IlarMeilyr
Liability Reincarnate!
Its a universally accepted scientific theory. That's as good as it gets. Better than the creation storyExcept that many brilliant scientists are perfectly willing to acknowledge that the very inception of the Universe is an unknowable for science. And lots of them therefore feel free to admit the possibility of a Creator.
What kind of scientist are they if they believe in something that can't be scientifically verified? That's just cognitive dissonance and wishful thinking and usually because they want to believe or they don't want to go to hell. Or a lot of people say they believe but don't really. Look at how many christians say they believe but admit the stories are just allegories. So there are many different levels of belief. And as a scientist. Could there be? Sure there could be. We didn't even know how big our universe was until the invention of the telescope. And do you realize the next closest star is 70,000 years from us? One day science will get us there in 40 years. Don't ask god to help
They cannot scientifically verify where the initial "thing" that "caused" the Big Bang came from.
But lots of them believe in it.
Scientists don't pretend to know everything. Some things are premised on either belief or are merely assumed pending further proof.
So the sillybozo thesis is that a nearly 'universally accepted scientific theory' is not only as "good as it gets" but is also somehow NOT the same thing as believing something that cannot be scientifically verified.
There are no absolute truths in science; all laws, theories and conclusions can become obsolete if they are found in contradiction with new evidence. However, a scientific theory is the highest honor any scientific principle can obtain, for they comprise all the evidence, laws and models relevant to an observed phenomena. Theories are rarely proven incorrect.
Theories are often proved to be incorrect.
You know not whereof you speak.