The fallacy of self defence by gun

[Captain Caveman]

I've always stated that needing a gun for self defence was a fallacy, and we all know it is. So what's with the gun nuts running off and copying pasting articles from shady sources?

Well look no further, just simply check with Harvard and the studies -

Gun Threats and Self-Defense Gun Use

1-3. Guns are not used millions of times each year in self-defense We use epidemiological theory to explain why the “false positive” problem for rare events can lead to large overestimates of the i…

www.hsph.harvard.edu

Pardon the pun, Harvard blow holes in the gun nut's self defence argument.

So anyone arming up for the mistaken belief they need to for self defence against others, they're the worst candidate to own a gun.

 

[marvin martian]

I've always stated that needing a gun for self defence was a fallacy

Why do cops carry guns, then?

 

[Damaged Eagle]

So now you're saying we don't have to give forty billion dollars to the Ukraine so they can buy guns for their self defense?

*****SMILE*****

 

[Confederate Soldier]

A study by Harvard can't POSSIBLY have political bias, now couldn't it?

 

[johngaltshrugged]

And I've always said it's better to have a gun & not need it, than need a gun & not have it.
Self defense with a gun worked out pretty well for these folks

The Latest Crime News Provides Evidence in Favor of Armed Citizens

The month of January was replete with highly publicized examples of defensive uses of guns.

www.dailysignal.com

 

[Jimmy_Chitwood]

I've always stated that needing a gun for self defence was a fallacy, and we all know it is. So what's with the gun nuts running off and copying pasting articles from shady sources?

Well look no further, just simply check with Harvard and the studies -

Gun Threats and Self-Defense Gun Use

1-3. Guns are not used millions of times each year in self-defense We use epidemiological theory to explain why the “false positive” problem for rare events can lead to large overestimates of the i…

www.hsph.harvard.edu

Pardon the pun, Harvard blow holes in the gun nut's self defence argument.

So anyone arming up for the mistaken belief they need to for self defence against others, they're the worst candidate to own a gun.

Try and rob my place dawg and we will see who is right homes.

 

[Captain Caveman]

Why do cops carry guns, then?

Ask Harvard.

 

[marvin martian]

So anyone arming up for the mistaken belief they need to for self defence against others, they're the worst candidate to own a gun.

Are you at all bothered by the fact that Hitler used that exact argument to disarm Jews prior to their genocide?

 

[jbrownson0831]

I've always stated that needing a gun for self defence was a fallacy, and we all know it is. So what's with the gun nuts running off and copying pasting articles from shady sources?

Well look no further, just simply check with Harvard and the studies -

Gun Threats and Self-Defense Gun Use

1-3. Guns are not used millions of times each year in self-defense We use epidemiological theory to explain why the “false positive” problem for rare events can lead to large overestimates of the i…

www.hsph.harvard.edu

Pardon the pun, Harvard blow holes in the gun nut's self defence argument.

So anyone arming up for the mistaken belief they need to for self defence against others, they're the worst candidate to own a gun.

Wacko article, wacko reads it, wacko parrots the fake results.

 

[Captain Caveman]

A study by Harvard can't POSSIBLY have political bias, now couldn't it?

That's a Trump tactic when cornered, attack the source, lol.

 

[Sunsettommy]

I've always stated that needing a gun for self defence was a fallacy, and we all know it is. So what's with the gun nuts running off and copying pasting articles from shady sources?

Well look no further, just simply check with Harvard and the studies -

Gun Threats and Self-Defense Gun Use

1-3. Guns are not used millions of times each year in self-defense We use epidemiological theory to explain why the “false positive” problem for rare events can lead to large overestimates of the i…

www.hsph.harvard.edu

Pardon the pun, Harvard blow holes in the gun nut's self defence argument.

So anyone arming up for the mistaken belief they need to for self defence against others, they're the worst candidate to own a gun.

Well I am calling Harvard a liar because I used to read in a website that DAILY posted newspaper accounts of self defense in it which was a lot in a years time.

Then there have been several books published showing good evidence that self defense does happen and a quite a few times every year which I have one of in my large library collection.

Harvard just like many leftist organizations lies a lot.

 

[Captain Caveman]

Wacko article, wacko reads it, wacko parrots the fake results.

That's a Trump tactic when cornered, attack the source, lol.

 

[jbrownson0831]

That's a Trump tactic when cornered, attack the source, lol.

Pretty easy to attack a Dimmer Polly Parrot, dont give it any crackers....awwwk, awwk!!

 

[Captain Caveman]

Well I am calling Harvard a liar because I used to read in a website that DAILY posted newspaper accounts of self defense in it which was a lot in a years time.

Then there have been several books published showing good evidence that self defense does happen and a quite a few times every year which I have one of in my large library collection.

Harvard just like many leftist organizations lies a lot.

You're welcome to, and you would have to to keep your fallacy true. Unfortunately, there are various studies in that article that conclude the findings. So stamping your feet, sticking fingers in your ears shouting,"Ner ner ner", doesn't dismiss the academic studies and findings.

 

[jbrownson0831]

You're welcome to, and you would have to to keep your fallacy true. Unfortunately, there are various studies in that article that conclude the findings. So stamping your feet, sticking fingers in your ears shouting,"Ner ner ner", doesn't dismiss the academic studies and findings.

Oooh....Dimmeer "academic" studies. Well here's a result for you, when I am cornered, I shoot back.

 

[Captain Caveman]

Pretty easy to attack a Dimmer Polly Parrot, dont give it any crackers....awwwk, awwk!!

What's that retarded comment in English? I don't speak butchered American English, so could you up the grade on that one please.

 

[Captain Caveman]

Oooh....Dimmeer "academic" studies. Well here's a result for you, when I am cornered, I shoot back.

When did you get cornered? Do you know the date and place?

 

[jbrownson0831]

What's that retarded comment in English? I don't speak butchered American English, so could you up the grade on that one please.

What is hard to understand? You have nothing but wind blowing through your ears, so you simply repeat, or parrot, back whatever your Gestapo leaders tell you to...just like a Polly Parrot. Awwwk, Awwwk, Awwwk!

 

[Confederate Soldier]

That's a Trump tactic when cornered, attack the source, lol.

But don't I have a point?

Harvard's class of 2018 was surveyed about their political viewpoints. 13 percent of the freshmen identified as "somewhat conservative", and 2.6 percent identified as "very conservative". 23% called themselves moderates, and 60% identified as liberal.

 

[Captain Caveman]

What is hard to understand? You have nothing but wind blowing through your ears, so you simply repeat, or parrot, back whatever your Gestapo leaders tell you to...just like a Polly Parrot. Awwwk, Awwwk, Awwwk!

Nope, still a retard.