once again the AR was right.

The observations of doctors performing emergency procedures is definitive evidence against the autopsy concluding a low entrance to the skull.

You are crushed and mocked as always.

A massive hole is a massive hole and does not prove exit or entrance poi9nt that is fact.

No evidence proves it is an exit wound as all of your posts shows.

You have totally failed to produce a speck of evidence to support this idiotic idea.

There is no exit wound captured on film only a wound no matter how much you scream otherwise.

There is no evidence of anything being faked.

The AR was correct and proves that the bullet entered from above and behind.

Casual observations are not evidence against a professional autopsy.

You are beaten as always.

If the exit wound wasn't in the rear, then the rear would not have blown off, but it did. The exit wound was in the rear.

The exit wound was not the rear the bullet entered from above and behind and exited the side.

That is fact proven by evidence and the skull bursting open from such a wound does not refute the facts or dictate another scenario is

It exited the rear and that is proven by the AR alone. No need for any corroboration.

You just lied as always.

The AR concluded with evidence that the bullet entered from above and behind

 

[Soupnazi630]

A massive hole is a massive hole the film does not shot an entrance or exit wound as you claimed.

A wound is captured in the film and it is not an exit wound nor can exit or entrance wounds be judged by films.

There is no evidence what so ever that any part of it was faked.

A massive hole does not prove an entrance or exit wound and once again you are wrong.

The observations of doctors performing emergency procedures are not definitive evidence against the autopsy whatsoever.

You are crushed and beaten as always

A massive hole in the film does show an exit wound as most of the evidence confirms.

An exit wound is captured in the film and is in the right rear.

The red blob was faked because no exit wound was there.

A massive hole does prove an exit wound and once again the AR was right.

The observations of doctors performing emergency procedures is definitive evidence against the autopsy concluding a low entrance to the skull.

You are crushed and mocked as always.

A massive hole is a massive hole and does not prove exit or entrance poi9nt that is fact.

No evidence proves it is an exit wound as all of your posts shows.

You have totally failed to produce a speck of evidence to support this idiotic idea.

There is no exit wound captured on film only a wound no matter how much you scream otherwise.

There is no evidence of anything being faked.

The AR was correct and proves that the bullet entered from above and behind.

Casual observations are not evidence against a professional autopsy.

You are beaten as always.

If the exit wound wasn't in the rear, then the rear would not have blown off, but it did. The exit wound was in the rear.

The exit wound was not the rear the bullet entered from above and behind and exited the side.

That is fact proven by evidence and the skull bursting open from such a wound does not refute the facts or dictate another scenario is

The rear blew out and you can't offer any evidence it could have entered there, because you know it didn't.

If the exit wound wasn't in the rear, then the rear would not have blown off, but it did. The exit wound was in the rear.

The skull will typically burst regardless.


The evidence proves you wrong .

The bullet entered from behind and your efforts to claim otherwise fail.