Crepitus
Diamond Member
- Mar 28, 2018
- 79,761
- 84,353
- 3,615
Ronny Raygun maybe, but not Notorious RBG.Old One Cell now at last has become "a Ronald Reagan"
and "a Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Everyone knows toad-frogs are all republicans.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ronny Raygun maybe, but not Notorious RBG.Old One Cell now at last has become "a Ronald Reagan"
and "a Ruth Bader Ginsburg
JAG Writes:
You have no Empirical Evidence that your original ancestor
was at one time a dead one-celled speck that lived in the
Primordial Slime and then later begin to pulsate with life.
Pulsate , , just a slight boom , , boom , , boom , , ,
I mean the one-celled speck was not always alive --so there
was a time when Old One-Cell was as dead as a door nail , ,
, , , but , , , ,
, , lo and behold , , ,
, , ,Old One Cell at some point became alive and it began to pulsate.
Then Time Passed.
After awhile Old One Cell, increased to the size of a pecan.
Then later on Old One Cell increased to the size of a baseball.
Then to the size of a Chicken.
A chicken , , ,
Then later on as Time Passed Old One Cell has now become a Toad Frog.
{or What Ever You Claim It Became}
But Old One Cell did not remain a Toad Frog.
On no.
Old One Cell eventually became a Chimp.
Then as time Passed a "scientific miracle" occurred , , ,
Here it comes , , ,
Old One Cell now at last has become "a Ronald Reagan"
and "a Ruth Bader Ginsburg."
And all that up there happened due to , , ,
~ natural selection
and
~ :random mutation
and
~ atoms and molecules wiggling around
and
~ chemical reactions taking place . . .
, , , and all that was produced by
~ unthinking non-intelligent Time
plus
~ unthinking non-intelligent Chance
plus
~ unthinking non-intelligent Matter , , ,
, , which produced a , ,
~ highly complex Human Brain
~ and a highly complex Human Eye, and
~ a highly complex Fully Functioning Human Body
So?
So if you believe all that up there, then you are a Great Man Of Faith
and you believe in the Religion Of Evolution.
My view is It requires MORE faith to believe in all that up there, than
it requires to believe in John 3:16 "For God so loved the world that He
gave His one and only Son that whoever believes in Him shall not perish
but have Eternal Life."
Best.
JAG
IMO, you're the one without faith. If God gave us our brains, why did he make it appear that evolution had occurred, if it really hadn't? Why do you think God couldn't have made evolution his plan for how life would develop? It has absolutely nothing to do with John 3:16, as it does not mention creation at all. Try again. Your logic is lacking.
At some point the theory of evolution breaks down because scientists have never been able to create a life form from non-living material.
Primordal soup?
Is that one of those ideas they didn't have?
We've also never made a planet, nor a black whole, or a sun, or a galaxy.... does this mean they don't exist?
Holy crap.
You're on "the internet".
If you were REALLY curious, you would have searched out and learned this stuff LONG ago.
At some point the theory of evolution breaks down because scientists have never been able to create a life form from non-living material.
Evolution doesn't claim to show how life began.
No such thing, except by some arbitrary definition. So choose the one you like.The first living organism? Magic? Divinity? Chemical evolution, a.k.a,, abiogenesis?
The fossil record for one. If everything was created at the same time, why aren't they all found at the same level? IMO, if this doesn't prove evolution, then you're saying God lies to us.Evolutionists sometimes say the darnedest things. How, precisely, has God made it appear that evolution is true? You haven't thought things through, have you?IMO, you're the one without faith. If God gave us our brains, why did he make it appear that evolution had occurred, if it really hadn't? Why do you think God couldn't have made evolution his plan for how life would develop? It has absolutely nothing to do with John 3:16, as it does not mention creation at all. Try again. Your logic is lacking.
The picture is of the CMB, which resulted from the decoupling event during the recombination epoch. Do you know what the CMB is, what the recombination epoch is, and what the decoupling event is? In short, the CMB is the radiation that resulted from the formation of the very first atoms. Before the first atoms, how many atoms do you think there were? Zero, of course.Oh right. You take a "picture" and you could see there were no atoms?
The next time you run into something you don't understand, you might want to consider first the idea that you don't understand it, before attempting to mock it.
The fossil record for one. If everything was created at the same time, why aren't they all found at the same level? IMO, if this doesn't prove evolution, then you're saying God lies to us.
The fossil record for one. If everything was created at the same time, why aren't they all found at the same level? IMO, if this doesn't prove evolution, then you're saying God lies to us.
JAG Writes:
You have no Empirical Evidence that your original ancestor
was at one time a dead one-celled speck that lived in the
Primordial Slime and then later begin to pulsate with life.
Pulsate , , just a slight boom , , boom , , boom , , ,
I mean the one-celled speck was not always alive --so there
was a time when Old One-Cell was as dead as a door nail , ,
, , , but , , , ,
, , lo and behold , , ,
, , ,Old One Cell at some point became alive and it began to pulsate.
Then Time Passed.
After awhile Old One Cell, increased to the size of a pecan.
Then later on Old One Cell increased to the size of a baseball.
Then to the size of a Chicken.
A chicken , , ,
Then later on as Time Passed Old One Cell has now become a Toad Frog.
{or What Ever You Claim It Became}
But Old One Cell did not remain a Toad Frog.
On no.
Old One Cell eventually became a Chimp.
Then as time Passed a "scientific miracle" occurred , , ,
Here it comes , , ,
Old One Cell now at last has become "a Ronald Reagan"
and "a Ruth Bader Ginsburg."
And all that up there happened due to , , ,
~ natural selection
and
~ :random mutation
and
~ atoms and molecules wiggling around
and
~ chemical reactions taking place . . .
, , , and all that was produced by
~ unthinking non-intelligent Time
plus
~ unthinking non-intelligent Chance
plus
~ unthinking non-intelligent Matter , , ,
, , which produced a , ,
~ highly complex Human Brain
~ and a highly complex Human Eye, and
~ a highly complex Fully Functioning Human Body
So?
So if you believe all that up there, then you are a Great Man Of Faith
and you believe in the Religion Of Evolution.
My view is It requires MORE faith to believe in all that up there, than
it requires to believe in John 3:16 "For God so loved the world that He
gave His one and only Son that whoever believes in Him shall not perish
but have Eternal Life."
Best.
JAG
At some point the theory of evolution breaks down because scientists have never been able to create a life form from non-living material.
That is not the definition of a theory.The Theory of Evolution is just that, a theory. That means it it subject to change as new information is found. But, a change in the root of the theory doesn't invalidate the findings that follow. Including, God. If evidence is provided showing that God was responsible for "creation" then the theory will change to accommodate this new information.JAG Writes:
You have no Empirical Evidence that your original ancestor
was at one time a dead one-celled speck that lived in the
Primordial Slime and then later begin to pulsate with life.
Pulsate , , just a slight boom , , boom , , boom , , ,
I mean the one-celled speck was not always alive --so there
was a time when Old One-Cell was as dead as a door nail , ,
, , , but , , , ,
, , lo and behold , , ,
, , ,Old One Cell at some point became alive and it began to pulsate.
Then Time Passed.
After awhile Old One Cell, increased to the size of a pecan.
Then later on Old One Cell increased to the size of a baseball.
Then to the size of a Chicken.
A chicken , , ,
Then later on as Time Passed Old One Cell has now become a Toad Frog.
{or What Ever You Claim It Became}
But Old One Cell did not remain a Toad Frog.
On no.
Old One Cell eventually became a Chimp.
Then as time Passed a "scientific miracle" occurred , , ,
Here it comes , , ,
Old One Cell now at last has become "a Ronald Reagan"
and "a Ruth Bader Ginsburg."
And all that up there happened due to , , ,
~ natural selection
and
~ :random mutation
and
~ atoms and molecules wiggling around
and
~ chemical reactions taking place . . .
, , , and all that was produced by
~ unthinking non-intelligent Time
plus
~ unthinking non-intelligent Chance
plus
~ unthinking non-intelligent Matter , , ,
, , which produced a , ,
~ highly complex Human Brain
~ and a highly complex Human Eye, and
~ a highly complex Fully Functioning Human Body
So?
So if you believe all that up there, then you are a Great Man Of Faith
and you believe in the Religion Of Evolution.
My view is It requires MORE faith to believe in all that up there, than
it requires to believe in John 3:16 "For God so loved the world that He
gave His one and only Son that whoever believes in Him shall not perish
but have Eternal Life."
Best.
JAG
In your concept if there is no God then everything that follows is false.
There is plenty of evidence supporting Evolution.
There has never been any evidence supporting the existence of any God.
You're free to believe whatever fairytale you'd like.Holy crap.
You're on "the internet".
If you were REALLY curious, you would have searched out and learned this stuff LONG ago.
Internet, eh?
Is that that where you're learned to unwittingly believe that naturalism was necessarily true sans thinking things through? Some kind of knee-jerk reaction?
You're free to believe whatever fairytale you'd like.
You can rattle on forever about your God etc, but nothing will extinguish the truth. Evolution is not a talking point, it is fact now. The alternatives of creators and spirits is fairy tales and should be treated as such.
I'll challenge anyone to produce irrefutable evidence to the contrary.
I don't claim to know The Answer, and I'm very comfy with that.You're free to believe whatever fairytale you'd like.
You're the one who believes naturalism is true. . . .