Vandalshandle
Gold Member
Somebody is definitely off his medication....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
that would be dawgshit.He is always off it.Somebody is definitely off his medication....

quote from handjob's latest book : MASTURBATION AND FRICTION BURNS.This is a true story-after the movie came out,i started reading books out there on the topic and when it became obvious that there was a conspiracy,I went back to my high school a few years later and said to my high school teacher-Mr Evans,you taught us in class that oswald killed JFK and was the lone assassin.that is not true.It was the CIA that killed him.
He then went on and replied saying-Oh I never did believe that.so i replied back and said-what,that the CIA killed him or that Oswald did? and he answered saying-that oswald killed him. so I then went on to ask him-If you did not believe it,then how come you told us Oswald killed him then? and he then said- Well just between you and me if I told you all in class what I honestly believed I wouldnt be talking to you right now because I would have lost my job back then and been fired.
Like I said,true story. If some teacher in our corrupt school system goes and tells the truth that he was killed by a conspiracy,then the school will fire that teacher for telling the truth and thats because the school is funded by the city and the city is funded by the state and the state is funded by the federal government so naturally,you are only going to hear what they WANT you to hear.
Other than the driver and Kennedy himself, there were four people in the car. None of th saw the driver shoot Kennedy?
This has to be the looniest of the CTs surrounding his death.
"
Hallucinations are:
the op show up every six months or so, my guess is that's when he runs low.Somebody is definitely off his medication....
if it had happened that way yes since it did not no.Other than the driver and Kennedy himself, there were four people in the car. None of th saw the driver shoot Kennedy?
This has to be the looniest of the CTs surrounding his death.
You would agree that a shot in the car would produce some eyewitnesses, correct?
No he would agree you are off your meds.Other than the driver and Kennedy himself, there were four people in the car. None of th saw the driver shoot Kennedy?
This has to be the looniest of the CTs surrounding his death.
You would agree that a shot in the car would produce some eyewitnesses, correct?
Other than the driver and Kennedy himself, there were four people in the car. None of th saw the driver shoot Kennedy?
This has to be the looniest of the CTs surrounding his death.
You would agree that a shot in the car would produce some eyewitnesses, correct?
It's been proven with models and ballistic gel.the op show up every six months or so, my guess is that's when he runs low.Somebody is definitely off his medication....
You keep passing on chances to prove your case because you are a POS. How would you prove that Oswald could have blown the back of jfk's head off when he was behind the President?
if it had happened that way yes since it did not no.Other than the driver and Kennedy himself, there were four people in the car. None of th saw the driver shoot Kennedy?
This has to be the looniest of the CTs surrounding his death.
You would agree that a shot in the car would produce some eyewitnesses, correct?
also this "theory "of yours only appeared in the last decade there are no contemporaneous reports or eyewitness accounts to give credibility to it .
It's been proven with models and ballistic gel.the op show up every six months or so, my guess is that's when he runs low.Somebody is definitely off his medication....
You keep passing on chances to prove your case because you are a POS. How would you prove that Oswald could have blown the back of jfk's head off when he was behind the President?

It's been proven with models and ballistic gel.the op show up every six months or so, my guess is that's when he runs low.Somebody is definitely off his medication....
You keep passing on chances to prove your case because you are a POS. How would you prove that Oswald could have blown the back of jfk's head off when he was behind the President?
The back of the head being blown off was proven by correctly seeing that frame 313 shows the rear gaped open with a fake red blob on the right forehead. That blob had to be placed there because the driver's shot impacted in that area. It's supposed to indicate an exit wound, but there was no such wound on this face, officially or really.
The back of his head opens up when the red mist appears in the front.
![]()
![]()
We know that the back of his head had a gaping wound, that is clearly visible in the autopsy photos.
How it happened when he was shot from the back has been explained and demonstrated many times.
It's been proven with models and ballistic gel.the op show up every six months or so, my guess is that's when he runs low.Somebody is definitely off his medication....
You keep passing on chances to prove your case because you are a POS. How would you prove that Oswald could have blown the back of jfk's head off when he was behind the President?
The back of the head being blown off was proven by correctly seeing that frame 313 shows the rear gaped open with a fake red blob on the right forehead. That blob had to be placed there because the driver's shot impacted in that area. It's supposed to indicate an exit wound, but there was no such wound on this face, officially or really.
The back of his head opens up when the red mist appears in the front.
![]()
![]()
Look, I'm attempting to have a civil discussion here, remember that when I say this:
You are trying to convince us that the driver shot Kennedy and Connelly, and then put fake red stuff (paint or ink) on his face, all without Jackie Kennedy, or anyone else in the car witnessing it. Are you really trying to make us believe that?