JoeB131
Diamond Member
Many Chinese don't want to be ruled by your beloved CCP. How will that end?
If that were true, they'd have another form of government that would STILL be Chinese.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Many Chinese don't want to be ruled by your beloved CCP. How will that end?
The main decline began when Khrushchev was sacked in 1964 in favor of Brezhnev who was powerful but stupid as he retched up the military and tried to export their ideology which drained their always meager economy.
Then they were suffering from food shortages that got worse in the 1970's where they were once forced to buy grain from, he he America that drains the weak economy some more which never recovered then Afghanistan involvement where they couldn't defeat roving tribe other drains of their never impressive economy continued.
Reagan came along with his loud put downs of the weak USSR calling them an evil empire which weakened them internally politically and that "Star Wars" proposals actually scared the old doddering empire who wanted to convince Reagan not to pursue it during negotiations even though it didn't exist at the time.
The Decline started long ago for it to be ripe for Reagan to apply the pressure to finish it off after all the confused leadership changes after Brezhnev died exposed that their power was in tatters already being a closed nation made it difficult for a productive workforce to be maintained.
Brezhnev was a TERRIBLE economic leader who greatly weakened them internally with his stupid Militaristic viewpoint (He was a Colonel) that drained the always weak economy which began its downward spiral around 1972 that never stopped.
I remember when Tipp Oneil, you know the head of Congress, he was the one blowing the deficit all out of whack, because he was in charge of the purse strings. RR wanted "line item veto" to keep the pork out of the bills, but those damn Marxists/Demofacists just had to spend on top of the military budget we so needed.
$28 trillion
The estimated aggregate cost of the War on Poverty is nearly $28 trillion, which is three and a half times higher than the $8 trillion total price tag of every major war since the American Revolution.
It’s Time to Admit the Feds Are Making Poverty Worse—Not Better
www.independent.org/news/article.asp?id=11707
Many Chinese don't want to be ruled by your beloved CCP. How will that end?
This is revisionist history. The Soviets were already in serious financial peril. Did Reagan's spending expedite their collapse? Probably by 5-10 years at the most. He also blew deficits out of the water and since Republicans only care about deficits when they're out of power and slash taxes on the people who can support federal budges the most, our debt situation has never really recovered. Thanks, Ronnie.
The savings and loans collapsed because people stopped putting their obey in them, the were paying one percent in interest while raking in high interest on loans. Credit Unions replaced S&Ls because they are member-owned.Yep. Reagan is responsible for the explosion in Hispanics replacing white workers, more than any President before or after hm.
Reagan is responsible for manufacturing moving to China, the collapse of the U.S. steel steel industry, the auto manufacturing industry moving to Canada, and Mexico, and the rust belt created from PA to WI.
And let’s not leave out the war on Central American socialist regimes, that led directly to the collapse of Nicaragua, El Salvador, Honduras, and Guatemala, that is the direct cause of the problem at the southern border.
And how can we overlook the collapse of the savings and loans, due directly to supply side economics.
And how much military aid did Iran receive from the Iran Contra criminal syndicate, he escaped prosecution for?
Something about a Marines barracks bombing, and a cut and run order jogs my memory.
No it didnt, it just increased it hundred fold. 28 trillion dollars has gone to the War on Poverty and we still have a big problem with poverty. Thanks to the Marxists/Demofacists who keep people on the welfare system, by high energy prices and inflation.The 'War On Poverty' ended with the Oil Crisis and corporate welfare bailouts of the 1970's and 1980's.
Of their unarmed peopleAll govt.s reflect the culture and people they govern. That's a fact that can never be any other way anywhere on Earth.
But not CommunismIf that were true, they'd have another form of government that would STILL be Chinese.
Of their unarmed people
But not Communism
Xi <3 your devotion to his Party!
Well Carter did totally botch the rescue attempt so there is that.....A “prominent Texas politician” has come forward to allege a shocking four-decade secret: that foes of President Jimmy Carter sabotaged his 1980 re-election by urging Iranians not to release 52 American hostages until after that election.
The New York Times reported yesterday that Ben Barnes, a major figure in Texas politics in the 1980s, says he now wants to set the record straight about having “unwittingly (taken) part in a 1980 tour of the Middle East with a clandestine agenda.”
In that tour, Barnes says, he traveled that summer with his mentor, former Texas Governor John Connally” to one Middle Eastern capital after another meeting with a host of regional leaders to deliver a blunt message to be passed to Iran: Don’t release the hostages before the election. Mr. Reagan will win and give you a better deal.”
![]()
Revealed: The alleged secret plot to sabotage Jimmy Carter's reelection by delaying hostage release
A “prominent Texas politician” has come forward to allege a shocking four-decade secret: that foes of President Jimmy Carter sabotaged his 1980 re-election by urging Iranians not to release 52 American hostages until after that election. The New York Times reported yesterday that Ben Barnes, a...www.rawstory.com
No body gives better deals to the mullah than Republicans.
Was there anything that Carter didnt do, that wasnt botched? He is Joe Biden 1.0. Now we have to deal with Joe 2.0Well Carter did totally botch the rescue attempt so there is that.....
A “prominent Texas politician” has come forward to allege a shocking four-decade secret: that foes of President Jimmy Carter sabotaged his 1980 re-election by urging Iranians not to release 52 American hostages until after that election.
The New York Times reported yesterday that Ben Barnes, a major figure in Texas politics in the 1980s, says he now wants to set the record straight about having “unwittingly (taken) part in a 1980 tour of the Middle East with a clandestine agenda.”
In that tour, Barnes says, he traveled that summer with his mentor, former Texas Governor John Connally” to one Middle Eastern capital after another meeting with a host of regional leaders to deliver a blunt message to be passed to Iran: Don’t release the hostages before the election. Mr. Reagan will win and give you a better deal.”
![]()
Revealed: The alleged secret plot to sabotage Jimmy Carter's reelection by delaying hostage release
A “prominent Texas politician” has come forward to allege a shocking four-decade secret: that foes of President Jimmy Carter sabotaged his 1980 re-election by urging Iranians not to release 52 American hostages until after that election. The New York Times reported yesterday that Ben Barnes, a...www.rawstory.com
No body gives better deals to the mullah than Republicans.
Carter wasn't flying the helicopter himself....Well Carter did totally botch the rescue attempt so there is that.....
And yet, he is responsible for the failed fiasco.Carter wasn't flying the helicopter himself....
That is the way politics work, clean or dirty.And yet, he is responsible for the failed fiasco.
Donald Trump wasnt the person behind the Russian Dossier either, yet the Demofacists like James Comey broke the law by presenting it as fact to a FISA court.Carter wasn't flying the helicopter himself....
True but irrelevant.Donald Trump wasnt the person behind the Russian Dossier either, yet the Demofacists like James Comey broke the law by presenting it as fact to a FISA court.