The CIA vs Iran - Phase 2 Coming up

Iran has steadily increased its uranium enrichment to levels that, according to the IAEA, are alarmingly close to weapons-grade.

They do not have nuclear weapons yet

They are close

If they keep trying then they will continue with the bombing.

Even if they think that they figured it out and actually make one.

They will be bombed.

Then they need to be able to launch it

They will be bombed and nuke themselves
 
Iran has steadily increased its uranium enrichment to levels that, according to the IAEA, are alarmingly close to weapons-grade.
PURE UNADULTERATED BULLSHIT

THAT IS A FRAUDULENT ALLEGATION ACQUIRED WHEN THE IAEA WAS TRICKED INTO USING PALANTIR/MOSSAIC SOFTWARE. THE IAEA DIRECTOR SUBSEQUENTLY DISAVOWED THE REPORT
 
There are multiple threads in which Contumacious have shown that the CIA 's Claim that Iran had nuclear weapons was a sham , i.e.



The warmongers, neocrazies and war profiteers who manipulate the CIA are seeking :

1- Regime change in Iran - they will try to install a CIA Puppet like Zelenskyy - someone who is friendly towards the Likudnicks but unfriendly towards Russia - this will turn Iran into another Ukraine

2- Consequently , soon , very very soon, we will read that Iran violated the cease fire agreement - the upcoming FALSE FLAG will be as deadly as the one that allegedly occurred October 7th, 2023

And so it goes :


Why Iran Ceasefire Will Not Last


By Vasko Kohlmayer


June 25, 2025


1- The Key Nuclear Allegation that started the Iran-Israeli War was Coaxed from a Palantir Counter-Intelligence Algorithm​

2-
The sudden claim of Iran being very close to a bomb (that seemingly jumped out of 'nowhere' to leave Americans puzzling how could it happen that -- in the blink of eye, we are going to war -- was subsequently refuted by IAEA Chief Grossi to CNN on 17 June — but only after the abrupt attack on Iran already had taken place:

We did not have any evidence of a systematic effort [by Iran] to move to a nuclear weapon”, Grossi confirmed on CNN.

 
PURE UNADULTERATED BULLSHIT

THAT IS A FRAUDULENT ALLEGATION ACQUIRED WHEN THE IAEA WAS TRICKED INTO USING PALANTIR/MOSSAIC SOFTWARE. THE IAEA DIRECTOR SUBSEQUENTLY DISAVOWED THE REPORT
so where's that receipt?
 

no one ever said they had weapons. hilarious. stay on track jack monkey

The statement was their uranium enrichment was close to weapons grade. pay the fk attention you fking idiot.
 
PURE UNADULTERATED BULLSHIT

THAT IS A FRAUDULENT ALLEGATION ACQUIRED WHEN THE IAEA WAS TRICKED INTO USING PALANTIR/MOSSAIC SOFTWARE. THE IAEA DIRECTOR SUBSEQUENTLY DISAVOWED THE REPORT
Post a source then at least you can be correct about something. Using capital letters will make people wander why your screaming to be heard. Also a source is usually required.

Using Capital letters also downgrades you believability.
 
Last edited:
Post a source then at least you can be correct about something. Using capital letters will make people wander why your screaming to be heard. Also a source is usually required.

Using Capital letters also downgrades you believability.
SOME ISSUES MUST BE EMPHASIZED

HERE IS ONE OF MY SOURCES
 
no one ever said they had weapons. hilarious. stay on track jack monkey

The statement was their uranium enrichment was close to weapons grade. pay the fk attention you fking idiot.
HUH?

I KNOW YOU LOVE TO SUCK ASS-K-NAZI RODS SO ADMIT THAT YOU INTENTIONALLY MISCHARACTERIZED WHAT THE IAEA DIRECTOR SAID:

"The sudden claim of Iran being very close to a bomb (that seemingly jumped out of 'nowhere' to leave Americans puzzling how could it happen that -- in the blink of eye, we are going to war -- was subsequently refuted by IAEA Chief Grossi to CNN on 17 June — but only after the abrupt attack on Iran already had taken place:"

 
HUH?

I KNOW YOU LOVE TO SUCK ASS-K-NAZI RODS SO ADMIT THAT YOU INTENTIONALLY MISCHARACTERIZED WHAT THE IAEA DIRECTOR SAID:

"The sudden claim of Iran being very close to a bomb (that seemingly jumped out of 'nowhere' to leave Americans puzzling how could it happen that -- in the blink of eye, we are going to war -- was subsequently refuted by IAEA Chief Grossi to CNN on 17 June — but only after the abrupt attack on Iran already had taken place:"

Receipt

 
Post a source then at least you can be correct about something. Using capital letters will make people wander why your screaming to be heard. Also a source is usually required.

Using Capital letters also downgrades you believability.
It’s also against board rules
 
HUH?
WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>>>FROM YOUR SOURCE :

This report summarizes and assesses information in the International Atomic Energy Agency’s (IAEA’s) quarterly report, dated May 31, 2025,<<<<<<

HE [David Albright] DID NOT DENY THAT THE THE MAY 31st, 2025 written report was MANUFACTURED BY PALANTIR/MOSSAIC SOFTWARE WHICH AS SHOWN ABOVE WAS DISAVOWED BY THE IAEA !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

PAY ATTENTION DUDE
 
Substack? Hahaha

Spying on Iran: How MI6 infiltrated the IAEA​


Leaked confidential files indicate the International Atomic Energy Agency was infiltrated by a veteran British spy who has claimed credit for sanctions on Iran. The documents lend weight to the Islamic Republic’s accusation that the nuclear watchdog secretly colluded with its enemies.


A notorious British MI6 agent infiltrated the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on London’s behalf, according to leaked documents reviewed by The Grayzone. The agent, Nicholas Langman, is a veteran intelligence operative who claims credit for helping engineer the West’s economic war on Iran.


Langman’s identity first surfaced in journalistic accounts of his role in deflecting accusations that British intelligence played a role in the death of Princess Diana. He was later accused by Greek authorities of overseeing the abduction and torture of Pakistani migrants in Athens.

 

Spying on Iran: How MI6 infiltrated the IAEA​


Leaked confidential files indicate the International Atomic Energy Agency was infiltrated by a veteran British spy who has claimed credit for sanctions on Iran. The documents lend weight to the Islamic Republic’s accusation that the nuclear watchdog secretly colluded with its enemies.


A notorious British MI6 agent infiltrated the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on London’s behalf, according to leaked documents reviewed by The Grayzone. The agent, Nicholas Langman, is a veteran intelligence operative who claims credit for helping engineer the West’s economic war on Iran.


Langman’s identity first surfaced in journalistic accounts of his role in deflecting accusations that British intelligence played a role in the death of Princess Diana. He was later accused by Greek authorities of overseeing the abduction and torture of Pakistani migrants in Athens.

Gray zone is a bullshit site. Get some approved site with evidence
 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom