rtwngAvngr
Senior Member
- Jan 5, 2004
- 15,755
- 515
- 48
- Banned
- #41
Or courts and a pernicious bevvy of lawyers willing to misread the constitution to enact defacto discrimination against specified religious groupsjillian said:I hope you don't mind my stepping in here...but I've been watching you guys go back and forth on this for days...
Yes, a majority can be oppressed by the minority. But that only occurs when the minority has political/military power to enforce its will on the majority.
Christians as individuals have the right to shape society through the democratic and constitutional processes available to them, just like individuals of other faiths.Christians in this country are not "oppressed'. No one Christian is prohibited from going to Church and practicing his or her religion freely and openly. What has become a debate about "oppression" is really a result of the tension between evangelicals who want to assert their political power and blur the lines between Church and State and the rest of the country which has tried, in the face of huge power and money from the far right, to keep that from happening.
If the far right can frame the issue as "Christian-bashing", instead of what it is -- which is a fight against the theocratization of the U.S., then they get the average, everyday Christians to side with them. Because who wouldn't protect their group from being discriminated against?
So... the desire of the vast majority of the country to not be a theocracy should not be confused with a lack of basic respect for religious diversity in this country. Nor should the issue be framed in such a way that it is called what it isn't.
So... yes, Virginia, a majority can be oppressed. But Christians in the U.S. aren't. Just my two cents.![]()
Nobody's trying to theocratize the country. This is paranoia. Why does the aclu was time suing about decorations at christmas time?