It’s problematic that no authors are named on this list, so that we could pick the psychos to focus on with much more efficiency, ex. Zinn’s history books....for young people....”Why do you want to be my daughter’s friend?”
Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz’s An Indigienous People’s History of the United States for Young People is tempting in Kindle format, because Kindle has key-word searching, though 272 pages is scant to justify that feature. Amazon says Zinn’s books are frequently purchased along with Dunbar-Ortiz’s. Some background on the authors of this list may be worthwhile. For example, Dunbar’s paternal grandfather was a socialist party member in Oklahoma.
Everything in every one of my posts is 100% true, accurate and correct.
Here's more proof of the racism you vote for:
you voted for this:
"Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believesblack people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin.
Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994.
“Melanin endows blacks with greater mental, physical, and spiritual abilities — something which cannot be measured by Eurocentric standards.” Kristen Clarke wrote."
“Melanin Endows Blacks with Greater Mental, Physical and Spiritual Abilities” (VIDEO)
Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believes black people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin. Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994. “Melanin endows blacks with greater ment ...
Yes, he is....as the the subsequent links I provided proved. Obviously you didn't read them.....typical willful ignorance of a Cheeto Jeezus acolyte.
It's like this sweetpea, when you make a claim, people will do research to see if that claim holds any water....they do so with a little thing called fact checking. The links I provided PROVE that Carlson is either a liar or too damned stupid to check his facts or both. This is his forte that he co-joins with his opinion. That makes him a useful idiot for the Cheeto Jeezus religion that has usurp the GOP. Carry on.
Mmm, not quite. That nonsense got started when in one of his speeches to the NOI rallies, Farrakhan EQUATED Obama with the "messiah". From them on, you had media wonks on both sides of the political aisle peppering their coverage of Obama with that word. Mind you, it was in effect a back handed attempt (promoted by the right wing media) to alienate any non-black voters from voting for him, and to paint black voters as dummies just following religious dogma and racial bias in voting en masse for a black candidate (IMHO, of course). But the people paid no attention to such silliness, and TWICE voted on the issues. Remember, the GOP gained control of both Houses because a large portion of voters withheld their congressional votes in protest over what they saw as Obama being too conciliatory to the GOP. They, and Obama, learned a hard lesson.
Oh, and FYI; the first time I heard the term "Cheeto Jeezus" was on a TV talk show called "The View"...it was uttered by Meaghan McCain, daughter of the late Sen. John McCain. She said it to point to the near fanatical religious approach that Trump supporters in Congress, the Media and the general public display even when Trump is caught flat footed lying.
And for the record, I'm a registered Independent. Hope this clears things up for you. Carry on.
2. Time's Nancy Gibbs who opened this week's cover story bycomparing Obama with Jesus:“Some princes are born in palaces. Some are born in mangers. But a few are born in the imagination, out of scraps of history and hope...” In the November 17 issue.
4. “Obama seemedthe political equivalent of a rainbow — a sudden preternatural event inspiring awe and ecstasy....” Time’s Joe Klein, October 23, 2006 cover story, "Why Barack Obama Could Be the Next President."
5. NBC’s Matt Lauer noted that “people” have called Obama “ ‘The Savior,’ ‘The Messiah,’ ‘The Messenger of Change,’“ Today Show, NBC, October 20, 2008.
6. The New York Time’s Judith Warner reported, “Many women- not too surprisingly – were dreaming about sex with the president [Obama]”.http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com...t-a-president/
“…the Obamas are not just a beacon of hope, inspiration and“demigodlikeness,”Ibid.
7. David Cordero, 24, made the sculpture for his senior show after noticing all the attention Obama has received: "All of this is a response to what I've been witnessing and hearing, this idea that Barack is sort ofa potential saviorthat might come and absolve the country of all its sins," Cordero said.Sculpture of Obama as Jesuscauses stir - politics - Decision '08 - Barack Obama News - msnbc.com
8. . In its November 22, 2010 issue, Obama has been shown by Newsweek on its cover page with multiple arms balancing several policy issues while raising his left leg mimickingthe cosmic dance of the Hindu deity; considered a manifestation of Lord Shiva.
... Newsweek has named Obama "god of all things" on its cover.
SOURCE: Times of India (November 20, 2010).
9. “I haven’t seen a politician get this kind ofwalk-on-watercoverage since Colin Powell a dozen years ago flirted with making a run for the White House,” said Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz on Meet the Press in February 2007
10. Samantha Fennell, formerly an associate publisher of Elle, wrote on the magazine’s website a month later: “When I attended my second “Obama Live” fund-raiser last week at New York City’s Grand Hyatt, . . . I was on my feet as Senator Obama entered the room. Fate had blessed me in this moment. . . . In a moment of divine intervention,he saw me,…”
11.Filmmaker Spike Lee, predicting an Obama victory, implicitly compared the candidate with Christ: “You’ll have to measure time by ‘Before Obama’ and ‘After Obama.’ . . .
12. Jesse Jackson, Jr. called Obama’s securing the Democratic nomination “so extraordinary thatanother chapter could be added to the Bibleto chronicle its significance.”
13. . Louis Farrakhan went one better, according to the website WorldNetDaily: “Barack has captured the youth. . . . That’s a sign.When the Messiah speaks,the youth will hear, andthe Messiah is absolutely speaking.”
14. His followers needed to re-elect him to a second term, so that he could continue to accomplish the promises he made, thus, realizing his vision of America as a more perfect political union or“heaven here on earth.”
The Gospel According to Apostle Barack, by Barbara A. Thompson.
15. "Does it not feel as ifsome special hand is guiding Obama on his journey, I mean, as he has said, the utter improbability of it all?"
-- Daily Kos
16"Obama's finest speeches do not excite. They do not inform. They don't even really inspire. They elevate. . . .He is not the Word made flesh, but the triumph of word over flesh . .. Obama is, at his best, able to call us back to our highest selves."
- Ezra Klein
17. "Obama has the capacity to summon heroic forces from the spiritual depths of ordinary citizens and to unleash therefrom a symphonic chorus of unique creative acts whose common purpose is to tame the soul and alleviate the great challenges facing mankind."
-- Gerald Campbell
18."We're here to evolve to a higher plane . . . he is an evolved leader . . . [he] has an ear for eloquence and a Tongue dipped in the Unvarnished Truth."
-- Oprah Winfrey
19. “I would characterize the Senate race as being a race where Obama was, let’s say, blessed and highly favored. That’s not routine. There’s something else going on. I think that Obama, his election to the Senate, was divinely ordered. . . . I know that that was God’s plan."
-- Bill Rush
20. "This is bigger than Kennedy. . . .This is the New Testament."| "I felt this thrill going up my leg. I mean, I don't have that too often. No, seriously. It's a dramatic event."
-- Chris Matthews
Newsweek editor Evan Thomas said President Obama is "sort of God" in a way that's "standing above the country." Transcript below.
"CHRIS MATTHEWS (HOST):Evan Thomas is editor at large for Newsweek magazine. Evan, you remember 1984. It wasn't 100 years ago. Reagan and World War II and the sense of us as the good guys in the world, how are we doing? EVAN THOMAS: Well, we were the good guys in 1984, it felt that way. It hasn't felt that way in recent years. So Obama's had, really, a different task We're seen too often as the bad guys. And he, he has a very different job from ... Reagan was all about America, and you talked about it. Obama is - we are above that now. We're not just parochial, we're not just chauvinistic, we're not just provincial. We stand for something, I mean in a way Obama's standing above the country, above above the world, he's sort of God."
You seem to think that these canned responses somehow disprove my previous assessment of Tucker Carlson.
Hint: they don't.
As for the regurgitation of this "messiah" bilge the right wing STILL carries on about after getting their butts whupped by Obama in two elections (popular and electoral vote, don't cha know): you (once again) inadvertently prove my point. All these quasi-religious references to Obama's speeches from pundits, politicos and news promoters came on the heels of Farrakhan's decree to his followers. Just as I said . But the smart voters, (All Americans of all races, creeds and colors) weren't buying it. Interesting, n-cest pas'?
And of course, you omit this tidbit from your cache of cliches':
The Atlantic covers news, politics, culture, technology, health, and more, through its articles, podcasts, videos, and flagship magazine.
www.theatlantic.com
A 3rd rate propagandist such as yourself will just deny the conclusive logic, and continue to parrot your myopic mantra ad nausea. I expect nothing less from you at this point. Carry on.
‘I won’t be pathologized for being White’: Man resigns, shreds school district over ‘white privilege’ training
An after-school coordinator at a New Hampshire elementary school has gone viral for resigning over the school’s embrace of anti-white critical race theory propaganda.
In a public resignation letter released Monday on Twitter, former Northwest Elementary after-school program coordinator Daniel Concannon, 40, accused his school district of having endorsed the “dehumanization and hatred of White people, as evidenced by their dissemination of the imbecilic ‘White Privilege’ curriculum.”
In the letter, he purposefully referred to the Manchester School District as “The Frankfurt School.” It was a reference to the school responsible for creating contemporary Marxism, which is believed to be at the root of CRT."
translation: another clown who can't deal with FACTS that point to the congenital racism in the American fabric....much less that skin color greatly increases your chances of beneficial treatment and opportunities. No one is asking the fool to apologize, as individually no one gives a damn about him.
My assessment of Tucker Carlson is valid and documented....your "messiah" dodge was aptly deconstructed with FACTS....pity you don't have the cojones to just concede a point, and will just throw anything against the wall repeatedly, hoping it sticks....but I expect nothing less from 3rd rate David Duke wanna be's. Carry on.
Once again, it appears that my role is to disabuse you of the lies your party and government school instituted.
David Duke was a Democrat, and believed as you do.
David Duke....the Democrat????
State Senator, 1975 (Baton Rouge Area)[edit]
Threshold > 50%
First Ballot, November 1, 1975
Louisiana State Senate, 1975
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Kenneth Osterberger 22,287 66
Democratic David Duke 11,079 33
N/A Others 1
Total 100
State Senator, 10th District, 1979 (Suburban New Orleans)[edit]
Threshold > 50% First Ballot, October 27, 1979
Louisiana State Senate, 10th District, 1979
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Joseph Tiemann 21,329 57
Democratic David Duke 9,897 26
N/A Others 6,459 17
Total 37,685 100
Democratic Nomination for United States Presidential Candidate, 1988 (Louisiana results)[edit]
Threshold = Plurality
1988 Democratic Presidential primary in Louisiana
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Jesse Jackson 221,522 35
Democratic Al Gore 174,971 28
Democratic Michael Dukakis 95,661 15
Democratic Dick Gephardt 67,029 11
Democratic Gary Hart 26,437 4
Democratic David Duke 23,391 4
Democratic Others 16,008 3
Total 625,019 100
Electoral history of David Duke - Wikipedia
Duke left the KKK long before he became a Republican....
"In 1979, after his first, abortive run for president (as a Democrat) and a series of highly publicized violent Klan incidents, Duke quietly incorporated the nonprofit National Association for the Advancement of White People (NAAWP) in an attempt to leave the baggage of the Klan behind."
The Democrats have always been associated with racism. The Democrat icon Franklin Roosevelt, in fact, made a KKKer his very first pick for the Supreme Court:
. "... [Hugo] Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..." http://egnorance.blogspot.com/2011/10/hugo-black-and-real-history-of-wall-of.html]
I can’t help but find the GOP leadership’s outrage at Donald Trump’s initial refusal to disavow David Duke and the Ku Klux Klan disingenuous. Lest we forget, the Republican Party …
www.baltimoresun.com
And spare us your attempt to soft soap Duke, who NEVER disavowed his core racist beliefs no matter what party he chose in a state bitterly contentious of its congenital racism:
Duke was successful to a degree despite his painfully obvious bigotry and racism. YOU aren't even a cheap knock-off....just a wanna be with delusions of grandeur. Carry on, sweetpea. It's a guilty pleasure making a fool of you while you tell the mirror the opposite.
1. So, your prime "evidence" for the theory is a consultant claiming credit? Wow. Why not cite a crack whore or a lawyer?
2. Trump denounced duke repeatedly. Your one counter is him blowing off a question? You do realize that that does not contradict his denouncements.
3. Yep. President is national. He's run for the President as both a dem and as gop. IN both cases he got less than 1% of the vote. A total that makes me wonder how much of that was errors.
1. translation: any time someone supplies sources with valid documentation that disproves the contentions of bigots and right wing wonks, they don't deal with the content, they just try to slander the source. But anything they source is akin to God's word. Such hypocritical foolishness only appeals to the willfully ignorant and insipidly stubborn like Correll.
2. The documented public record of Cheeto Jeezus playing word games so as to not piss off part of his base support is well documented (the self proclaimed genius suddenly feigning amnesia when it comes to Duke). Unlike his definitive statements concerning Obama and the birther BS. Anyone else just comes right out and denounces Duke no matter how many times asked. You do realize that saying "sure, if you say so" at one point is not the same as "I totally reject what he stands for and do not recognize his endorsement, nor do I want it".....you get that, right?
3. You carried on about him being a Democrat....yeah, in his home state where the Dem Party was still rife with "Dixiecrats"....people who still held onto the old Party beliefs until the shift under Johnson and Nixon, as I previously documented. When he realized that the old ways weren't going to stand, he went with the flow to the GOP....but by then no one wanted to be associated with blatant racism and bigotry from a former Neo-Nazi and KKK leader. A matter of fact, a matter of history whether you like it/acknowledge it or not. Carry on, my myopic friend.
1. YOu misunderstand. To support the claim of the c.t. you would need to show the policies used to pander to the supposed wacist bloc. You can't. Because it was not done. EVER.
2. Trump denounced Duke many times. He blew the question off once. Assholes ignore the repeated and clear denouncements to focus on the one blow off. Because they are assholes.
3. I did not carry on about him being a democrat. He ran two national campaigns and never got even a percentage point of the popular vote. That is the power of the w.s. fringe in action. Assuming that those votes were not all blind or drunk fools voting for him by accident.
1. No misunderstanding....YOU just refuse to accept the validity of the source material I used...despite documentation via footnotes and internal reference links. Your declarations and lame attempt at condescension are worthless given the historically documented FACTS. But essentially all you've got is some lame version of Goebbels.....repeating your BS ad nausea hoping it will magically become fact. Hint: it won't.
2. We've already done this dance, and as they say the devil is in the details. Cheeto Jeezus' wishy-washy public statements about your hero Davey are in there entirety for all to see, as I pointed out and was documented in the media. You're last 2 sentences are essentially a projection.
3. Umm, yeah you did...the chronology of the posts shows YOU emphasizing this at least twice, a third repetition done now. As usual with all alt-right revisionists, you just leave out certain details that detract from your main message. I just filled in the blanks with FACTS. My previous assessment stands documented, your propagandistic myopia non-withstanding. Now, run-a-long and post up your next regurgitation of you SOS. The reading audience awaits.
You think that centuries of ingrained racism can be erased in a generation? Civil rights only passed in the LATE 60s. It is going to take a lot longer than 50 years to remove all the tentacles that have wound their way into our system and culture.
What is wrong with examining why racial inequality still persists, even decades after these laws have passed? How do you fix it if you don’t know why it keeps going?
America's system is a TWO PARTY system. THe reasons are not important in this context.
For quite a while the republicans were pushing for racial equality for blacks, and the democrats were fighting that.
When the dems stopped fighting it, and started supporting it, suddenly in just a few years, Racists had no voice in national policy.
The moral and intellectual Debate, they had already lost well before that.
At that point, White Racists became marginalized. I grew up not long after wards and ALL the education and media and culture I got, supported the BI-Party line, of racial equality and blah, blah, blah, to the point I was bored with it. Indeed, i did not understand as a child why they kept harping on it.
For most people today, the time when white racism was openly practiced and had real political power and actual policy based on their agenda, seems...like another world.
TODAY, and indeed, even then, though not as bad as now, the message is not "examining why racial inequality still exists", but ASSUMING any inequality is because of Wacism and blaming white people and mobilizing EVERYTHING to fight it/them.
ANY voice raised, discussing an "inequality" that says ANTHING, other than "white people's fault" is dogpiled and shouted down with cries of wacism.
This is tearing this nation apart. It is teaching blacks that whites hate them, and teaching whites that they are always going to be fucked and discriminated against.
After all, if there is an "inequality" and the cause is NOT evul whites, but the solution implemented is based on the idea that is it evul whites, whites will be punished and suffer for shit that they did not do.
Politicians deciding something in DC did not change society and culture.
Blacks don’t have to be taught that a lot of whites hate them, believe stereotypes about them, fear them…they live it every day. That you refuse to see it just perpetuates it.
Analysis: Black Americans have grown tired of being forced to make the case for their citizenship, their humanity, their very survival — again and again and again.
I like the way you dismiss law and national policy as "politicians deciding something".
My parents were working class dems, from the Depression Era. They were primary motivated by the Union culture of the Rust Belt. Based on what I saw, long after the fact, the long standing alliance of the dem party to southern racists must have been a negative that they were forced to ignore because of overriding economic issues.
When the politicians flipped on that issue, it would not have been a problem for working class dems in the Rust Belt. They were already there on that issue, long before the Party that they supported DESPITE their racist allilance.
You are living in a fantasy land, where you imagine that your enemies are villains, so that you can be the hero.
I’m afraid it is you that is living in a fantasy land. You seem to think that legislation was passed and suddenly unicorns were farting daisies. It didn’t happen that way. It still hasn’t happened that way.
Racism was baked into our system for centuries and you think it can be a erased in a couple of decades?
You weren't trying to make a point beyond "derp, dems bad, derp". The thing you keep fucking up is that you idiots think the division on civil rights was Democrats vs Republicans. It wasn't. It was North vs South...again.
We know that institutional racism exists. What is so wrong at looking at why it prevails over half a century after the civil rights act?
My point was in response to that question. I am celebrating the fact that, long ago, the Democratic Party embraced the idea of racial equality for blacks. That is not "dem bad". When I have bad things to say about the dems, I say them clearly and loudly. YOu don't have to search for nuance.
Institutional anti-black racism does NOT exist. That is a lie. This nation has had a bi-partisan consensus on racial equality for blacks since the early 60s. National policy has been based on that, since then. Federal and State law has been based on that since then. Culture and media and education has constantly and strongly indoctrinated generation after generation of Americans in that consensus since then.
Racial inequity is baked into the public education system and for Black children, begins as early as preschool. Here are some of the systemic ways public education creates barriers to learning for Black students.
www.seattletimes.com
You see being anti-racism as being anti-white. That tells us a lot about you.
Pointing to the fact that teachers and administrators are overwhelmingly liberals dedicated to fighting wacism, is not eschewing facts, but embracing them.
SOmetimes I talk to them, and try to get understand how they feel about how they are constantly thrown under the bus by their fellow liberals.
I can't seem to get a straight answer. They do seem to appreciate that I point out that they are not wacist.
Data consistently shows that students of color are more likely to be disciplined than their White peers and receive harsher punishments for the same infractions. Black and Hispanic students are less likely to be placed in advanced or enriched classes, starting in elementary school. Many experts say school curriculums have failed to adequately reflect the perspectives of Indigenous and marginalized communities. And students and parents themselves often report that school culture does not feel welcoming.
Most administrators are promoted teachers. And as a group they tend to be liberals committed to racial equality for minority students.
If they are not, they are almost certainly moderates committed to racial equality for minority students.
The few that do not fit those two categories? Walk softly and try to not be noticed.
Studies? I call bullshit. Teachers are more likely to give minority students a pass for bad behavior, for fear of being called wacist, or to retreat behind some idiocy of a zero tolerance policy so they can punish both/all students involved to avoid assigning true blame, or something along those lines.
You don’t believe studies that tell you it exists. You don’t believe actual black people that tell you it exists. All you have to go on is your “feelings“.
Yeah, I think I’ll go with studies and the people that are experienced it and not some white guy that thinks Trump is delightful.
And when you people blatantly lie, we notice. You don't get to lie to our faces and stone wall on it, when called on it, and expect to be given any credibility after that.
My point stands.
Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.
Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.
Your "observations" are also not hard data. The experience of one white guy that thinks blacks aren't as intelligent as whites and that being anti racist equals anti white, doesn't add up to a hill of beans.
Traditionally "hard data" was given more weight than anecdotal evidence. But with the increasing politicalization of EVERYTHING, and the dangerous increase of cancel culture, not to mention actual violent mobs in the streets,
No. Liberals and academics can't be trusted.
DO YOU KNOW ANY TEACHERS AND/OR SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS?
Translation: with the increasing insanity of the Republican Party, they must eschew facts and evidence because facts don’t support their twisted worldview.
What point? You haven’t made any points. You’ve denied facts and keep repeating your feelings. You feel that teachers are overwhelmingly liberal, but completely ignore factual studies on the subject. You keep rejecting facts.
I do. I have two children that just finished school in the last few years. I found their teachers and administrators to be the same mix I find all over the country. Some conservative some liberal.
And again, just because one layer of the cake is strawberry doesn’t make the whole cake strawberry. Study after study points out the systemic and institutionalized racism in the education system but you don’t believe it because a few teachers are liberal. How utterly a child like view of the world…
Do you support or reject this statement from the Racists Trump supporter, BSFilter, yes or no?
Maybe if the jigaboos work on their attitudes they might find people more welcoming.
1. Your claim that teachers are a "mix" of conservatives and liberals is absurd. As a group they lean HARD left and it shows in their work. To claim that the problems of blacks are because of teachers is nonsense.
2. Plenty of blacks do have very poor attitudes. If you are half as world wise as you claim, you know that. I'm sure that many people are turned off by the "attitude" of radicalized blacks who get more attention than they deserve.
Racial inequity is baked into the public education system and for Black children, begins as early as preschool. Here are some of the systemic ways public education creates barriers to learning for Black students.
Like I said, when people like you can listen to a man say, "not w.s." and insist that they heard, "w.s.", you can't trust what they say.
Me? I know teachers, plenty of them. Some of them have been promoted to be administrators. They are not wacists. They are ALL (that I've met) standard out of the box libs, well indoctrinated in anti-wacism.
Dealing with the fact that you libs are either A. completely delusional, or B. completely dishonest, is dealing with reality.
My point stands. Teachers and administrators are as a group, generally speaking, completely committed to racial equality and diversity and blah, blah, blah, blah.
Studies are only as credible as the people doing them or peer reviewing them. You people are either completely deluded or completely dishonest.
Ignoring that, is ignoring the reality of the situation.
My personal observations of teachers and administrators stands. They are all good little lefties totally committed to wacial justice and equality and diverisity and blah, blah, blah.
THe idea that they are some sort of systemic wacism, is stupid.
Question: If an employer wants to hire a group of people, but due to the education gap, all the qualified candidates are white, and that is what he ends up with, is he being wacist?
Sure. If an employer, let's say a fire department needs to promote firefighters, and all the people that pass the test are white, is that wacism or the iq gap in practice?
In Dayton, Ohio, where the police and firefighter exams have proven to pass few minorities, the U.S. Department of Justice is demanding that the city lower its passing score for the police exam in order to allow a larger pool of black applicants. by Raven Clabough
Fantstic, thank you. How does this prove there is no systemic and institutionalized racism in education and the justice system as CRT theorizes (with evidence-based support)?
I just really hope parents are not whipped into a Moral Panic and are not confronting school boards where CRT is not being employed. Let's leave the Moral Panics to the Woke Covid Masking freaks and not mount one ourselves.
Where CRT has actually infested K-12 schools however--parents should go for it.
First off, it is very likely that every school district in the nation IS teaching critical race theory. But even if not....
Parents need to protest and make known their demands, unseat incumbents, and take control of their school boards, regardless of whether or not they are teaching critical race theory. School boards are supposed to be representative of the community and the parents in the community. It should always have been this way but parents got caught up in their own busy lives and blindly trusted the school boards to decide what their children needed to learn. They believed that the proper education of children was the motivation of those who ran for school boards so they must be good people.
It turns out that it's true; the proper education is why they run but what they believe to be the proper education is not at all what the parents thought was going on. For years, now, the parents knew this; the writing was on the wall, but they turned a blind eye, ignoring it so they could get to yoga class or the golf course or work a few more hours to get a Cadillac instead of a Chevy. And we all know how much more important is that 5th bathroom in the house than the future of our children.
Now it's time to take control or to surrender our children to the State and our State to the Communists.
I just really hope parents are not whipped into a Moral Panic and are not confronting school boards where CRT is not being employed. Let's leave the Moral Panics to the Woke Covid Masking freaks and not mount one ourselves.
Where CRT has actually infested K-12 schools however--parents should go for it.
First off, it is very likely that every school district in the nation IS teaching critical race theory. But even if not....
Parents need to protest and make known their demands, unseat incumbents, and take control of their school boards, regardless of whether or not they are teaching critical race theory. School boards are supposed to be representative of the community and the parents in the community. It should always have been this way but parents got caught up in their own busy lives and blindly trusted the school boards to decide what their children needed to learn. They believed that the proper education of children was the motivation of those who ran for school boards so they must be good people.
It turns out that it's true; the proper education is why they run but what they believe to be the proper education is not at all what the parents thought was going on. For years, now, the parents knew this; the writing was on the wall, but they turned a blind eye, ignoring it so they could get to yoga class or the golf course or work a few more hours to get a Cadillac instead of a Chevy. And we all know how much more important is that 5th bathroom in the house than the future of our children.
Now it's time to take control or to surrender our children to the State and our State to the Communists.
You think that centuries of ingrained racism can be erased in a generation? Civil rights only passed in the LATE 60s. It is going to take a lot longer than 50 years to remove all the tentacles that have wound their way into our system and culture.
What is wrong with examining why racial inequality still persists, even decades after these laws have passed? How do you fix it if you don’t know why it keeps going?
America's system is a TWO PARTY system. THe reasons are not important in this context.
For quite a while the republicans were pushing for racial equality for blacks, and the democrats were fighting that.
When the dems stopped fighting it, and started supporting it, suddenly in just a few years, Racists had no voice in national policy.
The moral and intellectual Debate, they had already lost well before that.
At that point, White Racists became marginalized. I grew up not long after wards and ALL the education and media and culture I got, supported the BI-Party line, of racial equality and blah, blah, blah, to the point I was bored with it. Indeed, i did not understand as a child why they kept harping on it.
For most people today, the time when white racism was openly practiced and had real political power and actual policy based on their agenda, seems...like another world.
TODAY, and indeed, even then, though not as bad as now, the message is not "examining why racial inequality still exists", but ASSUMING any inequality is because of Wacism and blaming white people and mobilizing EVERYTHING to fight it/them.
ANY voice raised, discussing an "inequality" that says ANTHING, other than "white people's fault" is dogpiled and shouted down with cries of wacism.
This is tearing this nation apart. It is teaching blacks that whites hate them, and teaching whites that they are always going to be fucked and discriminated against.
After all, if there is an "inequality" and the cause is NOT evul whites, but the solution implemented is based on the idea that is it evul whites, whites will be punished and suffer for shit that they did not do.
Politicians deciding something in DC did not change society and culture.
Blacks don’t have to be taught that a lot of whites hate them, believe stereotypes about them, fear them…they live it every day. That you refuse to see it just perpetuates it.
Analysis: Black Americans have grown tired of being forced to make the case for their citizenship, their humanity, their very survival — again and again and again.
I like the way you dismiss law and national policy as "politicians deciding something".
My parents were working class dems, from the Depression Era. They were primary motivated by the Union culture of the Rust Belt. Based on what I saw, long after the fact, the long standing alliance of the dem party to southern racists must have been a negative that they were forced to ignore because of overriding economic issues.
When the politicians flipped on that issue, it would not have been a problem for working class dems in the Rust Belt. They were already there on that issue, long before the Party that they supported DESPITE their racist allilance.
You are living in a fantasy land, where you imagine that your enemies are villains, so that you can be the hero.
I’m afraid it is you that is living in a fantasy land. You seem to think that legislation was passed and suddenly unicorns were farting daisies. It didn’t happen that way. It still hasn’t happened that way.
Racism was baked into our system for centuries and you think it can be a erased in a couple of decades?
You weren't trying to make a point beyond "derp, dems bad, derp". The thing you keep fucking up is that you idiots think the division on civil rights was Democrats vs Republicans. It wasn't. It was North vs South...again.
We know that institutional racism exists. What is so wrong at looking at why it prevails over half a century after the civil rights act?
My point was in response to that question. I am celebrating the fact that, long ago, the Democratic Party embraced the idea of racial equality for blacks. That is not "dem bad". When I have bad things to say about the dems, I say them clearly and loudly. YOu don't have to search for nuance.
Institutional anti-black racism does NOT exist. That is a lie. This nation has had a bi-partisan consensus on racial equality for blacks since the early 60s. National policy has been based on that, since then. Federal and State law has been based on that since then. Culture and media and education has constantly and strongly indoctrinated generation after generation of Americans in that consensus since then.
Racial inequity is baked into the public education system and for Black children, begins as early as preschool. Here are some of the systemic ways public education creates barriers to learning for Black students.
www.seattletimes.com
You see being anti-racism as being anti-white. That tells us a lot about you.
Pointing to the fact that teachers and administrators are overwhelmingly liberals dedicated to fighting wacism, is not eschewing facts, but embracing them.
SOmetimes I talk to them, and try to get understand how they feel about how they are constantly thrown under the bus by their fellow liberals.
I can't seem to get a straight answer. They do seem to appreciate that I point out that they are not wacist.
Data consistently shows that students of color are more likely to be disciplined than their White peers and receive harsher punishments for the same infractions. Black and Hispanic students are less likely to be placed in advanced or enriched classes, starting in elementary school. Many experts say school curriculums have failed to adequately reflect the perspectives of Indigenous and marginalized communities. And students and parents themselves often report that school culture does not feel welcoming.
Most administrators are promoted teachers. And as a group they tend to be liberals committed to racial equality for minority students.
If they are not, they are almost certainly moderates committed to racial equality for minority students.
The few that do not fit those two categories? Walk softly and try to not be noticed.
Studies? I call bullshit. Teachers are more likely to give minority students a pass for bad behavior, for fear of being called wacist, or to retreat behind some idiocy of a zero tolerance policy so they can punish both/all students involved to avoid assigning true blame, or something along those lines.
You don’t believe studies that tell you it exists. You don’t believe actual black people that tell you it exists. All you have to go on is your “feelings“.
Yeah, I think I’ll go with studies and the people that are experienced it and not some white guy that thinks Trump is delightful.
And when you people blatantly lie, we notice. You don't get to lie to our faces and stone wall on it, when called on it, and expect to be given any credibility after that.
My point stands.
Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.
Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.
Your "observations" are also not hard data. The experience of one white guy that thinks blacks aren't as intelligent as whites and that being anti racist equals anti white, doesn't add up to a hill of beans.
Traditionally "hard data" was given more weight than anecdotal evidence. But with the increasing politicalization of EVERYTHING, and the dangerous increase of cancel culture, not to mention actual violent mobs in the streets,
No. Liberals and academics can't be trusted.
DO YOU KNOW ANY TEACHERS AND/OR SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS?
Translation: with the increasing insanity of the Republican Party, they must eschew facts and evidence because facts don’t support their twisted worldview.
What point? You haven’t made any points. You’ve denied facts and keep repeating your feelings. You feel that teachers are overwhelmingly liberal, but completely ignore factual studies on the subject. You keep rejecting facts.
I do. I have two children that just finished school in the last few years. I found their teachers and administrators to be the same mix I find all over the country. Some conservative some liberal.
And again, just because one layer of the cake is strawberry doesn’t make the whole cake strawberry. Study after study points out the systemic and institutionalized racism in the education system but you don’t believe it because a few teachers are liberal. How utterly a child like view of the world…
Do you support or reject this statement from the Racists Trump supporter, BSFilter, yes or no?
Maybe if the jigaboos work on their attitudes they might find people more welcoming.
1. Your claim that teachers are a "mix" of conservatives and liberals is absurd. As a group they lean HARD left and it shows in their work. To claim that the problems of blacks are because of teachers is nonsense.
2. Plenty of blacks do have very poor attitudes. If you are half as world wise as you claim, you know that. I'm sure that many people are turned off by the "attitude" of radicalized blacks who get more attention than they deserve.
Racial inequity is baked into the public education system and for Black children, begins as early as preschool. Here are some of the systemic ways public education creates barriers to learning for Black students.
Like I said, when people like you can listen to a man say, "not w.s." and insist that they heard, "w.s.", you can't trust what they say.
Me? I know teachers, plenty of them. Some of them have been promoted to be administrators. They are not wacists. They are ALL (that I've met) standard out of the box libs, well indoctrinated in anti-wacism.
Dealing with the fact that you libs are either A. completely delusional, or B. completely dishonest, is dealing with reality.
My point stands. Teachers and administrators are as a group, generally speaking, completely committed to racial equality and diversity and blah, blah, blah, blah.
Studies are only as credible as the people doing them or peer reviewing them. You people are either completely deluded or completely dishonest.
Ignoring that, is ignoring the reality of the situation.
My personal observations of teachers and administrators stands. They are all good little lefties totally committed to wacial justice and equality and diverisity and blah, blah, blah.
THe idea that they are some sort of systemic wacism, is stupid.
Question: If an employer wants to hire a group of people, but due to the education gap, all the qualified candidates are white, and that is what he ends up with, is he being wacist?
Sure. If an employer, let's say a fire department needs to promote firefighters, and all the people that pass the test are white, is that wacism or the iq gap in practice?
You think that centuries of ingrained racism can be erased in a generation? Civil rights only passed in the LATE 60s. It is going to take a lot longer than 50 years to remove all the tentacles that have wound their way into our system and culture.
What is wrong with examining why racial inequality still persists, even decades after these laws have passed? How do you fix it if you don’t know why it keeps going?
America's system is a TWO PARTY system. THe reasons are not important in this context.
For quite a while the republicans were pushing for racial equality for blacks, and the democrats were fighting that.
When the dems stopped fighting it, and started supporting it, suddenly in just a few years, Racists had no voice in national policy.
The moral and intellectual Debate, they had already lost well before that.
At that point, White Racists became marginalized. I grew up not long after wards and ALL the education and media and culture I got, supported the BI-Party line, of racial equality and blah, blah, blah, to the point I was bored with it. Indeed, i did not understand as a child why they kept harping on it.
For most people today, the time when white racism was openly practiced and had real political power and actual policy based on their agenda, seems...like another world.
TODAY, and indeed, even then, though not as bad as now, the message is not "examining why racial inequality still exists", but ASSUMING any inequality is because of Wacism and blaming white people and mobilizing EVERYTHING to fight it/them.
ANY voice raised, discussing an "inequality" that says ANTHING, other than "white people's fault" is dogpiled and shouted down with cries of wacism.
This is tearing this nation apart. It is teaching blacks that whites hate them, and teaching whites that they are always going to be fucked and discriminated against.
After all, if there is an "inequality" and the cause is NOT evul whites, but the solution implemented is based on the idea that is it evul whites, whites will be punished and suffer for shit that they did not do.
Politicians deciding something in DC did not change society and culture.
Blacks don’t have to be taught that a lot of whites hate them, believe stereotypes about them, fear them…they live it every day. That you refuse to see it just perpetuates it.
Analysis: Black Americans have grown tired of being forced to make the case for their citizenship, their humanity, their very survival — again and again and again.
I like the way you dismiss law and national policy as "politicians deciding something".
My parents were working class dems, from the Depression Era. They were primary motivated by the Union culture of the Rust Belt. Based on what I saw, long after the fact, the long standing alliance of the dem party to southern racists must have been a negative that they were forced to ignore because of overriding economic issues.
When the politicians flipped on that issue, it would not have been a problem for working class dems in the Rust Belt. They were already there on that issue, long before the Party that they supported DESPITE their racist allilance.
You are living in a fantasy land, where you imagine that your enemies are villains, so that you can be the hero.
I’m afraid it is you that is living in a fantasy land. You seem to think that legislation was passed and suddenly unicorns were farting daisies. It didn’t happen that way. It still hasn’t happened that way.
Racism was baked into our system for centuries and you think it can be a erased in a couple of decades?
You weren't trying to make a point beyond "derp, dems bad, derp". The thing you keep fucking up is that you idiots think the division on civil rights was Democrats vs Republicans. It wasn't. It was North vs South...again.
We know that institutional racism exists. What is so wrong at looking at why it prevails over half a century after the civil rights act?
My point was in response to that question. I am celebrating the fact that, long ago, the Democratic Party embraced the idea of racial equality for blacks. That is not "dem bad". When I have bad things to say about the dems, I say them clearly and loudly. YOu don't have to search for nuance.
Institutional anti-black racism does NOT exist. That is a lie. This nation has had a bi-partisan consensus on racial equality for blacks since the early 60s. National policy has been based on that, since then. Federal and State law has been based on that since then. Culture and media and education has constantly and strongly indoctrinated generation after generation of Americans in that consensus since then.
Racial inequity is baked into the public education system and for Black children, begins as early as preschool. Here are some of the systemic ways public education creates barriers to learning for Black students.
www.seattletimes.com
You see being anti-racism as being anti-white. That tells us a lot about you.
Pointing to the fact that teachers and administrators are overwhelmingly liberals dedicated to fighting wacism, is not eschewing facts, but embracing them.
SOmetimes I talk to them, and try to get understand how they feel about how they are constantly thrown under the bus by their fellow liberals.
I can't seem to get a straight answer. They do seem to appreciate that I point out that they are not wacist.
Data consistently shows that students of color are more likely to be disciplined than their White peers and receive harsher punishments for the same infractions. Black and Hispanic students are less likely to be placed in advanced or enriched classes, starting in elementary school. Many experts say school curriculums have failed to adequately reflect the perspectives of Indigenous and marginalized communities. And students and parents themselves often report that school culture does not feel welcoming.
Most administrators are promoted teachers. And as a group they tend to be liberals committed to racial equality for minority students.
If they are not, they are almost certainly moderates committed to racial equality for minority students.
The few that do not fit those two categories? Walk softly and try to not be noticed.
Studies? I call bullshit. Teachers are more likely to give minority students a pass for bad behavior, for fear of being called wacist, or to retreat behind some idiocy of a zero tolerance policy so they can punish both/all students involved to avoid assigning true blame, or something along those lines.
You don’t believe studies that tell you it exists. You don’t believe actual black people that tell you it exists. All you have to go on is your “feelings“.
Yeah, I think I’ll go with studies and the people that are experienced it and not some white guy that thinks Trump is delightful.
And when you people blatantly lie, we notice. You don't get to lie to our faces and stone wall on it, when called on it, and expect to be given any credibility after that.
My point stands.
Policy, law, cultural, media, education, for 60 years has been united in pushing a bi-partisan consensus in favor of racial equality for blacks.
Schools? Have you ever met a teacher or a school administrator? They are some of the most liberal people on the fucking planet.
Your "observations" are also not hard data. The experience of one white guy that thinks blacks aren't as intelligent as whites and that being anti racist equals anti white, doesn't add up to a hill of beans.
Traditionally "hard data" was given more weight than anecdotal evidence. But with the increasing politicalization of EVERYTHING, and the dangerous increase of cancel culture, not to mention actual violent mobs in the streets,
No. Liberals and academics can't be trusted.
DO YOU KNOW ANY TEACHERS AND/OR SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS?
Translation: with the increasing insanity of the Republican Party, they must eschew facts and evidence because facts don’t support their twisted worldview.
What point? You haven’t made any points. You’ve denied facts and keep repeating your feelings. You feel that teachers are overwhelmingly liberal, but completely ignore factual studies on the subject. You keep rejecting facts.
I do. I have two children that just finished school in the last few years. I found their teachers and administrators to be the same mix I find all over the country. Some conservative some liberal.
And again, just because one layer of the cake is strawberry doesn’t make the whole cake strawberry. Study after study points out the systemic and institutionalized racism in the education system but you don’t believe it because a few teachers are liberal. How utterly a child like view of the world…
Do you support or reject this statement from the Racists Trump supporter, BSFilter, yes or no?
Maybe if the jigaboos work on their attitudes they might find people more welcoming.
1. Your claim that teachers are a "mix" of conservatives and liberals is absurd. As a group they lean HARD left and it shows in their work. To claim that the problems of blacks are because of teachers is nonsense.
2. Plenty of blacks do have very poor attitudes. If you are half as world wise as you claim, you know that. I'm sure that many people are turned off by the "attitude" of radicalized blacks who get more attention than they deserve.
Racial inequity is baked into the public education system and for Black children, begins as early as preschool. Here are some of the systemic ways public education creates barriers to learning for Black students.
Like I said, when people like you can listen to a man say, "not w.s." and insist that they heard, "w.s.", you can't trust what they say.
Me? I know teachers, plenty of them. Some of them have been promoted to be administrators. They are not wacists. They are ALL (that I've met) standard out of the box libs, well indoctrinated in anti-wacism.
Dealing with the fact that you libs are either A. completely delusional, or B. completely dishonest, is dealing with reality.
My point stands. Teachers and administrators are as a group, generally speaking, completely committed to racial equality and diversity and blah, blah, blah, blah.
Studies are only as credible as the people doing them or peer reviewing them. You people are either completely deluded or completely dishonest.
Ignoring that, is ignoring the reality of the situation.
My personal observations of teachers and administrators stands. They are all good little lefties totally committed to wacial justice and equality and diverisity and blah, blah, blah.
THe idea that they are some sort of systemic wacism, is stupid.
Question: If an employer wants to hire a group of people, but due to the education gap, all the qualified candidates are white, and that is what he ends up with, is he being wacist?
Sure. If an employer, let's say a fire department needs to promote firefighters, and all the people that pass the test are white, is that wacism or the iq gap in practice?
In Dayton, Ohio, where the police and firefighter exams have proven to pass few minorities, the U.S. Department of Justice is demanding that the city lower its passing score for the police exam in order to allow a larger pool of black applicants. by Raven Clabough
Everything in every one of my posts is 100% true, accurate and correct.
Here's more proof of the racism you vote for:
you voted for this:
"Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believesblack people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin.
Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994.
“Melanin endows blacks with greater mental, physical, and spiritual abilities — something which cannot be measured by Eurocentric standards.” Kristen Clarke wrote."
“Melanin Endows Blacks with Greater Mental, Physical and Spiritual Abilities” (VIDEO)
Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believes black people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin. Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994. “Melanin endows blacks with greater ment ...
Yes, he is....as the the subsequent links I provided proved. Obviously you didn't read them.....typical willful ignorance of a Cheeto Jeezus acolyte.
It's like this sweetpea, when you make a claim, people will do research to see if that claim holds any water....they do so with a little thing called fact checking. The links I provided PROVE that Carlson is either a liar or too damned stupid to check his facts or both. This is his forte that he co-joins with his opinion. That makes him a useful idiot for the Cheeto Jeezus religion that has usurp the GOP. Carry on.
Mmm, not quite. That nonsense got started when in one of his speeches to the NOI rallies, Farrakhan EQUATED Obama with the "messiah". From them on, you had media wonks on both sides of the political aisle peppering their coverage of Obama with that word. Mind you, it was in effect a back handed attempt (promoted by the right wing media) to alienate any non-black voters from voting for him, and to paint black voters as dummies just following religious dogma and racial bias in voting en masse for a black candidate (IMHO, of course). But the people paid no attention to such silliness, and TWICE voted on the issues. Remember, the GOP gained control of both Houses because a large portion of voters withheld their congressional votes in protest over what they saw as Obama being too conciliatory to the GOP. They, and Obama, learned a hard lesson.
Oh, and FYI; the first time I heard the term "Cheeto Jeezus" was on a TV talk show called "The View"...it was uttered by Meaghan McCain, daughter of the late Sen. John McCain. She said it to point to the near fanatical religious approach that Trump supporters in Congress, the Media and the general public display even when Trump is caught flat footed lying.
And for the record, I'm a registered Independent. Hope this clears things up for you. Carry on.
2. Time's Nancy Gibbs who opened this week's cover story bycomparing Obama with Jesus:“Some princes are born in palaces. Some are born in mangers. But a few are born in the imagination, out of scraps of history and hope...” In the November 17 issue.
4. “Obama seemedthe political equivalent of a rainbow — a sudden preternatural event inspiring awe and ecstasy....” Time’s Joe Klein, October 23, 2006 cover story, "Why Barack Obama Could Be the Next President."
5. NBC’s Matt Lauer noted that “people” have called Obama “ ‘The Savior,’ ‘The Messiah,’ ‘The Messenger of Change,’“ Today Show, NBC, October 20, 2008.
6. The New York Time’s Judith Warner reported, “Many women- not too surprisingly – were dreaming about sex with the president [Obama]”.http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com...t-a-president/
“…the Obamas are not just a beacon of hope, inspiration and“demigodlikeness,”Ibid.
7. David Cordero, 24, made the sculpture for his senior show after noticing all the attention Obama has received: "All of this is a response to what I've been witnessing and hearing, this idea that Barack is sort ofa potential saviorthat might come and absolve the country of all its sins," Cordero said.Sculpture of Obama as Jesuscauses stir - politics - Decision '08 - Barack Obama News - msnbc.com
8. . In its November 22, 2010 issue, Obama has been shown by Newsweek on its cover page with multiple arms balancing several policy issues while raising his left leg mimickingthe cosmic dance of the Hindu deity; considered a manifestation of Lord Shiva.
... Newsweek has named Obama "god of all things" on its cover.
SOURCE: Times of India (November 20, 2010).
9. “I haven’t seen a politician get this kind ofwalk-on-watercoverage since Colin Powell a dozen years ago flirted with making a run for the White House,” said Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz on Meet the Press in February 2007
10. Samantha Fennell, formerly an associate publisher of Elle, wrote on the magazine’s website a month later: “When I attended my second “Obama Live” fund-raiser last week at New York City’s Grand Hyatt, . . . I was on my feet as Senator Obama entered the room. Fate had blessed me in this moment. . . . In a moment of divine intervention,he saw me,…”
11.Filmmaker Spike Lee, predicting an Obama victory, implicitly compared the candidate with Christ: “You’ll have to measure time by ‘Before Obama’ and ‘After Obama.’ . . .
12. Jesse Jackson, Jr. called Obama’s securing the Democratic nomination “so extraordinary thatanother chapter could be added to the Bibleto chronicle its significance.”
13. . Louis Farrakhan went one better, according to the website WorldNetDaily: “Barack has captured the youth. . . . That’s a sign.When the Messiah speaks,the youth will hear, andthe Messiah is absolutely speaking.”
14. His followers needed to re-elect him to a second term, so that he could continue to accomplish the promises he made, thus, realizing his vision of America as a more perfect political union or“heaven here on earth.”
The Gospel According to Apostle Barack, by Barbara A. Thompson.
15. "Does it not feel as ifsome special hand is guiding Obama on his journey, I mean, as he has said, the utter improbability of it all?"
-- Daily Kos
16"Obama's finest speeches do not excite. They do not inform. They don't even really inspire. They elevate. . . .He is not the Word made flesh, but the triumph of word over flesh . .. Obama is, at his best, able to call us back to our highest selves."
- Ezra Klein
17. "Obama has the capacity to summon heroic forces from the spiritual depths of ordinary citizens and to unleash therefrom a symphonic chorus of unique creative acts whose common purpose is to tame the soul and alleviate the great challenges facing mankind."
-- Gerald Campbell
18."We're here to evolve to a higher plane . . . he is an evolved leader . . . [he] has an ear for eloquence and a Tongue dipped in the Unvarnished Truth."
-- Oprah Winfrey
19. “I would characterize the Senate race as being a race where Obama was, let’s say, blessed and highly favored. That’s not routine. There’s something else going on. I think that Obama, his election to the Senate, was divinely ordered. . . . I know that that was God’s plan."
-- Bill Rush
20. "This is bigger than Kennedy. . . .This is the New Testament."| "I felt this thrill going up my leg. I mean, I don't have that too often. No, seriously. It's a dramatic event."
-- Chris Matthews
Newsweek editor Evan Thomas said President Obama is "sort of God" in a way that's "standing above the country." Transcript below.
"CHRIS MATTHEWS (HOST):Evan Thomas is editor at large for Newsweek magazine. Evan, you remember 1984. It wasn't 100 years ago. Reagan and World War II and the sense of us as the good guys in the world, how are we doing? EVAN THOMAS: Well, we were the good guys in 1984, it felt that way. It hasn't felt that way in recent years. So Obama's had, really, a different task We're seen too often as the bad guys. And he, he has a very different job from ... Reagan was all about America, and you talked about it. Obama is - we are above that now. We're not just parochial, we're not just chauvinistic, we're not just provincial. We stand for something, I mean in a way Obama's standing above the country, above above the world, he's sort of God."
You seem to think that these canned responses somehow disprove my previous assessment of Tucker Carlson.
Hint: they don't.
As for the regurgitation of this "messiah" bilge the right wing STILL carries on about after getting their butts whupped by Obama in two elections (popular and electoral vote, don't cha know): you (once again) inadvertently prove my point. All these quasi-religious references to Obama's speeches from pundits, politicos and news promoters came on the heels of Farrakhan's decree to his followers. Just as I said . But the smart voters, (All Americans of all races, creeds and colors) weren't buying it. Interesting, n-cest pas'?
And of course, you omit this tidbit from your cache of cliches':
The Atlantic covers news, politics, culture, technology, health, and more, through its articles, podcasts, videos, and flagship magazine.
www.theatlantic.com
A 3rd rate propagandist such as yourself will just deny the conclusive logic, and continue to parrot your myopic mantra ad nausea. I expect nothing less from you at this point. Carry on.
‘I won’t be pathologized for being White’: Man resigns, shreds school district over ‘white privilege’ training
An after-school coordinator at a New Hampshire elementary school has gone viral for resigning over the school’s embrace of anti-white critical race theory propaganda.
In a public resignation letter released Monday on Twitter, former Northwest Elementary after-school program coordinator Daniel Concannon, 40, accused his school district of having endorsed the “dehumanization and hatred of White people, as evidenced by their dissemination of the imbecilic ‘White Privilege’ curriculum.”
In the letter, he purposefully referred to the Manchester School District as “The Frankfurt School.” It was a reference to the school responsible for creating contemporary Marxism, which is believed to be at the root of CRT."
translation: another clown who can't deal with FACTS that point to the congenital racism in the American fabric....much less that skin color greatly increases your chances of beneficial treatment and opportunities. No one is asking the fool to apologize, as individually no one gives a damn about him.
My assessment of Tucker Carlson is valid and documented....your "messiah" dodge was aptly deconstructed with FACTS....pity you don't have the cojones to just concede a point, and will just throw anything against the wall repeatedly, hoping it sticks....but I expect nothing less from 3rd rate David Duke wanna be's. Carry on.
Once again, it appears that my role is to disabuse you of the lies your party and government school instituted.
David Duke was a Democrat, and believed as you do.
David Duke....the Democrat????
State Senator, 1975 (Baton Rouge Area)[edit]
Threshold > 50%
First Ballot, November 1, 1975
Louisiana State Senate, 1975
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Kenneth Osterberger 22,287 66
Democratic David Duke 11,079 33
N/A Others 1
Total 100
State Senator, 10th District, 1979 (Suburban New Orleans)[edit]
Threshold > 50% First Ballot, October 27, 1979
Louisiana State Senate, 10th District, 1979
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Joseph Tiemann 21,329 57
Democratic David Duke 9,897 26
N/A Others 6,459 17
Total 37,685 100
Democratic Nomination for United States Presidential Candidate, 1988 (Louisiana results)[edit]
Threshold = Plurality
1988 Democratic Presidential primary in Louisiana
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Jesse Jackson 221,522 35
Democratic Al Gore 174,971 28
Democratic Michael Dukakis 95,661 15
Democratic Dick Gephardt 67,029 11
Democratic Gary Hart 26,437 4
Democratic David Duke 23,391 4
Democratic Others 16,008 3
Total 625,019 100
Electoral history of David Duke - Wikipedia
Duke left the KKK long before he became a Republican....
"In 1979, after his first, abortive run for president (as a Democrat) and a series of highly publicized violent Klan incidents, Duke quietly incorporated the nonprofit National Association for the Advancement of White People (NAAWP) in an attempt to leave the baggage of the Klan behind."
The Democrats have always been associated with racism. The Democrat icon Franklin Roosevelt, in fact, made a KKKer his very first pick for the Supreme Court:
. "... [Hugo] Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..." http://egnorance.blogspot.com/2011/10/hugo-black-and-real-history-of-wall-of.html]
I can’t help but find the GOP leadership’s outrage at Donald Trump’s initial refusal to disavow David Duke and the Ku Klux Klan disingenuous. Lest we forget, the Republican Party …
www.baltimoresun.com
And spare us your attempt to soft soap Duke, who NEVER disavowed his core racist beliefs no matter what party he chose in a state bitterly contentious of its congenital racism:
Duke was successful to a degree despite his painfully obvious bigotry and racism. YOU aren't even a cheap knock-off....just a wanna be with delusions of grandeur. Carry on, sweetpea. It's a guilty pleasure making a fool of you while you tell the mirror the opposite.
1. So, your prime "evidence" for the theory is a consultant claiming credit? Wow. Why not cite a crack whore or a lawyer?
2. Trump denounced duke repeatedly. Your one counter is him blowing off a question? You do realize that that does not contradict his denouncements.
3. Yep. President is national. He's run for the President as both a dem and as gop. IN both cases he got less than 1% of the vote. A total that makes me wonder how much of that was errors.
1. translation: any time someone supplies sources with valid documentation that disproves the contentions of bigots and right wing wonks, they don't deal with the content, they just try to slander the source. But anything they source is akin to God's word. Such hypocritical foolishness only appeals to the willfully ignorant and insipidly stubborn like Correll.
2. The documented public record of Cheeto Jeezus playing word games so as to not piss off part of his base support is well documented (the self proclaimed genius suddenly feigning amnesia when it comes to Duke). Unlike his definitive statements concerning Obama and the birther BS. Anyone else just comes right out and denounces Duke no matter how many times asked. You do realize that saying "sure, if you say so" at one point is not the same as "I totally reject what he stands for and do not recognize his endorsement, nor do I want it".....you get that, right?
3. You carried on about him being a Democrat....yeah, in his home state where the Dem Party was still rife with "Dixiecrats"....people who still held onto the old Party beliefs until the shift under Johnson and Nixon, as I previously documented. When he realized that the old ways weren't going to stand, he went with the flow to the GOP....but by then no one wanted to be associated with blatant racism and bigotry from a former Neo-Nazi and KKK leader. A matter of fact, a matter of history whether you like it/acknowledge it or not. Carry on, my myopic friend.
1. YOu misunderstand. To support the claim of the c.t. you would need to show the policies used to pander to the supposed wacist bloc. You can't. Because it was not done. EVER.
2. Trump denounced Duke many times. He blew the question off once. Assholes ignore the repeated and clear denouncements to focus on the one blow off. Because they are assholes.
3. I did not carry on about him being a democrat. He ran two national campaigns and never got even a percentage point of the popular vote. That is the power of the w.s. fringe in action. Assuming that those votes were not all blind or drunk fools voting for him by accident.
1. No misunderstanding....YOU just refuse to accept the validity of the source material I used...despite documentation via footnotes and internal reference links. Your declarations and lame attempt at condescension are worthless given the historically documented FACTS. But essentially all you've got is some lame version of Goebbels.....repeating your BS ad nausea hoping it will magically become fact. Hint: it won't.
2. We've already done this dance, and as they say the devil is in the details. Cheeto Jeezus' wishy-washy public statements about your hero Davey are in there entirety for all to see, as I pointed out and was documented in the media. You're last 2 sentences are essentially a projection.
3. Umm, yeah you did...the chronology of the posts shows YOU emphasizing this at least twice, a third repetition done now. As usual with all alt-right revisionists, you just leave out certain details that detract from your main message. I just filled in the blanks with FACTS. My previous assessment stands documented, your propagandistic myopia non-withstanding. Now, run-a-long and post up your next regurgitation of you SOS. The reading audience awaits.
1. The Southern Strategy, if real, would have required policy to get the southern wacist votes. That is the claim. Just citing someone saying that it happened, without showing the ACTIONS that were supposedly taken to pander for the votes, is failing to support your position. Your "documentation" is just documentation of someone else saying what you said, with no real evidence to back it up.
2. You aske a question a dozen times, and get the same answer, it is not a question anymore, but a slur. Trump blew off the question once, and you leftards focus solely on that. Him blowing off the question does not support your stupid claims. To counter his many denouncements, you would have to find him saying the OPPOSITE. Which you can't.
3. He ran multiple times as an ACTUAL REAL w.s. and got less than one percent every time. That is the point. That is the power of w.s. in this country. YOu people are focusing on an irrelevant fringe to smear good people. YOu are assholes.
Everything in every one of my posts is 100% true, accurate and correct.
Here's more proof of the racism you vote for:
you voted for this:
"Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believesblack people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin.
Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994.
“Melanin endows blacks with greater mental, physical, and spiritual abilities — something which cannot be measured by Eurocentric standards.” Kristen Clarke wrote."
“Melanin Endows Blacks with Greater Mental, Physical and Spiritual Abilities” (VIDEO)
Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believes black people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin. Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994. “Melanin endows blacks with greater ment ...
Yes, he is....as the the subsequent links I provided proved. Obviously you didn't read them.....typical willful ignorance of a Cheeto Jeezus acolyte.
It's like this sweetpea, when you make a claim, people will do research to see if that claim holds any water....they do so with a little thing called fact checking. The links I provided PROVE that Carlson is either a liar or too damned stupid to check his facts or both. This is his forte that he co-joins with his opinion. That makes him a useful idiot for the Cheeto Jeezus religion that has usurp the GOP. Carry on.
Mmm, not quite. That nonsense got started when in one of his speeches to the NOI rallies, Farrakhan EQUATED Obama with the "messiah". From them on, you had media wonks on both sides of the political aisle peppering their coverage of Obama with that word. Mind you, it was in effect a back handed attempt (promoted by the right wing media) to alienate any non-black voters from voting for him, and to paint black voters as dummies just following religious dogma and racial bias in voting en masse for a black candidate (IMHO, of course). But the people paid no attention to such silliness, and TWICE voted on the issues. Remember, the GOP gained control of both Houses because a large portion of voters withheld their congressional votes in protest over what they saw as Obama being too conciliatory to the GOP. They, and Obama, learned a hard lesson.
Oh, and FYI; the first time I heard the term "Cheeto Jeezus" was on a TV talk show called "The View"...it was uttered by Meaghan McCain, daughter of the late Sen. John McCain. She said it to point to the near fanatical religious approach that Trump supporters in Congress, the Media and the general public display even when Trump is caught flat footed lying.
And for the record, I'm a registered Independent. Hope this clears things up for you. Carry on.
2. Time's Nancy Gibbs who opened this week's cover story bycomparing Obama with Jesus:“Some princes are born in palaces. Some are born in mangers. But a few are born in the imagination, out of scraps of history and hope...” In the November 17 issue.
4. “Obama seemedthe political equivalent of a rainbow — a sudden preternatural event inspiring awe and ecstasy....” Time’s Joe Klein, October 23, 2006 cover story, "Why Barack Obama Could Be the Next President."
5. NBC’s Matt Lauer noted that “people” have called Obama “ ‘The Savior,’ ‘The Messiah,’ ‘The Messenger of Change,’“ Today Show, NBC, October 20, 2008.
6. The New York Time’s Judith Warner reported, “Many women- not too surprisingly – were dreaming about sex with the president [Obama]”.http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com...t-a-president/
“…the Obamas are not just a beacon of hope, inspiration and“demigodlikeness,”Ibid.
7. David Cordero, 24, made the sculpture for his senior show after noticing all the attention Obama has received: "All of this is a response to what I've been witnessing and hearing, this idea that Barack is sort ofa potential saviorthat might come and absolve the country of all its sins," Cordero said.Sculpture of Obama as Jesuscauses stir - politics - Decision '08 - Barack Obama News - msnbc.com
8. . In its November 22, 2010 issue, Obama has been shown by Newsweek on its cover page with multiple arms balancing several policy issues while raising his left leg mimickingthe cosmic dance of the Hindu deity; considered a manifestation of Lord Shiva.
... Newsweek has named Obama "god of all things" on its cover.
SOURCE: Times of India (November 20, 2010).
9. “I haven’t seen a politician get this kind ofwalk-on-watercoverage since Colin Powell a dozen years ago flirted with making a run for the White House,” said Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz on Meet the Press in February 2007
10. Samantha Fennell, formerly an associate publisher of Elle, wrote on the magazine’s website a month later: “When I attended my second “Obama Live” fund-raiser last week at New York City’s Grand Hyatt, . . . I was on my feet as Senator Obama entered the room. Fate had blessed me in this moment. . . . In a moment of divine intervention,he saw me,…”
11.Filmmaker Spike Lee, predicting an Obama victory, implicitly compared the candidate with Christ: “You’ll have to measure time by ‘Before Obama’ and ‘After Obama.’ . . .
12. Jesse Jackson, Jr. called Obama’s securing the Democratic nomination “so extraordinary thatanother chapter could be added to the Bibleto chronicle its significance.”
13. . Louis Farrakhan went one better, according to the website WorldNetDaily: “Barack has captured the youth. . . . That’s a sign.When the Messiah speaks,the youth will hear, andthe Messiah is absolutely speaking.”
14. His followers needed to re-elect him to a second term, so that he could continue to accomplish the promises he made, thus, realizing his vision of America as a more perfect political union or“heaven here on earth.”
The Gospel According to Apostle Barack, by Barbara A. Thompson.
15. "Does it not feel as ifsome special hand is guiding Obama on his journey, I mean, as he has said, the utter improbability of it all?"
-- Daily Kos
16"Obama's finest speeches do not excite. They do not inform. They don't even really inspire. They elevate. . . .He is not the Word made flesh, but the triumph of word over flesh . .. Obama is, at his best, able to call us back to our highest selves."
- Ezra Klein
17. "Obama has the capacity to summon heroic forces from the spiritual depths of ordinary citizens and to unleash therefrom a symphonic chorus of unique creative acts whose common purpose is to tame the soul and alleviate the great challenges facing mankind."
-- Gerald Campbell
18."We're here to evolve to a higher plane . . . he is an evolved leader . . . [he] has an ear for eloquence and a Tongue dipped in the Unvarnished Truth."
-- Oprah Winfrey
19. “I would characterize the Senate race as being a race where Obama was, let’s say, blessed and highly favored. That’s not routine. There’s something else going on. I think that Obama, his election to the Senate, was divinely ordered. . . . I know that that was God’s plan."
-- Bill Rush
20. "This is bigger than Kennedy. . . .This is the New Testament."| "I felt this thrill going up my leg. I mean, I don't have that too often. No, seriously. It's a dramatic event."
-- Chris Matthews
Newsweek editor Evan Thomas said President Obama is "sort of God" in a way that's "standing above the country." Transcript below.
"CHRIS MATTHEWS (HOST):Evan Thomas is editor at large for Newsweek magazine. Evan, you remember 1984. It wasn't 100 years ago. Reagan and World War II and the sense of us as the good guys in the world, how are we doing? EVAN THOMAS: Well, we were the good guys in 1984, it felt that way. It hasn't felt that way in recent years. So Obama's had, really, a different task We're seen too often as the bad guys. And he, he has a very different job from ... Reagan was all about America, and you talked about it. Obama is - we are above that now. We're not just parochial, we're not just chauvinistic, we're not just provincial. We stand for something, I mean in a way Obama's standing above the country, above above the world, he's sort of God."
You seem to think that these canned responses somehow disprove my previous assessment of Tucker Carlson.
Hint: they don't.
As for the regurgitation of this "messiah" bilge the right wing STILL carries on about after getting their butts whupped by Obama in two elections (popular and electoral vote, don't cha know): you (once again) inadvertently prove my point. All these quasi-religious references to Obama's speeches from pundits, politicos and news promoters came on the heels of Farrakhan's decree to his followers. Just as I said . But the smart voters, (All Americans of all races, creeds and colors) weren't buying it. Interesting, n-cest pas'?
And of course, you omit this tidbit from your cache of cliches':
The Atlantic covers news, politics, culture, technology, health, and more, through its articles, podcasts, videos, and flagship magazine.
www.theatlantic.com
A 3rd rate propagandist such as yourself will just deny the conclusive logic, and continue to parrot your myopic mantra ad nausea. I expect nothing less from you at this point. Carry on.
‘I won’t be pathologized for being White’: Man resigns, shreds school district over ‘white privilege’ training
An after-school coordinator at a New Hampshire elementary school has gone viral for resigning over the school’s embrace of anti-white critical race theory propaganda.
In a public resignation letter released Monday on Twitter, former Northwest Elementary after-school program coordinator Daniel Concannon, 40, accused his school district of having endorsed the “dehumanization and hatred of White people, as evidenced by their dissemination of the imbecilic ‘White Privilege’ curriculum.”
In the letter, he purposefully referred to the Manchester School District as “The Frankfurt School.” It was a reference to the school responsible for creating contemporary Marxism, which is believed to be at the root of CRT."
translation: another clown who can't deal with FACTS that point to the congenital racism in the American fabric....much less that skin color greatly increases your chances of beneficial treatment and opportunities. No one is asking the fool to apologize, as individually no one gives a damn about him.
My assessment of Tucker Carlson is valid and documented....your "messiah" dodge was aptly deconstructed with FACTS....pity you don't have the cojones to just concede a point, and will just throw anything against the wall repeatedly, hoping it sticks....but I expect nothing less from 3rd rate David Duke wanna be's. Carry on.
Once again, it appears that my role is to disabuse you of the lies your party and government school instituted.
David Duke was a Democrat, and believed as you do.
David Duke....the Democrat????
State Senator, 1975 (Baton Rouge Area)[edit]
Threshold > 50%
First Ballot, November 1, 1975
Louisiana State Senate, 1975
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Kenneth Osterberger 22,287 66
Democratic David Duke 11,079 33
N/A Others 1
Total 100
State Senator, 10th District, 1979 (Suburban New Orleans)[edit]
Threshold > 50% First Ballot, October 27, 1979
Louisiana State Senate, 10th District, 1979
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Joseph Tiemann 21,329 57
Democratic David Duke 9,897 26
N/A Others 6,459 17
Total 37,685 100
Democratic Nomination for United States Presidential Candidate, 1988 (Louisiana results)[edit]
Threshold = Plurality
1988 Democratic Presidential primary in Louisiana
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Jesse Jackson 221,522 35
Democratic Al Gore 174,971 28
Democratic Michael Dukakis 95,661 15
Democratic Dick Gephardt 67,029 11
Democratic Gary Hart 26,437 4
Democratic David Duke 23,391 4
Democratic Others 16,008 3
Total 625,019 100
Electoral history of David Duke - Wikipedia
Duke left the KKK long before he became a Republican....
"In 1979, after his first, abortive run for president (as a Democrat) and a series of highly publicized violent Klan incidents, Duke quietly incorporated the nonprofit National Association for the Advancement of White People (NAAWP) in an attempt to leave the baggage of the Klan behind."
The Democrats have always been associated with racism. The Democrat icon Franklin Roosevelt, in fact, made a KKKer his very first pick for the Supreme Court:
. "... [Hugo] Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..." http://egnorance.blogspot.com/2011/10/hugo-black-and-real-history-of-wall-of.html]
I can’t help but find the GOP leadership’s outrage at Donald Trump’s initial refusal to disavow David Duke and the Ku Klux Klan disingenuous. Lest we forget, the Republican Party …
www.baltimoresun.com
And spare us your attempt to soft soap Duke, who NEVER disavowed his core racist beliefs no matter what party he chose in a state bitterly contentious of its congenital racism:
Duke was successful to a degree despite his painfully obvious bigotry and racism. YOU aren't even a cheap knock-off....just a wanna be with delusions of grandeur. Carry on, sweetpea. It's a guilty pleasure making a fool of you while you tell the mirror the opposite.
1. So, your prime "evidence" for the theory is a consultant claiming credit? Wow. Why not cite a crack whore or a lawyer?
2. Trump denounced duke repeatedly. Your one counter is him blowing off a question? You do realize that that does not contradict his denouncements.
3. Yep. President is national. He's run for the President as both a dem and as gop. IN both cases he got less than 1% of the vote. A total that makes me wonder how much of that was errors.
1. translation: any time someone supplies sources with valid documentation that disproves the contentions of bigots and right wing wonks, they don't deal with the content, they just try to slander the source. But anything they source is akin to God's word. Such hypocritical foolishness only appeals to the willfully ignorant and insipidly stubborn like Correll.
2. The documented public record of Cheeto Jeezus playing word games so as to not piss off part of his base support is well documented (the self proclaimed genius suddenly feigning amnesia when it comes to Duke). Unlike his definitive statements concerning Obama and the birther BS. Anyone else just comes right out and denounces Duke no matter how many times asked. You do realize that saying "sure, if you say so" at one point is not the same as "I totally reject what he stands for and do not recognize his endorsement, nor do I want it".....you get that, right?
3. You carried on about him being a Democrat....yeah, in his home state where the Dem Party was still rife with "Dixiecrats"....people who still held onto the old Party beliefs until the shift under Johnson and Nixon, as I previously documented. When he realized that the old ways weren't going to stand, he went with the flow to the GOP....but by then no one wanted to be associated with blatant racism and bigotry from a former Neo-Nazi and KKK leader. A matter of fact, a matter of history whether you like it/acknowledge it or not. Carry on, my myopic friend.
1. YOu misunderstand. To support the claim of the c.t. you would need to show the policies used to pander to the supposed wacist bloc. You can't. Because it was not done. EVER.
2. Trump denounced Duke many times. He blew the question off once. Assholes ignore the repeated and clear denouncements to focus on the one blow off. Because they are assholes.
3. I did not carry on about him being a democrat. He ran two national campaigns and never got even a percentage point of the popular vote. That is the power of the w.s. fringe in action. Assuming that those votes were not all blind or drunk fools voting for him by accident.
1. No misunderstanding....YOU just refuse to accept the validity of the source material I used...despite documentation via footnotes and internal reference links. Your declarations and lame attempt at condescension are worthless given the historically documented FACTS. But essentially all you've got is some lame version of Goebbels.....repeating your BS ad nausea hoping it will magically become fact. Hint: it won't.
2. We've already done this dance, and as they say the devil is in the details. Cheeto Jeezus' wishy-washy public statements about your hero Davey are in there entirety for all to see, as I pointed out and was documented in the media. You're last 2 sentences are essentially a projection.
3. Umm, yeah you did...the chronology of the posts shows YOU emphasizing this at least twice, a third repetition done now. As usual with all alt-right revisionists, you just leave out certain details that detract from your main message. I just filled in the blanks with FACTS. My previous assessment stands documented, your propagandistic myopia non-withstanding. Now, run-a-long and post up your next regurgitation of you SOS. The reading audience awaits.
1. The Southern Strategy, if real, would have required policy to get the southern wacist votes. That is the claim. Just citing someone saying that it happened, without showing the ACTIONS that were supposedly taken to pander for the votes, is failing to support your position. Your "documentation" is just documentation of someone else saying what you said, with no real evidence to back it up.
2. You aske a question a dozen times, and get the same answer, it is not a question anymore, but a slur. Trump blew off the question once, and you leftards focus solely on that. Him blowing off the question does not support your stupid claims. To counter his many denouncements, you would have to find him saying the OPPOSITE. Which you can't.
3. He ran multiple times as an ACTUAL REAL w.s. and got less than one percent every time. That is the point. That is the power of w.s. in this country. YOu people are focusing on an irrelevant fringe to smear good people. YOu are assholes.
Everything in every one of my posts is 100% true, accurate and correct.
Here's more proof of the racism you vote for:
you voted for this:
"Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believesblack people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin.
Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994.
“Melanin endows blacks with greater mental, physical, and spiritual abilities — something which cannot be measured by Eurocentric standards.” Kristen Clarke wrote."
“Melanin Endows Blacks with Greater Mental, Physical and Spiritual Abilities” (VIDEO)
Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believes black people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin. Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994. “Melanin endows blacks with greater ment ...
Yes, he is....as the the subsequent links I provided proved. Obviously you didn't read them.....typical willful ignorance of a Cheeto Jeezus acolyte.
It's like this sweetpea, when you make a claim, people will do research to see if that claim holds any water....they do so with a little thing called fact checking. The links I provided PROVE that Carlson is either a liar or too damned stupid to check his facts or both. This is his forte that he co-joins with his opinion. That makes him a useful idiot for the Cheeto Jeezus religion that has usurp the GOP. Carry on.
Mmm, not quite. That nonsense got started when in one of his speeches to the NOI rallies, Farrakhan EQUATED Obama with the "messiah". From them on, you had media wonks on both sides of the political aisle peppering their coverage of Obama with that word. Mind you, it was in effect a back handed attempt (promoted by the right wing media) to alienate any non-black voters from voting for him, and to paint black voters as dummies just following religious dogma and racial bias in voting en masse for a black candidate (IMHO, of course). But the people paid no attention to such silliness, and TWICE voted on the issues. Remember, the GOP gained control of both Houses because a large portion of voters withheld their congressional votes in protest over what they saw as Obama being too conciliatory to the GOP. They, and Obama, learned a hard lesson.
Oh, and FYI; the first time I heard the term "Cheeto Jeezus" was on a TV talk show called "The View"...it was uttered by Meaghan McCain, daughter of the late Sen. John McCain. She said it to point to the near fanatical religious approach that Trump supporters in Congress, the Media and the general public display even when Trump is caught flat footed lying.
And for the record, I'm a registered Independent. Hope this clears things up for you. Carry on.
2. Time's Nancy Gibbs who opened this week's cover story bycomparing Obama with Jesus:“Some princes are born in palaces. Some are born in mangers. But a few are born in the imagination, out of scraps of history and hope...” In the November 17 issue.
4. “Obama seemedthe political equivalent of a rainbow — a sudden preternatural event inspiring awe and ecstasy....” Time’s Joe Klein, October 23, 2006 cover story, "Why Barack Obama Could Be the Next President."
5. NBC’s Matt Lauer noted that “people” have called Obama “ ‘The Savior,’ ‘The Messiah,’ ‘The Messenger of Change,’“ Today Show, NBC, October 20, 2008.
6. The New York Time’s Judith Warner reported, “Many women- not too surprisingly – were dreaming about sex with the president [Obama]”.http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com...t-a-president/
“…the Obamas are not just a beacon of hope, inspiration and“demigodlikeness,”Ibid.
7. David Cordero, 24, made the sculpture for his senior show after noticing all the attention Obama has received: "All of this is a response to what I've been witnessing and hearing, this idea that Barack is sort ofa potential saviorthat might come and absolve the country of all its sins," Cordero said.Sculpture of Obama as Jesuscauses stir - politics - Decision '08 - Barack Obama News - msnbc.com
8. . In its November 22, 2010 issue, Obama has been shown by Newsweek on its cover page with multiple arms balancing several policy issues while raising his left leg mimickingthe cosmic dance of the Hindu deity; considered a manifestation of Lord Shiva.
... Newsweek has named Obama "god of all things" on its cover.
SOURCE: Times of India (November 20, 2010).
9. “I haven’t seen a politician get this kind ofwalk-on-watercoverage since Colin Powell a dozen years ago flirted with making a run for the White House,” said Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz on Meet the Press in February 2007
10. Samantha Fennell, formerly an associate publisher of Elle, wrote on the magazine’s website a month later: “When I attended my second “Obama Live” fund-raiser last week at New York City’s Grand Hyatt, . . . I was on my feet as Senator Obama entered the room. Fate had blessed me in this moment. . . . In a moment of divine intervention,he saw me,…”
11.Filmmaker Spike Lee, predicting an Obama victory, implicitly compared the candidate with Christ: “You’ll have to measure time by ‘Before Obama’ and ‘After Obama.’ . . .
12. Jesse Jackson, Jr. called Obama’s securing the Democratic nomination “so extraordinary thatanother chapter could be added to the Bibleto chronicle its significance.”
13. . Louis Farrakhan went one better, according to the website WorldNetDaily: “Barack has captured the youth. . . . That’s a sign.When the Messiah speaks,the youth will hear, andthe Messiah is absolutely speaking.”
14. His followers needed to re-elect him to a second term, so that he could continue to accomplish the promises he made, thus, realizing his vision of America as a more perfect political union or“heaven here on earth.”
The Gospel According to Apostle Barack, by Barbara A. Thompson.
15. "Does it not feel as ifsome special hand is guiding Obama on his journey, I mean, as he has said, the utter improbability of it all?"
-- Daily Kos
16"Obama's finest speeches do not excite. They do not inform. They don't even really inspire. They elevate. . . .He is not the Word made flesh, but the triumph of word over flesh . .. Obama is, at his best, able to call us back to our highest selves."
- Ezra Klein
17. "Obama has the capacity to summon heroic forces from the spiritual depths of ordinary citizens and to unleash therefrom a symphonic chorus of unique creative acts whose common purpose is to tame the soul and alleviate the great challenges facing mankind."
-- Gerald Campbell
18."We're here to evolve to a higher plane . . . he is an evolved leader . . . [he] has an ear for eloquence and a Tongue dipped in the Unvarnished Truth."
-- Oprah Winfrey
19. “I would characterize the Senate race as being a race where Obama was, let’s say, blessed and highly favored. That’s not routine. There’s something else going on. I think that Obama, his election to the Senate, was divinely ordered. . . . I know that that was God’s plan."
-- Bill Rush
20. "This is bigger than Kennedy. . . .This is the New Testament."| "I felt this thrill going up my leg. I mean, I don't have that too often. No, seriously. It's a dramatic event."
-- Chris Matthews
Newsweek editor Evan Thomas said President Obama is "sort of God" in a way that's "standing above the country." Transcript below.
"CHRIS MATTHEWS (HOST):Evan Thomas is editor at large for Newsweek magazine. Evan, you remember 1984. It wasn't 100 years ago. Reagan and World War II and the sense of us as the good guys in the world, how are we doing? EVAN THOMAS: Well, we were the good guys in 1984, it felt that way. It hasn't felt that way in recent years. So Obama's had, really, a different task We're seen too often as the bad guys. And he, he has a very different job from ... Reagan was all about America, and you talked about it. Obama is - we are above that now. We're not just parochial, we're not just chauvinistic, we're not just provincial. We stand for something, I mean in a way Obama's standing above the country, above above the world, he's sort of God."
You seem to think that these canned responses somehow disprove my previous assessment of Tucker Carlson.
Hint: they don't.
As for the regurgitation of this "messiah" bilge the right wing STILL carries on about after getting their butts whupped by Obama in two elections (popular and electoral vote, don't cha know): you (once again) inadvertently prove my point. All these quasi-religious references to Obama's speeches from pundits, politicos and news promoters came on the heels of Farrakhan's decree to his followers. Just as I said . But the smart voters, (All Americans of all races, creeds and colors) weren't buying it. Interesting, n-cest pas'?
And of course, you omit this tidbit from your cache of cliches':
The Atlantic covers news, politics, culture, technology, health, and more, through its articles, podcasts, videos, and flagship magazine.
www.theatlantic.com
A 3rd rate propagandist such as yourself will just deny the conclusive logic, and continue to parrot your myopic mantra ad nausea. I expect nothing less from you at this point. Carry on.
‘I won’t be pathologized for being White’: Man resigns, shreds school district over ‘white privilege’ training
An after-school coordinator at a New Hampshire elementary school has gone viral for resigning over the school’s embrace of anti-white critical race theory propaganda.
In a public resignation letter released Monday on Twitter, former Northwest Elementary after-school program coordinator Daniel Concannon, 40, accused his school district of having endorsed the “dehumanization and hatred of White people, as evidenced by their dissemination of the imbecilic ‘White Privilege’ curriculum.”
In the letter, he purposefully referred to the Manchester School District as “The Frankfurt School.” It was a reference to the school responsible for creating contemporary Marxism, which is believed to be at the root of CRT."
translation: another clown who can't deal with FACTS that point to the congenital racism in the American fabric....much less that skin color greatly increases your chances of beneficial treatment and opportunities. No one is asking the fool to apologize, as individually no one gives a damn about him.
My assessment of Tucker Carlson is valid and documented....your "messiah" dodge was aptly deconstructed with FACTS....pity you don't have the cojones to just concede a point, and will just throw anything against the wall repeatedly, hoping it sticks....but I expect nothing less from 3rd rate David Duke wanna be's. Carry on.
Once again, it appears that my role is to disabuse you of the lies your party and government school instituted.
David Duke was a Democrat, and believed as you do.
David Duke....the Democrat????
State Senator, 1975 (Baton Rouge Area)[edit]
Threshold > 50%
First Ballot, November 1, 1975
Louisiana State Senate, 1975
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Kenneth Osterberger 22,287 66
Democratic David Duke 11,079 33
N/A Others 1
Total 100
State Senator, 10th District, 1979 (Suburban New Orleans)[edit]
Threshold > 50% First Ballot, October 27, 1979
Louisiana State Senate, 10th District, 1979
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Joseph Tiemann 21,329 57
Democratic David Duke 9,897 26
N/A Others 6,459 17
Total 37,685 100
Democratic Nomination for United States Presidential Candidate, 1988 (Louisiana results)[edit]
Threshold = Plurality
1988 Democratic Presidential primary in Louisiana
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Jesse Jackson 221,522 35
Democratic Al Gore 174,971 28
Democratic Michael Dukakis 95,661 15
Democratic Dick Gephardt 67,029 11
Democratic Gary Hart 26,437 4
Democratic David Duke 23,391 4
Democratic Others 16,008 3
Total 625,019 100
Electoral history of David Duke - Wikipedia
Duke left the KKK long before he became a Republican....
"In 1979, after his first, abortive run for president (as a Democrat) and a series of highly publicized violent Klan incidents, Duke quietly incorporated the nonprofit National Association for the Advancement of White People (NAAWP) in an attempt to leave the baggage of the Klan behind."
The Democrats have always been associated with racism. The Democrat icon Franklin Roosevelt, in fact, made a KKKer his very first pick for the Supreme Court:
. "... [Hugo] Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..." http://egnorance.blogspot.com/2011/10/hugo-black-and-real-history-of-wall-of.html]
I can’t help but find the GOP leadership’s outrage at Donald Trump’s initial refusal to disavow David Duke and the Ku Klux Klan disingenuous. Lest we forget, the Republican Party …
www.baltimoresun.com
And spare us your attempt to soft soap Duke, who NEVER disavowed his core racist beliefs no matter what party he chose in a state bitterly contentious of its congenital racism:
Duke was successful to a degree despite his painfully obvious bigotry and racism. YOU aren't even a cheap knock-off....just a wanna be with delusions of grandeur. Carry on, sweetpea. It's a guilty pleasure making a fool of you while you tell the mirror the opposite.
1. So, your prime "evidence" for the theory is a consultant claiming credit? Wow. Why not cite a crack whore or a lawyer?
2. Trump denounced duke repeatedly. Your one counter is him blowing off a question? You do realize that that does not contradict his denouncements.
3. Yep. President is national. He's run for the President as both a dem and as gop. IN both cases he got less than 1% of the vote. A total that makes me wonder how much of that was errors.
1. translation: any time someone supplies sources with valid documentation that disproves the contentions of bigots and right wing wonks, they don't deal with the content, they just try to slander the source. But anything they source is akin to God's word. Such hypocritical foolishness only appeals to the willfully ignorant and insipidly stubborn like Correll.
2. The documented public record of Cheeto Jeezus playing word games so as to not piss off part of his base support is well documented (the self proclaimed genius suddenly feigning amnesia when it comes to Duke). Unlike his definitive statements concerning Obama and the birther BS. Anyone else just comes right out and denounces Duke no matter how many times asked. You do realize that saying "sure, if you say so" at one point is not the same as "I totally reject what he stands for and do not recognize his endorsement, nor do I want it".....you get that, right?
3. You carried on about him being a Democrat....yeah, in his home state where the Dem Party was still rife with "Dixiecrats"....people who still held onto the old Party beliefs until the shift under Johnson and Nixon, as I previously documented. When he realized that the old ways weren't going to stand, he went with the flow to the GOP....but by then no one wanted to be associated with blatant racism and bigotry from a former Neo-Nazi and KKK leader. A matter of fact, a matter of history whether you like it/acknowledge it or not. Carry on, my myopic friend.
1. YOu misunderstand. To support the claim of the c.t. you would need to show the policies used to pander to the supposed wacist bloc. You can't. Because it was not done. EVER.
2. Trump denounced Duke many times. He blew the question off once. Assholes ignore the repeated and clear denouncements to focus on the one blow off. Because they are assholes.
3. I did not carry on about him being a democrat. He ran two national campaigns and never got even a percentage point of the popular vote. That is the power of the w.s. fringe in action. Assuming that those votes were not all blind or drunk fools voting for him by accident.
1. No misunderstanding....YOU just refuse to accept the validity of the source material I used...despite documentation via footnotes and internal reference links. Your declarations and lame attempt at condescension are worthless given the historically documented FACTS. But essentially all you've got is some lame version of Goebbels.....repeating your BS ad nausea hoping it will magically become fact. Hint: it won't.
2. We've already done this dance, and as they say the devil is in the details. Cheeto Jeezus' wishy-washy public statements about your hero Davey are in there entirety for all to see, as I pointed out and was documented in the media. You're last 2 sentences are essentially a projection.
3. Umm, yeah you did...the chronology of the posts shows YOU emphasizing this at least twice, a third repetition done now. As usual with all alt-right revisionists, you just leave out certain details that detract from your main message. I just filled in the blanks with FACTS. My previous assessment stands documented, your propagandistic myopia non-withstanding. Now, run-a-long and post up your next regurgitation of you SOS. The reading audience awaits.
1. The Southern Strategy, if real, would have required policy to get the southern wacist votes. That is the claim. Just citing someone saying that it happened, without showing the ACTIONS that were supposedly taken to pander for the votes, is failing to support your position. Your "documentation" is just documentation of someone else saying what you said, with no real evidence to back it up.
2. You aske a question a dozen times, and get the same answer, it is not a question anymore, but a slur. Trump blew off the question once, and you leftards focus solely on that. Him blowing off the question does not support your stupid claims. To counter his many denouncements, you would have to find him saying the OPPOSITE. Which you can't.
3. He ran multiple times as an ACTUAL REAL w.s. and got less than one percent every time. That is the point. That is the power of w.s. in this country. YOu people are focusing on an irrelevant fringe to smear good people. YOu are assholes.
Everything in every one of my posts is 100% true, accurate and correct.
Here's more proof of the racism you vote for:
you voted for this:
"Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believesblack people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin.
Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994.
“Melanin endows blacks with greater mental, physical, and spiritual abilities — something which cannot be measured by Eurocentric standards.” Kristen Clarke wrote."
“Melanin Endows Blacks with Greater Mental, Physical and Spiritual Abilities” (VIDEO)
Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believes black people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin. Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994. “Melanin endows blacks with greater ment ...
Yes, he is....as the the subsequent links I provided proved. Obviously you didn't read them.....typical willful ignorance of a Cheeto Jeezus acolyte.
It's like this sweetpea, when you make a claim, people will do research to see if that claim holds any water....they do so with a little thing called fact checking. The links I provided PROVE that Carlson is either a liar or too damned stupid to check his facts or both. This is his forte that he co-joins with his opinion. That makes him a useful idiot for the Cheeto Jeezus religion that has usurp the GOP. Carry on.
Mmm, not quite. That nonsense got started when in one of his speeches to the NOI rallies, Farrakhan EQUATED Obama with the "messiah". From them on, you had media wonks on both sides of the political aisle peppering their coverage of Obama with that word. Mind you, it was in effect a back handed attempt (promoted by the right wing media) to alienate any non-black voters from voting for him, and to paint black voters as dummies just following religious dogma and racial bias in voting en masse for a black candidate (IMHO, of course). But the people paid no attention to such silliness, and TWICE voted on the issues. Remember, the GOP gained control of both Houses because a large portion of voters withheld their congressional votes in protest over what they saw as Obama being too conciliatory to the GOP. They, and Obama, learned a hard lesson.
Oh, and FYI; the first time I heard the term "Cheeto Jeezus" was on a TV talk show called "The View"...it was uttered by Meaghan McCain, daughter of the late Sen. John McCain. She said it to point to the near fanatical religious approach that Trump supporters in Congress, the Media and the general public display even when Trump is caught flat footed lying.
And for the record, I'm a registered Independent. Hope this clears things up for you. Carry on.
2. Time's Nancy Gibbs who opened this week's cover story bycomparing Obama with Jesus:“Some princes are born in palaces. Some are born in mangers. But a few are born in the imagination, out of scraps of history and hope...” In the November 17 issue.
4. “Obama seemedthe political equivalent of a rainbow — a sudden preternatural event inspiring awe and ecstasy....” Time’s Joe Klein, October 23, 2006 cover story, "Why Barack Obama Could Be the Next President."
5. NBC’s Matt Lauer noted that “people” have called Obama “ ‘The Savior,’ ‘The Messiah,’ ‘The Messenger of Change,’“ Today Show, NBC, October 20, 2008.
6. The New York Time’s Judith Warner reported, “Many women- not too surprisingly – were dreaming about sex with the president [Obama]”.http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com...t-a-president/
“…the Obamas are not just a beacon of hope, inspiration and“demigodlikeness,”Ibid.
7. David Cordero, 24, made the sculpture for his senior show after noticing all the attention Obama has received: "All of this is a response to what I've been witnessing and hearing, this idea that Barack is sort ofa potential saviorthat might come and absolve the country of all its sins," Cordero said.Sculpture of Obama as Jesuscauses stir - politics - Decision '08 - Barack Obama News - msnbc.com
8. . In its November 22, 2010 issue, Obama has been shown by Newsweek on its cover page with multiple arms balancing several policy issues while raising his left leg mimickingthe cosmic dance of the Hindu deity; considered a manifestation of Lord Shiva.
... Newsweek has named Obama "god of all things" on its cover.
SOURCE: Times of India (November 20, 2010).
9. “I haven’t seen a politician get this kind ofwalk-on-watercoverage since Colin Powell a dozen years ago flirted with making a run for the White House,” said Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz on Meet the Press in February 2007
10. Samantha Fennell, formerly an associate publisher of Elle, wrote on the magazine’s website a month later: “When I attended my second “Obama Live” fund-raiser last week at New York City’s Grand Hyatt, . . . I was on my feet as Senator Obama entered the room. Fate had blessed me in this moment. . . . In a moment of divine intervention,he saw me,…”
11.Filmmaker Spike Lee, predicting an Obama victory, implicitly compared the candidate with Christ: “You’ll have to measure time by ‘Before Obama’ and ‘After Obama.’ . . .
12. Jesse Jackson, Jr. called Obama’s securing the Democratic nomination “so extraordinary thatanother chapter could be added to the Bibleto chronicle its significance.”
13. . Louis Farrakhan went one better, according to the website WorldNetDaily: “Barack has captured the youth. . . . That’s a sign.When the Messiah speaks,the youth will hear, andthe Messiah is absolutely speaking.”
14. His followers needed to re-elect him to a second term, so that he could continue to accomplish the promises he made, thus, realizing his vision of America as a more perfect political union or“heaven here on earth.”
The Gospel According to Apostle Barack, by Barbara A. Thompson.
15. "Does it not feel as ifsome special hand is guiding Obama on his journey, I mean, as he has said, the utter improbability of it all?"
-- Daily Kos
16"Obama's finest speeches do not excite. They do not inform. They don't even really inspire. They elevate. . . .He is not the Word made flesh, but the triumph of word over flesh . .. Obama is, at his best, able to call us back to our highest selves."
- Ezra Klein
17. "Obama has the capacity to summon heroic forces from the spiritual depths of ordinary citizens and to unleash therefrom a symphonic chorus of unique creative acts whose common purpose is to tame the soul and alleviate the great challenges facing mankind."
-- Gerald Campbell
18."We're here to evolve to a higher plane . . . he is an evolved leader . . . [he] has an ear for eloquence and a Tongue dipped in the Unvarnished Truth."
-- Oprah Winfrey
19. “I would characterize the Senate race as being a race where Obama was, let’s say, blessed and highly favored. That’s not routine. There’s something else going on. I think that Obama, his election to the Senate, was divinely ordered. . . . I know that that was God’s plan."
-- Bill Rush
20. "This is bigger than Kennedy. . . .This is the New Testament."| "I felt this thrill going up my leg. I mean, I don't have that too often. No, seriously. It's a dramatic event."
-- Chris Matthews
Newsweek editor Evan Thomas said President Obama is "sort of God" in a way that's "standing above the country." Transcript below.
"CHRIS MATTHEWS (HOST):Evan Thomas is editor at large for Newsweek magazine. Evan, you remember 1984. It wasn't 100 years ago. Reagan and World War II and the sense of us as the good guys in the world, how are we doing? EVAN THOMAS: Well, we were the good guys in 1984, it felt that way. It hasn't felt that way in recent years. So Obama's had, really, a different task We're seen too often as the bad guys. And he, he has a very different job from ... Reagan was all about America, and you talked about it. Obama is - we are above that now. We're not just parochial, we're not just chauvinistic, we're not just provincial. We stand for something, I mean in a way Obama's standing above the country, above above the world, he's sort of God."
You seem to think that these canned responses somehow disprove my previous assessment of Tucker Carlson.
Hint: they don't.
As for the regurgitation of this "messiah" bilge the right wing STILL carries on about after getting their butts whupped by Obama in two elections (popular and electoral vote, don't cha know): you (once again) inadvertently prove my point. All these quasi-religious references to Obama's speeches from pundits, politicos and news promoters came on the heels of Farrakhan's decree to his followers. Just as I said . But the smart voters, (All Americans of all races, creeds and colors) weren't buying it. Interesting, n-cest pas'?
And of course, you omit this tidbit from your cache of cliches':
The Atlantic covers news, politics, culture, technology, health, and more, through its articles, podcasts, videos, and flagship magazine.
www.theatlantic.com
A 3rd rate propagandist such as yourself will just deny the conclusive logic, and continue to parrot your myopic mantra ad nausea. I expect nothing less from you at this point. Carry on.
‘I won’t be pathologized for being White’: Man resigns, shreds school district over ‘white privilege’ training
An after-school coordinator at a New Hampshire elementary school has gone viral for resigning over the school’s embrace of anti-white critical race theory propaganda.
In a public resignation letter released Monday on Twitter, former Northwest Elementary after-school program coordinator Daniel Concannon, 40, accused his school district of having endorsed the “dehumanization and hatred of White people, as evidenced by their dissemination of the imbecilic ‘White Privilege’ curriculum.”
In the letter, he purposefully referred to the Manchester School District as “The Frankfurt School.” It was a reference to the school responsible for creating contemporary Marxism, which is believed to be at the root of CRT."
translation: another clown who can't deal with FACTS that point to the congenital racism in the American fabric....much less that skin color greatly increases your chances of beneficial treatment and opportunities. No one is asking the fool to apologize, as individually no one gives a damn about him.
My assessment of Tucker Carlson is valid and documented....your "messiah" dodge was aptly deconstructed with FACTS....pity you don't have the cojones to just concede a point, and will just throw anything against the wall repeatedly, hoping it sticks....but I expect nothing less from 3rd rate David Duke wanna be's. Carry on.
Once again, it appears that my role is to disabuse you of the lies your party and government school instituted.
David Duke was a Democrat, and believed as you do.
David Duke....the Democrat????
State Senator, 1975 (Baton Rouge Area)[edit]
Threshold > 50%
First Ballot, November 1, 1975
Louisiana State Senate, 1975
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Kenneth Osterberger 22,287 66
Democratic David Duke 11,079 33
N/A Others 1
Total 100
State Senator, 10th District, 1979 (Suburban New Orleans)[edit]
Threshold > 50% First Ballot, October 27, 1979
Louisiana State Senate, 10th District, 1979
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Joseph Tiemann 21,329 57
Democratic David Duke 9,897 26
N/A Others 6,459 17
Total 37,685 100
Democratic Nomination for United States Presidential Candidate, 1988 (Louisiana results)[edit]
Threshold = Plurality
1988 Democratic Presidential primary in Louisiana
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Jesse Jackson 221,522 35
Democratic Al Gore 174,971 28
Democratic Michael Dukakis 95,661 15
Democratic Dick Gephardt 67,029 11
Democratic Gary Hart 26,437 4
Democratic David Duke 23,391 4
Democratic Others 16,008 3
Total 625,019 100
Electoral history of David Duke - Wikipedia
Duke left the KKK long before he became a Republican....
"In 1979, after his first, abortive run for president (as a Democrat) and a series of highly publicized violent Klan incidents, Duke quietly incorporated the nonprofit National Association for the Advancement of White People (NAAWP) in an attempt to leave the baggage of the Klan behind."
The Democrats have always been associated with racism. The Democrat icon Franklin Roosevelt, in fact, made a KKKer his very first pick for the Supreme Court:
. "... [Hugo] Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..." http://egnorance.blogspot.com/2011/10/hugo-black-and-real-history-of-wall-of.html]
I can’t help but find the GOP leadership’s outrage at Donald Trump’s initial refusal to disavow David Duke and the Ku Klux Klan disingenuous. Lest we forget, the Republican Party …
www.baltimoresun.com
And spare us your attempt to soft soap Duke, who NEVER disavowed his core racist beliefs no matter what party he chose in a state bitterly contentious of its congenital racism:
Duke was successful to a degree despite his painfully obvious bigotry and racism. YOU aren't even a cheap knock-off....just a wanna be with delusions of grandeur. Carry on, sweetpea. It's a guilty pleasure making a fool of you while you tell the mirror the opposite.
1. So, your prime "evidence" for the theory is a consultant claiming credit? Wow. Why not cite a crack whore or a lawyer?
2. Trump denounced duke repeatedly. Your one counter is him blowing off a question? You do realize that that does not contradict his denouncements.
3. Yep. President is national. He's run for the President as both a dem and as gop. IN both cases he got less than 1% of the vote. A total that makes me wonder how much of that was errors.
1. translation: any time someone supplies sources with valid documentation that disproves the contentions of bigots and right wing wonks, they don't deal with the content, they just try to slander the source. But anything they source is akin to God's word. Such hypocritical foolishness only appeals to the willfully ignorant and insipidly stubborn like Correll.
2. The documented public record of Cheeto Jeezus playing word games so as to not piss off part of his base support is well documented (the self proclaimed genius suddenly feigning amnesia when it comes to Duke). Unlike his definitive statements concerning Obama and the birther BS. Anyone else just comes right out and denounces Duke no matter how many times asked. You do realize that saying "sure, if you say so" at one point is not the same as "I totally reject what he stands for and do not recognize his endorsement, nor do I want it".....you get that, right?
3. You carried on about him being a Democrat....yeah, in his home state where the Dem Party was still rife with "Dixiecrats"....people who still held onto the old Party beliefs until the shift under Johnson and Nixon, as I previously documented. When he realized that the old ways weren't going to stand, he went with the flow to the GOP....but by then no one wanted to be associated with blatant racism and bigotry from a former Neo-Nazi and KKK leader. A matter of fact, a matter of history whether you like it/acknowledge it or not. Carry on, my myopic friend.
1. YOu misunderstand. To support the claim of the c.t. you would need to show the policies used to pander to the supposed wacist bloc. You can't. Because it was not done. EVER.
2. Trump denounced Duke many times. He blew the question off once. Assholes ignore the repeated and clear denouncements to focus on the one blow off. Because they are assholes.
3. I did not carry on about him being a democrat. He ran two national campaigns and never got even a percentage point of the popular vote. That is the power of the w.s. fringe in action. Assuming that those votes were not all blind or drunk fools voting for him by accident.
1. No misunderstanding....YOU just refuse to accept the validity of the source material I used...despite documentation via footnotes and internal reference links. Your declarations and lame attempt at condescension are worthless given the historically documented FACTS. But essentially all you've got is some lame version of Goebbels.....repeating your BS ad nausea hoping it will magically become fact. Hint: it won't.
2. We've already done this dance, and as they say the devil is in the details. Cheeto Jeezus' wishy-washy public statements about your hero Davey are in there entirety for all to see, as I pointed out and was documented in the media. You're last 2 sentences are essentially a projection.
3. Umm, yeah you did...the chronology of the posts shows YOU emphasizing this at least twice, a third repetition done now. As usual with all alt-right revisionists, you just leave out certain details that detract from your main message. I just filled in the blanks with FACTS. My previous assessment stands documented, your propagandistic myopia non-withstanding. Now, run-a-long and post up your next regurgitation of you SOS. The reading audience awaits.
1. The Southern Strategy, if real, would have required policy to get the southern wacist votes. That is the claim. Just citing someone saying that it happened, without showing the ACTIONS that were supposedly taken to pander for the votes, is failing to support your position. Your "documentation" is just documentation of someone else saying what you said, with no real evidence to back it up.
2. You aske a question a dozen times, and get the same answer, it is not a question anymore, but a slur. Trump blew off the question once, and you leftards focus solely on that. Him blowing off the question does not support your stupid claims. To counter his many denouncements, you would have to find him saying the OPPOSITE. Which you can't.
3. He ran multiple times as an ACTUAL REAL w.s. and got less than one percent every time. That is the point. That is the power of w.s. in this country. YOu people are focusing on an irrelevant fringe to smear good people. YOu are assholes.
Everything in every one of my posts is 100% true, accurate and correct.
Here's more proof of the racism you vote for:
you voted for this:
"Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believesblack people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin.
Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994.
“Melanin endows blacks with greater mental, physical, and spiritual abilities — something which cannot be measured by Eurocentric standards.” Kristen Clarke wrote."
“Melanin Endows Blacks with Greater Mental, Physical and Spiritual Abilities” (VIDEO)
Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believes black people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin. Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994. “Melanin endows blacks with greater ment ...
Yes, he is....as the the subsequent links I provided proved. Obviously you didn't read them.....typical willful ignorance of a Cheeto Jeezus acolyte.
It's like this sweetpea, when you make a claim, people will do research to see if that claim holds any water....they do so with a little thing called fact checking. The links I provided PROVE that Carlson is either a liar or too damned stupid to check his facts or both. This is his forte that he co-joins with his opinion. That makes him a useful idiot for the Cheeto Jeezus religion that has usurp the GOP. Carry on.
Mmm, not quite. That nonsense got started when in one of his speeches to the NOI rallies, Farrakhan EQUATED Obama with the "messiah". From them on, you had media wonks on both sides of the political aisle peppering their coverage of Obama with that word. Mind you, it was in effect a back handed attempt (promoted by the right wing media) to alienate any non-black voters from voting for him, and to paint black voters as dummies just following religious dogma and racial bias in voting en masse for a black candidate (IMHO, of course). But the people paid no attention to such silliness, and TWICE voted on the issues. Remember, the GOP gained control of both Houses because a large portion of voters withheld their congressional votes in protest over what they saw as Obama being too conciliatory to the GOP. They, and Obama, learned a hard lesson.
Oh, and FYI; the first time I heard the term "Cheeto Jeezus" was on a TV talk show called "The View"...it was uttered by Meaghan McCain, daughter of the late Sen. John McCain. She said it to point to the near fanatical religious approach that Trump supporters in Congress, the Media and the general public display even when Trump is caught flat footed lying.
And for the record, I'm a registered Independent. Hope this clears things up for you. Carry on.
2. Time's Nancy Gibbs who opened this week's cover story bycomparing Obama with Jesus:“Some princes are born in palaces. Some are born in mangers. But a few are born in the imagination, out of scraps of history and hope...” In the November 17 issue.
4. “Obama seemedthe political equivalent of a rainbow — a sudden preternatural event inspiring awe and ecstasy....” Time’s Joe Klein, October 23, 2006 cover story, "Why Barack Obama Could Be the Next President."
5. NBC’s Matt Lauer noted that “people” have called Obama “ ‘The Savior,’ ‘The Messiah,’ ‘The Messenger of Change,’“ Today Show, NBC, October 20, 2008.
6. The New York Time’s Judith Warner reported, “Many women- not too surprisingly – were dreaming about sex with the president [Obama]”.http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com...t-a-president/
“…the Obamas are not just a beacon of hope, inspiration and“demigodlikeness,”Ibid.
7. David Cordero, 24, made the sculpture for his senior show after noticing all the attention Obama has received: "All of this is a response to what I've been witnessing and hearing, this idea that Barack is sort ofa potential saviorthat might come and absolve the country of all its sins," Cordero said.Sculpture of Obama as Jesuscauses stir - politics - Decision '08 - Barack Obama News - msnbc.com
8. . In its November 22, 2010 issue, Obama has been shown by Newsweek on its cover page with multiple arms balancing several policy issues while raising his left leg mimickingthe cosmic dance of the Hindu deity; considered a manifestation of Lord Shiva.
... Newsweek has named Obama "god of all things" on its cover.
SOURCE: Times of India (November 20, 2010).
9. “I haven’t seen a politician get this kind ofwalk-on-watercoverage since Colin Powell a dozen years ago flirted with making a run for the White House,” said Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz on Meet the Press in February 2007
10. Samantha Fennell, formerly an associate publisher of Elle, wrote on the magazine’s website a month later: “When I attended my second “Obama Live” fund-raiser last week at New York City’s Grand Hyatt, . . . I was on my feet as Senator Obama entered the room. Fate had blessed me in this moment. . . . In a moment of divine intervention,he saw me,…”
11.Filmmaker Spike Lee, predicting an Obama victory, implicitly compared the candidate with Christ: “You’ll have to measure time by ‘Before Obama’ and ‘After Obama.’ . . .
12. Jesse Jackson, Jr. called Obama’s securing the Democratic nomination “so extraordinary thatanother chapter could be added to the Bibleto chronicle its significance.”
13. . Louis Farrakhan went one better, according to the website WorldNetDaily: “Barack has captured the youth. . . . That’s a sign.When the Messiah speaks,the youth will hear, andthe Messiah is absolutely speaking.”
14. His followers needed to re-elect him to a second term, so that he could continue to accomplish the promises he made, thus, realizing his vision of America as a more perfect political union or“heaven here on earth.”
The Gospel According to Apostle Barack, by Barbara A. Thompson.
15. "Does it not feel as ifsome special hand is guiding Obama on his journey, I mean, as he has said, the utter improbability of it all?"
-- Daily Kos
16"Obama's finest speeches do not excite. They do not inform. They don't even really inspire. They elevate. . . .He is not the Word made flesh, but the triumph of word over flesh . .. Obama is, at his best, able to call us back to our highest selves."
- Ezra Klein
17. "Obama has the capacity to summon heroic forces from the spiritual depths of ordinary citizens and to unleash therefrom a symphonic chorus of unique creative acts whose common purpose is to tame the soul and alleviate the great challenges facing mankind."
-- Gerald Campbell
18."We're here to evolve to a higher plane . . . he is an evolved leader . . . [he] has an ear for eloquence and a Tongue dipped in the Unvarnished Truth."
-- Oprah Winfrey
19. “I would characterize the Senate race as being a race where Obama was, let’s say, blessed and highly favored. That’s not routine. There’s something else going on. I think that Obama, his election to the Senate, was divinely ordered. . . . I know that that was God’s plan."
-- Bill Rush
20. "This is bigger than Kennedy. . . .This is the New Testament."| "I felt this thrill going up my leg. I mean, I don't have that too often. No, seriously. It's a dramatic event."
-- Chris Matthews
Newsweek editor Evan Thomas said President Obama is "sort of God" in a way that's "standing above the country." Transcript below.
"CHRIS MATTHEWS (HOST):Evan Thomas is editor at large for Newsweek magazine. Evan, you remember 1984. It wasn't 100 years ago. Reagan and World War II and the sense of us as the good guys in the world, how are we doing? EVAN THOMAS: Well, we were the good guys in 1984, it felt that way. It hasn't felt that way in recent years. So Obama's had, really, a different task We're seen too often as the bad guys. And he, he has a very different job from ... Reagan was all about America, and you talked about it. Obama is - we are above that now. We're not just parochial, we're not just chauvinistic, we're not just provincial. We stand for something, I mean in a way Obama's standing above the country, above above the world, he's sort of God."
You seem to think that these canned responses somehow disprove my previous assessment of Tucker Carlson.
Hint: they don't.
As for the regurgitation of this "messiah" bilge the right wing STILL carries on about after getting their butts whupped by Obama in two elections (popular and electoral vote, don't cha know): you (once again) inadvertently prove my point. All these quasi-religious references to Obama's speeches from pundits, politicos and news promoters came on the heels of Farrakhan's decree to his followers. Just as I said . But the smart voters, (All Americans of all races, creeds and colors) weren't buying it. Interesting, n-cest pas'?
And of course, you omit this tidbit from your cache of cliches':
The Atlantic covers news, politics, culture, technology, health, and more, through its articles, podcasts, videos, and flagship magazine.
www.theatlantic.com
A 3rd rate propagandist such as yourself will just deny the conclusive logic, and continue to parrot your myopic mantra ad nausea. I expect nothing less from you at this point. Carry on.
‘I won’t be pathologized for being White’: Man resigns, shreds school district over ‘white privilege’ training
An after-school coordinator at a New Hampshire elementary school has gone viral for resigning over the school’s embrace of anti-white critical race theory propaganda.
In a public resignation letter released Monday on Twitter, former Northwest Elementary after-school program coordinator Daniel Concannon, 40, accused his school district of having endorsed the “dehumanization and hatred of White people, as evidenced by their dissemination of the imbecilic ‘White Privilege’ curriculum.”
In the letter, he purposefully referred to the Manchester School District as “The Frankfurt School.” It was a reference to the school responsible for creating contemporary Marxism, which is believed to be at the root of CRT."
translation: another clown who can't deal with FACTS that point to the congenital racism in the American fabric....much less that skin color greatly increases your chances of beneficial treatment and opportunities. No one is asking the fool to apologize, as individually no one gives a damn about him.
My assessment of Tucker Carlson is valid and documented....your "messiah" dodge was aptly deconstructed with FACTS....pity you don't have the cojones to just concede a point, and will just throw anything against the wall repeatedly, hoping it sticks....but I expect nothing less from 3rd rate David Duke wanna be's. Carry on.
Once again, it appears that my role is to disabuse you of the lies your party and government school instituted.
David Duke was a Democrat, and believed as you do.
David Duke....the Democrat????
State Senator, 1975 (Baton Rouge Area)[edit]
Threshold > 50%
First Ballot, November 1, 1975
Louisiana State Senate, 1975
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Kenneth Osterberger 22,287 66
Democratic David Duke 11,079 33
N/A Others 1
Total 100
State Senator, 10th District, 1979 (Suburban New Orleans)[edit]
Threshold > 50% First Ballot, October 27, 1979
Louisiana State Senate, 10th District, 1979
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Joseph Tiemann 21,329 57
Democratic David Duke 9,897 26
N/A Others 6,459 17
Total 37,685 100
Democratic Nomination for United States Presidential Candidate, 1988 (Louisiana results)[edit]
Threshold = Plurality
1988 Democratic Presidential primary in Louisiana
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Jesse Jackson 221,522 35
Democratic Al Gore 174,971 28
Democratic Michael Dukakis 95,661 15
Democratic Dick Gephardt 67,029 11
Democratic Gary Hart 26,437 4
Democratic David Duke 23,391 4
Democratic Others 16,008 3
Total 625,019 100
Electoral history of David Duke - Wikipedia
Duke left the KKK long before he became a Republican....
"In 1979, after his first, abortive run for president (as a Democrat) and a series of highly publicized violent Klan incidents, Duke quietly incorporated the nonprofit National Association for the Advancement of White People (NAAWP) in an attempt to leave the baggage of the Klan behind."
The Democrats have always been associated with racism. The Democrat icon Franklin Roosevelt, in fact, made a KKKer his very first pick for the Supreme Court:
. "... [Hugo] Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..." http://egnorance.blogspot.com/2011/10/hugo-black-and-real-history-of-wall-of.html]
I can’t help but find the GOP leadership’s outrage at Donald Trump’s initial refusal to disavow David Duke and the Ku Klux Klan disingenuous. Lest we forget, the Republican Party …
www.baltimoresun.com
And spare us your attempt to soft soap Duke, who NEVER disavowed his core racist beliefs no matter what party he chose in a state bitterly contentious of its congenital racism:
Duke was successful to a degree despite his painfully obvious bigotry and racism. YOU aren't even a cheap knock-off....just a wanna be with delusions of grandeur. Carry on, sweetpea. It's a guilty pleasure making a fool of you while you tell the mirror the opposite.
1. So, your prime "evidence" for the theory is a consultant claiming credit? Wow. Why not cite a crack whore or a lawyer?
2. Trump denounced duke repeatedly. Your one counter is him blowing off a question? You do realize that that does not contradict his denouncements.
3. Yep. President is national. He's run for the President as both a dem and as gop. IN both cases he got less than 1% of the vote. A total that makes me wonder how much of that was errors.
1. translation: any time someone supplies sources with valid documentation that disproves the contentions of bigots and right wing wonks, they don't deal with the content, they just try to slander the source. But anything they source is akin to God's word. Such hypocritical foolishness only appeals to the willfully ignorant and insipidly stubborn like Correll.
2. The documented public record of Cheeto Jeezus playing word games so as to not piss off part of his base support is well documented (the self proclaimed genius suddenly feigning amnesia when it comes to Duke). Unlike his definitive statements concerning Obama and the birther BS. Anyone else just comes right out and denounces Duke no matter how many times asked. You do realize that saying "sure, if you say so" at one point is not the same as "I totally reject what he stands for and do not recognize his endorsement, nor do I want it".....you get that, right?
3. You carried on about him being a Democrat....yeah, in his home state where the Dem Party was still rife with "Dixiecrats"....people who still held onto the old Party beliefs until the shift under Johnson and Nixon, as I previously documented. When he realized that the old ways weren't going to stand, he went with the flow to the GOP....but by then no one wanted to be associated with blatant racism and bigotry from a former Neo-Nazi and KKK leader. A matter of fact, a matter of history whether you like it/acknowledge it or not. Carry on, my myopic friend.
1. YOu misunderstand. To support the claim of the c.t. you would need to show the policies used to pander to the supposed wacist bloc. You can't. Because it was not done. EVER.
2. Trump denounced Duke many times. He blew the question off once. Assholes ignore the repeated and clear denouncements to focus on the one blow off. Because they are assholes.
3. I did not carry on about him being a democrat. He ran two national campaigns and never got even a percentage point of the popular vote. That is the power of the w.s. fringe in action. Assuming that those votes were not all blind or drunk fools voting for him by accident.
1. No misunderstanding....YOU just refuse to accept the validity of the source material I used...despite documentation via footnotes and internal reference links. Your declarations and lame attempt at condescension are worthless given the historically documented FACTS. But essentially all you've got is some lame version of Goebbels.....repeating your BS ad nausea hoping it will magically become fact. Hint: it won't.
2. We've already done this dance, and as they say the devil is in the details. Cheeto Jeezus' wishy-washy public statements about your hero Davey are in there entirety for all to see, as I pointed out and was documented in the media. You're last 2 sentences are essentially a projection.
3. Umm, yeah you did...the chronology of the posts shows YOU emphasizing this at least twice, a third repetition done now. As usual with all alt-right revisionists, you just leave out certain details that detract from your main message. I just filled in the blanks with FACTS. My previous assessment stands documented, your propagandistic myopia non-withstanding. Now, run-a-long and post up your next regurgitation of you SOS. The reading audience awaits.
1. The Southern Strategy, if real, would have required policy to get the southern wacist votes. That is the claim. Just citing someone saying that it happened, without showing the ACTIONS that were supposedly taken to pander for the votes, is failing to support your position. Your "documentation" is just documentation of someone else saying what you said, with no real evidence to back it up.
2. You aske a question a dozen times, and get the same answer, it is not a question anymore, but a slur. Trump blew off the question once, and you leftards focus solely on that. Him blowing off the question does not support your stupid claims. To counter his many denouncements, you would have to find him saying the OPPOSITE. Which you can't.
3. He ran multiple times as an ACTUAL REAL w.s. and got less than one percent every time. That is the point. That is the power of w.s. in this country. YOu people are focusing on an irrelevant fringe to smear good people. YOu are assholes.
Everything in every one of my posts is 100% true, accurate and correct.
Here's more proof of the racism you vote for:
you voted for this:
"Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believesblack people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin.
Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994.
“Melanin endows blacks with greater mental, physical, and spiritual abilities — something which cannot be measured by Eurocentric standards.” Kristen Clarke wrote."
“Melanin Endows Blacks with Greater Mental, Physical and Spiritual Abilities” (VIDEO)
Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believes black people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin. Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994. “Melanin endows blacks with greater ment ...
Yes, he is....as the the subsequent links I provided proved. Obviously you didn't read them.....typical willful ignorance of a Cheeto Jeezus acolyte.
It's like this sweetpea, when you make a claim, people will do research to see if that claim holds any water....they do so with a little thing called fact checking. The links I provided PROVE that Carlson is either a liar or too damned stupid to check his facts or both. This is his forte that he co-joins with his opinion. That makes him a useful idiot for the Cheeto Jeezus religion that has usurp the GOP. Carry on.
Mmm, not quite. That nonsense got started when in one of his speeches to the NOI rallies, Farrakhan EQUATED Obama with the "messiah". From them on, you had media wonks on both sides of the political aisle peppering their coverage of Obama with that word. Mind you, it was in effect a back handed attempt (promoted by the right wing media) to alienate any non-black voters from voting for him, and to paint black voters as dummies just following religious dogma and racial bias in voting en masse for a black candidate (IMHO, of course). But the people paid no attention to such silliness, and TWICE voted on the issues. Remember, the GOP gained control of both Houses because a large portion of voters withheld their congressional votes in protest over what they saw as Obama being too conciliatory to the GOP. They, and Obama, learned a hard lesson.
Oh, and FYI; the first time I heard the term "Cheeto Jeezus" was on a TV talk show called "The View"...it was uttered by Meaghan McCain, daughter of the late Sen. John McCain. She said it to point to the near fanatical religious approach that Trump supporters in Congress, the Media and the general public display even when Trump is caught flat footed lying.
And for the record, I'm a registered Independent. Hope this clears things up for you. Carry on.
2. Time's Nancy Gibbs who opened this week's cover story bycomparing Obama with Jesus:“Some princes are born in palaces. Some are born in mangers. But a few are born in the imagination, out of scraps of history and hope...” In the November 17 issue.
4. “Obama seemedthe political equivalent of a rainbow — a sudden preternatural event inspiring awe and ecstasy....” Time’s Joe Klein, October 23, 2006 cover story, "Why Barack Obama Could Be the Next President."
5. NBC’s Matt Lauer noted that “people” have called Obama “ ‘The Savior,’ ‘The Messiah,’ ‘The Messenger of Change,’“ Today Show, NBC, October 20, 2008.
6. The New York Time’s Judith Warner reported, “Many women- not too surprisingly – were dreaming about sex with the president [Obama]”.http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com...t-a-president/
“…the Obamas are not just a beacon of hope, inspiration and“demigodlikeness,”Ibid.
7. David Cordero, 24, made the sculpture for his senior show after noticing all the attention Obama has received: "All of this is a response to what I've been witnessing and hearing, this idea that Barack is sort ofa potential saviorthat might come and absolve the country of all its sins," Cordero said.Sculpture of Obama as Jesuscauses stir - politics - Decision '08 - Barack Obama News - msnbc.com
8. . In its November 22, 2010 issue, Obama has been shown by Newsweek on its cover page with multiple arms balancing several policy issues while raising his left leg mimickingthe cosmic dance of the Hindu deity; considered a manifestation of Lord Shiva.
... Newsweek has named Obama "god of all things" on its cover.
SOURCE: Times of India (November 20, 2010).
9. “I haven’t seen a politician get this kind ofwalk-on-watercoverage since Colin Powell a dozen years ago flirted with making a run for the White House,” said Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz on Meet the Press in February 2007
10. Samantha Fennell, formerly an associate publisher of Elle, wrote on the magazine’s website a month later: “When I attended my second “Obama Live” fund-raiser last week at New York City’s Grand Hyatt, . . . I was on my feet as Senator Obama entered the room. Fate had blessed me in this moment. . . . In a moment of divine intervention,he saw me,…”
11.Filmmaker Spike Lee, predicting an Obama victory, implicitly compared the candidate with Christ: “You’ll have to measure time by ‘Before Obama’ and ‘After Obama.’ . . .
12. Jesse Jackson, Jr. called Obama’s securing the Democratic nomination “so extraordinary thatanother chapter could be added to the Bibleto chronicle its significance.”
13. . Louis Farrakhan went one better, according to the website WorldNetDaily: “Barack has captured the youth. . . . That’s a sign.When the Messiah speaks,the youth will hear, andthe Messiah is absolutely speaking.”
14. His followers needed to re-elect him to a second term, so that he could continue to accomplish the promises he made, thus, realizing his vision of America as a more perfect political union or“heaven here on earth.”
The Gospel According to Apostle Barack, by Barbara A. Thompson.
15. "Does it not feel as ifsome special hand is guiding Obama on his journey, I mean, as he has said, the utter improbability of it all?"
-- Daily Kos
16"Obama's finest speeches do not excite. They do not inform. They don't even really inspire. They elevate. . . .He is not the Word made flesh, but the triumph of word over flesh . .. Obama is, at his best, able to call us back to our highest selves."
- Ezra Klein
17. "Obama has the capacity to summon heroic forces from the spiritual depths of ordinary citizens and to unleash therefrom a symphonic chorus of unique creative acts whose common purpose is to tame the soul and alleviate the great challenges facing mankind."
-- Gerald Campbell
18."We're here to evolve to a higher plane . . . he is an evolved leader . . . [he] has an ear for eloquence and a Tongue dipped in the Unvarnished Truth."
-- Oprah Winfrey
19. “I would characterize the Senate race as being a race where Obama was, let’s say, blessed and highly favored. That’s not routine. There’s something else going on. I think that Obama, his election to the Senate, was divinely ordered. . . . I know that that was God’s plan."
-- Bill Rush
20. "This is bigger than Kennedy. . . .This is the New Testament."| "I felt this thrill going up my leg. I mean, I don't have that too often. No, seriously. It's a dramatic event."
-- Chris Matthews
Newsweek editor Evan Thomas said President Obama is "sort of God" in a way that's "standing above the country." Transcript below.
"CHRIS MATTHEWS (HOST):Evan Thomas is editor at large for Newsweek magazine. Evan, you remember 1984. It wasn't 100 years ago. Reagan and World War II and the sense of us as the good guys in the world, how are we doing? EVAN THOMAS: Well, we were the good guys in 1984, it felt that way. It hasn't felt that way in recent years. So Obama's had, really, a different task We're seen too often as the bad guys. And he, he has a very different job from ... Reagan was all about America, and you talked about it. Obama is - we are above that now. We're not just parochial, we're not just chauvinistic, we're not just provincial. We stand for something, I mean in a way Obama's standing above the country, above above the world, he's sort of God."
You seem to think that these canned responses somehow disprove my previous assessment of Tucker Carlson.
Hint: they don't.
As for the regurgitation of this "messiah" bilge the right wing STILL carries on about after getting their butts whupped by Obama in two elections (popular and electoral vote, don't cha know): you (once again) inadvertently prove my point. All these quasi-religious references to Obama's speeches from pundits, politicos and news promoters came on the heels of Farrakhan's decree to his followers. Just as I said . But the smart voters, (All Americans of all races, creeds and colors) weren't buying it. Interesting, n-cest pas'?
And of course, you omit this tidbit from your cache of cliches':
The Atlantic covers news, politics, culture, technology, health, and more, through its articles, podcasts, videos, and flagship magazine.
www.theatlantic.com
A 3rd rate propagandist such as yourself will just deny the conclusive logic, and continue to parrot your myopic mantra ad nausea. I expect nothing less from you at this point. Carry on.
‘I won’t be pathologized for being White’: Man resigns, shreds school district over ‘white privilege’ training
An after-school coordinator at a New Hampshire elementary school has gone viral for resigning over the school’s embrace of anti-white critical race theory propaganda.
In a public resignation letter released Monday on Twitter, former Northwest Elementary after-school program coordinator Daniel Concannon, 40, accused his school district of having endorsed the “dehumanization and hatred of White people, as evidenced by their dissemination of the imbecilic ‘White Privilege’ curriculum.”
In the letter, he purposefully referred to the Manchester School District as “The Frankfurt School.” It was a reference to the school responsible for creating contemporary Marxism, which is believed to be at the root of CRT."
translation: another clown who can't deal with FACTS that point to the congenital racism in the American fabric....much less that skin color greatly increases your chances of beneficial treatment and opportunities. No one is asking the fool to apologize, as individually no one gives a damn about him.
My assessment of Tucker Carlson is valid and documented....your "messiah" dodge was aptly deconstructed with FACTS....pity you don't have the cojones to just concede a point, and will just throw anything against the wall repeatedly, hoping it sticks....but I expect nothing less from 3rd rate David Duke wanna be's. Carry on.
Once again, it appears that my role is to disabuse you of the lies your party and government school instituted.
David Duke was a Democrat, and believed as you do.
David Duke....the Democrat????
State Senator, 1975 (Baton Rouge Area)[edit]
Threshold > 50%
First Ballot, November 1, 1975
Louisiana State Senate, 1975
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Kenneth Osterberger 22,287 66
Democratic David Duke 11,079 33
N/A Others 1
Total 100
State Senator, 10th District, 1979 (Suburban New Orleans)[edit]
Threshold > 50% First Ballot, October 27, 1979
Louisiana State Senate, 10th District, 1979
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Joseph Tiemann 21,329 57
Democratic David Duke 9,897 26
N/A Others 6,459 17
Total 37,685 100
Democratic Nomination for United States Presidential Candidate, 1988 (Louisiana results)[edit]
Threshold = Plurality
1988 Democratic Presidential primary in Louisiana
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Jesse Jackson 221,522 35
Democratic Al Gore 174,971 28
Democratic Michael Dukakis 95,661 15
Democratic Dick Gephardt 67,029 11
Democratic Gary Hart 26,437 4
Democratic David Duke 23,391 4
Democratic Others 16,008 3
Total 625,019 100
Electoral history of David Duke - Wikipedia
Duke left the KKK long before he became a Republican....
"In 1979, after his first, abortive run for president (as a Democrat) and a series of highly publicized violent Klan incidents, Duke quietly incorporated the nonprofit National Association for the Advancement of White People (NAAWP) in an attempt to leave the baggage of the Klan behind."
The Democrats have always been associated with racism. The Democrat icon Franklin Roosevelt, in fact, made a KKKer his very first pick for the Supreme Court:
. "... [Hugo] Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..." http://egnorance.blogspot.com/2011/10/hugo-black-and-real-history-of-wall-of.html]
I can’t help but find the GOP leadership’s outrage at Donald Trump’s initial refusal to disavow David Duke and the Ku Klux Klan disingenuous. Lest we forget, the Republican Party …
www.baltimoresun.com
And spare us your attempt to soft soap Duke, who NEVER disavowed his core racist beliefs no matter what party he chose in a state bitterly contentious of its congenital racism:
Duke was successful to a degree despite his painfully obvious bigotry and racism. YOU aren't even a cheap knock-off....just a wanna be with delusions of grandeur. Carry on, sweetpea. It's a guilty pleasure making a fool of you while you tell the mirror the opposite.
1. So, your prime "evidence" for the theory is a consultant claiming credit? Wow. Why not cite a crack whore or a lawyer?
2. Trump denounced duke repeatedly. Your one counter is him blowing off a question? You do realize that that does not contradict his denouncements.
3. Yep. President is national. He's run for the President as both a dem and as gop. IN both cases he got less than 1% of the vote. A total that makes me wonder how much of that was errors.
1. translation: any time someone supplies sources with valid documentation that disproves the contentions of bigots and right wing wonks, they don't deal with the content, they just try to slander the source. But anything they source is akin to God's word. Such hypocritical foolishness only appeals to the willfully ignorant and insipidly stubborn like Correll.
2. The documented public record of Cheeto Jeezus playing word games so as to not piss off part of his base support is well documented (the self proclaimed genius suddenly feigning amnesia when it comes to Duke). Unlike his definitive statements concerning Obama and the birther BS. Anyone else just comes right out and denounces Duke no matter how many times asked. You do realize that saying "sure, if you say so" at one point is not the same as "I totally reject what he stands for and do not recognize his endorsement, nor do I want it".....you get that, right?
3. You carried on about him being a Democrat....yeah, in his home state where the Dem Party was still rife with "Dixiecrats"....people who still held onto the old Party beliefs until the shift under Johnson and Nixon, as I previously documented. When he realized that the old ways weren't going to stand, he went with the flow to the GOP....but by then no one wanted to be associated with blatant racism and bigotry from a former Neo-Nazi and KKK leader. A matter of fact, a matter of history whether you like it/acknowledge it or not. Carry on, my myopic friend.
1. YOu misunderstand. To support the claim of the c.t. you would need to show the policies used to pander to the supposed wacist bloc. You can't. Because it was not done. EVER.
2. Trump denounced Duke many times. He blew the question off once. Assholes ignore the repeated and clear denouncements to focus on the one blow off. Because they are assholes.
3. I did not carry on about him being a democrat. He ran two national campaigns and never got even a percentage point of the popular vote. That is the power of the w.s. fringe in action. Assuming that those votes were not all blind or drunk fools voting for him by accident.
1. No misunderstanding....YOU just refuse to accept the validity of the source material I used...despite documentation via footnotes and internal reference links. Your declarations and lame attempt at condescension are worthless given the historically documented FACTS. But essentially all you've got is some lame version of Goebbels.....repeating your BS ad nausea hoping it will magically become fact. Hint: it won't.
2. We've already done this dance, and as they say the devil is in the details. Cheeto Jeezus' wishy-washy public statements about your hero Davey are in there entirety for all to see, as I pointed out and was documented in the media. You're last 2 sentences are essentially a projection.
3. Umm, yeah you did...the chronology of the posts shows YOU emphasizing this at least twice, a third repetition done now. As usual with all alt-right revisionists, you just leave out certain details that detract from your main message. I just filled in the blanks with FACTS. My previous assessment stands documented, your propagandistic myopia non-withstanding. Now, run-a-long and post up your next regurgitation of you SOS. The reading audience awaits.
1. The Southern Strategy, if real, would have required policy to get the southern wacist votes. That is the claim. Just citing someone saying that it happened, without showing the ACTIONS that were supposedly taken to pander for the votes, is failing to support your position. Your "documentation" is just documentation of someone else saying what you said, with no real evidence to back it up.
2. You aske a question a dozen times, and get the same answer, it is not a question anymore, but a slur. Trump blew off the question once, and you leftards focus solely on that. Him blowing off the question does not support your stupid claims. To counter his many denouncements, you would have to find him saying the OPPOSITE. Which you can't.
3. He ran multiple times as an ACTUAL REAL w.s. and got less than one percent every time. That is the point. That is the power of w.s. in this country. YOu people are focusing on an irrelevant fringe to smear good people. YOu are assholes.
Everything in every one of my posts is 100% true, accurate and correct.
Here's more proof of the racism you vote for:
you voted for this:
"Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believesblack people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin.
Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994.
“Melanin endows blacks with greater mental, physical, and spiritual abilities — something which cannot be measured by Eurocentric standards.” Kristen Clarke wrote."
“Melanin Endows Blacks with Greater Mental, Physical and Spiritual Abilities” (VIDEO)
Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believes black people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin. Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994. “Melanin endows blacks with greater ment ...
Yes, he is....as the the subsequent links I provided proved. Obviously you didn't read them.....typical willful ignorance of a Cheeto Jeezus acolyte.
It's like this sweetpea, when you make a claim, people will do research to see if that claim holds any water....they do so with a little thing called fact checking. The links I provided PROVE that Carlson is either a liar or too damned stupid to check his facts or both. This is his forte that he co-joins with his opinion. That makes him a useful idiot for the Cheeto Jeezus religion that has usurp the GOP. Carry on.
Mmm, not quite. That nonsense got started when in one of his speeches to the NOI rallies, Farrakhan EQUATED Obama with the "messiah". From them on, you had media wonks on both sides of the political aisle peppering their coverage of Obama with that word. Mind you, it was in effect a back handed attempt (promoted by the right wing media) to alienate any non-black voters from voting for him, and to paint black voters as dummies just following religious dogma and racial bias in voting en masse for a black candidate (IMHO, of course). But the people paid no attention to such silliness, and TWICE voted on the issues. Remember, the GOP gained control of both Houses because a large portion of voters withheld their congressional votes in protest over what they saw as Obama being too conciliatory to the GOP. They, and Obama, learned a hard lesson.
Oh, and FYI; the first time I heard the term "Cheeto Jeezus" was on a TV talk show called "The View"...it was uttered by Meaghan McCain, daughter of the late Sen. John McCain. She said it to point to the near fanatical religious approach that Trump supporters in Congress, the Media and the general public display even when Trump is caught flat footed lying.
And for the record, I'm a registered Independent. Hope this clears things up for you. Carry on.
2. Time's Nancy Gibbs who opened this week's cover story bycomparing Obama with Jesus:“Some princes are born in palaces. Some are born in mangers. But a few are born in the imagination, out of scraps of history and hope...” In the November 17 issue.
4. “Obama seemedthe political equivalent of a rainbow — a sudden preternatural event inspiring awe and ecstasy....” Time’s Joe Klein, October 23, 2006 cover story, "Why Barack Obama Could Be the Next President."
5. NBC’s Matt Lauer noted that “people” have called Obama “ ‘The Savior,’ ‘The Messiah,’ ‘The Messenger of Change,’“ Today Show, NBC, October 20, 2008.
6. The New York Time’s Judith Warner reported, “Many women- not too surprisingly – were dreaming about sex with the president [Obama]”.http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com...t-a-president/
“…the Obamas are not just a beacon of hope, inspiration and“demigodlikeness,”Ibid.
7. David Cordero, 24, made the sculpture for his senior show after noticing all the attention Obama has received: "All of this is a response to what I've been witnessing and hearing, this idea that Barack is sort ofa potential saviorthat might come and absolve the country of all its sins," Cordero said.Sculpture of Obama as Jesuscauses stir - politics - Decision '08 - Barack Obama News - msnbc.com
8. . In its November 22, 2010 issue, Obama has been shown by Newsweek on its cover page with multiple arms balancing several policy issues while raising his left leg mimickingthe cosmic dance of the Hindu deity; considered a manifestation of Lord Shiva.
... Newsweek has named Obama "god of all things" on its cover.
SOURCE: Times of India (November 20, 2010).
9. “I haven’t seen a politician get this kind ofwalk-on-watercoverage since Colin Powell a dozen years ago flirted with making a run for the White House,” said Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz on Meet the Press in February 2007
10. Samantha Fennell, formerly an associate publisher of Elle, wrote on the magazine’s website a month later: “When I attended my second “Obama Live” fund-raiser last week at New York City’s Grand Hyatt, . . . I was on my feet as Senator Obama entered the room. Fate had blessed me in this moment. . . . In a moment of divine intervention,he saw me,…”
11.Filmmaker Spike Lee, predicting an Obama victory, implicitly compared the candidate with Christ: “You’ll have to measure time by ‘Before Obama’ and ‘After Obama.’ . . .
12. Jesse Jackson, Jr. called Obama’s securing the Democratic nomination “so extraordinary thatanother chapter could be added to the Bibleto chronicle its significance.”
13. . Louis Farrakhan went one better, according to the website WorldNetDaily: “Barack has captured the youth. . . . That’s a sign.When the Messiah speaks,the youth will hear, andthe Messiah is absolutely speaking.”
14. His followers needed to re-elect him to a second term, so that he could continue to accomplish the promises he made, thus, realizing his vision of America as a more perfect political union or“heaven here on earth.”
The Gospel According to Apostle Barack, by Barbara A. Thompson.
15. "Does it not feel as ifsome special hand is guiding Obama on his journey, I mean, as he has said, the utter improbability of it all?"
-- Daily Kos
16"Obama's finest speeches do not excite. They do not inform. They don't even really inspire. They elevate. . . .He is not the Word made flesh, but the triumph of word over flesh . .. Obama is, at his best, able to call us back to our highest selves."
- Ezra Klein
17. "Obama has the capacity to summon heroic forces from the spiritual depths of ordinary citizens and to unleash therefrom a symphonic chorus of unique creative acts whose common purpose is to tame the soul and alleviate the great challenges facing mankind."
-- Gerald Campbell
18."We're here to evolve to a higher plane . . . he is an evolved leader . . . [he] has an ear for eloquence and a Tongue dipped in the Unvarnished Truth."
-- Oprah Winfrey
19. “I would characterize the Senate race as being a race where Obama was, let’s say, blessed and highly favored. That’s not routine. There’s something else going on. I think that Obama, his election to the Senate, was divinely ordered. . . . I know that that was God’s plan."
-- Bill Rush
20. "This is bigger than Kennedy. . . .This is the New Testament."| "I felt this thrill going up my leg. I mean, I don't have that too often. No, seriously. It's a dramatic event."
-- Chris Matthews
Newsweek editor Evan Thomas said President Obama is "sort of God" in a way that's "standing above the country." Transcript below.
"CHRIS MATTHEWS (HOST):Evan Thomas is editor at large for Newsweek magazine. Evan, you remember 1984. It wasn't 100 years ago. Reagan and World War II and the sense of us as the good guys in the world, how are we doing? EVAN THOMAS: Well, we were the good guys in 1984, it felt that way. It hasn't felt that way in recent years. So Obama's had, really, a different task We're seen too often as the bad guys. And he, he has a very different job from ... Reagan was all about America, and you talked about it. Obama is - we are above that now. We're not just parochial, we're not just chauvinistic, we're not just provincial. We stand for something, I mean in a way Obama's standing above the country, above above the world, he's sort of God."
You seem to think that these canned responses somehow disprove my previous assessment of Tucker Carlson.
Hint: they don't.
As for the regurgitation of this "messiah" bilge the right wing STILL carries on about after getting their butts whupped by Obama in two elections (popular and electoral vote, don't cha know): you (once again) inadvertently prove my point. All these quasi-religious references to Obama's speeches from pundits, politicos and news promoters came on the heels of Farrakhan's decree to his followers. Just as I said . But the smart voters, (All Americans of all races, creeds and colors) weren't buying it. Interesting, n-cest pas'?
And of course, you omit this tidbit from your cache of cliches':
The Atlantic covers news, politics, culture, technology, health, and more, through its articles, podcasts, videos, and flagship magazine.
www.theatlantic.com
A 3rd rate propagandist such as yourself will just deny the conclusive logic, and continue to parrot your myopic mantra ad nausea. I expect nothing less from you at this point. Carry on.
‘I won’t be pathologized for being White’: Man resigns, shreds school district over ‘white privilege’ training
An after-school coordinator at a New Hampshire elementary school has gone viral for resigning over the school’s embrace of anti-white critical race theory propaganda.
In a public resignation letter released Monday on Twitter, former Northwest Elementary after-school program coordinator Daniel Concannon, 40, accused his school district of having endorsed the “dehumanization and hatred of White people, as evidenced by their dissemination of the imbecilic ‘White Privilege’ curriculum.”
In the letter, he purposefully referred to the Manchester School District as “The Frankfurt School.” It was a reference to the school responsible for creating contemporary Marxism, which is believed to be at the root of CRT."
translation: another clown who can't deal with FACTS that point to the congenital racism in the American fabric....much less that skin color greatly increases your chances of beneficial treatment and opportunities. No one is asking the fool to apologize, as individually no one gives a damn about him.
My assessment of Tucker Carlson is valid and documented....your "messiah" dodge was aptly deconstructed with FACTS....pity you don't have the cojones to just concede a point, and will just throw anything against the wall repeatedly, hoping it sticks....but I expect nothing less from 3rd rate David Duke wanna be's. Carry on.
Once again, it appears that my role is to disabuse you of the lies your party and government school instituted.
David Duke was a Democrat, and believed as you do.
David Duke....the Democrat????
State Senator, 1975 (Baton Rouge Area)[edit]
Threshold > 50%
First Ballot, November 1, 1975
Louisiana State Senate, 1975
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Kenneth Osterberger 22,287 66
Democratic David Duke 11,079 33
N/A Others 1
Total 100
State Senator, 10th District, 1979 (Suburban New Orleans)[edit]
Threshold > 50% First Ballot, October 27, 1979
Louisiana State Senate, 10th District, 1979
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Joseph Tiemann 21,329 57
Democratic David Duke 9,897 26
N/A Others 6,459 17
Total 37,685 100
Democratic Nomination for United States Presidential Candidate, 1988 (Louisiana results)[edit]
Threshold = Plurality
1988 Democratic Presidential primary in Louisiana
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Jesse Jackson 221,522 35
Democratic Al Gore 174,971 28
Democratic Michael Dukakis 95,661 15
Democratic Dick Gephardt 67,029 11
Democratic Gary Hart 26,437 4
Democratic David Duke 23,391 4
Democratic Others 16,008 3
Total 625,019 100
Electoral history of David Duke - Wikipedia
Duke left the KKK long before he became a Republican....
"In 1979, after his first, abortive run for president (as a Democrat) and a series of highly publicized violent Klan incidents, Duke quietly incorporated the nonprofit National Association for the Advancement of White People (NAAWP) in an attempt to leave the baggage of the Klan behind."
The Democrats have always been associated with racism. The Democrat icon Franklin Roosevelt, in fact, made a KKKer his very first pick for the Supreme Court:
. "... [Hugo] Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..." http://egnorance.blogspot.com/2011/10/hugo-black-and-real-history-of-wall-of.html]
I can’t help but find the GOP leadership’s outrage at Donald Trump’s initial refusal to disavow David Duke and the Ku Klux Klan disingenuous. Lest we forget, the Republican Party …
www.baltimoresun.com
And spare us your attempt to soft soap Duke, who NEVER disavowed his core racist beliefs no matter what party he chose in a state bitterly contentious of its congenital racism:
Duke was successful to a degree despite his painfully obvious bigotry and racism. YOU aren't even a cheap knock-off....just a wanna be with delusions of grandeur. Carry on, sweetpea. It's a guilty pleasure making a fool of you while you tell the mirror the opposite.
1. So, your prime "evidence" for the theory is a consultant claiming credit? Wow. Why not cite a crack whore or a lawyer?
2. Trump denounced duke repeatedly. Your one counter is him blowing off a question? You do realize that that does not contradict his denouncements.
3. Yep. President is national. He's run for the President as both a dem and as gop. IN both cases he got less than 1% of the vote. A total that makes me wonder how much of that was errors.
1. translation: any time someone supplies sources with valid documentation that disproves the contentions of bigots and right wing wonks, they don't deal with the content, they just try to slander the source. But anything they source is akin to God's word. Such hypocritical foolishness only appeals to the willfully ignorant and insipidly stubborn like Correll.
2. The documented public record of Cheeto Jeezus playing word games so as to not piss off part of his base support is well documented (the self proclaimed genius suddenly feigning amnesia when it comes to Duke). Unlike his definitive statements concerning Obama and the birther BS. Anyone else just comes right out and denounces Duke no matter how many times asked. You do realize that saying "sure, if you say so" at one point is not the same as "I totally reject what he stands for and do not recognize his endorsement, nor do I want it".....you get that, right?
3. You carried on about him being a Democrat....yeah, in his home state where the Dem Party was still rife with "Dixiecrats"....people who still held onto the old Party beliefs until the shift under Johnson and Nixon, as I previously documented. When he realized that the old ways weren't going to stand, he went with the flow to the GOP....but by then no one wanted to be associated with blatant racism and bigotry from a former Neo-Nazi and KKK leader. A matter of fact, a matter of history whether you like it/acknowledge it or not. Carry on, my myopic friend.
1. YOu misunderstand. To support the claim of the c.t. you would need to show the policies used to pander to the supposed wacist bloc. You can't. Because it was not done. EVER.
2. Trump denounced Duke many times. He blew the question off once. Assholes ignore the repeated and clear denouncements to focus on the one blow off. Because they are assholes.
3. I did not carry on about him being a democrat. He ran two national campaigns and never got even a percentage point of the popular vote. That is the power of the w.s. fringe in action. Assuming that those votes were not all blind or drunk fools voting for him by accident.
1. No misunderstanding....YOU just refuse to accept the validity of the source material I used...despite documentation via footnotes and internal reference links. Your declarations and lame attempt at condescension are worthless given the historically documented FACTS. But essentially all you've got is some lame version of Goebbels.....repeating your BS ad nausea hoping it will magically become fact. Hint: it won't.
2. We've already done this dance, and as they say the devil is in the details. Cheeto Jeezus' wishy-washy public statements about your hero Davey are in there entirety for all to see, as I pointed out and was documented in the media. You're last 2 sentences are essentially a projection.
3. Umm, yeah you did...the chronology of the posts shows YOU emphasizing this at least twice, a third repetition done now. As usual with all alt-right revisionists, you just leave out certain details that detract from your main message. I just filled in the blanks with FACTS. My previous assessment stands documented, your propagandistic myopia non-withstanding. Now, run-a-long and post up your next regurgitation of you SOS. The reading audience awaits.
1. The Southern Strategy, if real, would have required policy to get the southern wacist votes. That is the claim. Just citing someone saying that it happened, without showing the ACTIONS that were supposedly taken to pander for the votes, is failing to support your position. Your "documentation" is just documentation of someone else saying what you said, with no real evidence to back it up.
2. You aske a question a dozen times, and get the same answer, it is not a question anymore, but a slur. Trump blew off the question once, and you leftards focus solely on that. Him blowing off the question does not support your stupid claims. To counter his many denouncements, you would have to find him saying the OPPOSITE. Which you can't.
3. He ran multiple times as an ACTUAL REAL w.s. and got less than one percent every time. That is the point. That is the power of w.s. in this country. YOu people are focusing on an irrelevant fringe to smear good people. YOu are assholes.
In Dayton, Ohio, where the police and firefighter exams have proven to pass few minorities, the U.S. Department of Justice is demanding that the city lower its passing score for the police exam in order to allow a larger pool of black applicants. by Raven Clabough
Fantstic, thank you. How does this prove there is no systemic and institutionalized racism in education and the justice system as CRT theorizes (with evidence-based support)?
>How does this prove there is no systemic and institutionalized racism in education and the justice system as CRT theorizes (with evidence-based support)?
You can't prove a negative, silly. It's like saying, "prove there are no aliens" or "prove there is no God."
The burden of proof is on those who make the claim of systemic racism.
In this example, we're looking at an aptitude test. Tests like this are not racist; everyone, regardless of ethnicity, have an equal opportunity to pass or fail.
Dems have controlled, for decades, the government of most of the largest cities, public education, many US government departments, Hollywood, most major media outlets, universities, etc., and now big tech.
If there is systemic racism, whose fault is it?
The Dems are also the party of slavery, the party of the KKK, the party of Jim Crow laws, the party of Affirmative Action , the party of Planned Parenthood, the latter two still being very relevant today.
In Dayton, Ohio, where the police and firefighter exams have proven to pass few minorities, the U.S. Department of Justice is demanding that the city lower its passing score for the police exam in order to allow a larger pool of black applicants. by Raven Clabough
Fantstic, thank you. How does this prove there is no systemic and institutionalized racism in education and the justice system as CRT theorizes (with evidence-based support)?
>How does this prove there is no systemic and institutionalized racism in education and the justice system as CRT theorizes (with evidence-based support)?
You can't prove a negative, silly. It's like saying, "prove there are no aliens" or "prove there is no God."
The burden of proof is on those who make the claim of systemic racism.
In this example, we're looking at an aptitude test. Tests like this are not racist; everyone, regardless of ethnicity, have an equal opportunity to pass or fail.
Dems have controlled, for decades, the government of most of the largest cities, public education, many US government departments, Hollywood, most major media outlets, universities, etc., and now big tech.
If there is systemic racism, whose fault is it?
The Dems are also the party of slavery, the party of the KKK, the party of Jim Crow laws, the party of Affirmative Action , the party of Planned Parenthood, the latter two still being very relevant today.
Systemic and institutionalized racism has been proven over and over and over. That's what CRT does.
Yes, Democrats have the Dixiecrats in their HISTORY, as in the past. Where did the racists go when Democrats told them they weren't welcomed in the party anymore? Who has embraced them with open arms and appealed to their racism? (I'll give you three guesses and the first two don't count )
In Dayton, Ohio, where the police and firefighter exams have proven to pass few minorities, the U.S. Department of Justice is demanding that the city lower its passing score for the police exam in order to allow a larger pool of black applicants. by Raven Clabough
Fantstic, thank you. How does this prove there is no systemic and institutionalized racism in education and the justice system as CRT theorizes (with evidence-based support)?
>How does this prove there is no systemic and institutionalized racism in education and the justice system as CRT theorizes (with evidence-based support)?
You can't prove a negative, silly. It's like saying, "prove there are no aliens" or "prove there is no God."
The burden of proof is on those who make the claim of systemic racism.
In this example, we're looking at an aptitude test. Tests like this are not racist; everyone, regardless of ethnicity, have an equal opportunity to pass or fail.
Dems have controlled, for decades, the government of most of the largest cities, public education, many US government departments, Hollywood, most major media outlets, universities, etc., and now big tech.
If there is systemic racism, whose fault is it?
The Dems are also the party of slavery, the party of the KKK, the party of Jim Crow laws, the party of Affirmative Action , the party of Planned Parenthood, the latter two still being very relevant today.
Systemic and institutionalized racism has been proven over and over and over. That's what CRT does.
Yes, Democrats have the Dixiecrats in their HISTORY, as in the past. Where did the racists go when Democrats told them they weren't welcomed in the party anymore? Who has embraced them with open arms and appealed to their racism? (I'll give you three guesses and the first two don't count )
In Dayton, Ohio, where the police and firefighter exams have proven to pass few minorities, the U.S. Department of Justice is demanding that the city lower its passing score for the police exam in order to allow a larger pool of black applicants. by Raven Clabough
Fantstic, thank you. How does this prove there is no systemic and institutionalized racism in education and the justice system as CRT theorizes (with evidence-based support)?
>How does this prove there is no systemic and institutionalized racism in education and the justice system as CRT theorizes (with evidence-based support)?
You can't prove a negative, silly. It's like saying, "prove there are no aliens" or "prove there is no God."
The burden of proof is on those who make the claim of systemic racism.
In this example, we're looking at an aptitude test. Tests like this are not racist; everyone, regardless of ethnicity, have an equal opportunity to pass or fail.
Dems have controlled, for decades, the government of most of the largest cities, public education, many US government departments, Hollywood, most major media outlets, universities, etc., and now big tech.
If there is systemic racism, whose fault is it?
The Dems are also the party of slavery, the party of the KKK, the party of Jim Crow laws, the party of Affirmative Action , the party of Planned Parenthood, the latter two still being very relevant today.
Systemic and institutionalized racism has been proven over and over and over. That's what CRT does.
Yes, Democrats have the Dixiecrats in their HISTORY, as in the past. Where did the racists go when Democrats told them they weren't welcomed in the party anymore? Who has embraced them with open arms and appealed to their racism? (I'll give you three guesses and the first two don't count )
In Dayton, Ohio, where the police and firefighter exams have proven to pass few minorities, the U.S. Department of Justice is demanding that the city lower its passing score for the police exam in order to allow a larger pool of black applicants. by Raven Clabough
Fantstic, thank you. How does this prove there is no systemic and institutionalized racism in education and the justice system as CRT theorizes (with evidence-based support)?
>How does this prove there is no systemic and institutionalized racism in education and the justice system as CRT theorizes (with evidence-based support)?
You can't prove a negative, silly. It's like saying, "prove there are no aliens" or "prove there is no God."
The burden of proof is on those who make the claim of systemic racism.
In this example, we're looking at an aptitude test. Tests like this are not racist; everyone, regardless of ethnicity, have an equal opportunity to pass or fail.
Dems have controlled, for decades, the government of most of the largest cities, public education, many US government departments, Hollywood, most major media outlets, universities, etc., and now big tech.
If there is systemic racism, whose fault is it?
The Dems are also the party of slavery, the party of the KKK, the party of Jim Crow laws, the party of Affirmative Action , the party of Planned Parenthood, the latter two still being very relevant today.
Systemic and institutionalized racism has been proven over and over and over. That's what CRT does.
Yes, Democrats have the Dixiecrats in their HISTORY, as in the past. Where did the racists go when Democrats told them they weren't welcomed in the party anymore? Who has embraced them with open arms and appealed to their racism? (I'll give you three guesses and the first two don't count )
Yes, so that’s why pseudoprog dems chose blm racism in 2020 with which to bust up the American infrastructure over a fentanyl eater, while simultaneously troubling the nights of white boys and girls in the suburbs. Since there is a precisely Chinese fentanyl problem in Missouri, was Floyd’s fentanyl also Chinese? You are an asshole.
In Dayton, Ohio, where the police and firefighter exams have proven to pass few minorities, the U.S. Department of Justice is demanding that the city lower its passing score for the police exam in order to allow a larger pool of black applicants. by Raven Clabough
Fantstic, thank you. How does this prove there is no systemic and institutionalized racism in education and the justice system as CRT theorizes (with evidence-based support)?
>How does this prove there is no systemic and institutionalized racism in education and the justice system as CRT theorizes (with evidence-based support)?
You can't prove a negative, silly. It's like saying, "prove there are no aliens" or "prove there is no God."
The burden of proof is on those who make the claim of systemic racism.
In this example, we're looking at an aptitude test. Tests like this are not racist; everyone, regardless of ethnicity, have an equal opportunity to pass or fail.
Dems have controlled, for decades, the government of most of the largest cities, public education, many US government departments, Hollywood, most major media outlets, universities, etc., and now big tech.
If there is systemic racism, whose fault is it?
The Dems are also the party of slavery, the party of the KKK, the party of Jim Crow laws, the party of Affirmative Action , the party of Planned Parenthood, the latter two still being very relevant today.
Systemic and institutionalized racism has been proven over and over and over. That's what CRT does.
Yes, Democrats have the Dixiecrats in their HISTORY, as in the past. Where did the racists go when Democrats told them they weren't welcomed in the party anymore? Who has embraced them with open arms and appealed to their racism? (I'll give you three guesses and the first two don't count )
The leaders of the country HAD a bipartisan consensus on racial inequality...the people, especially Southern whites, are still catching up or in many cases (voting rights) backsliding.
The white racists that used to belong to the Democratic party left them in the 60s. They didn't disappear, princess. They went somewhere. Where do you think they went? (Nixon and his Southern Strategy know)
No, cupcake, I'm only smearing the racists and the folks that give them succor by pretending they don't exist in their party...not all Republicans are racist...but most of the racists are SOUTHERN, WHITE Republicans.
In Dayton, Ohio, where the police and firefighter exams have proven to pass few minorities, the U.S. Department of Justice is demanding that the city lower its passing score for the police exam in order to allow a larger pool of black applicants. by Raven Clabough
Fantstic, thank you. How does this prove there is no systemic and institutionalized racism in education and the justice system as CRT theorizes (with evidence-based support)?
>How does this prove there is no systemic and institutionalized racism in education and the justice system as CRT theorizes (with evidence-based support)?
You can't prove a negative, silly. It's like saying, "prove there are no aliens" or "prove there is no God."
The burden of proof is on those who make the claim of systemic racism.
In this example, we're looking at an aptitude test. Tests like this are not racist; everyone, regardless of ethnicity, have an equal opportunity to pass or fail.
Dems have controlled, for decades, the government of most of the largest cities, public education, many US government departments, Hollywood, most major media outlets, universities, etc., and now big tech.
If there is systemic racism, whose fault is it?
The Dems are also the party of slavery, the party of the KKK, the party of Jim Crow laws, the party of Affirmative Action , the party of Planned Parenthood, the latter two still being very relevant today.
Systemic and institutionalized racism has been proven over and over and over. That's what CRT does.
Yes, Democrats have the Dixiecrats in their HISTORY, as in the past. Where did the racists go when Democrats told them they weren't welcomed in the party anymore? Who has embraced them with open arms and appealed to their racism? (I'll give you three guesses and the first two don't count )
The leaders of the country HAD a bipartisan consensus on racial inequality...the people, especially Southern whites, are still catching up or in many cases (voting rights) backsliding.
The white racists that used to belong to the Democratic party left them in the 60s. They didn't disappear, princess. They went somewhere. Where do you think they went? (Nixon and his Southern Strategy know)
No, cupcake, I'm only smearing the racists and the folks that give them succor by pretending they don't exist in their party...not all Republicans are racist...but most of the racists are SOUTHERN, WHITE Republicans.
