The "genocide" LIE

In his May 22, 2025 piece, 'Spain should think thrice before it lectures Israel about genocide,' professor of political science Daniel Friedman sharply criticizes Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez for accusing Israel of committing “genocide” in Gaza, calling it both factually false and deeply hypocritical given Spain’s own dark history with the Jewish people.

Let’s begin with the accusation itself. The charge of genocide implies a deliberate attempt to annihilate an entire people. That is not what is happening in Gaza. Israel is engaged in a painful, prolonged war with Hamas, a terrorist group that deliberately embeds itself within civilian infrastructure – schools, hospitals, and mosques – using its own people as human shields while launching rockets at Israeli towns and cities.
Unlike genocidal regimes, Israel takes unprecedented steps to protect civilians. It issues warnings before airstrikes. It drops leaflets, makes phone calls, and broadcasts evacuation routes. No other country fighting a terrorist insurgency takes such measures. And let’s not forget: This war began on October 7, 2023, when Hamas massacred over 1,200 Israeli men, women, and children – an act of genocidal violence if there ever was one.

Spain’s Hypocrisy: Three Historical Genocides Against Jews.
The historical hypocrisy. Friedman notes that Spain (known in Hebrew as 'Sefarad') has repeatedly persecuted its Jewish population:

1. 12th century Almohad persecution:
The end of the “Golden Age” of Spanish Jewry under the Almohad Muslim regime, which gave Jews the choice to convert to Islam, flee, or die. Prominent figures like Maimonides’ family were forced to escape.

2. 1492 Spanish Expulsion:
Under King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella, approximately 200,000 Jews were expelled. Those who converted faced the Spanish Inquisition, which tortured and executed many for “heresy.” Jewish books were banned, synagogues turned into churches, and Jewish identity was systematically erased — amounting to both physical and cultural genocide.

3. Holocaust era (20th century):
During World War II, Spain largely closed its borders to its own Jewish citizens (about 4,000 Jewish Spaniards in Europe), readmitting only around 800. The rest were left vulnerable to Nazi deportation and extermination, making Spain complicit in the Holocaust.

This pattern is “transference” — Spain projecting its own guilt onto Israel.
In conclusion, Israel, established partly as a safe haven for Jews after centuries of persecution, is not committing genocide but defending itself against a Hamas regime explicitly dedicated to its destruction, while going to unusual lengths to protect Palestinian-Arab civilians caught in the crossfire.

____

'Spain should think thrice before it lectures Israel about genocide'
"Spain's historical relationship with the Jews makes its accusations of genocide hypocritical."
Daniel Friedman, 'Jerusalem Post', May 22, 2025.
 
The Three Streams Fueling the False “Genocide” Charge.

A.
The Ignorant and the Trend-Driven.

Well-meaning but uninformed people who have absorbed the slogan without understanding its true meaning. Caught up in social media outrage and campus fashion, they treat “genocide” as a dramatic buzzword to express discomfort with any war involving Israel. They fail to grasp the term’s legal and historical weight — especially its grotesque misuse against the Jewish state, the very people who suffered the real genocide in living memory.

B.
THE BULK:
The Jew-Haters and Professional Israelophobes.

Those who weaponize the accusation as a modern blood libel. This includes:

– Classic antisemites — Neo-Nazis, far-right extremists, and certain podcasters eager to diminish or deny the Holocaust while hurling the “genocide” charge at its survivors and descendants.
– Islamist antisemites and radical Islamic voices who blend ancient Jew-hatred with modern jihadist ideology.
– Fanatical inheritors of centuries-old antisemitic tropes, often cross-pollinating with each other.

A common tactic is blaming Jewish victims and promoting conspiracy theories such as “false flag” operations. Random Jews worldwide have been assaulted and harassed under the cover of this slur.

Then there are the Israelophobes — those for whom Israel is guilty by definition, regardless of the facts, the context, or the atrocities committed against her. This category includes certain NGOs and “human rights” organizations (such as B’Tselem/PHR-I and Human Rights Watch, various UN agencies who also have a notorious track record of appointing individuals with clear extremist and anti-Israel agendas. See also the “aparthrid” slur) that display a singular, obsessive bias against the Jewish state. Many Islamic academics and media personalities and the far-left also fall into this group. Israelophobia frequently overlaps with, and serves as a socially acceptable mask for, outright Jew-hatred.

Fact, just like the ‘apartheid’ slander, Israelophobia has been busy in the industry of propagating ‘genocide’ accusations for decades. The recent mass casualties have simply been a [tragic] convenience for advancing that narrative.”

C.
The Small, Ill-Informed Minority.
A relatively tiny group of genuinely misinformed individuals who have absorbed one-sided propaganda without exposure to the full context of Israel’s existential struggle against genocidal Hamas and other terror entities.

To be clear:
Gaza leadership Hamas and similar groups deliberately embed their military infrastructure within civilian areas—such as homes, schools, and hospitals. AKA the use of its own population as “human shields,” they operate in ways that increase the likelihood of civilian casualties. Civilian harm is not just an unfortunate byproduct but can serve a strategic purpose: generating international sympathy, increasing pressure on Israel, and delegitimizing Israeli military actions.

Israel, on the other hand, focused on minimizing civilian casualties despite operating in dense urban environments. The Israeli military uses measures like advance warnings (phone calls, text messages, leaflet drops), targeted strikes, and intelligence-based operations to reduce harm to noncombatants. It routinely accepts greater risk to its own soldiers—such as conducting ground operations instead of relying solely on airpower—to avoid more indiscriminate destruction.

From:
The “genocide” LIE
 
Debunking the "genocide" lie in Gaza. A new Blood Libel.
David & History for the Ages.
Feb 21, 2024
In this video, we tackle the controversial and misleading claim of a 'Gaza genocide'—a narrative often used to distort the reality of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. We break down the facts, examining the historical context, the use of terminology, and the true nature of the ongoing situation. By perpetuating the "genocide" claim, many are repeating a blood libel, accusing an entire people of atrocities they did not commit. Get a clear, fact-based perspective as we separate truth from propaganda, showing how such falsehoods can fuel misunderstanding, hatred, and conflict. If you're looking to understand the complexities of the Gaza issue beyond the headlines, this video provides the essential context you need.

Another point not mentioned in the video. Some may want to say the number of total deaths on each side is not equal, and therefore it means the side has less deaths is somehow guilty of wrongdoing.

For anyone who has had that thought here are a couple more stats: (Historians today would not say the British were more guilty of WWII b/c they had far fewer civilian deaths than Germany)
British Civilians killed in WWII: 70,000
Germany Civilians killed in WWII: 350,000-500,000.




Blood libel...

There are several other times in history you see it into the modern world. You see it a little bit in the ancient world, the Middle Ages. And then in the modern world, in the 17th century, there's some examples in Eastern Europe.

It reemerged in Damascus in 1840. I'm going to leave a link here in the description to give you some more detail on when it re-emerged in Damascus.
But there were basically these trials that Jewish people were tortured to get confessions that they were involved in these blood libel rituals.

And then of course, it was often used by Nazi propaganda during the years prior to World War II. And it circulates a lot in the Arab world today. I mean, you oftentimes get stories that Arab babies are used for blood for Jewish rituals. The most recent one I saw is that Israel is harvesting[sic] organs of babies and using them.

All these kind of crazy stories with no evidence that they're out there, which takes us to kind of this new form of blood libel, which I think does need to be explained clearly and objectively, which is currently in 2024 there's a war going on between Israel and Hamas in Gaza.

And people oftentimes, you see this on social media, they go, oh, Israel is committing genocide.

Well, genocide is the attempt to wipe out an entire group of people, and this is a line that's been used even before this conflict. This is not like all of a sudden now people are accusing Israel of genocide.

So you have to really dig into the details and the facts and the facts is these are some really important statistics and numbers that I want to share with you.

The population of the Palestinians before about 1950 was less than a million. Today in 2024, it's over 5 million. So that's not how a genocide works.

If you compare that to the Jewish people during World War II, it was about a third of the Jewish population went down as a result of the Holocaust. That's a tragic and horrific genocide. There was the targeting attempt to wipe out all the Jews.

Are there going to be civilian casualties in a war? Of course. Right? And so I really looked this up and I'm going to put some links again in the descriptions where you could find these numbers. If you don't trust the links-- you go, OK, I don't want to trust these links, do your own research on this.

But you will find this very consistently, that during this conflict in Gaza there's about a two to one ratio of civilians killed to combatants.

In other words, for every Hamas terrorist that Israel kills, there are two civilians killed as well. And they go well, OK, how does that represent compared to other events?

So I looked up some other wars. The Korean War, three to one. Three civilians killed for every combatant. The Iraq War, was four to one. World War II was about two to one. The NATO Yugoslavia conflict was about four to one. For every four combatants in Yugoslavia.., for every one combatant that was killed in Yugoslavia by NATO during those conflicts, there were four civilians killed. No one uses the word genocide for any of those, right?
And that's where you get into this inconsistency.

Another important point is Israel tends to warn the civilians in Gaza when they're going to attack.
People who do genocides don't do that.

Another factor is, I think it's really important that Israel does have the ability, if they wanted to, to basically wipe out hundreds of thousands of people in Gaza very quickly with their military. They don't. Instead, they literally send their own soldiers into Gaza, in foot soldiers as an infantry, which is much more dangerous. They're risking their own soldiers to limit casualties there.

And so I think that's important to remember as well.

And it's also on top of all of this. When you compare the ratios, Israel is dealing with a war where their enemies openly use hospitals, schools, civilians, as human shields. So if anything, you would expect the ratio to even be higher than it is. L
When I looked it up, I was expecting it to be higher, honestly, when you're fighting an enemy that's actually using their own people as human shields.

So when people say, well, OK, Israel is committing genocide, it would be like people saying during World War II, that the United States committed genocide in Germany because German civilians were killed while fighting the Nazis, right? And you have accounts of-- now let me say this. Can you say, you're too harsh as a society. You're fighting the war too harshly. Sure. Look, people do that with World War II all the time. Should the atomic bomb have been used? Some people say yes, some people say no. Nobody calls it a genocide. Should-- I shouldn't say nobody. I'm sure there's a few people but it's not a mainstream idea. Same thing with Germany. Germany was bombed tremendously for example by the British towards the end of World War II, and some people say, well, that was too aggressive. They didn't need to do that. Nobody calls it a genocide. And I have accounts and stories, and we could see this where literally when Germany was being bombed, when the atomic bombs were being dropped on Japan, American soldiers were cheering even. They were openly cheering because they thought, OK, we don't have to be fighting there and we might not need to die. Even with all that, even with people cheering this, no one called it genocide.

So the question is, why is this happening now uniquely to the Jewish state of Israel? And it's happening by design. It is a form of propaganda to create another example of anti-Semitism against the Jewish people. And this is why I call it a form of blood libel, because it's not the technical blood libel, although there are, again, some stories that they're using, blood and rituals and harvesting organs. But the term blood libel can have another meaning to it when you falsely accuse somebody of doing these horrific things that simply are not true.
And we see a correlation with this where more people who chant genocide, genocide, genocide against the Jewish state of Israel, you see more anti-Semitic incidents. And don't think it's a coincidence either that it's used specifically against the Jewish people because historically, people know the Jewish people went through the worst genocide in human history, and it also diminishes the term.

Look, there are other genocides.
There's the Armenian Genocide, for example, during the World War II.
That's a clear genocide.
What happened in Rwanda during the 1990s, that was a clear genocide. And every time you use that word when it's not, it diminishes the real genocides, and perhaps that's part of the agenda as well.

Regardless, I really hope people are careful about using this word. You don't throw it around. If you want to think that maybe Israel is being too aggressive, OK, everyone can have their own opinions on that. You have to look again, look at everything in the whole context. There's still hostages at the time I'm recording this. This has been a long fight for generations as all this is going on. I think you do need to know the entire nuanced history as to why this is happening. That's the very idea, does Israel have a right to exist in the minds of their enemies? All of these kind of things. And I've got long lectures explaining everything from ancient times to modern times, which you could check out. But the use of the word genocide is simply factually incorrect.
 
IMG-20260414-WA0000.webp

False genocide charges put Jews everywhere at risk:

1. The accusation of genocide against Israel is not an abstract debate. It stigmatizes Jews worldwide, giving cover to those who intimidate, harass and attack Jews on the street, in synagogues and at kosher restaurants. Students are bullied, mezuzahs torn down from doorposts and community organizations need constant police protection. This genocidal lie fuels the hatred of Jews (antisemitism) and threatens the safety of Jews everywhere.

2. Accusations of genocide target the Jewish people, not just Israel: Labeling Israel a ‘genocidal’ state is not just about one nation. It paints all Jews as complicit in humanity’s worst crime. These accusations are designed to alienate Jews from public life, delegitimize Jewish voices and rewrite Jewish history. The danger extends far beyond Israel’s borders – to the U.S., Australia, Europe and the rest of the world.

3. Activists rewrite definitions to fit accusations against Israel: Genocide is the “crime of crimes.” Diluting the term through false accusations cheapens the suffering of Armenians, Rwandans and other actual victims of genocide. Anti-Israel activist groups like Amnesty International admitted that Israel does not meet the accepted definition of genocide – so they argue the term must be “revised” or “broadened.” This is part of a larger pattern: “apartheid,” “refugee” and “statehood” have all been twisted into political weapons against Israel.

4. Hamas’s agenda is openly genocidal: Hamas openly declares in its founding charter the goal of killing Jews everywhere: “The Day of Judgment will not come until Muslims fight the Jews.” Leaders of the Iran-backed terror group have promised “a million Oct. 7s” and “Oct. 7 assaults will be repeated from the West Bank.” These declarations excuse the genocidal intent of Hamas.

5. Civilian suffering in war is not proof of genocide: War is tragic, and the suffering of Palestinians is real. But suffering in war is not proof of genocide – it must be tied to an intention to wipe out a people. Israel allows aid into Gaza, facilitates Palestinian medical treatment abroad and risks its own soldiers’ lives in ground combat to reduce civilian casualties. International law requires intent, and Israel’s actions directly contradict this claim. Even some anti-Israel activists admit the legal definition of genocide does not apply to Israel’s war goals.

6. Hamas uses civilians as weapons of war: Hamas turns Gaza hospitals, mosques and schools into military bases by placing its fighters and weapons among patients, worshippers and students. The terror group steals humanitarian aid to feed its terrorists instead of civilians and traps Gazan families inside buildings as shields. This strategy prolongs suffering and deliberately sacrifices Palestinian lives to drive its global propaganda efforts.

7. The news media amplified a flawed vote into global headlines: A small minority of IAGS members pushed through its Gaza ‘genocide’ resolution without full debate. One member called the process “an embarrassing absence of professionalism.” Yet reporters framed the conclusion as if the world’s genocide scholars had reached a unanimous determination – helping to spread misinformation and turning a disputed vote into worldwide headlines.

8. Echoes of the past: Twisting the Holocaust against Jews: Weaponizing the term “genocide” against the Jewish state perverts the memory of the Holocaust. The Nazis perfected the “Big Lie” – repeat a monstrous falsehood often enough and people will believe it. With horrific irony, anti-Israel activists use the same tactic today – repeating the genocide smear until it appears to be truth.

9. Peace is possible if Hamas chooses life over death: This war could have ended long ago – and it could end now if Hamas releases the hostages, lays down its weapons and allows new leadership for Gaza. Hamas clings to its genocidal dream while Palestinian civilians pay the price. True peace will come only when Hamas abandons death and chooses life – for Israelis, Palestinians and humanity.

Genocide Lies Against Israel Distort Truth and Endanger Jews.
Separate 3, 2025.
 
Approximately 72% of fatalities between the ages of 13-55 are men - the demographic category aligns with Hamas combatants.

Hamas admits 72% of combat-aged fatalities are men, quietly reduces civilian death toll - report.
A similar report by the Henry Jackson Society in December also concluded that Hamas had inflated the number of casualties in the war.
Apr 2, 2025

A male-heavy casualty profile (especially ages 13–55) is seen as evidence that:
Israel is primarily hitting combatants
Not indiscriminately killing civilians
The relatively lower number of women killed is explained by:
The gender imbalance in militant groups
Different exposure to combat situations.
 
Israel's Conduct in Gaza Does Not Resemble Genocide
Reason
05.11.2026


Israel's Conduct in Gaza Does Not Resemble Genocide. David Bernstein | 5.11.2026.

Frankly, I find the charge of genocide against Israel to be obviously absurd, one of those claims that true believers insist upon precisely because the claim is so implausible that promoting it is valuable to show you are a true believer. Hence the pressure by anti-Israel activists for everyone who purports to be "pro-Palestinian" to accept the genocide claim, or be excluded from the club.

Nevertheless, because the genocide lie is so common in public discourse over Gaza, I thought it would be useful to write a piece debunking the claim, though I wasn't sure where I would place it. Serendipitously, Skeptic Magazine solicited an article for me, giving me the opportunity to present my case in about four thousand words, with footnotes.

I also wrote a much shorter version for my Times of Israel blog. And an even shorter synopsis follows below:

The accusation that Israel is committing "genocide" in Gaza has become commonplace in protests, university activism, social media campaigns, and international legal rhetoric. But one striking feature of the debate is how little attention is paid to a basic question: what would genocidal behavior actually look like, and does Israel's conduct resemble it?

The answer is plainly no.

Genocide is not simply a war that causes extensive civilian casualties. It is the deliberate attempt to destroy a people as such. Historically recognized genocides share recognizable characteristics: civilians are targeted precisely because of their identity, and the perpetrators seek maximum civilian death rather than military victory.

Israel's conduct in Gaza looks very different.

To begin with, Israel has repeatedly taken steps that are fundamentally inconsistent with exterminatory intent. Before major operations, the Israeli military has issued evacuation warnings through phone calls, text messages, leaflets, and media announcements. It has established humanitarian corridors and periodically paused military activity to facilitate civilian movement and aid delivery. It has employed "roof-knocking" procedures designed to warn civilians before airstrikes. Armies attempting genocide do not warn civilian populations to leave targeted areas in advance.

The broader strategic picture points in the same direction. Israel possesses overwhelming military superiority over Hamas. If Israel's objective were truly the destruction of Palestinians as a people, the death toll could have been vastly higher within a very short time. Instead, Israel has fought a grinding urban campaign focused on Hamas infrastructure, tunnel systems, command centers, rocket launch sites, and militant leadership. The fact that civilian casualties have nevertheless been severe reflects the reality of urban warfare against an armed group deeply embedded in civilian areas, not a campaign aimed at exterminating Palestinians as such.

Indeed, Hamas's military strategy depends heavily on operating within densely populated civilian zones. Weapons are stored in residential neighborhoods, fighters operate from civilian buildings, and command infrastructure has been constructed beneath urban areas. None of this relieves Israel of its obligations under international humanitarian law. But it does provide an obvious military explanation for large-scale civilian casualties,

The genocide accusation also struggles to explain conduct that makes little sense if extermination were the goal. Israel has facilitated substantial humanitarian aid into Gaza despite the obvious military disadvantage that aid creates by potentially benefiting Hamas. Israeli officials have repeatedly coordinated aid deliveries, fuel transfers, field hospitals, and medical evacuations under enormous international pressure and domestic controversy. Again, critics may argue these efforts are inadequate. But inadequate humanitarian precautions are not the same thing as an intent to destroy an entire population.

One must also note the political context. Accusations that Israel is genocidal long predate the current war. Versions of the claim were promoted in Soviet anti-Zionist propaganda after the Six-Day War and later reemerged at the 2001 Durban conference, where activists portrayed Zionism itself as inherently racist and genocidal. In many cases, the conclusion preceded the evidence.

The danger of stretching the term genocide beyond recognition is substantial. If every brutal urban war involving high civilian casualties becomes genocide, then the concept loses the distinctive moral and legal meaning that made it powerful in the first place.
 
War crimes.

Among the mutilated and butchered bodies of young women slaughtered on October 7, it was their colourful, polished nails that many of the morgue staff remember.

Bright, beautiful, shiny, pink manicures glistening amid the pervasive 'grey and green' of death were often the only reminder of who these girls had been just hours earlier.

Because Hamas-led terrorists had not just executed these women. They had 'deliberately and systematically' defiled them, as the most comprehensive account of the atrocity released by The Civil Commission today shows.

Full Hamas October 7 depravity revealed for the first time

 
In a new report, a survivor from the October 7th attack, using the pseudonym Sapir, told how a woman was gang raped by terrorists, during which one cut off her breast.
'He throws it on the road, and they are playing with it,' she said. A terrorist then 'shot her in the head' while still assaulting her.
This is the reality of Hamas’ sexual violence, which some on the Left still choose to ignore.

IMG_4017.webp
 
EMH.
There is only a small group that keeps repeating the ACCIDENT of ussliberty so many years ago. Especially by fascist KKK DavidDuke's fans or "vanguard" supremacists.
The Liberty had an incompetent captain who placed his ship in an active war zone.
 
We are working to wipe the entire southern part of Lebanon up to the Litani River off the face of the earth; we will destroy all the houses to prevent Lebanese civilians from returning. We will destroy both the houses and the vegetation.

Mira Regev, Israel’s Minister of Transportation, openly declares that ethnic cleansing is being carried out in southern Lebanon and proudly admits that they will destroy all the homes of Lebanese families so that they cannot return to their homes.

In the past, the Nazis tried to hide their crimes; now they proudly talk about ethnic cleansing, and their Führer struts around on American television like a media star while bombing two countries and invading the territory of three others.
 
We are working to wipe the entire southern part of Lebanon up to the Litani River off the face of the earth; we will destroy all the houses to prevent Lebanese civilians from returning. We will destroy both the houses and the vegetation.
You are misquoting her. Here's the actual full quote translated from Hebrew by unknown source, emphasis mine:

"We have freedom of action up to the Litani. We are operating and flattening the entire area of the Litani in order to prevent those residents from returning to southern Lebanon and as I said ... (interrupted by interviewer) ... the houses, the houses, yes all the houses and the underground ... (interrupted by interviewer) ... the houses, the houses, and, of course, the vegetation which is used to fire at and to harm the IDF soldiers operating there. ... (interrupted by interviewer) ... No, we are saying up to the missile line where the IDF are positioned, a few kilometers from the northern border there are certainly no civilians entering or living there up to the Litani line there are several Christian villages there where people live, the rest of the residents have been evacuated. They are in northern Lebanon and we ... (interrupted by interviewer) ... Yes. All houses we've identified as containing weapons or ammunition where they are firing at the IDF forces. We are taking care of them by flattening the area."
The IDF is destroying military infrastructure used to harm the IDF and Israeli civilians and creating a buffer zone to prevent future belligerent attacks from armed forces. It is a military necessity.

ICRC IHL Database
Rule 129

A. Parties to an international armed conflict may not deport or forcibly transfer the civilian population of an occupied territory, in whole or in part, unless the security of the civilians involved or imperative military reasons so demand.
B. Parties to a non-international armed conflict may not order the displacement of the civilian population, in whole or in part, for reasons related to the conflict, unless the security of the civilians involved or imperative military reasons so demand.



Definition of ethnic cleansing (Encyclopedia Britannica): ethnic cleansing, the attempt to create ethnically homogeneous geographic areas through the deportation or forcible displacement of persons belonging to particular ethnic groups.
 
Back
Top Bottom