CDZ The "gun rights" argument gets torn to pieces in this editorial

Status
Not open for further replies.
yeah , interesting . Dirty mouthed and the most interesting thing to me is that most English libs , lefties are always pushing for less freedom and liberty . Funny the things they argue for though . a couple months ago the pervs in England were putting on a 'face sitting' protest . I don't know details but I saw pics of face sitters in some demonstration or protest areas in 'londonistan' . Something to do with the English porn industry I think . No wonder that their government is letting their island and population be over run by imported people .
 
yeah , interesting . Dirty mouthed and the most interesting thing to me is that most English libs , lefties are always pushing for less freedom and liberty . Funny the things they argue for though . a couple months ago the pervs in England were putting on a 'face sitting' protest . I don't know details but I saw pics of face sitters in some demonstration or protest areas in 'londonistan' . Something to do with the English porn industry I think . No wonder that their government is letting their island and population be over run by imported people .
The face sitting protest was civil disobedience against the far right David Cameron government trying to outlaw certian types of poronography, despite it being harmless to society
 
funny what you consider Freedom 'english' , lots of your 'birds' , chicks woman and men getting pie eyed on weekends and falling asleep in their vomit in the public areas of 'londonistan' . But back to guns , why is the queen and tony blair allowed to have armed protection and self defense by guns but you guys are not ?? Did tonys body guard keep her job after she lost her glock in a Starbucks toilet while she was spending a penny ??
 
Despite being the number one country in the world for gun ownership we don't even make the top 100 in homicides. This guy is a broken record of stupidity.
 
Perhaps if you understood the written word better you would understand that the clause dealing with the Militia is not the controlling clause but simple one of any number of reasons why the People should be free to own possess and use firearms. The controlling clause is the one that states the RIGHT of the people to be armed shall not be infringed.

I realize expecting anyone from England to actually understand how the English language works is a hoot. But you really should try harder. Further the Supreme Court has clarified and expounded on what the Second Amendment means. It is a personal, individual right, not associated with any militia for a private citizen to own, possess and use firearms.
 
course I didn't 'english' , I just know that you are from England , land of the disarmed 'subject' . Why is the 'queen' and tony blair protected by guns but the tax paying Englishman isn't allowed to own guns or handguns for self defense and protection .
Well read the article I posted , and you WILL change your mind

I read the article and it didn't include anything new. Anti-gun nuts have been saying all of that for years. It is nonsense.

If you read the papers of the men who wrote the US Constitution, you would know that they believed in the citizen militia. They expected citizens to maintain arms for when they were needed.

But then, before your last ban you said if someone gave you and example of a gun being used in self defense you would change your mind. Funny how you bailed out on that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top