IceMan30
Senior Member
- Sep 24, 2016
- 515
- 18
- 53
- Banned
- #1
There are things that I don't believe about the government, but why should I believe that JFK was killed from the front, (or) by multiple shooters, let alone with different guns ?
First of all, JFK has wounds from only one caliber bullet of just a single type, suggesting it was from the same gun, also, JFK had a much smaller wound on the the rear, of his body and a larger wound in the front of his body which definitively says that he was in fact shot from the rear, because exit wounds are bigger than entrance wounds..
Moreover, JFK and his people were in the correct position to be affected by the bullet in the way described by the warren report, judging by original photographs.
Also what you can you, is you can do a little dice test... take two dice and roll them, pay attention to statistics, 7 has the most ways of being rolled compared to all other numbers and so therefore 7 will (most likely) come up the most.
Well you can apply that theory, to the most likely scenario as to who killed JFK and why JFK was killed.
There are more ways that Oswald was a Southern American white male racist in the 1960s, than there are that he was a foreign government agent, or a communist.
So its a lot more likely that Oswald killed JFK, because Oswald was from the South (Louisiana), JFK happened to be in Texas on the day he was killed, in 1963, Oswald was a racist, his side was losing in the courts, and the political party of JFK was a political nightmare for Oswald.
It is statistically much more likely that scenario was the reason, then calculate how (comparatively) unlikely it was that he was a foreign government agent.
Throw in the fact that his name is Lee Harvey Oswald, that is not a Latin name (Cuba) nor is it a Russian name, nor is it an east Asian name (Vietnam)
And he was born in Louisiana, and he was in the Marines.
So how much do these conspiracy theorists expect me to believe ?
First of all, JFK has wounds from only one caliber bullet of just a single type, suggesting it was from the same gun, also, JFK had a much smaller wound on the the rear, of his body and a larger wound in the front of his body which definitively says that he was in fact shot from the rear, because exit wounds are bigger than entrance wounds..
Moreover, JFK and his people were in the correct position to be affected by the bullet in the way described by the warren report, judging by original photographs.
Also what you can you, is you can do a little dice test... take two dice and roll them, pay attention to statistics, 7 has the most ways of being rolled compared to all other numbers and so therefore 7 will (most likely) come up the most.
Well you can apply that theory, to the most likely scenario as to who killed JFK and why JFK was killed.
There are more ways that Oswald was a Southern American white male racist in the 1960s, than there are that he was a foreign government agent, or a communist.
So its a lot more likely that Oswald killed JFK, because Oswald was from the South (Louisiana), JFK happened to be in Texas on the day he was killed, in 1963, Oswald was a racist, his side was losing in the courts, and the political party of JFK was a political nightmare for Oswald.
It is statistically much more likely that scenario was the reason, then calculate how (comparatively) unlikely it was that he was a foreign government agent.
Throw in the fact that his name is Lee Harvey Oswald, that is not a Latin name (Cuba) nor is it a Russian name, nor is it an east Asian name (Vietnam)
And he was born in Louisiana, and he was in the Marines.
So how much do these conspiracy theorists expect me to believe ?