"The constitutional right to bear arms in public for self-defense is not 'a second-class right'"

bripat9643

Diamond Member
Apr 1, 2011
169,983
47,197
2,180
"The constitutional right to bear arms in public for self-defense is not 'a second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees,'"

There you have it, folks: the government can not regulate the right to bear arms into meaninglessness.


The U.S. Supreme Court has shot down a Massachusetts gun control law, overturning a lower court's approval and returning it to the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for a determination that aligns with the high court's recent precedents.
Fox explained that ruling was thought to be a "landmark" in 2nd Amendment jurisprudence, opening the door for a multitude of challenges to state limits.
"The constitutional right to bear arms in public for self-defense is not 'a second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees,'" Justice Clarence Thomas wrote for the 6-3 majority at the time. "We know of no other constitutional right that an individual may exercise only after demonstrating to government officers some special need."
 
For the guns to hold first class status, full automatic weapons can't be excluded from the protection of the 2nd. amendment.

but alas, many American liberals are still even trying to exclude AR type rifles that are the most appropriate weapon for a citizen intent on assault with a weapon.
 
For the guns to hold first class status, full automatic weapons can't be excluded from the protection of the 2nd. amendment.

but alas, many American liberals are still even trying to exclude AR type rifles that are the most appropriate weapon for a citizen intent on assault with a weapon.
Says the idiot commie, Canadian, fascist duck that has no clue about the US constitution.
 
"The constitutional right to bear arms in public for self-defense is not 'a second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees,'" Justice Clarence Thomas wrote for the 6-3 majority at the time. "We know of no other constitutional right that an individual may exercise only after demonstrating to government officers some special need."
The anti-gun left sees the writing on the wall.
 
Can we hear the support for machine guns and hand grenades in America's schools?

The only thing that can stop a bad guy with a hand grenade is a good ................................., etc.
 
Can we hear the support for machine guns and hand grenades in America's schools?
The only thing that can stop a bad guy with a hand grenade is a good ................................., etc.
1665077553222.png
 
For the guns to hold first class status, full automatic weapons can't be excluded from the protection of the 2nd. amendment.

but alas, many American liberals are still even trying to exclude AR type rifles that are the most appropriate weapon for a citizen intent on assault with a weapon.
S. T . F. U. Canadian. Nobody gives a F . What your ridiculous opinion is ...
 
For the guns to hold first class status, full automatic weapons can't be excluded from the protection of the 2nd. amendment.

but alas, many American liberals are still even trying to exclude AR type rifles that are the most appropriate weapon for a citizen intent on assault with a weapon.
There is no such thing as a 2nd class right in the Bill of Rights, moron. That's a new scam conceived by the prog NAZIs.
 
"The result of that case was, effectively, that possessing a pistol in public is a constitutional right under the 2nd Amendment.

And the 2nd Amendment preemptively protects that right from restriction, unless the state can show said restriction is consistent with - that is, analogous to - the historical record with regard to same.

Which of the states, in the late 18th century, required a person to obtain a permit before he coud own or carry a firearm?
 
S. T . F. U. Canadian. Nobody gives a F . What your ridiculous opinion is ...
No outsider's opinion is going to stop the progress to machine guns and hand grenades on Main street whoda!

But I'm going to join the pro-gun chorus whether it sticks in your craw or not.

Limitations to your 2nd. amendment rights have stalled progress for much too long. The school shooter's hands have been unconstitutionally bound by the commies!

And the 2nd Amendment preemptively protects that right from restriction, unless the state can show said restriction is consistent with - that is, analogous to - the historical record with regard to same.

The unarguable proof why the restrictions on machine guns and hand grenades cannot stand!
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top