The Jews and the Native Americans

[SherriMunnerlyn]

Show me the 'UN documents'.....at least link to them. And you've also pretended that any 'ethnic cleansing' was only done to the Arabs......

The noises you make about 'Zionist lies and propaganda' are drowned out by your own lies and propaganda, sherrikins .....

"The transformation of Mandated Palestine At the culmination of a quarter century of Mandatory rule, Palestine had been radically transformed in demographic terms. The population of Palestine had increased tremendously - from the 750,000 of the 1922 census to almost 1,850,000 at the end of 1946 - an increase of nearly 250 per cent. During this period the Jewish population had soared from 56,000 after the First World War to 84,000 in 1922 to 608,000 in 1946, an increase of about 725 per cent.*141/ From constituting less than a tenth of the population in Palestine after the First World War, the Jewish community in 1947 constituted nearly a third. A good part of this was due to births within Palestine but legal immigration alone accounted for over 376,000, with illegal immigration being estimated at another 65,000 - a total of 440,000.*142/ This Jewish population was primarily urban - about 70 per cent to 75 per cent in and around the cities of Jerusalem, Jaffa-Tel Aviv and Haifa.*143/Land holding patterns had also changed considerably. From the 650,000 dunums held by Jewish organizations in 1920, of the total land area of 26 million dunums, the figure at the end of 1946 had reached 1,625,000 dunums - an increase of about 250 per cent*144/ and Jewish settlement had displaced large numbers of Palestinian Arab peasants. Even so, this area represented only 6.2 per cent of the total area of Palestine and 12 per cent of the cultivable land." *145/ The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem - CEIRPP, DPR study, part I: 1917-1947 (30 June 1978)

Israel is there get used to it hater

There are over 6 million Palestinians in Palestine going nowhere and soon they will be in the majority if they are not already. Get used to that, Zionist

 

[MHunterB]

Yet it still offends Muslims that it exists.

One grain of sand not under Muslim control is more than Islam will tolerate.

That is what this whole thing comes down to.

That seems pretty greedy if that is what this is all about.

It is not what it is about at all. Its about millions unlawfully displaced from their lands and homes that includes Palestinian Christians.

The even larger number of Arab Jews 'unlawfully displaced from their lands and homes' somehow never penetrates the consciousness of those promoting themselves as "people of conscience".

What so amazes me about that 'blind spot' is that Israel is repeatedly alleged to have had a 'policy' and 'laws' specifically to remove nonJews. And yet in country after country, the Jewish citizenry were legislated out of their possessions (meaning there were overt laws and policies, the 'smoking gun' not present in Israeli law) , property and rights - beggared and cast out. But somehow the 'humanitarian people of conscience' deny that this ever happened: they refuse to disuss the fact that Arab League nations conspired to eject their long-established Jewish citizenry (who were not attacking anyone!) ???

Then there's the idiotic noise made by those same 'pacifist humanitarians "But you can't punish the Palestinians for what they didn't do"......

How is it 'punishing the Palestinans' to merely acknowledge the abuses against Arab Jews by Arab Muslims? That certainly would make no sense - except of course for the Jews pushed out of their homes in the Mandate by Arabs (Jordan will have to answer for its ethnic cleansing of 'East Jerusalem') I have made NO suggestion about what I think 'should' be done to right that wrong - but taking it out on the Palestnian people would be a really stupid move, and wrong.

I would like to see the Arab Jews have a chance to be compensated for what the nations of Egypt, Syria, Iraq and others have stolen from them. There is no point in a 'right of return' since nobody in or out of those nations is willing to let the Jews have their homes and businesses back - and more importantly, no other nation on earth is willing to even try to guarantee their safety in such a hostile environment.

If it was wrong to 'ethnically cleanse' the Palestinians, it was equally as wrong to do the same to the Arab Jews.

If Palestininan refugees deserve compensation, then so do Arab Jewish refugees - whether they are beggars or billionaires doesn't matter.

So long as Arab League nations which ethnically cleansed their Jewish citizenry insist on making noises about a 'Palestinian right of return' - one would expect to see their governments FIRST act promptly and generously to compensate the refugees who they themselves created.

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

Palestinians are not responsible for what Arab countries outside Palestine did. Ethnic cleansing in Palestine has been by Israel.

 

[flowery]

Israel became a Kingdom in 1020 B.C.

There has never been a Palestine Nation nor Kingdom.
The Palestine State was created in 1964 (made up) by Yasser Arafat and other Arab nations. The Palestinian state is still more of a plan or ideal than an actual entity.

Palestine is an Arabic country it is written in Torah because Canaanites are the Arabs,,
it is their lands forever ,,

Israelis came from all over the world, to dominate Palestinians lands and farms

Israelis steel their lands and souls while the world is watching

SHAME

The Quran, The Torah and the Bible all say that the land is Israel's and that the Israelis would return again to their promised land in the end times.
EDITOR'S CHOICE: Quran explicitly refers to the return of the Jews to the Land of Israel before the Last Judgment

What ???

Nothing in the Qura'n said that the land is Israel's ,,,!! where did you get that
Yes they are mentioned about them and their history in Holly Qur'an but there is no mentioned that they have the right to take Palestine or they are indigenous to the Holy Land ,,

never

 

[flowery]

Jews a little less so right? holocaust denying Jews hater ..

Lets' pretend "holocaust" was true ,, Israel commits the same as "holocaust" against Muslims in Palestine everyday

Ah, now it becomes clearer: the Holocaust denier edited its post at 10:33 this morning. So - whether or not the seal and the sherri actually 'agreed' with the original wording which was 'just' the idiotic exaggeration and also referred to Christians as 'victims' - they are now both appearing to 'second' Holocaust denial. Although the " around the word Holocaust in the original version of the post *may* indicate Holocaust denial - the edit makes it blatant.

I think that's pretty skunky behavior on 'Flowery's part.

I don't know the meaning of "skunky" but I assume it is a bad word
anyway, English is not my native language so surely I need to modify my words sometimes
I want them to be exactly just as I believe in and this is not to be a shamed of
and I assume there are a NOTE is written down tells that I have changed the reply
So everyone can see and this is not something I hided from anyone


about the "holocaust" it is uncertain event, that how I believe
and even If I believe in it, what is the point of it, it is not the main issue here

and even ,, If the "holocaust" was certain event, then Jewish people should be one of the nations that should carry the highest amount of mercy feelings of compassion as they have been subjected to such cruelty
But
watch to what they are doing now
they make the "Holocaust" in every inch in a stolen land from parents and grandparents
They are killing children
steal lands
And tortured people

I will not feel sympathy toward Israel or cry for what happened to them
because they stole the land of Palestine, and killed and displaced people , in the name of "religion" and tears of "Holocaust"

 

[P F Tinmore]

The difference between the conquest of America and the conquest of Palestine is that back then it was not illegal to "win" land but now it is. Israel has never won any land because it is illegal to do so.

 

[ForeverYoung436]

The difference between the conquest of America and the conquest of Palestine is that back then it was not illegal to "win" land but now it is. Israel has never won any land because it is illegal to do so.

If it is wrong now (or 100 years ago), then it was wrong then (300 years ago), Mr. Hypocrite. Move back to Scandinavia.

 

[P F Tinmore]

The difference between the conquest of America and the conquest of Palestine is that back then it was not illegal to "win" land but now it is. Israel has never won any land because it is illegal to do so.

If it is wrong now (or 100 years ago), then it was wrong then (300 years ago), Mr. Hypocrite. Move back to Scandinavia.

It has always been wrong. But it has only been illegal for about a hundred years.

 

[Uncensored2008]

That seems pretty greedy if that is what this is all about.

It's not greed, it's bigotry.

The Warlord Muhammad said that all lands that have been conquered by Muslims must forever remain under Muslim control, that there can be no peace unless the Kafirum are slaughtered and the Dhimmis accept Islamic domination with willing submission.

This leads to the position that not one grain of sand will be under the dominion of Infidels. It is this bigotry that drive PF and Sherri and the rest of the Muslims to reject peace, regardless of terms. Islam is the religion of war and will wage perpetual war rather than tolerate what they view as Muslim land being under the control of Infidels.

 

[Michelle420]

Palestine is an Arabic country it is written in Torah because Canaanites are the Arabs,,
it is their lands forever ,,

Israelis came from all over the world, to dominate Palestinians lands and farms

Israelis steel their lands and souls while the world is watching

SHAME

The Quran, The Torah and the Bible all say that the land is Israel's and that the Israelis would return again to their promised land in the end times.
EDITOR'S CHOICE: Quran explicitly refers to the return of the Jews to the Land of Israel before the Last Judgment

What ???

Nothing in the Qura'n said that the land is Israel's ,,,!! where did you get that
Yes they are mentioned about them and their history in Holly Qur'an but there is no mentioned that they have the right to take Palestine or they are indigenous to the Holy Land ,,

never

which book is older?

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

The Quran, The Torah and the Bible all say that the land is Israel's and that the Israelis would return again to their promised land in the end times.
EDITOR'S CHOICE: Quran explicitly refers to the return of the Jews to the Land of Israel before the Last Judgment

What ???

Nothing in the Qura'n said that the land is Israel's ,,,!! where did you get that
Yes they are mentioned about them and their history in Holly Qur'an but there is no mentioned that they have the right to take Palestine or they are indigenous to the Holy Land ,,

never

which book is older?

None of the books speak of "the Land of Israel." That is a Zionist myth you are buying into.

 

[flowery]

That seems pretty greedy if that is what this is all about.

It's not greed, it's bigotry.

The Warlord Muhammad said that all lands that have been conquered by Muslims must forever remain under Muslim control, that there can be no peace unless the Kafirum are slaughtered and the Dhimmis accept Islamic domination with willing submission.

This leads to the position that not one grain of sand will be under the dominion of Infidels. It is this bigotry that drive PF and Sherri and the rest of the Muslims to reject peace, regardless of terms. Islam is the religion of war and will wage perpetual war rather than tolerate what they view as Muslim land being under the control of Infidels.

Why did not write other texts that tells the Non Muslims' and dhimmis have rights?
Why did not you write texts that tell us that it is forbidden to kill them?
or beat them, or steal their money, or even make scratch on their body without any reason?
why didn't you write that there are penalty for any Muslim who kill non Muslims?


If you want to explain the texts of the Qur'an and the words of the Prophet Muhammad
You must understand the era in which Islam began
And the circumstances that were around him
Even your circumstances ,
Christians were in bad situation with control of the church and the tyranny of governments
They lived under the shadow of capitalism and communism
Islam came to make people worship the God instead of worshiping people
Plus ,, It is not compulsory to converted to Islam

It is Forbidden to kill people, and that's what we learned from the Qur'an and Hadith
Whether they are Muslims or infidels or dhimmis
Every human being has rights

And the Lord will punish a Muslim who dared kill the other
Except those who are attacking
It is called (Self-defense) , which is not forbidden at all

Britain , America, Israel, Russia, China, France and many other countries have killed unlawfully
Some countries still do it, they kill Muslims and destroy Mosques
Prophet Muhammad order Muslims if they want to open countries and spread Islam , he ordered them not to kill women, or children or priest , not to destroy Churches or any place that they worship their God in, and plus gave to non-Muslims their rights to choose any religion they want.

Why didn't you write all these, they are facts by the way.


Islam freed some countries from slavery and did not force them to be Muslim and gave them their rights. He did not even deprive them from practicing their religion, either if they were Christians or Jews or even without religion

We spread peace in the entire country that have been opened
The Kings who were rules your countries in the past were stealing from nations and impose taxes

This is the testimony of non-Muslim Westerners themselves about Prophet Mohammad peace be upon him

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyXn7ftUYT8]what did they say about prophet Muhammad : PBUH - YouTube[/ame]

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

Scottish Church votes to ignore Israel in campaigns

By*Jonathan Kalmus, May 31, 2012. "Follow The JC on TwitterThe Scottish Church will no longer consider the Israeli perspective when campaigning on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, its General Assembly has voted.Delegates in Edinburgh at the annual conference of Scotland’s largest church, which has over 450,000 members, overwhelmingly voted against a motion to “ensure a proper balance between the Israeli and Palestinian perspectives” at a session on Gaza.It followed the adoption of a special report and vote instructing the church to lobby the British government to “end the inhumane blockade of Gaza and related violence”. The report suggested the church may stop support for a two-state solution, but also condemned rocket attacks on Israel.When urged by a delegate to reverse the one-sided approach at last Monday’s assembly meeting of the Church and Society Council, convenor Rev Ian Galloway said: “There could never be a truly balanced view between Israel and Palestine”.The vote means future reports and resource material produced by the church for its members would not present an Israeli narrative. " Scottish Church votes to ignore Israel in campaigns | The Jewish Chronicle. This Christian church rejects the Israeli Narrative and it is a rejection of Zionism.

 

[Michelle420]

That seems pretty greedy if that is what this is all about.

It is not what it is about at all. Its about millions unlawfully displaced from their lands and homes that includes Palestinian Christians.

The even larger number of Arab Jews 'unlawfully displaced from their lands and homes' somehow never penetrates the consciousness of those promoting themselves as "people of conscience".

What so amazes me about that 'blind spot' is that Israel is repeatedly alleged to have had a 'policy' and 'laws' specifically to remove nonJews. And yet in country after country, the Jewish citizenry were legislated out of their possessions (meaning there were overt laws and policies, the 'smoking gun' not present in Israeli law) , property and rights - beggared and cast out. But somehow the 'humanitarian people of conscience' deny that this ever happened: they refuse to disuss the fact that Arab League nations conspired to eject their long-established Jewish citizenry (who were not attacking anyone!) ???

Then there's the idiotic noise made by those same 'pacifist humanitarians "But you can't punish the Palestinians for what they didn't do"......

How is it 'punishing the Palestinans' to merely acknowledge the abuses against Arab Jews by Arab Muslims? That certainly would make no sense - except of course for the Jews pushed out of their homes in the Mandate by Arabs (Jordan will have to answer for its ethnic cleansing of 'East Jerusalem') I have made NO suggestion about what I think 'should' be done to right that wrong - but taking it out on the Palestnian people would be a really stupid move, and wrong.

I would like to see the Arab Jews have a chance to be compensated for what the nations of Egypt, Syria, Iraq and others have stolen from them. There is no point in a 'right of return' since nobody in or out of those nations is willing to let the Jews have their homes and businesses back - and more importantly, no other nation on earth is willing to even try to guarantee their safety in such a hostile environment.

If it was wrong to 'ethnically cleanse' the Palestinians, it was equally as wrong to do the same to the Arab Jews.

If Palestininan refugees deserve compensation, then so do Arab Jewish refugees - whether they are beggars or billionaires doesn't matter.

So long as Arab League nations which ethnically cleansed their Jewish citizenry insist on making noises about a 'Palestinian right of return' - one would expect to see their governments FIRST act promptly and generously to compensate the refugees who they themselves created.

Yeah it's wrong for anyone to do.

It does seem very greedy though that the muslim population outnumbers the jewish population and they want to dominate every inch of land.

They should just get over it.

 

[Michelle420]

That seems pretty greedy if that is what this is all about.

It's not greed, it's bigotry.

The Warlord Muhammad said that all lands that have been conquered by Muslims must forever remain under Muslim control, that there can be no peace unless the Kafirum are slaughtered and the Dhimmis accept Islamic domination with willing submission.

This leads to the position that not one grain of sand will be under the dominion of Infidels. It is this bigotry that drive PF and Sherri and the rest of the Muslims to reject peace, regardless of terms. Islam is the religion of war and will wage perpetual war rather than tolerate what they view as Muslim land being under the control of Infidels.

Why did not write other texts that tells the Non Muslims' and dhimmis have rights?
Why did not you write texts that tell us that it is forbidden to kill them?
or beat them, or steal their money, or even make scratch on their body without any reason?
why didn't you write that there are penalty for any Muslim who kill non Muslims?


If you want to explain the texts of the Qur'an and the words of the Prophet Muhammad
You must understand the era in which Islam began
And the circumstances that were around him
Even your circumstances ,
Christians were in bad situation with control of the church and the tyranny of governments
They lived under the shadow of capitalism and communism
Islam came to make people worship the God instead of worshiping people
Plus ,, It is not compulsory to converted to Islam

It is Forbidden to kill people, and that's what we learned from the Qur'an and Hadith
Whether they are Muslims or infidels or dhimmis
Every human being has rights

And the Lord will punish a Muslim who dared kill the other
Except those who are attacking
It is called (Self-defense) , which is not forbidden at all

Britain , America, Israel, Russia, China, France and many other countries have killed unlawfully
Some countries still do it, they kill Muslims and destroy Mosques
Prophet Muhammad order Muslims if they want to open countries and spread Islam , he ordered them not to kill women, or children or priest , not to destroy Churches or any place that they worship their God in, and plus gave to non-Muslims their rights to choose any religion they want.

Why didn't you write all these, they are facts by the way.


Islam freed some countries from slavery and did not force them to be Muslim and gave them their rights. He did not even deprive them from practicing their religion, either if they were Christians or Jews or even without religion

We spread peace in the entire country that have been opened
The Kings who were rules your countries in the past were stealing from nations and impose taxes

This is the testimony of non-Muslim Westerners themselves about Prophet Mohammad peace be upon him

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyXn7ftUYT8]what did they say about prophet Muhammad : PBUH - YouTube[/ame]

But Muhammed came after Jesus correct?

I mean if a modern day Prophet was here and declared both sides wrong does that supersede everything?

I am not religious, so frankly I don't care about the religious reason from either side.

That said, if you look at a map the muslims pretty much own and live in all surrounding areas.

So they can give a little piece of land up.

 

[Michelle420]

What ???

Nothing in the Qura'n said that the land is Israel's ,,,!! where did you get that
Yes they are mentioned about them and their history in Holly Qur'an but there is no mentioned that they have the right to take Palestine or they are indigenous to the Holy Land ,,

never

which book is older?

None of the books speak of "the Land of Israel." That is a Zionist myth you are buying into.

I asked questions.

You replied with this?

Which book is older>?

Are you religious at all?

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

It is not what it is about at all. Its about millions unlawfully displaced from their lands and homes that includes Palestinian Christians.

The even larger number of Arab Jews 'unlawfully displaced from their lands and homes' somehow never penetrates the consciousness of those promoting themselves as "people of conscience".

What so amazes me about that 'blind spot' is that Israel is repeatedly alleged to have had a 'policy' and 'laws' specifically to remove nonJews. And yet in country after country, the Jewish citizenry were legislated out of their possessions (meaning there were overt laws and policies, the 'smoking gun' not present in Israeli law) , property and rights - beggared and cast out. But somehow the 'humanitarian people of conscience' deny that this ever happened: they refuse to disuss the fact that Arab League nations conspired to eject their long-established Jewish citizenry (who were not attacking anyone!) ???

Then there's the idiotic noise made by those same 'pacifist humanitarians "But you can't punish the Palestinians for what they didn't do"......

How is it 'punishing the Palestinans' to merely acknowledge the abuses against Arab Jews by Arab Muslims? That certainly would make no sense - except of course for the Jews pushed out of their homes in the Mandate by Arabs (Jordan will have to answer for its ethnic cleansing of 'East Jerusalem') I have made NO suggestion about what I think 'should' be done to right that wrong - but taking it out on the Palestnian people would be a really stupid move, and wrong.

I would like to see the Arab Jews have a chance to be compensated for what the nations of Egypt, Syria, Iraq and others have stolen from them. There is no point in a 'right of return' since nobody in or out of those nations is willing to let the Jews have their homes and businesses back - and more importantly, no other nation on earth is willing to even try to guarantee their safety in such a hostile environment.

If it was wrong to 'ethnically cleanse' the Palestinians, it was equally as wrong to do the same to the Arab Jews.

If Palestininan refugees deserve compensation, then so do Arab Jewish refugees - whether they are beggars or billionaires doesn't matter.

So long as Arab League nations which ethnically cleansed their Jewish citizenry insist on making noises about a 'Palestinian right of return' - one would expect to see their governments FIRST act promptly and generously to compensate the refugees who they themselves created.

Yeah it's wrong for anyone to do.

It does seem very greedy though that the muslim population outnumbers the jewish population and they want to dominate every inch of land.

They should just get over it.

There were and are a people called Palestinian in Palestine and they are the indigenous people of Palestine. Most are Muslim, some are Christians. The conflict is all about their rights in the land and to live free of Occupation in their homeland. I actually believe at this point they would be willing to accept one state, but they want equal rights and the right to vote and their basic human rights respected.

 

[Michelle420]

The even larger number of Arab Jews 'unlawfully displaced from their lands and homes' somehow never penetrates the consciousness of those promoting themselves as "people of conscience".

What so amazes me about that 'blind spot' is that Israel is repeatedly alleged to have had a 'policy' and 'laws' specifically to remove nonJews. And yet in country after country, the Jewish citizenry were legislated out of their possessions (meaning there were overt laws and policies, the 'smoking gun' not present in Israeli law) , property and rights - beggared and cast out. But somehow the 'humanitarian people of conscience' deny that this ever happened: they refuse to disuss the fact that Arab League nations conspired to eject their long-established Jewish citizenry (who were not attacking anyone!) ???

Then there's the idiotic noise made by those same 'pacifist humanitarians "But you can't punish the Palestinians for what they didn't do"......

How is it 'punishing the Palestinans' to merely acknowledge the abuses against Arab Jews by Arab Muslims? That certainly would make no sense - except of course for the Jews pushed out of their homes in the Mandate by Arabs (Jordan will have to answer for its ethnic cleansing of 'East Jerusalem') I have made NO suggestion about what I think 'should' be done to right that wrong - but taking it out on the Palestnian people would be a really stupid move, and wrong.

I would like to see the Arab Jews have a chance to be compensated for what the nations of Egypt, Syria, Iraq and others have stolen from them. There is no point in a 'right of return' since nobody in or out of those nations is willing to let the Jews have their homes and businesses back - and more importantly, no other nation on earth is willing to even try to guarantee their safety in such a hostile environment.

If it was wrong to 'ethnically cleanse' the Palestinians, it was equally as wrong to do the same to the Arab Jews.

If Palestininan refugees deserve compensation, then so do Arab Jewish refugees - whether they are beggars or billionaires doesn't matter.

So long as Arab League nations which ethnically cleansed their Jewish citizenry insist on making noises about a 'Palestinian right of return' - one would expect to see their governments FIRST act promptly and generously to compensate the refugees who they themselves created.

Yeah it's wrong for anyone to do.

It does seem very greedy though that the muslim population outnumbers the jewish population and they want to dominate every inch of land.

They should just get over it.

There were and are a people called Palestinian in Palestine and they are the indigenous people of Palestine. Most are Muslim, some are Christians. The conflict is all about their rights in the land and to live free of Occupation in their homeland. I actually believe at this point they would be willing to accept one state, but they want equal rights and the right to vote and their basic human rights respected.

Sounds reasonable, do they want the same for the other side?

 

[P F Tinmore]

It's not greed, it's bigotry.

The Warlord Muhammad said that all lands that have been conquered by Muslims must forever remain under Muslim control, that there can be no peace unless the Kafirum are slaughtered and the Dhimmis accept Islamic domination with willing submission.

This leads to the position that not one grain of sand will be under the dominion of Infidels. It is this bigotry that drive PF and Sherri and the rest of the Muslims to reject peace, regardless of terms. Islam is the religion of war and will wage perpetual war rather than tolerate what they view as Muslim land being under the control of Infidels.

Why did not write other texts that tells the Non Muslims' and dhimmis have rights?
Why did not you write texts that tell us that it is forbidden to kill them?
or beat them, or steal their money, or even make scratch on their body without any reason?
why didn't you write that there are penalty for any Muslim who kill non Muslims?


If you want to explain the texts of the Qur'an and the words of the Prophet Muhammad
You must understand the era in which Islam began
And the circumstances that were around him
Even your circumstances ,
Christians were in bad situation with control of the church and the tyranny of governments
They lived under the shadow of capitalism and communism
Islam came to make people worship the God instead of worshiping people
Plus ,, It is not compulsory to converted to Islam

It is Forbidden to kill people, and that's what we learned from the Qur'an and Hadith
Whether they are Muslims or infidels or dhimmis
Every human being has rights

And the Lord will punish a Muslim who dared kill the other
Except those who are attacking
It is called (Self-defense) , which is not forbidden at all

Britain , America, Israel, Russia, China, France and many other countries have killed unlawfully
Some countries still do it, they kill Muslims and destroy Mosques
Prophet Muhammad order Muslims if they want to open countries and spread Islam , he ordered them not to kill women, or children or priest , not to destroy Churches or any place that they worship their God in, and plus gave to non-Muslims their rights to choose any religion they want.

Why didn't you write all these, they are facts by the way.


Islam freed some countries from slavery and did not force them to be Muslim and gave them their rights. He did not even deprive them from practicing their religion, either if they were Christians or Jews or even without religion

We spread peace in the entire country that have been opened
The Kings who were rules your countries in the past were stealing from nations and impose taxes

This is the testimony of non-Muslim Westerners themselves about Prophet Mohammad peace be upon him

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyXn7ftUYT8]what did they say about prophet Muhammad : PBUH - YouTube[/ame]

But Muhammed came after Jesus correct?

I mean if a modern day Prophet was here and declared both sides wrong does that supersede everything?

I am not religious, so frankly I don't care about the religious reason from either side.

That said, if you look at a map the muslims pretty much own and live in all surrounding areas.

So they can give a little piece of land up.

The Palestinian refugees lost all of their land not just a piece of it.

 

[Michelle420]

Why did not write other texts that tells the Non Muslims' and dhimmis have rights?
Why did not you write texts that tell us that it is forbidden to kill them?
or beat them, or steal their money, or even make scratch on their body without any reason?
why didn't you write that there are penalty for any Muslim who kill non Muslims?


If you want to explain the texts of the Qur'an and the words of the Prophet Muhammad
You must understand the era in which Islam began
And the circumstances that were around him
Even your circumstances ,
Christians were in bad situation with control of the church and the tyranny of governments
They lived under the shadow of capitalism and communism
Islam came to make people worship the God instead of worshiping people
Plus ,, It is not compulsory to converted to Islam

It is Forbidden to kill people, and that's what we learned from the Qur'an and Hadith
Whether they are Muslims or infidels or dhimmis
Every human being has rights

And the Lord will punish a Muslim who dared kill the other
Except those who are attacking
It is called (Self-defense) , which is not forbidden at all

Britain , America, Israel, Russia, China, France and many other countries have killed unlawfully
Some countries still do it, they kill Muslims and destroy Mosques
Prophet Muhammad order Muslims if they want to open countries and spread Islam , he ordered them not to kill women, or children or priest , not to destroy Churches or any place that they worship their God in, and plus gave to non-Muslims their rights to choose any religion they want.

Why didn't you write all these, they are facts by the way.


Islam freed some countries from slavery and did not force them to be Muslim and gave them their rights. He did not even deprive them from practicing their religion, either if they were Christians or Jews or even without religion

We spread peace in the entire country that have been opened
The Kings who were rules your countries in the past were stealing from nations and impose taxes

This is the testimony of non-Muslim Westerners themselves about Prophet Mohammad peace be upon him

what did they say about prophet Muhammad : PBUH - YouTube

But Muhammed came after Jesus correct?

I mean if a modern day Prophet was here and declared both sides wrong does that supersede everything?

I am not religious, so frankly I don't care about the religious reason from either side.

That said, if you look at a map the muslims pretty much own and live in all surrounding areas.

So they can give a little piece of land up.

The Palestinian refugees lost all of their land not just a piece of it.

How many Palestinians are there and where do they all live right now?