The blueprint for prosperity

[danielpalos]

you guys still have nothing but repeal to go with your tax cut economics.

If you left-wing lunatics would stop engaging in unconstitutional actions, we wouldn’t have to “repeal”. It really is that simple.

Nobody takes the right wing seriously about the Law, Constitutional or otherwise.

What's the number and where did you get it?

A book on Economics. I don't need to Gossip, like right wingers.

What is the number and what is the name of the book?

nothing but diversion? why no Dictionary definition instead of an encyclopedic definition.

 

[hadit]

If you left-wing lunatics would stop engaging in unconstitutional actions, we wouldn’t have to “repeal”. It really is that simple.

Nobody takes the right wing seriously about the Law, Constitutional or otherwise.

What's the number and where did you get it?

A book on Economics. I don't need to Gossip, like right wingers.

What is the number and what is the name of the book?

nothing but diversion? why no Dictionary definition instead of an encyclopedic definition.

You're stalling and trying to divert. Stick to the question. What is the natural rate of unemployment and what is your source? Post that for discussion, because if you won't, all you're doing is repeating something that doesn't really apply.

 

[danielpalos]

Full employment of capital resources is what we are discussing. Capital Must circulate not Labor to engender a positive multiplier effect upon our economy.

 

[danielpalos]

Nobody takes the right wing seriously about the Law, Constitutional or otherwise.

What's the number and where did you get it?

A book on Economics. I don't need to Gossip, like right wingers.

What is the number and what is the name of the book?

nothing but diversion? why no Dictionary definition instead of an encyclopedic definition.

You're stalling and trying to divert. Stick to the question. What is the natural rate of unemployment and what is your source? Post that for discussion, because if you won't, all you're doing is repeating something that doesn't really apply.

why not acquire and possess a definition you subscribe to and are willing to discuss.

 

[hadit]

What's the number and where did you get it?

A book on Economics. I don't need to Gossip, like right wingers.

What is the number and what is the name of the book?

nothing but diversion? why no Dictionary definition instead of an encyclopedic definition.

You're stalling and trying to divert. Stick to the question. What is the natural rate of unemployment and what is your source? Post that for discussion, because if you won't, all you're doing is repeating something that doesn't really apply.

why not acquire and possess a definition you subscribe to and are willing to discuss.

Because I'm not the one using the phrase. You are, so you define what you mean by it. You got it out of book? Fine, post the name and author of the book, and quote the section you got it from. You've been saying it for a long time, over and over again, so what do you mean by it?

 

[joaquinmiller]

Good

I rest my case. You responded exactly as I predicted you would. You denied everything. Once I proved it and you could no longer deny it, then you simply declare that anything Obama did was “good”.

there's plenty of coal that is not on Federal Land

Uh...why does the federal government even own “federal land”? The U.S. Constitution never authorized them to steal lands from the state and make it federal.

and none of it is important for the economy.

All of it is vital to the economy, stupid. It’s basic Supply & Demand.

there are more people employed in alternate energy than in gas and coal combined now

Because of unconstitutional government intervention. The federal government isn’t empowered to pick winners and losers. That is supposed to be done by the consumers of the free market.

and we are competing with China and the EU, which we were not before Obama.

Exactly. Before, we had no competition. We were the elite of the elite. In typical Dumbocrat fahsion, MaObama lowered the bar (and thus lowered our standard of living) and now we have to compete with shit-hole communists states like China. Thankfully though, President Trump is fixin that. God Bless President Trump.

United States Constitution (Article Four, section 3, clause 2)

When the US bought Alaska, or made the Louisiana Purchase, or conquered and took California, who do you think owned the land? The US didn't steal lands from States - many of which were Federal territories long before they became States. In many cases, it did purchase lands from individual states.

Are you arguing from a position of Hate-Radio ignorance?

 

[danielpalos]

A book on Economics. I don't need to Gossip, like right wingers.

What is the number and what is the name of the book?

nothing but diversion? why no Dictionary definition instead of an encyclopedic definition.

You're stalling and trying to divert. Stick to the question. What is the natural rate of unemployment and what is your source? Post that for discussion, because if you won't, all you're doing is repeating something that doesn't really apply.

why not acquire and possess a definition you subscribe to and are willing to discuss.

Because I'm not the one using the phrase. You are, so you define what you mean by it. You got it out of book? Fine, post the name and author of the book, and quote the section you got it from. You've been saying it for a long time, over and over again, so what do you mean by it?

because it is an economic term; usually, we just quibble about it.

 

[hadit]

What is the number and what is the name of the book?

nothing but diversion? why no Dictionary definition instead of an encyclopedic definition.

You're stalling and trying to divert. Stick to the question. What is the natural rate of unemployment and what is your source? Post that for discussion, because if you won't, all you're doing is repeating something that doesn't really apply.

why not acquire and possess a definition you subscribe to and are willing to discuss.

Because I'm not the one using the phrase. You are, so you define what you mean by it. You got it out of book? Fine, post the name and author of the book, and quote the section you got it from. You've been saying it for a long time, over and over again, so what do you mean by it?

because it is an economic term; usually, we just quibble about it.

So, to recap, you use a phrase that should easily be quantifiable, yet you will not define it or tell us where you got it from.

THIS IS WHY NO ONE TAKES YOU SERIOUSLY ON ECONOMIC ISSUES. Do you get that? Whenever I see you use that phrase, you can expect me to ask again what is the number and where did you get it.

 

[joaquinmiller]

It's not "easily quantifiable", because it's not fixed. It can be quantified as fluctuating within a narrow range.

Why Zero Unemployment Isn't as Good as It Sounds

The natural rate of unemployment is a combination of frictional, structural, and surplus unemployment. Even a healthy economy will have this level of unemployment because workers are always coming and going, looking for better jobs. This jobless status, until they find that new job, is the natural rate of unemployment.


The Federal Reserve estimates this rate to be between 4.5 percent and 5 percent. Both fiscal and monetary policymakers use that rate as the goal of full employment. They use 2 percent as the target inflation rate. They also consider the ideal gross domestic product growth rate to be between 2 percent and 3 percent. They must try to balance these three goals when setting interest rates. The Fed encourages Congress to consider all three goals when setting tax rates or spending levels.


Three Components of the Natural Rate of Unemployment
Even in a healthy economy, there is some level of unemployment for three reasons:

1. Frictional Unemployment – Some workers are in between jobs. Examples are new graduates looking for their first job. Others are workers who move to a new town without lining up another position. Some people quit abruptly, knowing they'll get a better job shortly. Still, others might decide to leave the workforce for personal reasons such as retirement, pregnancy, or sickness. They drop out of the labor force. When they return and start looking again, the BEA counts them as unemployed.
2. Structural Unemployment – As the economy evolves, there is an unavoidable mismatch between workers' job skills and employers' needs. It happens when workers are displaced by technology, as when robots take over manufacturing jobs. It also occurs when factories move to cheaper locations. That's what happened after the North American Free Trade Agreement was signed. When baby boomers reached their 30s and had fewer children, there was less need for daycare workers. Structural unemployment remains until workers receive new training.

1. Surplus Unemployment – This occurs whenever the government intervenes with minimum wage laws or wage/price controls. It can also happen with unions. Why? Employers must pay the mandated wage while keeping within their payroll budget. The only way to do this is to let some workers go. It's the consequence of an unfunded mandate.

 

[joaquinmiller]

It's not "easily quantifiable", because it's not fixed. It can be quantified as fluctuating within a narrow range.

Why Zero Unemployment Isn't as Good as It Sounds

The natural rate of unemployment is a combination of frictional, structural, and surplus unemployment. Even a healthy economy will have this level of unemployment because workers are always coming and going, looking for better jobs. This jobless status, until they find that new job, is the natural rate of unemployment.


The Federal Reserve estimates this rate to be between 4.5 percent and 5 percent. Both fiscal and monetary policymakers use that rate as the goal of full employment. They use 2 percent as the target inflation rate. They also consider the ideal gross domestic product growth rate to be between 2 percent and 3 percent. They must try to balance these three goals when setting interest rates. The Fed encourages Congress to consider all three goals when setting tax rates or spending levels.


Three Components of the Natural Rate of Unemployment
Even in a healthy economy, there is some level of unemployment for three reasons:

1. Frictional Unemployment – Some workers are in between jobs. Examples are new graduates looking for their first job. Others are workers who move to a new town without lining up another position. Some people quit abruptly, knowing they'll get a better job shortly. Still, others might decide to leave the workforce for personal reasons such as retirement, pregnancy, or sickness. They drop out of the labor force. When they return and start looking again, the BEA counts them as unemployed.
2. Structural Unemployment – As the economy evolves, there is an unavoidable mismatch between workers' job skills and employers' needs. It happens when workers are displaced by technology, as when robots take over manufacturing jobs. It also occurs when factories move to cheaper locations. That's what happened after the North American Free Trade Agreement was signed. When baby boomers reached their 30s and had fewer children, there was less need for daycare workers. Structural unemployment remains until workers receive new training.

1. Surplus Unemployment – This occurs whenever the government intervenes with minimum wage laws or wage/price controls. It can also happen with unions. Why? Employers must pay the mandated wage while keeping within their payroll budget. The only way to do this is to let some workers go. It's the consequence of an unfunded mandate.

Surplus unemployment is a component of Frictional and Structural Unemployment. It is differentiated to carry negative connotations, and it assumes facts not in evidence.

 

[danielpalos]

nothing but diversion? why no Dictionary definition instead of an encyclopedic definition.

You're stalling and trying to divert. Stick to the question. What is the natural rate of unemployment and what is your source? Post that for discussion, because if you won't, all you're doing is repeating something that doesn't really apply.

why not acquire and possess a definition you subscribe to and are willing to discuss.

Because I'm not the one using the phrase. You are, so you define what you mean by it. You got it out of book? Fine, post the name and author of the book, and quote the section you got it from. You've been saying it for a long time, over and over again, so what do you mean by it?

because it is an economic term; usually, we just quibble about it.

So, to recap, you use a phrase that should easily be quantifiable, yet you will not define it or tell us where you got it from.

THIS IS WHY NO ONE TAKES YOU SERIOUSLY ON ECONOMIC ISSUES. Do you get that? Whenever I see you use that phrase, you can expect me to ask again what is the number and where did you get it.

Anyone who knows Any given Thing about Economics, knows those terms.

 

[danielpalos]

It's not "easily quantifiable", because it's not fixed. It can be quantified as fluctuating within a narrow range.

Why Zero Unemployment Isn't as Good as It Sounds

The natural rate of unemployment is a combination of frictional, structural, and surplus unemployment. Even a healthy economy will have this level of unemployment because workers are always coming and going, looking for better jobs. This jobless status, until they find that new job, is the natural rate of unemployment.


The Federal Reserve estimates this rate to be between 4.5 percent and 5 percent. Both fiscal and monetary policymakers use that rate as the goal of full employment. They use 2 percent as the target inflation rate. They also consider the ideal gross domestic product growth rate to be between 2 percent and 3 percent. They must try to balance these three goals when setting interest rates. The Fed encourages Congress to consider all three goals when setting tax rates or spending levels.


Three Components of the Natural Rate of Unemployment
Even in a healthy economy, there is some level of unemployment for three reasons:

1. Frictional Unemployment – Some workers are in between jobs. Examples are new graduates looking for their first job. Others are workers who move to a new town without lining up another position. Some people quit abruptly, knowing they'll get a better job shortly. Still, others might decide to leave the workforce for personal reasons such as retirement, pregnancy, or sickness. They drop out of the labor force. When they return and start looking again, the BEA counts them as unemployed.
2. Structural Unemployment – As the economy evolves, there is an unavoidable mismatch between workers' job skills and employers' needs. It happens when workers are displaced by technology, as when robots take over manufacturing jobs. It also occurs when factories move to cheaper locations. That's what happened after the North American Free Trade Agreement was signed. When baby boomers reached their 30s and had fewer children, there was less need for daycare workers. Structural unemployment remains until workers receive new training.

1. Surplus Unemployment – This occurs whenever the government intervenes with minimum wage laws or wage/price controls. It can also happen with unions. Why? Employers must pay the mandated wage while keeping within their payroll budget. The only way to do this is to let some workers go. It's the consequence of an unfunded mandate.

Capital must circulate under Capitalism to generate a positive multiplier effect upon our economy. Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is market friendly.

 

[hadit]

It's not "easily quantifiable", because it's not fixed. It can be quantified as fluctuating within a narrow range.

Why Zero Unemployment Isn't as Good as It Sounds

The natural rate of unemployment is a combination of frictional, structural, and surplus unemployment. Even a healthy economy will have this level of unemployment because workers are always coming and going, looking for better jobs. This jobless status, until they find that new job, is the natural rate of unemployment.


The Federal Reserve estimates this rate to be between 4.5 percent and 5 percent. Both fiscal and monetary policymakers use that rate as the goal of full employment. They use 2 percent as the target inflation rate. They also consider the ideal gross domestic product growth rate to be between 2 percent and 3 percent. They must try to balance these three goals when setting interest rates. The Fed encourages Congress to consider all three goals when setting tax rates or spending levels.


Three Components of the Natural Rate of Unemployment
Even in a healthy economy, there is some level of unemployment for three reasons:

1. Frictional Unemployment – Some workers are in between jobs. Examples are new graduates looking for their first job. Others are workers who move to a new town without lining up another position. Some people quit abruptly, knowing they'll get a better job shortly. Still, others might decide to leave the workforce for personal reasons such as retirement, pregnancy, or sickness. They drop out of the labor force. When they return and start looking again, the BEA counts them as unemployed.
2. Structural Unemployment – As the economy evolves, there is an unavoidable mismatch between workers' job skills and employers' needs. It happens when workers are displaced by technology, as when robots take over manufacturing jobs. It also occurs when factories move to cheaper locations. That's what happened after the North American Free Trade Agreement was signed. When baby boomers reached their 30s and had fewer children, there was less need for daycare workers. Structural unemployment remains until workers receive new training.

1. Surplus Unemployment – This occurs whenever the government intervenes with minimum wage laws or wage/price controls. It can also happen with unions. Why? Employers must pay the mandated wage while keeping within their payroll budget. The only way to do this is to let some workers go. It's the consequence of an unfunded mandate.

Capital must circulate under Capitalism to generate a positive multiplier effect upon our economy. Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is market friendly.

What is the natural rate? Give a number and explain why it's significant. Hint, it should be really easy for you.

 

[danielpalos]

It's not "easily quantifiable", because it's not fixed. It can be quantified as fluctuating within a narrow range.

Why Zero Unemployment Isn't as Good as It Sounds

The natural rate of unemployment is a combination of frictional, structural, and surplus unemployment. Even a healthy economy will have this level of unemployment because workers are always coming and going, looking for better jobs. This jobless status, until they find that new job, is the natural rate of unemployment.


The Federal Reserve estimates this rate to be between 4.5 percent and 5 percent. Both fiscal and monetary policymakers use that rate as the goal of full employment. They use 2 percent as the target inflation rate. They also consider the ideal gross domestic product growth rate to be between 2 percent and 3 percent. They must try to balance these three goals when setting interest rates. The Fed encourages Congress to consider all three goals when setting tax rates or spending levels.


Three Components of the Natural Rate of Unemployment
Even in a healthy economy, there is some level of unemployment for three reasons:

1. Frictional Unemployment – Some workers are in between jobs. Examples are new graduates looking for their first job. Others are workers who move to a new town without lining up another position. Some people quit abruptly, knowing they'll get a better job shortly. Still, others might decide to leave the workforce for personal reasons such as retirement, pregnancy, or sickness. They drop out of the labor force. When they return and start looking again, the BEA counts them as unemployed.
2. Structural Unemployment – As the economy evolves, there is an unavoidable mismatch between workers' job skills and employers' needs. It happens when workers are displaced by technology, as when robots take over manufacturing jobs. It also occurs when factories move to cheaper locations. That's what happened after the North American Free Trade Agreement was signed. When baby boomers reached their 30s and had fewer children, there was less need for daycare workers. Structural unemployment remains until workers receive new training.

1. Surplus Unemployment – This occurs whenever the government intervenes with minimum wage laws or wage/price controls. It can also happen with unions. Why? Employers must pay the mandated wage while keeping within their payroll budget. The only way to do this is to let some workers go. It's the consequence of an unfunded mandate.

Capital must circulate under Capitalism to generate a positive multiplier effect upon our economy. Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is market friendly.

What is the natural rate? Give a number and explain why it's significant. Hint, it should be really easy for you.

did you miss the previous post? the right wing has nothing but diversion not any form of valid arguments.

 

[hadit]

It's not "easily quantifiable", because it's not fixed. It can be quantified as fluctuating within a narrow range.

Why Zero Unemployment Isn't as Good as It Sounds

The natural rate of unemployment is a combination of frictional, structural, and surplus unemployment. Even a healthy economy will have this level of unemployment because workers are always coming and going, looking for better jobs. This jobless status, until they find that new job, is the natural rate of unemployment.


The Federal Reserve estimates this rate to be between 4.5 percent and 5 percent. Both fiscal and monetary policymakers use that rate as the goal of full employment. They use 2 percent as the target inflation rate. They also consider the ideal gross domestic product growth rate to be between 2 percent and 3 percent. They must try to balance these three goals when setting interest rates. The Fed encourages Congress to consider all three goals when setting tax rates or spending levels.


Three Components of the Natural Rate of Unemployment
Even in a healthy economy, there is some level of unemployment for three reasons:

1. Frictional Unemployment – Some workers are in between jobs. Examples are new graduates looking for their first job. Others are workers who move to a new town without lining up another position. Some people quit abruptly, knowing they'll get a better job shortly. Still, others might decide to leave the workforce for personal reasons such as retirement, pregnancy, or sickness. They drop out of the labor force. When they return and start looking again, the BEA counts them as unemployed.
2. Structural Unemployment – As the economy evolves, there is an unavoidable mismatch between workers' job skills and employers' needs. It happens when workers are displaced by technology, as when robots take over manufacturing jobs. It also occurs when factories move to cheaper locations. That's what happened after the North American Free Trade Agreement was signed. When baby boomers reached their 30s and had fewer children, there was less need for daycare workers. Structural unemployment remains until workers receive new training.

1. Surplus Unemployment – This occurs whenever the government intervenes with minimum wage laws or wage/price controls. It can also happen with unions. Why? Employers must pay the mandated wage while keeping within their payroll budget. The only way to do this is to let some workers go. It's the consequence of an unfunded mandate.

Capital must circulate under Capitalism to generate a positive multiplier effect upon our economy. Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is market friendly.

What is the natural rate? Give a number and explain why it's significant. Hint, it should be really easy for you.

did you miss the previous post? the right wing has nothing but diversion not any form of valid arguments.

That's why I said it should be easy for you. Are you just counting on someone else digging up something for you and you still not be prepared to defend it?

 

[danielpalos]

It's not "easily quantifiable", because it's not fixed. It can be quantified as fluctuating within a narrow range.

Why Zero Unemployment Isn't as Good as It Sounds

The natural rate of unemployment is a combination of frictional, structural, and surplus unemployment. Even a healthy economy will have this level of unemployment because workers are always coming and going, looking for better jobs. This jobless status, until they find that new job, is the natural rate of unemployment.


The Federal Reserve estimates this rate to be between 4.5 percent and 5 percent. Both fiscal and monetary policymakers use that rate as the goal of full employment. They use 2 percent as the target inflation rate. They also consider the ideal gross domestic product growth rate to be between 2 percent and 3 percent. They must try to balance these three goals when setting interest rates. The Fed encourages Congress to consider all three goals when setting tax rates or spending levels.


Three Components of the Natural Rate of Unemployment
Even in a healthy economy, there is some level of unemployment for three reasons:

1. Frictional Unemployment – Some workers are in between jobs. Examples are new graduates looking for their first job. Others are workers who move to a new town without lining up another position. Some people quit abruptly, knowing they'll get a better job shortly. Still, others might decide to leave the workforce for personal reasons such as retirement, pregnancy, or sickness. They drop out of the labor force. When they return and start looking again, the BEA counts them as unemployed.
2. Structural Unemployment – As the economy evolves, there is an unavoidable mismatch between workers' job skills and employers' needs. It happens when workers are displaced by technology, as when robots take over manufacturing jobs. It also occurs when factories move to cheaper locations. That's what happened after the North American Free Trade Agreement was signed. When baby boomers reached their 30s and had fewer children, there was less need for daycare workers. Structural unemployment remains until workers receive new training.

1. Surplus Unemployment – This occurs whenever the government intervenes with minimum wage laws or wage/price controls. It can also happen with unions. Why? Employers must pay the mandated wage while keeping within their payroll budget. The only way to do this is to let some workers go. It's the consequence of an unfunded mandate.

Capital must circulate under Capitalism to generate a positive multiplier effect upon our economy. Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is market friendly.

What is the natural rate? Give a number and explain why it's significant. Hint, it should be really easy for you.

did you miss the previous post? the right wing has nothing but diversion not any form of valid arguments.

That's why I said it should be easy for you. Are you just counting on someone else digging up something for you and you still not be prepared to defend it?

Post your definition so we can quibble. I don't make excuses.

 

[hadit]

It's not "easily quantifiable", because it's not fixed. It can be quantified as fluctuating within a narrow range.

Why Zero Unemployment Isn't as Good as It Sounds

The natural rate of unemployment is a combination of frictional, structural, and surplus unemployment. Even a healthy economy will have this level of unemployment because workers are always coming and going, looking for better jobs. This jobless status, until they find that new job, is the natural rate of unemployment.


The Federal Reserve estimates this rate to be between 4.5 percent and 5 percent. Both fiscal and monetary policymakers use that rate as the goal of full employment. They use 2 percent as the target inflation rate. They also consider the ideal gross domestic product growth rate to be between 2 percent and 3 percent. They must try to balance these three goals when setting interest rates. The Fed encourages Congress to consider all three goals when setting tax rates or spending levels.


Three Components of the Natural Rate of Unemployment
Even in a healthy economy, there is some level of unemployment for three reasons:

1. Frictional Unemployment – Some workers are in between jobs. Examples are new graduates looking for their first job. Others are workers who move to a new town without lining up another position. Some people quit abruptly, knowing they'll get a better job shortly. Still, others might decide to leave the workforce for personal reasons such as retirement, pregnancy, or sickness. They drop out of the labor force. When they return and start looking again, the BEA counts them as unemployed.
2. Structural Unemployment – As the economy evolves, there is an unavoidable mismatch between workers' job skills and employers' needs. It happens when workers are displaced by technology, as when robots take over manufacturing jobs. It also occurs when factories move to cheaper locations. That's what happened after the North American Free Trade Agreement was signed. When baby boomers reached their 30s and had fewer children, there was less need for daycare workers. Structural unemployment remains until workers receive new training.

1. Surplus Unemployment – This occurs whenever the government intervenes with minimum wage laws or wage/price controls. It can also happen with unions. Why? Employers must pay the mandated wage while keeping within their payroll budget. The only way to do this is to let some workers go. It's the consequence of an unfunded mandate.

Capital must circulate under Capitalism to generate a positive multiplier effect upon our economy. Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is market friendly.

What is the natural rate? Give a number and explain why it's significant. Hint, it should be really easy for you.

did you miss the previous post? the right wing has nothing but diversion not any form of valid arguments.

That's why I said it should be easy for you. Are you just counting on someone else digging up something for you and you still not be prepared to defend it?

Post your definition so we can quibble. I don't make excuses.

I didn't use the phrase. You did, you define it.

 

[danielpalos]

Capital must circulate under Capitalism to generate a positive multiplier effect upon our economy. Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is market friendly.

What is the natural rate? Give a number and explain why it's significant. Hint, it should be really easy for you.

did you miss the previous post? the right wing has nothing but diversion not any form of valid arguments.

That's why I said it should be easy for you. Are you just counting on someone else digging up something for you and you still not be prepared to defend it?

Post your definition so we can quibble. I don't make excuses.

I didn't use the phrase. You did, you define it.

You are not quibbling anything about it; why don't You already know it if you are going to discuss economics.

 

[P@triot]

I am not the one claiming I have a valid argument with nothing but an appeal to ignorance.

No...instead you’re claiming to have a “valid” argument built entirely on ignorance.

 

[P@triot]

you guys still have nothing but repeal to go with your tax cut economics.

If you left-wing lunatics would stop engaging in unconstitutional actions, we wouldn’t have to “repeal”. It really is that simple.

Nobody takes the right wing seriously about the Law, Constitutional or otherwise.

Then why does the “right-wing” control the White House, the Senate, and the majority of the states? Oops.