"The Jihad Murder in Florida You Heard Nothing About"

[Coyote]

You have yet to show a clue about Islam.

But I'm an optimist. I will assume you really are asleep

(Awaiting another barrage of cut'n'paste nonsense)

You're a liar.....I quoted aspects of sharia.

And?

Are we supposed to assume that because you can paste massive amount of cherry picked quotes, harvested from hate sites, that you have any understanding of it?

Here is a clue: Sharia is interpreted differently across the Muslim world. Not all muslims or muslim countries follow the penal code. Sharia is also about halal, financial transactions, how and how often to pray, fasting, etc.

If you are going to pretend you know anything about it...you should try real research...not some poorly constructed survey, from a hate site, of 600 American muslims.

You do know what real research is right?

Ok. That might be a bridge too far too troll.

I proved you're a liar.

Now....you're a moron as well.

I provided aspects of sharia.....


You dismissed it as "paste massive amount of cherry picked quotes, "


See what I mean? Not that it isn't true.....


Pretty much the post of a moron....

Did you say something?

When it's not cut'n'paste....it's hard to recognize you.

Let me know when your research extends beyond well recognized hate sites.

So, what's a "love site"?

We're not allowed to post those here....

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

You're a liar.....I quoted aspects of sharia.

And?

Are we supposed to assume that because you can paste massive amount of cherry picked quotes, harvested from hate sites, that you have any understanding of it?

Here is a clue: Sharia is interpreted differently across the Muslim world. Not all muslims or muslim countries follow the penal code. Sharia is also about halal, financial transactions, how and how often to pray, fasting, etc.

If you are going to pretend you know anything about it...you should try real research...not some poorly constructed survey, from a hate site, of 600 American muslims.

You do know what real research is right?

Ok. That might be a bridge too far too troll.

I proved you're a liar.

Now....you're a moron as well.

I provided aspects of sharia.....


You dismissed it as "paste massive amount of cherry picked quotes, "


See what I mean? Not that it isn't true.....


Pretty much the post of a moron....

Did you say something?

When it's not cut'n'paste....it's hard to recognize you.

Let me know when your research extends beyond well recognized hate sites.

So, what's a "love site"?

We're not allowed to post those here....

They would be websites that promote things YOU believe.

But I get the joke, except the opposite of a "hate site" to a leftist would be those you agree with

 

[Coyote]

And?

Are we supposed to assume that because you can paste massive amount of cherry picked quotes, harvested from hate sites, that you have any understanding of it?

Here is a clue: Sharia is interpreted differently across the Muslim world. Not all muslims or muslim countries follow the penal code. Sharia is also about halal, financial transactions, how and how often to pray, fasting, etc.

If you are going to pretend you know anything about it...you should try real research...not some poorly constructed survey, from a hate site, of 600 American muslims.

You do know what real research is right?

Ok. That might be a bridge too far too troll.

I proved you're a liar.

Now....you're a moron as well.

I provided aspects of sharia.....


You dismissed it as "paste massive amount of cherry picked quotes, "


See what I mean? Not that it isn't true.....


Pretty much the post of a moron....

Did you say something?

When it's not cut'n'paste....it's hard to recognize you.

Let me know when your research extends beyond well recognized hate sites.

So, what's a "love site"?

We're not allowed to post those here....

They would be websites that promote things YOU believe.

But I get the joke, except the opposite of a "hate site" to a leftist would be those you agree with

Is Storm Front a hate site?

 

[Leo123]

Is Storm Front a hate site?

Dunno.......what is it? Got a link?

 

[Coyote]

Is Storm Front a hate site?

Dunno.......what is it? Got a link?

It's widely known, so...I frankly don't believe you are unaware.

 

[MaryL]

2018, Then 17-year old Corey Johnson slits the throat of a 13 year old boy and knifes 2 others after converting to Islam.

"Yes, you read that right: he reached out to ISIS, wanting to join them, and likely sent threats of a jihad massacre to a school, and yet over a year later he was still running around loose and unsupervised to the extent that he was able to buy a knife, even though he was undera

Of course not, we hear about stories of black males on death row

2018, Then 17-year old Corey Johnson slits the throat of a 13 year old boy and knifes 2 others after converting to Islam.

"Yes, you read that right: he reached out to ISIS, wanting to join them, and likely sent threats of a jihad massacre to a school, and yet over a year later he was still running around loose and unsupervised to the extent that he was able to buy a knife, even though he was underage, and use it on three people, killing one."

"Yes, you read that right: he reached out to ISIS, wanting to join them, and likely sent threats of a jihad massacre to a school, and yet over a year later he was still running around loose and unsupervised to the extent that he was able to buy a knife, even though he was underage, and use it on three people, killing one."

We have a problem and it ain't guns.

1998. Autumn, leaves are falling. My mother is still alive...

 

[Leo123]

Is Storm Front a hate site?

Dunno.......what is it? Got a link?

It's widely known, so...I frankly don't believe you are unaware.

'Widely known' by who? You? Why can't you provide a link? I have no idea what they are all about, you brought it up I'm just asking for a link. What's the problem?

 

[Leo123]

2018, Then 17-year old Corey Johnson slits the throat of a 13 year old boy and knifes 2 others after converting to Islam.

"Yes, you read that right: he reached out to ISIS, wanting to join them, and likely sent threats of a jihad massacre to a school, and yet over a year later he was still running around loose and unsupervised to the extent that he was able to buy a knife, even though he was undera

Of course not, we hear about stories of black males on death row

2018, Then 17-year old Corey Johnson slits the throat of a 13 year old boy and knifes 2 others after converting to Islam.

"Yes, you read that right: he reached out to ISIS, wanting to join them, and likely sent threats of a jihad massacre to a school, and yet over a year later he was still running around loose and unsupervised to the extent that he was able to buy a knife, even though he was underage, and use it on three people, killing one."

"Yes, you read that right: he reached out to ISIS, wanting to join them, and likely sent threats of a jihad massacre to a school, and yet over a year later he was still running around loose and unsupervised to the extent that he was able to buy a knife, even though he was underage, and use it on three people, killing one."

We have a problem and it ain't guns.

1998. Autumn, leaves are falling. My mother is still alive...

What is your post about?

 

[PoliticalChic]

The problem is twofold.

1. You are clueless about Islam

2. You are a coward when it comes to confronting the mandates of your elites.




"I still fail to see ..."

Exactly.

You Can’t Wake a Person Who Is Pretending to Be Asleep – Navajo Proverb

You have yet to show a clue about Islam.

But I'm an optimist. I will assume you really are asleep

(Awaiting another barrage of cut'n'paste nonsense)

This is the best you can do?


Government school grad, huh?



You're a liar.....I quoted aspects of sharia.

And?

Are we supposed to assume that because you can paste massive amount of cherry picked quotes, harvested from hate sites, that you have any understanding of it?

Here is a clue: Sharia is interpreted differently across the Muslim world. Not all muslims or muslim countries follow the penal code. Sharia is also about halal, financial transactions, how and how often to pray, fasting, etc.

If you are going to pretend you know anything about it...you should try real research...not some poorly constructed survey, from a hate site, of 600 American muslims.

You do know what real research is right?

Ok. That might be a bridge too far too troll.

I proved you're a liar.

Now....you're a moron as well.

I provided aspects of sharia.....


You dismissed it as "paste massive amount of cherry picked quotes, "


See what I mean? Not that it isn't true.....


Pretty much the post of a moron....

Did you say something?

When it's not cut'n'paste....it's hard to recognize you.

Let me know when your research extends beyond well recognized hate sites.

This is the best you can do?????



Government school grad, huh?

 

[Coyote]

We have a problem and it ain't guns.

Thank goodness he didn't have a gun, else he would have killed and injured many more people.

Yes, we need to make it illegal for mentally unbalanced people to murder our citizens

That seems self-evident....yet this is the program of the Democrat Party:



"Immigration To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing thePresident to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.

This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.

Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program has led to the development of pockets of radicalized communities throughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart




"Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S."
Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S. - Breitbart



These are unvetted refuges steeped in a war mentality, and from a war zone.


Remember when the Democrat Party was an American party?

Do you normally lie so blatently?

 

[PoliticalChic]

We have a problem and it ain't guns.

Thank goodness he didn't have a gun, else he would have killed and injured many more people.

Yes, we need to make it illegal for mentally unbalanced people to murder our citizens

That seems self-evident....yet this is the program of the Democrat Party:



"Immigration To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing thePresident to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.

This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.

Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program has led to the development of pockets of radicalized communities throughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart




"Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S."
Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S. - Breitbart



These are unvetted refuges steeped in a war mentality, and from a war zone.


Remember when the Democrat Party was an American party?

Do you normally lie so blatently?

I never lie.....that's why you didn't put any such examples in the post.


BTW....it's spelled 'blatantly.'

Another result of your government schooling, huh?

 

[Coyote]

We have a problem and it ain't guns.

Thank goodness he didn't have a gun, else he would have killed and injured many more people.

Yes, we need to make it illegal for mentally unbalanced people to murder our citizens

That seems self-evident....yet this is the program of the Democrat Party:



"Immigration To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing thePresident to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.

This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.

Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program has led to the development of pockets of radicalized communities throughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart




"Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S."
Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S. - Breitbart



These are unvetted refuges steeped in a war mentality, and from a war zone.


Remember when the Democrat Party was an American party?

Do you normally lie so blatently?

I never lie.....that's why you didn't put any such examples in the post.


BTW....it's spelled 'blatantly.'

Another result of your government schooling, huh?

Lying again, huh?
I bolded your blatant lie.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Thank goodness he didn't have a gun, else he would have killed and injured many more people.

Yes, we need to make it illegal for mentally unbalanced people to murder our citizens

That seems self-evident....yet this is the program of the Democrat Party:



"Immigration To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing thePresident to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.

This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.

Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program has led to the development of pockets of radicalized communities throughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart




"Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S."
Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S. - Breitbart



These are unvetted refuges steeped in a war mentality, and from a war zone.


Remember when the Democrat Party was an American party?

Do you normally lie so blatently?

I never lie.....that's why you didn't put any such examples in the post.


BTW....it's spelled 'blatantly.'

Another result of your government schooling, huh?

Lying again, huh?
I bolded your blatant lie.

Everything in the post is linked and documented.

So you must be the liar, huh?


Don't you want to thank me for teaching you how to spell 'blatant'?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Yes, we need to make it illegal for mentally unbalanced people to murder our citizens

That seems self-evident....yet this is the program of the Democrat Party:



"Immigration To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing thePresident to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.

This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.

Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program has led to the development of pockets of radicalized communities throughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart




"Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S."
Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S. - Breitbart



These are unvetted refuges steeped in a war mentality, and from a war zone.


Remember when the Democrat Party was an American party?

Do you normally lie so blatently?

I never lie.....that's why you didn't put any such examples in the post.


BTW....it's spelled 'blatantly.'

Another result of your government schooling, huh?

Lying again, huh?
I bolded your blatant lie.

Everything in the post is linked and documented.

So you must be the liar, huh?


Don't you want to thank me for teaching you how to spell 'blatant'?

Is this what you are claiming is untrue????


"These are unvetted refuges "???


Watch me smash another custard pie in your ugly kisser:


"(CNSNews.com) – John Bolton, former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations,.... ... the U.S. can refuse to allow Syrian refugees entry “without in any way violating our humanitarian obligations.”


Bolton also dismissed White House Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes’ statement Sunday that the refugees are being vetted in Iraq before they are brought to the U.S.

“I don’t know who else believes this other than the White House,” Bolton said in response to Rhodes’ assertion that the U.S. has “very robust vetting procedures for those refugees.”


The U.N.’s 1951 Convention and Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, which was amended in 1967, defines a refugee as “someone who is unable or unwilling to return to their country of origin owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion.”

... the signers of the convention are not required to offer them asylum in their own countries.

“The refugee convention imposes on the country of first asylum an obligation to provide food, shelter, sanitation, and medicine in refugee camps” with the main goal of repatriating them back to their country of origin as soon as possible, ...."
Former Ambassador to UN: US Has ‘No Obligation’ to Accept Syrian Refugees



"...dismissed White House Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes’ statement Sunday that the refugees are being vetted..."




"....Succar, 57, who immigrated to the United States when he was 10, also noted that “Third World countries, particularly places like Syria, do not have the network of information the United States has.”

“In Syria, there’s no such thing. So when they tell you that [the refugees] are vetted, are you out of your mind?” he said.

Meanwhile, officials in Honduras said Wednesday that five Syrian nationals headed for the United States had been caught with fraudulent ID papers in the capital city of Tegucigalpa, Reuters reported."
http://nypost.com/2015/11/19/syrian-community-leader-isis-is-already-in-new-york-city/



"Rep. King To MSNBC’s Brzezinski: ‘You Are 1,000 Percent Wrong’ On Refugee Vetting Process


1. ....a heated debate over the viability and quality of the vetting process that would allow Syrian refugees into America.

2. ....King explained, “I’m extremely concerned because what the president is telling us is not true. We cannot vet the refugees from Syria.”

PETER KING: I’m extremely concerned because what the president is telling us is not true. We cannot vet the refugees from Syria. There are no databases to work against. There are no government records. And when I talk to people involved in the vetting, they have no confidence at all in the people that are being allowed in. There’s no way. People talk about thorough vetting, there is no vetting as a practical matter. That is the reality.

MIKA BRZEZINSKI: Hold on a second. There is vetting.

KING: There is not. Mika —

BRZEZINSKI: “There are face-to-face interviews, there’s health screenings. Often it takes two years for a family to get here.

KING: Mika, you’re entirely wrong. You are wrong, you are wrong.

BRZEZINSKI: Actually, sir, I think you’re wrong.

KING: I met with the people doing the interviews. I’m talking to the people involved in the highest levels of government. They tell us that they have no confidence at all. This is not proper vetting. I’m telling you that.

BRZEZINSKI: But the vetting is happening whether you like it or not.

KING: No, it is not a real vetting. You can’t vet if you have nothing to base it against. You are wrong, Mika. You are 1,000 percent wrong, W-R-O-N-G.

BRZEZINSKI: So meeting face-to-face and screening them and interviewing them and often making them wait months and years — that is not a vetting process?

KING: That is not vetting. That is not vetting. No, it is not. You cannot vet unless you have material to base it —

BRZEZINSKI: So should we say, ‘Syrians, stay out of America, you’re not welcome here?’

KING: Mika, we’re not saying Syrians. We’re saying these refugees. Unless we know who the refugees are, we cannot be allowing them in. My job is to protect Americans, not to feel good about myself, not to say that I’m doing something humanitarian. If Americans get killed because we are letting people in because they are not properly vetted — they cannot be properly vetted. How many times am I supposed to tell you this, Mika? You are wrong. They cannot, and it puts American lives at risk."
Rep. King To MSNBC’s Brzezinski: ‘You Are 1,000 Percent Wrong’ On Refugee Vetting Process



In your face, dunce!!!!!!!

 

[PoliticalChic]

Thank goodness he didn't have a gun, else he would have killed and injured many more people.

Yes, we need to make it illegal for mentally unbalanced people to murder our citizens

That seems self-evident....yet this is the program of the Democrat Party:



"Immigration To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing thePresident to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.

This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.

Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program has led to the development of pockets of radicalized communities throughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart




"Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S."
Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S. - Breitbart



These are unvetted refuges steeped in a war mentality, and from a war zone.


Remember when the Democrat Party was an American party?

Do you normally lie so blatently?

I never lie.....that's why you didn't put any such examples in the post.


BTW....it's spelled 'blatantly.'

Another result of your government schooling, huh?

Lying again, huh?
I bolded your blatant lie.

Ready to admit that I am never wrong?

 

[DrLove]

2018 was two years ago. Hardly a Current Event.

 

[Coyote]

That seems self-evident....yet this is the program of the Democrat Party:



"Immigration To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing thePresident to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.

This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.

Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program has led to the development of pockets of radicalized communities throughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart




"Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S."
Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S. - Breitbart



These are unvetted refuges steeped in a war mentality, and from a war zone.


Remember when the Democrat Party was an American party?

Do you normally lie so blatently?

I never lie.....that's why you didn't put any such examples in the post.


BTW....it's spelled 'blatantly.'

Another result of your government schooling, huh?

Lying again, huh?
I bolded your blatant lie.

Everything in the post is linked and documented.

So you must be the liar, huh?


Don't you want to thank me for teaching you how to spell 'blatant'?

Is this what you are claiming is untrue????


"These are unvetted refuges "???


Watch me smash another custard pie in your ugly kisser:


"(CNSNews.com) – John Bolton, former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations,.... ... the U.S. can refuse to allow Syrian refugees entry “without in any way violating our humanitarian obligations.”


Bolton also dismissed White House Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes’ statement Sunday that the refugees are being vetted in Iraq before they are brought to the U.S.

“I don’t know who else believes this other than the White House,” Bolton said in response to Rhodes’ assertion that the U.S. has “very robust vetting procedures for those refugees.”


The U.N.’s 1951 Convention and Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, which was amended in 1967, defines a refugee as “someone who is unable or unwilling to return to their country of origin owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion.”

... the signers of the convention are not required to offer them asylum in their own countries.

“The refugee convention imposes on the country of first asylum an obligation to provide food, shelter, sanitation, and medicine in refugee camps” with the main goal of repatriating them back to their country of origin as soon as possible, ...."
Former Ambassador to UN: US Has ‘No Obligation’ to Accept Syrian Refugees



"...dismissed White House Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes’ statement Sunday that the refugees are being vetted..."




"....Succar, 57, who immigrated to the United States when he was 10, also noted that “Third World countries, particularly places like Syria, do not have the network of information the United States has.”

“In Syria, there’s no such thing. So when they tell you that [the refugees] are vetted, are you out of your mind?” he said.

Meanwhile, officials in Honduras said Wednesday that five Syrian nationals headed for the United States had been caught with fraudulent ID papers in the capital city of Tegucigalpa, Reuters reported."
http://nypost.com/2015/11/19/syrian-community-leader-isis-is-already-in-new-york-city/



"Rep. King To MSNBC’s Brzezinski: ‘You Are 1,000 Percent Wrong’ On Refugee Vetting Process


1. ....a heated debate over the viability and quality of the vetting process that would allow Syrian refugees into America.

2. ....King explained, “I’m extremely concerned because what the president is telling us is not true. We cannot vet the refugees from Syria.”

PETER KING: I’m extremely concerned because what the president is telling us is not true. We cannot vet the refugees from Syria. There are no databases to work against. There are no government records. And when I talk to people involved in the vetting, they have no confidence at all in the people that are being allowed in. There’s no way. People talk about thorough vetting, there is no vetting as a practical matter. That is the reality.

MIKA BRZEZINSKI: Hold on a second. There is vetting.

KING: There is not. Mika —

BRZEZINSKI: “There are face-to-face interviews, there’s health screenings. Often it takes two years for a family to get here.

KING: Mika, you’re entirely wrong. You are wrong, you are wrong.

BRZEZINSKI: Actually, sir, I think you’re wrong.

KING: I met with the people doing the interviews. I’m talking to the people involved in the highest levels of government. They tell us that they have no confidence at all. This is not proper vetting. I’m telling you that.

BRZEZINSKI: But the vetting is happening whether you like it or not.

KING: No, it is not a real vetting. You can’t vet if you have nothing to base it against. You are wrong, Mika. You are 1,000 percent wrong, W-R-O-N-G.

BRZEZINSKI: So meeting face-to-face and screening them and interviewing them and often making them wait months and years — that is not a vetting process?

KING: That is not vetting. That is not vetting. No, it is not. You cannot vet unless you have material to base it —

BRZEZINSKI: So should we say, ‘Syrians, stay out of America, you’re not welcome here?’

KING: Mika, we’re not saying Syrians. We’re saying these refugees. Unless we know who the refugees are, we cannot be allowing them in. My job is to protect Americans, not to feel good about myself, not to say that I’m doing something humanitarian. If Americans get killed because we are letting people in because they are not properly vetted — they cannot be properly vetted. How many times am I supposed to tell you this, Mika? You are wrong. They cannot, and it puts American lives at risk."
Rep. King To MSNBC’s Brzezinski: ‘You Are 1,000 Percent Wrong’ On Refugee Vetting Process



In your face, dunce!!!!!!!

Time to remove your face from your over-stretched cut'n'paste rectum.

False GOP Theme: 'Unvetted' Refugees

Even when a lapse is found they are rechecked and it isn't major.
Federal agents are reinvestigating Syrian refugees in U.S. who may have slipped through vetting lapse

They are obviously vetted. And as a group, very well vetted. The fact that you don't believe they are vetted well enough is not synonymous with "unvetted".

Perhaps you should thank me for correcting your blatant lie.

 

[Coyote]

Yes, we need to make it illegal for mentally unbalanced people to murder our citizens

That seems self-evident....yet this is the program of the Democrat Party:



"Immigration To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing thePresident to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.

This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.

Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program has led to the development of pockets of radicalized communities throughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart




"Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S."
Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S. - Breitbart



These are unvetted refuges steeped in a war mentality, and from a war zone.


Remember when the Democrat Party was an American party?

Do you normally lie so blatently?

I never lie.....that's why you didn't put any such examples in the post.


BTW....it's spelled 'blatantly.'

Another result of your government schooling, huh?

Lying again, huh?
I bolded your blatant lie.

Ready to admit that I am never wrong?

That would be lying.

 

[Coyote]

That seems self-evident....yet this is the program of the Democrat Party:



"Immigration To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing thePresident to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.

This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.

Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program has led to the development of pockets of radicalized communities throughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart




"Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S."
Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Wants a 550% Increase in Syrian Refugees in U.S. - Breitbart



These are unvetted refuges steeped in a war mentality, and from a war zone.


Remember when the Democrat Party was an American party?

Do you normally lie so blatently?

I never lie.....that's why you didn't put any such examples in the post.


BTW....it's spelled 'blatantly.'

Another result of your government schooling, huh?

Lying again, huh?
I bolded your blatant lie.

Everything in the post is linked and documented.

So you must be the liar, huh?


Don't you want to thank me for teaching you how to spell 'blatant'?

Is this what you are claiming is untrue????


"These are unvetted refuges "???


Watch me smash another custard pie in your ugly kisser:


"(CNSNews.com) – John Bolton, former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations,.... ... the U.S. can refuse to allow Syrian refugees entry “without in any way violating our humanitarian obligations.”


Bolton also dismissed White House Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes’ statement Sunday that the refugees are being vetted in Iraq before they are brought to the U.S.

“I don’t know who else believes this other than the White House,” Bolton said in response to Rhodes’ assertion that the U.S. has “very robust vetting procedures for those refugees.”


The U.N.’s 1951 Convention and Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, which was amended in 1967, defines a refugee as “someone who is unable or unwilling to return to their country of origin owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion.”

... the signers of the convention are not required to offer them asylum in their own countries.

“The refugee convention imposes on the country of first asylum an obligation to provide food, shelter, sanitation, and medicine in refugee camps” with the main goal of repatriating them back to their country of origin as soon as possible, ...."
Former Ambassador to UN: US Has ‘No Obligation’ to Accept Syrian Refugees



"...dismissed White House Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes’ statement Sunday that the refugees are being vetted..."




"....Succar, 57, who immigrated to the United States when he was 10, also noted that “Third World countries, particularly places like Syria, do not have the network of information the United States has.”

“In Syria, there’s no such thing. So when they tell you that [the refugees] are vetted, are you out of your mind?” he said.

Meanwhile, officials in Honduras said Wednesday that five Syrian nationals headed for the United States had been caught with fraudulent ID papers in the capital city of Tegucigalpa, Reuters reported."
http://nypost.com/2015/11/19/syrian-community-leader-isis-is-already-in-new-york-city/



"Rep. King To MSNBC’s Brzezinski: ‘You Are 1,000 Percent Wrong’ On Refugee Vetting Process


1. ....a heated debate over the viability and quality of the vetting process that would allow Syrian refugees into America.

2. ....King explained, “I’m extremely concerned because what the president is telling us is not true. We cannot vet the refugees from Syria.”

PETER KING: I’m extremely concerned because what the president is telling us is not true. We cannot vet the refugees from Syria. There are no databases to work against. There are no government records. And when I talk to people involved in the vetting, they have no confidence at all in the people that are being allowed in. There’s no way. People talk about thorough vetting, there is no vetting as a practical matter. That is the reality.

MIKA BRZEZINSKI: Hold on a second. There is vetting.

KING: There is not. Mika —

BRZEZINSKI: “There are face-to-face interviews, there’s health screenings. Often it takes two years for a family to get here.

KING: Mika, you’re entirely wrong. You are wrong, you are wrong.

BRZEZINSKI: Actually, sir, I think you’re wrong.

KING: I met with the people doing the interviews. I’m talking to the people involved in the highest levels of government. They tell us that they have no confidence at all. This is not proper vetting. I’m telling you that.

BRZEZINSKI: But the vetting is happening whether you like it or not.

KING: No, it is not a real vetting. You can’t vet if you have nothing to base it against. You are wrong, Mika. You are 1,000 percent wrong, W-R-O-N-G.

BRZEZINSKI: So meeting face-to-face and screening them and interviewing them and often making them wait months and years — that is not a vetting process?

KING: That is not vetting. That is not vetting. No, it is not. You cannot vet unless you have material to base it —

BRZEZINSKI: So should we say, ‘Syrians, stay out of America, you’re not welcome here?’

KING: Mika, we’re not saying Syrians. We’re saying these refugees. Unless we know who the refugees are, we cannot be allowing them in. My job is to protect Americans, not to feel good about myself, not to say that I’m doing something humanitarian. If Americans get killed because we are letting people in because they are not properly vetted — they cannot be properly vetted. How many times am I supposed to tell you this, Mika? You are wrong. They cannot, and it puts American lives at risk."
Rep. King To MSNBC’s Brzezinski: ‘You Are 1,000 Percent Wrong’ On Refugee Vetting Process



In your face, dunce!!!!!!!

By the...in your cut"n paste storm surge you seem to be mixing refugees with non refugees. Two very different systems.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Do you normally lie so blatently?

I never lie.....that's why you didn't put any such examples in the post.


BTW....it's spelled 'blatantly.'

Another result of your government schooling, huh?

Lying again, huh?
I bolded your blatant lie.

Everything in the post is linked and documented.

So you must be the liar, huh?


Don't you want to thank me for teaching you how to spell 'blatant'?

Is this what you are claiming is untrue????


"These are unvetted refuges "???


Watch me smash another custard pie in your ugly kisser:


"(CNSNews.com) – John Bolton, former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations,.... ... the U.S. can refuse to allow Syrian refugees entry “without in any way violating our humanitarian obligations.”


Bolton also dismissed White House Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes’ statement Sunday that the refugees are being vetted in Iraq before they are brought to the U.S.

“I don’t know who else believes this other than the White House,” Bolton said in response to Rhodes’ assertion that the U.S. has “very robust vetting procedures for those refugees.”


The U.N.’s 1951 Convention and Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, which was amended in 1967, defines a refugee as “someone who is unable or unwilling to return to their country of origin owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion.”

... the signers of the convention are not required to offer them asylum in their own countries.

“The refugee convention imposes on the country of first asylum an obligation to provide food, shelter, sanitation, and medicine in refugee camps” with the main goal of repatriating them back to their country of origin as soon as possible, ...."
Former Ambassador to UN: US Has ‘No Obligation’ to Accept Syrian Refugees



"...dismissed White House Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes’ statement Sunday that the refugees are being vetted..."




"....Succar, 57, who immigrated to the United States when he was 10, also noted that “Third World countries, particularly places like Syria, do not have the network of information the United States has.”

“In Syria, there’s no such thing. So when they tell you that [the refugees] are vetted, are you out of your mind?” he said.

Meanwhile, officials in Honduras said Wednesday that five Syrian nationals headed for the United States had been caught with fraudulent ID papers in the capital city of Tegucigalpa, Reuters reported."
http://nypost.com/2015/11/19/syrian-community-leader-isis-is-already-in-new-york-city/



"Rep. King To MSNBC’s Brzezinski: ‘You Are 1,000 Percent Wrong’ On Refugee Vetting Process


1. ....a heated debate over the viability and quality of the vetting process that would allow Syrian refugees into America.

2. ....King explained, “I’m extremely concerned because what the president is telling us is not true. We cannot vet the refugees from Syria.”

PETER KING: I’m extremely concerned because what the president is telling us is not true. We cannot vet the refugees from Syria. There are no databases to work against. There are no government records. And when I talk to people involved in the vetting, they have no confidence at all in the people that are being allowed in. There’s no way. People talk about thorough vetting, there is no vetting as a practical matter. That is the reality.

MIKA BRZEZINSKI: Hold on a second. There is vetting.

KING: There is not. Mika —

BRZEZINSKI: “There are face-to-face interviews, there’s health screenings. Often it takes two years for a family to get here.

KING: Mika, you’re entirely wrong. You are wrong, you are wrong.

BRZEZINSKI: Actually, sir, I think you’re wrong.

KING: I met with the people doing the interviews. I’m talking to the people involved in the highest levels of government. They tell us that they have no confidence at all. This is not proper vetting. I’m telling you that.

BRZEZINSKI: But the vetting is happening whether you like it or not.

KING: No, it is not a real vetting. You can’t vet if you have nothing to base it against. You are wrong, Mika. You are 1,000 percent wrong, W-R-O-N-G.

BRZEZINSKI: So meeting face-to-face and screening them and interviewing them and often making them wait months and years — that is not a vetting process?

KING: That is not vetting. That is not vetting. No, it is not. You cannot vet unless you have material to base it —

BRZEZINSKI: So should we say, ‘Syrians, stay out of America, you’re not welcome here?’

KING: Mika, we’re not saying Syrians. We’re saying these refugees. Unless we know who the refugees are, we cannot be allowing them in. My job is to protect Americans, not to feel good about myself, not to say that I’m doing something humanitarian. If Americans get killed because we are letting people in because they are not properly vetted — they cannot be properly vetted. How many times am I supposed to tell you this, Mika? You are wrong. They cannot, and it puts American lives at risk."
Rep. King To MSNBC’s Brzezinski: ‘You Are 1,000 Percent Wrong’ On Refugee Vetting Process



In your face, dunce!!!!!!!

Time to remove your face from your over-stretched cut'n'paste rectum.

False GOP Theme: 'Unvetted' Refugees

Even when a lapse is found they are rechecked and it isn't major.
Federal agents are reinvestigating Syrian refugees in U.S. who may have slipped through vetting lapse

They are obviously vetted. And as a group, very well vetted. The fact that you don't believe they are vetted well enough is not synonymous with "unvetted".

Perhaps you should thank me for correcting your blatant lie.

Fact check???


Time to teach you a bit more...


Factcheck.org -- A Fraudulent "Fact Check" Site Funded By Biased Political Group
theswash.com ^ | 8/27/2012 11 | matchdoctor


Posted on 8/28/2012, 146 PM by bronxville

Factcheck.org -- A Fraudulent "Fact Check" Site Funded By Biased Political Group

If you wanted to use a devious method to deceive people who are trying to differentiate between truth and lies on the Internet how would you do it? If you were extremely devious and had no conscience, you might set up a Web site with some official and unbiased sounding name that claims to be the encyclopedia of truth to be used as a tool for anyone who has the same biased view and wants to make believe to "back it up" with what they would like you to think is "indisputable fact."

That is exactly what Web sites like factcheck.org are. They are biased, politically motivated propaganda Web sites, manned and funded by biased political organizations who set up the sites for the sole purpose of deviously "backing up" the political arguments of those who hold the same views that they do. It's kind of like you have a friend who is in on your lie, and you use him to back up your story and don't tell anyone else he is your friend.

Just because they use a name that implies unbiased assessments, doesn't mean that they provide them. You can call your Web site anything you want. I can set up a web site called thetruth.org or realfacts.com or stopthelies.org and post any kind of biased political propaganda I want on it. The name means nothing. And in the case of sites like factcheck.org, the name is intentionally misleading and deceptive. But it isn't the only so called "fact check" site that is a fraud. There are others.

Think about it. Would you rely on any particular Web site to get the "truth?" Anyone honest would tell you that you should NOT rely solely on them to get your facts. You should get them by considering many different and sources, with different points of view and opinions and arrive at what you believe to be the truth by using your own God given senses. Only con artists purport to be the de facto source of truth.

If you look behind the scenes at these phony "fact check" sites, you find that they are funded by organizations with political biases. You must always ask yourself. Who is writing about this so-called "truth." Who funds the site and pays their expenses. What are the origins and history of the funders and who are they associated with. In the case of factcheck.org they receive their funding from the liberal Annenberg Foundation.

The Annenberg Foundation was originally founded by Walter J. Annenberg, a conservative who supported Ronald Reagan. However, when Walter Annenberg died, his family took over the management of the foundation and it took a turn to the far left and has ties to radical left individuals such as Bill Ayers and his friend and fellow left wing radical collegue Barack Obama. How is factcheck.org associated with these people:

To start, Ayers was the key founder of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, which was a Chicago public school reform project from 1995 to 2001. Upon its start in 1995, Obama was appointed Board Chairman and President of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. Geesh, that alone connects all three. Well, it branches out even more from there.

Ayers co-chaired the organization’s Collaborative, which set the education policies of the Challenge. Oddly enough, Obama was the one who was authorized to delegate to the Collaborative in regards to its programs and projects. In addition to that, Obama often times had to seek advice and assistance from the Ayer’s led Collaborative in regards to the programmatic aspects of grant proposals. Ayers even sat on the same board as Obama as an “ex officio member”. They both also sat together on the board of the CAC’s Governance Committee. Obama and Ayers were two parts of a group of four who were instructed to draft the bylaws that would govern the CAC. Keep in mind that the “A” in CAC is for Annenberg, the owners of FactCheck.org. The funding for Ayer’s projects and those of his cronies was approved by Board Chair, Barack Obama.

http://theswash.com/liberty/who-fact-checks-factcheck-org

Factcheck.org -- A Fraudulent "Fact Check" Site Funded By Biased Political Group





They don't come any more gullible than you, huh?


So we agree.....I never lie, and you're a dunce?