I comprehend it just fine. When faced with facts, make up a story about how things would have been before the event and present that fable as truth. A convenient, if not entirely intellectually dishonest way to argue. In other words, par for the course for you and your ilk.So comparing X to after X is invalid while comparing X to an assumption reveals fact? And that's the model you use when developing these so called responses? How on earth can you look yourself in the mirror?
Darn, I knew it was going to be too much for you to comprehend. Sorry, dude.
Here's a pic of a hot chick to make up for it. I won't try to make you think again.
No you didint understand the point at all. No problem, don't worry about it.