Some people take more convincing than others. Are you interested in discovering the truth or not?
Are YOU interested in discovering truth?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Some people take more convincing than others. Are you interested in discovering the truth or not?
Some people take more convincing than others. Are you interested in discovering the truth or not?
Are YOU interested in discovering truth?
Some people take more convincing than others. Are you interested in discovering the truth or not?
Are YOU interested in discovering truth?
Absolutely. Why wouldn’t I be?
What the hell kind of a question is that?Some people take more convincing than others. Are you interested in discovering the truth or not?
Are YOU interested in discovering truth?
Absolutely. Why wouldn’t I be?
Do you have a biological father?
What the hell kind of a question is that?Some people take more convincing than others. Are you interested in discovering the truth or not?
Are YOU interested in discovering truth?
Absolutely. Why wouldn’t I be?
Do you have a biological father?
What the hell kind of a question is that?Some people take more convincing than others. Are you interested in discovering the truth or not?
Are YOU interested in discovering truth?
Absolutely. Why wouldn’t I be?
Do you have a biological father?
A leading one.
To see how close you are willing to get to the "truth"
What the hell kind of a question is that?Are YOU interested in discovering truth?
Absolutely. Why wouldn’t I be?
Do you have a biological father?
A leading one.
To see how close you are willing to get to the "truth"
Get to the point or I’m out.
INTHE HOUSE INVESTIGATION...THE SENATE DOES NOT INVESTIGATE THEY REACH A CONCLUSION!Is this a CRIMINAL TRIAL???...How many times have we heard it is a political trial....HUGE DIFFERENCE! IF YOU think IT IS CRIMINAL quote us the law and statutes that were broken....I Haven't seen or heard of any!
No, I don’t think it’s a criminal trial, but every impeachment trial has included witnesses.
...But keep going, we need more good laughs from the wee IQ crowd!
No one is asking the Senate to investigate. Senate is supposed to have a trial. Witnesses are called at trials.
Unless you want a show trial...
You are just WRONG Colfax!
It is up to the House to have the witnesses, and they did not even try to compel them to testify by running the request through the Supreme Court. Don't you read newspapers or other media?
If you want fairness, all this is in reality is another "gotcha!" It is NOT a slam-dunk that the Senate can force testimony from these people if the Trump Administration uses executive priv. That would mean, the Senate would then have to do what the House refused to do, and run it by the whole Supreme Court, stalling the whole outcome, leaving it up in the air.
So, in essence by using this tactic, the House got to impeach the President, while not allowing the Senate to vindicate him, as they would be having to wait for the Supreme Court to rule; and that could take months to get the trial off the ground.
No, the House did this to themselves, and did it on purpose, trying to put the onus on the Senate to do the Houses's job; in essence, trying to "eat their cake, and have it too!" You see, the House doesn't REALLY want witnesses because of what would come out. They only want Americans to BELIEVE they champion this, so they can blame the Senate, lol!
Possibly/probably a smart political move by the Democrats, if the GOP has no answer to it. Do they? I don't know; starting Tuesday we will find out!
Bolton has stated he will testify if called before the Senate. I’d say that’s a testimony worth hearing, wouldn’t you?
Are you interested in getting at the truth?
What the hell kind of a question is that?Absolutely. Why wouldn’t I be?
Do you have a biological father?
A leading one.
To see how close you are willing to get to the "truth"
Get to the point or I’m out.
The point is that there are truths that you are likely in denial of and I was going to lead you to one of them.
What the hell kind of a question is that?Do you have a biological father?
A leading one.
To see how close you are willing to get to the "truth"
Get to the point or I’m out.
The point is that there are truths that you are likely in denial of and I was going to lead you to one of them.
Then go ahead and state your truth.
Are you? See, most of those wailing that they want all this additional testimony will turn right around and insist they're lying if that testimony is not derogatory.INTHE HOUSE INVESTIGATION...THE SENATE DOES NOT INVESTIGATE THEY REACH A CONCLUSION!Is this a CRIMINAL TRIAL???...How many times have we heard it is a political trial....HUGE DIFFERENCE! IF YOU think IT IS CRIMINAL quote us the law and statutes that were broken....I Haven't seen or heard of any!
No, I don’t think it’s a criminal trial, but every impeachment trial has included witnesses.
...But keep going, we need more good laughs from the wee IQ crowd!
No one is asking the Senate to investigate. Senate is supposed to have a trial. Witnesses are called at trials.
Unless you want a show trial...
You are just WRONG Colfax!
It is up to the House to have the witnesses, and they did not even try to compel them to testify by running the request through the Supreme Court. Don't you read newspapers or other media?
If you want fairness, all this is in reality is another "gotcha!" It is NOT a slam-dunk that the Senate can force testimony from these people if the Trump Administration uses executive priv. That would mean, the Senate would then have to do what the House refused to do, and run it by the whole Supreme Court, stalling the whole outcome, leaving it up in the air.
So, in essence by using this tactic, the House got to impeach the President, while not allowing the Senate to vindicate him, as they would be having to wait for the Supreme Court to rule; and that could take months to get the trial off the ground.
No, the House did this to themselves, and did it on purpose, trying to put the onus on the Senate to do the Houses's job; in essence, trying to "eat their cake, and have it too!" You see, the House doesn't REALLY want witnesses because of what would come out. They only want Americans to BELIEVE they champion this, so they can blame the Senate, lol!
Possibly/probably a smart political move by the Democrats, if the GOP has no answer to it. Do they? I don't know; starting Tuesday we will find out!
Bolton has stated he will testify if called before the Senate. I’d say that’s a testimony worth hearing, wouldn’t you?
Are you interested in getting at the truth?
What the hell kind of a question is that?Absolutely. Why wouldn’t I be?
Do you have a biological father?
A leading one.
To see how close you are willing to get to the "truth"
Get to the point or I’m out.
The point is that there are truths that you are likely in denial of and I was going to lead you to one of them.
INTHE HOUSE INVESTIGATION...THE SENATE DOES NOT INVESTIGATE THEY REACH A CONCLUSION!No, I don’t think it’s a criminal trial, but every impeachment trial has included witnesses.
...But keep going, we need more good laughs from the wee IQ crowd!
No one is asking the Senate to investigate. Senate is supposed to have a trial. Witnesses are called at trials.
Unless you want a show trial...
You are just WRONG Colfax!
It is up to the House to have the witnesses, and they did not even try to compel them to testify by running the request through the Supreme Court. Don't you read newspapers or other media?
If you want fairness, all this is in reality is another "gotcha!" It is NOT a slam-dunk that the Senate can force testimony from these people if the Trump Administration uses executive priv. That would mean, the Senate would then have to do what the House refused to do, and run it by the whole Supreme Court, stalling the whole outcome, leaving it up in the air.
So, in essence by using this tactic, the House got to impeach the President, while not allowing the Senate to vindicate him, as they would be having to wait for the Supreme Court to rule; and that could take months to get the trial off the ground.
No, the House did this to themselves, and did it on purpose, trying to put the onus on the Senate to do the Houses's job; in essence, trying to "eat their cake, and have it too!" You see, the House doesn't REALLY want witnesses because of what would come out. They only want Americans to BELIEVE they champion this, so they can blame the Senate, lol!
Possibly/probably a smart political move by the Democrats, if the GOP has no answer to it. Do they? I don't know; starting Tuesday we will find out!
Bolton has stated he will testify if called before the Senate. I’d say that’s a testimony worth hearing, wouldn’t you?
Are you interested in getting at the truth?
You are using a smoke screen, lol. He can NOT testify if Trump uses executive priv, without the Supreme Court ruling.
And before you go to--------->what is Trump hiding then, let us remember that BOTH Obama and Clinton used that exact same order, to stop information from being released.
No matter, it was/is the House job to compel their testimony, not the Senates. If he/they do NOT testify for any reason, Pelosi dropped the ball, not the Senate. I mean, you DO know that the House COULD have reopened the case before delivering the articles, and gone to the Supreme Court, don't you!
There’s only one way to find out.Are you? See, most of those wailing that they want all this additional testimony will turn right around and insist they're lying if that testimony is not derogatory.INTHE HOUSE INVESTIGATION...THE SENATE DOES NOT INVESTIGATE THEY REACH A CONCLUSION!No, I don’t think it’s a criminal trial, but every impeachment trial has included witnesses.
...But keep going, we need more good laughs from the wee IQ crowd!
No one is asking the Senate to investigate. Senate is supposed to have a trial. Witnesses are called at trials.
Unless you want a show trial...
You are just WRONG Colfax!
It is up to the House to have the witnesses, and they did not even try to compel them to testify by running the request through the Supreme Court. Don't you read newspapers or other media?
If you want fairness, all this is in reality is another "gotcha!" It is NOT a slam-dunk that the Senate can force testimony from these people if the Trump Administration uses executive priv. That would mean, the Senate would then have to do what the House refused to do, and run it by the whole Supreme Court, stalling the whole outcome, leaving it up in the air.
So, in essence by using this tactic, the House got to impeach the President, while not allowing the Senate to vindicate him, as they would be having to wait for the Supreme Court to rule; and that could take months to get the trial off the ground.
No, the House did this to themselves, and did it on purpose, trying to put the onus on the Senate to do the Houses's job; in essence, trying to "eat their cake, and have it too!" You see, the House doesn't REALLY want witnesses because of what would come out. They only want Americans to BELIEVE they champion this, so they can blame the Senate, lol!
Possibly/probably a smart political move by the Democrats, if the GOP has no answer to it. Do they? I don't know; starting Tuesday we will find out!
Bolton has stated he will testify if called before the Senate. I’d say that’s a testimony worth hearing, wouldn’t you?
Are you interested in getting at the truth?
So Mitch takes his ball and goes home
Let him sell to the voters that Trump was acquitted on the merits of his case
Deluded, The Bible states that in the latter days these people will be overtaken by strong delusions so that they believe lies.Are there any Liberals on this board who aren't emotionally and mentally disturbed?
Are there any Right of Liberal people on this Thread who realize the Liberals on this Thread are psychotic...or outright retarded?
Why would I even entertain you with something like that.....$20 can feed a lot of my rescue cats!What is it that ]Piglousi said....it is ALL ABOUT THE ALLEGATIONS....NOT THE FACTS.....YOU COMMIERATS are our entertainment!...ROTFLMFAO!So Mitch takes his ball and goes home
Let him sell to the voters that Trump was acquitted on the merits of his case
Think about it...
To you, he was guilty from the onset. You will simply dismiss any evidence that acquits him.
We don't have to worry about your objectivity, because you have none.
It's never been about if he was guilty or not. It's about how guilty is he and is it enough to justify removal from office. And now it's more. The Senate Republicans MUST give a reasonable facsimile of being fair and honest. Just to dismiss it won't work anymore. Only allowing Trump to present his side won't work anymore. Not allowing the House team to call on the people that Trump refused them during the impeachment phase won't cut it anymore. Refusing to supply many documents won't cut it anymore. I am predicting that a simple majority will vote to have him removed but it will fall just short of the 2/3rds required unless there is one hell of a Republican Blue Flu the say of the vote.
Tell you what. If you are right, I have to buy a MAGA hate, take my picture wearing it and wear it in public for a week. If I am right, you have to wear this hat.
If the vote is a simple majority for impeachment then you have to buy that hat and wear it for a solid week out in public and post a picture of you wearing it in here. If it's less than a simple majority then I get the same deal with a MAGA hat.
You are so sure, let's make it interesting. What are we talking about, 10 to 20 bucks? According to you, you are rich and I am poor. But I can afford the MAGA hat. Can you afford the MADA hat?
Are there any Liberals on this board who aren't emotionally and mentally disturbed?
Are there any Right of Liberal people on this Thread who realize the Liberals on this Thread are psychotic...or outright retarded?
House rules require the minority party to have a day to call witnesses. Nazi, Shifferbrains, and Nadless refused to give them that day.Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is as of now including in the U.S. Senate impeachment trial rules a “kill switch” that effectively allows for the president’s legal team to seek an immediate verdict or dismissal of the case should Democrats engage in any shenanigans like they did in the House process.
The revelation comes after the House finally late last week formally sent the Articles of Impeachment it adopted before Christmas—after holding them for more than a month without transmission—to the U.S. Senate, thereby triggering the start of a Senate trial. The Senate will formally commence its trial procedures in votes this coming week, and while some Republicans want to outright dismiss the charges altogether from the outset, others believe a trial should take place.
In so finally transmitting the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi also named impeachment case managers—the Democrats who will present and manage the House’s case to the Senate—last week. They include House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY). Both Schiff and Nadler were widely panned for the highly unfair process they ran in the House of Representatives, and many Senate Republicans do not trust them to refrain from playing games that seek to make the Senate trial unfair to the president as the highly partisan process in the House ended up.
Republicans on the House side, who were essentially powerless to stop the Democrats’ shenanigans since they are in the minority in the lower chamber, are warning Senate Republicans to be on the lookout for Schiff’s gamesmanship and that from his ilk.
“It’s incumbent upon the Senate to preserve the right of the President’s legal team to ask for a verdict or move to dismiss this sham impeachment anytime they..
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
------------
“killswitch” will be thrown only if any Dem pulls a ruthless, dishonest, crooked stunt for their own political gain.
Dems: OMG. That means we’re finished....Flushed, ....Kaput.....where is that trump RED MAGA CAP?....ROTFLMFAO!!!
The ONLY people pulling “shenanigans” in the Congressional Hearings were Republicans demanding witnesses who had nothing to do with the charges.
Republicans want to make this about the Bidens and it has NOTHING to do with the Bidens and everything to do with this illegal President.
This isn't a court, it is political.Courts do not call witnesses to discover crimes or wrongdoings.INTHE HOUSE INVESTIGATION...THE SENATE DOES NOT INVESTIGATE THEY REACH A CONCLUSION!Is this a CRIMINAL TRIAL???...How many times have we heard it is a political trial....HUGE DIFFERENCE! IF YOU think IT IS CRIMINAL quote us the law and statutes that were broken....I Haven't seen or heard of any!
No, I don’t think it’s a criminal trial, but every impeachment trial has included witnesses.
...But keep going, we need more good laughs from the wee IQ crowd!
No one is asking the Senate to investigate. Senate is supposed to have a trial. Witnesses are called at trials.
Unless you want a show trial...
Pelosi refused to subpoena these witnesses. It's not McConnell's job to call them for her.
Um, what? Witnesses are called to testify in court all the time.