THE BIG LIE!: 5.6% Unemployment from the guy who should KNOW!!!

.

The economy remains mediocre. Forget the talking heads, politicians and partisans, and pay attention to the yield of 10-year Treasuries.

Last month at this time it was at a ridiculously low 2.03%. As of this writing it's at 1.82%.

A foundation is there, but there is little dynamic pressure upwards.

.
The chief reason the economy is sluggish is because we have a massive public and private debt overhang. As long as we have that overhang, whenever there is a down cycle our economy is going to have a lethargic recovery.

Deleveraging our debts should be the number one priority.
 
From Jim Clifton is Chairman and CEO at Gallup.

If you perform a minimum of one hour of work in a week and are paid at least $20 -- maybe someone pays you to mow their lawn -- you're not officially counted as unemployed in the much-reported 5.6%. Few Americans know this.
There's no minimum pay. I don't know where he's getting that $20 number from. And unpaid work in a family business or farm is employed if 15 or more hours.

Yet another figure of importance that doesn't get much press: those working part time but wanting full-time work. If you have a degree in chemistry or math and are working 10 hours part time because it is all you can find -- in other words, you are severely underemployed -- the government doesn't count you in the 5.6%. Few Americans know this.
Why would you count someone who has a job as unemployed?

There's no other way to say this. The official unemployment rate, which cruelly overlooks the suffering of the long-term and often permanently unemployed as well as the depressingly underemployed, amounts to a Big Lie.
If it was purported or presented to be a measure of suffering then that would be true. But it is not meant to be and no one has ever claimed it is a measure of suffering.
Right now, as many as 30 million Americans are either out of work or severely underemployed. Trust me, the vast majority of them aren't throwing parties to toast "falling" unemployment.
In December, there were 8.3 million people not working but looking for work, 6.2 million not working who said they wanted a job but hadn't looked for work in the last month or were unable to accept a job if offered. And 7 million who want to and could work 35+ hours/week, but worked less than that due to slow business or couldn't find full time job. (all numbers not seasonally adjusted). That's far short of his 6 million.
Gallup defines a good job as 30+ hours per week for an organization that provides a regular paycheck. Right now, the U.S. is delivering at a staggeringly low rate of 44%, which is the number of full-time jobs as a percent of the adult population, 18 years and older.
But about 3/4 of those who work part time are voluntary, not due to economic reasons.

Link
 
Has the methodology for the measurement of unemployment changed in the past ten years?

No?

Okay then.

Funny how the rubes weren't parsing the shit out of the unemployment figures when the white guy was in office.

When the method becomes misleading on the true state of the economy then another method should be used.

Underemployment should be a major factor in unemployment accounting.

Obama brags that economy is doing great and full story of the economy shows he's full of crap.

You don't really care that it's all bs because the misleading UE3 numbers favor your guy. Who's really the rube?
 
Last edited:
.

The economy remains mediocre. Forget the talking heads, politicians and partisans, and pay attention to the yield of 10-year Treasuries.

Last month at this time it was at a ridiculously low 2.03%. As of this writing it's at 1.82%.

A foundation is there, but there is little dynamic pressure upwards.

.
The chief reason the economy is sluggish is because we have a massive public and private debt overhang. As long as we have that overhang, whenever there is a down cycle, our economy is going to have a lethargic recovery until we have deleveraged all that debt.
Yep, definitely an element of this.

We'll pay around $260 billion just on interest payments this year, nearly 7% of the federal budget.

If interest rates increase while we're still borrowing like this, it will get even MORE interesting.

.
 
Has the methodology for the measurement of unemployment changed in the past ten years?

No?

Okay then.

Funny how the rubes weren't parsing the shit out of the unemployment figures when the white guy was in office.

When the method becomes misleading on the true state of the economy then another method should be used.

Underemployment should be a major factor in unemployment accounting.
There is nothing misleading about the information provided by BLS. I can't help it if rubes choose to have that information dumbed down for them by way of their favorite partisan media filters instead of going straight to the source.
 
When the method becomes misleading on the true state of the economy then another method should be used.

Underemployment should be a major factor in unemployment accounting.
And underemployment is DOWN since Obama came into office. When Bush left there were 7,911,000 underemployed and there are 6,699,000 now.
 
Li
Has the methodology for the measurement of unemployment changed in the past ten years?

No?

Okay then.

Funny how the rubes weren't parsing the shit out of the unemployment figures when the white guy was in office.

When the method becomes misleading on the true state of the economy then another method should be used.

Underemployment should be a major factor in unemployment accounting.
There is nothing misleading about the information provided by BLS. I can't help it if rubes choose to have that information dumbed down for them by way of their favorite partisan media filters instead of going straight to the source.
Liar
th
 
When the method becomes misleading on the true state of the economy then another method should be used.

Underemployment should be a major factor in unemployment accounting.
And underemployment is DOWN since Obama came into office. When Bush left there were 7,911,000 underemployed and there are 6,699,000 now.

Only because the labor participation rate went down.

Figure it out.

Fewer are working because of either retirement or lack of good jobs.
 
When the method becomes misleading on the true state of the economy then another method should be used.

Underemployment should be a major factor in unemployment accounting.
And underemployment is DOWN since Obama came into office. When Bush left there were 7,911,000 underemployed and there are 6,699,000 now.

Only because the labor participation rate went down.

Figure it out.
I have every confidence that when the labor force participation rate goes up, Fox News and Breitbart and the Washington Times will be right there to whisper in your ear and tell you why that is a bad thing.

Every confidence.
 
When the method becomes misleading on the true state of the economy then another method should be used.

Underemployment should be a major factor in unemployment accounting.
And underemployment is DOWN since Obama came into office. When Bush left there were 7,911,000 underemployed and there are 6,699,000 now.

Only because the labor participation rate went down.

Figure it out.
I have every confidence that when the labor force participation rate goes up, Fox News and Breitbart and the Washington Times will be right there to whisper in your ear and tell you why that is a bad thing.

Every confidence.

Non sequitur
 
When the method becomes misleading on the true state of the economy then another method should be used.

Underemployment should be a major factor in unemployment accounting.
And underemployment is DOWN since Obama came into office. When Bush left there were 7,911,000 underemployed and there are 6,699,000 now.

Only because the labor participation rate went down.

Figure it out.
I have every confidence that when the labor force participation rate goes up, Fox News and Breitbart and the Washington Times will be right there to whisper in your ear and tell you why that is a bad thing.

Every confidence.

Non sequitur
Fox News did not hesitate to tell the rubes why dropping gas prices are a bad thing.

Every confidence.
 
Hell yes - obozo is lying about unemployment If the public knew it was actually 20% there is no way he could get away with giving illegals work permits. Obozo is the most dishonest and lawless president in history.
 
When the method becomes misleading on the true state of the economy then another method should be used.

Underemployment should be a major factor in unemployment accounting.
And underemployment is DOWN since Obama came into office. When Bush left there were 7,911,000 underemployed and there are 6,699,000 now.

Only because the labor participation rate went down.

Figure it out.
I have every confidence that when the labor force participation rate goes up, Fox News and Breitbart and the Washington Times will be right there to whisper in your ear and tell you why that is a bad thing.

Every confidence.

Non sequitur
Fox News did not hesitate to tell the rubes why dropping gas prices are a bad thing.

Every confidence.

I watch Fox.

Never happened.

Liar
th
 
Fox News did not hesitate to tell the rubes why dropping gas prices are a bad thing.

Every confidence.

I watch Fox.

Never happened.

Liar
Falling oil prices could hurt US producers fracking industry Fox News

Falling oil prices could hurt US producers, fracking industry
By Kelly David Burke

Published December 16, 2014
FoxNews.com
With the price of oil now below $56 a barrel, drivers are smiling at the gas pump. However, American oil producers and the states whose economies rely on them are bracing for tougher times ahead.

"If oil drops five dollars a barrel, that's about a $17 million loss to our general fund and $17 million to schools in Wyoming -- a total of about $35 million," Wyoming Gov. Matt Mead told Fox News. He said, depending on various factors, the oil industry makes up about 30 percent of the state's revenue.

The irony in the falling prices is that the success of U.S. producers using hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling technologies is partly responsible, along with slowing demand by struggling Asian and European markets. Now that success could come back to bite the so-called fracking industry and other drillers in America.

Mead acknowledged that in the short term, lower gas prices will benefit businesses and residents in his sparsely populated state, where distances between towns are often calculated in hours instead of minutes.

But, he pointed out, "If we see low prices continue for some time, we'll see rigs start to lay down. And it's not just the direct revenue. It's the hotels, restaurants and all that goes with that."

Not to mention jobs.
 
Has the methodology for the measurement of unemployment changed in the past ten years?

No?

Okay then.

Funny how the rubes weren't parsing the shit out of the unemployment figures when the white guy was in office.

When the method becomes misleading on the true state of the economy then another method should be used.
The method measures the same thing it always has: the percent of the labor force not working. If you want the answer to a different question, look at a different measure. Don't complain that the screwdriver is a poor hammer

Underemployment should be a major factor in unemployment accounting.
Why? And how would you objectively define and measure underemployment?
 
When the method becomes misleading on the true state of the economy then another method should be used.

Underemployment should be a major factor in unemployment accounting.
And underemployment is DOWN since Obama came into office. When Bush left there were 7,911,000 underemployed and there are 6,699,000 now.

Only because the labor participation rate went down.

Figure it out.
I have every confidence that when the labor force participation rate goes up, Fox News and Breitbart and the Washington Times will be right there to whisper in your ear and tell you why that is a bad thing.

Every confidence.

You make it sound like ALL media has a bias!
Because you are stating Fox,etc. only report bad things... does this mean the remainder of MSM only report "good" things"?
See I believe Fox,etc. more then I believe the remainder of MSM because of this impartial one simple fact:
85% of media donated money to Democrats!
1,160 (85%) of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs writers reporters The Daily Caller

So tell me again when you have 85% of the ABC,CBS & NBC contribute over $1 million to Democrats... what kind of stupid
reporter/producer/editor/anchor would then tell "bad things" about the people YOU donated money to to win?

Finally tell me is the word "liberate" a positive or negative word?
Or is the word "Invasion" a positive or negative word?
 
And underemployment is DOWN since Obama came into office. When Bush left there were 7,911,000 underemployed and there are 6,699,000 now.

Only because the labor participation rate went down.

Figure it out.
I have every confidence that when the labor force participation rate goes up, Fox News and Breitbart and the Washington Times will be right there to whisper in your ear and tell you why that is a bad thing.

Every confidence.

Non sequitur
Fox News did not hesitate to tell the rubes why dropping gas prices are a bad thing.

Every confidence.

I watch Fox.

Never happened.

Liar
th


U IDIOT ..

Falling gas prices a bad sign On Air Videos Fox News

cheap gas/bad economy

STFU
 
you just wonder how ANYONE can still believe a word out of this administrations mouth. If you still take them at their word, then you deserve to be DECEIVED by them
Again, this administration didn't invent the U-3 measure.

It has been around for a long time and is based on ILO's formula.
 

Forum List

Back
Top