TroglocratsRdumb
Diamond Member
- Aug 11, 2017
- 45,928
- 67,998
- 3,615
Because you don't know who dropped the ballots.In what way?
You don't know where the ballot came from.
Ballots can be forged.
Every ballot should be tied to a real living citizen.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because you don't know who dropped the ballots.In what way?
The ballot is legal, the ballot collector is committing a crime if it is against election rules to be paid to collect ballots. It's a state issue. Not all states have it as illegal, is my understanding.not if you get paid!!!!! then the ballot is fruadulent.
So you would pay somebody to watch and check the ballot getting dropped off. But that would cost more money. And the tax payers don't want to pay more taxes.Why?
Why cant people just mail in the ballots? Why the special ballot drop boxes?
What about having poll workers at the ballot box who check IDs? One from each party at each box.
Seems reasonable, doesnt it?
BALLOT HARVESTING AND STUFFING BALLOT BOXES ARE ILLEGAL.
Nope ballot is fraudulentThe ballot is legal, the ballot collector is committing a crime if it is against election rules to be paid to collect ballots. It's a state issue. Not all states have it as illegal, is my understanding.
Not controlled. Poll workers should always be presentIn what way?
It’s called chain of custodyBecause you don't know who dropped the ballots.
You don't know where the ballot came from.
Ballots can be forged.
Every ballot should be tied to a real living citizen.
Your answer doesn't make any sense. Are you implying that if fraud occurs if the ballot is mailed it's prosecuted, but if fraud occurs if the ballot is hand dropped in a ballot box it's not?

Because you don't know who dropped the ballots.
You don't know where the ballot came from.
Ballots can be forged.
Every ballot should be tied to a real living citizen.
No problem at all and that's how elections are run, ALREADY.Every ballot should be tied to a real person who has only voted once.
What's the problem with that?
Every ballot is already tied to a real human being, a citizen who is registered to vote, who individually requested an absentee ballot be sent to them.Because you don't know who dropped the ballots.
You don't know where the ballot came from.
Ballots can be forged.
Every ballot should be tied to a real living citizen.
Every ballot is already tied to a real human being, a citizen who is registered to vote, who individually requested an absentee ballot be sent to them.
There can't be more absentee ballot votes counted, than the absentee ballots that were individually requested and sent out.
The election process has checks and balances put in place to prevent any kind of ballot stuffing or voting twice etc....
The key column in the Judicial Watch study that gives the percentage difference of registered voters over CVAP (the citizen voting age population from the ACS) is misleading because it includes inactive voters, Stark said.![]()
Judicial Watch finds 1.8 million ‘ghost voters’ in 29 states, warns of ‘dirty elections’
Judicial Watch has released a comparison study of Census Bureau population statistics and state registration data to reveal a notable disparity.www.washingtontimes.com
Ohh snopes LMAOThe key column in the Judicial Watch study that gives the percentage difference of registered voters over CVAP (the citizen voting age population from the ACS) is misleading because it includes inactive voters, Stark said.
The bottom line is that experts we consulted stated that the comparison between CVAP figures and voter registration figures do not prove the existence of “ghost voters” in counties. Rather, the two datasets make for problematic comparisons because of the differences in the time frame they were taken, the differing purposes of each set of data, and the method by which they are collected.
![]()
Do Hundreds of Counties Have 1.8 Million 'Ghost Voters' in the US?
A study published by the activist legal group Judicial Watch used two different types of data to make a comparison.www.snopes.com
Don't be silly.Ohh snopes LMAO