The Constitution Prohibits Trump From Ever Being President Again

[Rawley]

"It's time to put Trump in the bullseye."

View attachment 977486

“I am not engaged in that rhetoric" Lying scumbag.

 

[Dagosa]

"It's time to put Trump in the bullseye."

View attachment 977486

Even by fellow republicans it seems.

 

[Soupnazi630]

LOLOL

You're right, they haven't been -- they are being.

Not being either

 

[Faun]

Not being either

LOL

Your empty denials are amusing.

Michigan ‘fake electors’ head back in court: What to know - Bridge Michigan

Republicans charged with felonies for allegedly attempting to overturn Michigan’s 2020 presidential election results are back in court this week. Here’s what you need to know.

www.bridgemi.com

Attorney General Mayes Releases Unredacted Copy of Indictment in Fake Electors Case

PHOENIX – Attorney General Kris Mayes today released an unredacted copy of the indictment issued in late April by the State Grand Jury in the ongoing investigation into the fake elector scheme in Arizona.

www.azag.gov

Who’s who among the fake electors, conspirators indicted in Fulton DA’s 2020 election probe • Georgia Recorder

Ex President Trump, attorneys, fake electors, indicted on Fulton, Georgia Monday investigation into 2020 election interference.

georgiarecorder.com

Wisconsin attorney general files felony charges against attorneys, aide who worked for Trump in 2020

Felony forgery charges have been filed in Wisconsin against two attorneys and an aide who helped submit paperwork falsely saying that former President Donald Trump had won the battleground state in 2020.

apnews.com

 

[Delldude]

Your empty denials are amusing.

One state dropped charges already.......precedent?

Now this:

A Lansing-based judge is reviewing whether there is enough evidence to take those involved with the ‘fake elector’ plot to trial

 

[Faun]

One state dropped charges already.......precedent?

Now this:

A Lansing-based judge is reviewing whether there is enough evidence to take those involved with the ‘fake elector’ plot to trial

No, not precedent. The judge dismissed it on grounds the case was filed in the wrong jurisdiction. A decision likely to be appealed. Regardless, it doesn't apply to any other states.

 

[Delldude]

No, not precedent. The judge dismissed it on grounds the case was filed in the wrong jurisdiction. A decision likely to be appealed. Regardless, it doesn't apply to any other states.

We'll see if this judge starts a precedent.

 

[Faun]

We'll see if this judge starts a precedent.

Standing in one case has no bearing in other cases in other states.

 

[Soupnazi630]

LOL

Your empty denials are amusing.

Michigan ‘fake electors’ head back in court: What to know - Bridge Michigan

Republicans charged with felonies for allegedly attempting to overturn Michigan’s 2020 presidential election results are back in court this week. Here’s what you need to know.

www.bridgemi.com

Attorney General Mayes Releases Unredacted Copy of Indictment in Fake Electors Case

PHOENIX – Attorney General Kris Mayes today released an unredacted copy of the indictment issued in late April by the State Grand Jury in the ongoing investigation into the fake elector scheme in Arizona.

www.azag.gov

Who’s who among the fake electors, conspirators indicted in Fulton DA’s 2020 election probe • Georgia Recorder

Ex President Trump, attorneys, fake electors, indicted on Fulton, Georgia Monday investigation into 2020 election interference.

georgiarecorder.com

Wisconsin attorney general files felony charges against attorneys, aide who worked for Trump in 2020

Felony forgery charges have been filed in Wisconsin against two attorneys and an aide who helped submit paperwork falsely saying that former President Donald Trump had won the battleground state in 2020.

apnews.com

Not one example given

 

[Delldude]

Standing in one case has no bearing in other cases in other states.

Didn't say it does................but one judges opinion could affect other states views.

 

[Faun]

Not one example given

LOLOL

You're demented. A showed 4 states prosecuting fake electors and others involved in the scheme and you still have nothing but empty denials.

This is you...

 

[Faun]

Didn't say it does................but one judges opinion could affect other states views.

LOL

Ok, you keep your fingers crossed.

 

[Delldude]

LOL

Ok, you keep your fingers crossed.

Not affecting me one way or another.......................

 

[JustAGuy1]

J. Michael Luttig is a former federal judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

Laurence H. Tribe is the Carl M. Loeb University Professor of Constitutional Law Emeritus at Harvard University.

The only question is whether American citizens today can uphold that commitment.

As students of the United States Constitution for many decades—one of us as a U.S. Court of Appeals judge, the other as a professor of constitutional law, and both as constitutional advocates, scholars, and practitioners—we long ago came to the conclusion that the Fourteenth Amendment, the amendment ratified in 1868 that represents our nation’s second founding and a new birth of freedom, contains within it a protection against the dissolution of the republic by a treasonous president.

This protection, embodied in the amendment’s often-overlooked Section 3, automatically excludes from future office and position of power in the United States government—and also from any equivalent office and position of power in the sovereign states and their subdivisions—any person who has taken an oath to support and defend our Constitution and thereafter rebels against that sacred charter, either through overt insurrection or by giving aid or comfort to the Constitution’s enemies.

The historically unprecedented federal and state indictments of former President Donald Trump have prompted many to ask whether his conviction pursuant to any or all of these indictments would be either necessary or sufficient to deny him the office of the presidency in 2024.

Trump Is Constitutionally Prohibited From the Presidency​

I agree with Luttig and Tribe. Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution seem clear to me! What will SCOTUS do? What do you think?

Turns out your info was wrong.

 

[Dagosa]

We'll see if this judge starts a precedent.

A hero to criminals.

 

[Delldude]

A hero to criminals.

Or maybe to the constitution.

 

[jbander]

No my post is accurate fact and you are a liar

Not one person has been prosecuted for trying to overthrow an election

I own you *****

Funny , I've never met a MAGA shit bomb like you that tells the truth. Two Of shitpantses charges are exactly that you micro prick. Never prosecuted this shit stain says.

 

[jbander]

LOLOL

You're right, they haven't been -- they are being.

some 378 individuals have been sentenced to periods of incarceration over their involvement in the January 6, 2021, uprising at the U.S. Capitol in the 32 months since the attempted overthrow of the 2020 election certification took place, the District of Columbia's attorney's office said on Wednesday.
Sedition conspiracy charged mean to over throw the government. and their have been multiple of those charges.

 

[jbander]

The worm thinks he has a clue

 

[BackAgain]

J. Michael Luttig is a former federal judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

Laurence H. Tribe is the Carl M. Loeb University Professor of Constitutional Law Emeritus at Harvard University.

The only question is whether American citizens today can uphold that commitment.

As students of the United States Constitution for many decades—one of us as a U.S. Court of Appeals judge, the other as a professor of constitutional law, and both as constitutional advocates, scholars, and practitioners—we long ago came to the conclusion that the Fourteenth Amendment, the amendment ratified in 1868 that represents our nation’s second founding and a new birth of freedom, contains within it a protection against the dissolution of the republic by a treasonous president.

This protection, embodied in the amendment’s often-overlooked Section 3, automatically excludes from future office and position of power in the United States government—and also from any equivalent office and position of power in the sovereign states and their subdivisions—any person who has taken an oath to support and defend our Constitution and thereafter rebels against that sacred charter, either through overt insurrection or by giving aid or comfort to the Constitution’s enemies.

The historically unprecedented federal and state indictments of former President Donald Trump have prompted many to ask whether his conviction pursuant to any or all of these indictments would be either necessary or sufficient to deny him the office of the presidency in 2024.

Trump Is Constitutionally Prohibited From the Presidency​

I agree with Luttig and Tribe. Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution seem clear to me! What will SCOTUS do? What do you think?

Dorkhota is a retard.

The 14th Amendment obviously doesn’t bar Trump from a second term.