iceberg
Diamond Member
- May 15, 2017
- 36,788
- 14,926
- 1,600
hell, Schumer tells people to say that to scotus judges.Well, no, but "we know who you are and we're coming for you" is.
double standard bitches.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
hell, Schumer tells people to say that to scotus judges.Well, no, but "we know who you are and we're coming for you" is.
Would "a call to arms", or, "you will pay the price. You won't know what hit you" be credible threats?No credible threats, no problem.
Threaten people and terrorize them...get treated like a terrorist.
Always or when under certain administration's ?? I'd like to think the latter, but not sure how bad it is.I’ve known the FBI were bad actors since the Richard Jewell Fiasco
Do you need a warrant to watch people?Get a warrant. That's what we expect.
You should if law enforcement, otherwise you Open up an active investigation with warrants and everything included to be based upon certain criteria as laid out in our law's and constitution. Watching people without probable cause or not during an active investigation is called "stalking", and that's against the law.Do you need a warrant to watch people?
Not as part of an investigation it isn't.You should if law enforcement, otherwise you Open up an active investigation with warrants and everything included to be based upon certain criteria as laid out in our law's and constitution. Watching people without probable cause or not during an active investigation is called "stalking", and that's against the law.
How is this under the jurisdiction of the FBI? Usually, this is a local issue and handled locally, what Federal statute may they have violated?If the parents are acting like crazy nutbags and threatening people what the hell do you expect?
Think a little harder. Geez.How is this under the jurisdiction of the FBI? Usually, this is a local issue and handled locally, what Federal statute may they have violated?
The government does.Do you need a warrant to watch people?
For an arrest. Show me the law where the DOJ can't start an investigation.The government does.
you. couldn't keep up so why ask him to?Think a little harder. Geez.
It comes under "counter terrorism"How is this under the jurisdiction of the FBI? Usually, this is a local issue and handled locally, what Federal statute may they have violated?
Sure it does, the feds did that just to get involved and play politics. It gets old that nutters need to infiltrate our personal lives for no real reasons. The extreme left and right are the problem with our country.It comes under "counter terrorism"
Threats were limited to “you will regret the policies you are attempting to initiate”No credible threats, no problem.