martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 93,415
- 43,651
- 2,300
How many are acceptable to you?
How many forced stillbirths? Give us a number.
How many actual forced stillbirths have happened?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How many are acceptable to you?
How many forced stillbirths? Give us a number.
How many actual forced stillbirths have happened?
Anyone can look up the stats online. 93% of abortions occur before the 15th week. Over 90% of the remaining 7% of abortions are due to medical reasons. Willy-nilly, abortions of convenience after the 15th week are very rare. The "pro-lifers" want people to believe later-term abortions for reasons other than medical reasons are common and that's simply not true.
Then why do abortion rights States pass laws making abortion legal right up to the point of birth for reasons as obscure as "the health of the mother"?
Oh wait, birthing person.
There’s nothing in that article about why women are getting their abortion. Where are you getting that stat?What stats are you referring to? Despite whatever you're saying the facts are that 93% of abortions are performed before the 15th week of pregnancy, and abortions of convenience or for any reason other than for medical emergencies are rare. It's far from the norm. You can pretend otherwise, but what evidence do you have?
![]()
What the data says about abortion in the U.S.
The U.S. abortion rate has generally declined since the 1980s, but there have been slight upticks in the late 2010s and early 2020s.www.pewresearch.org
There’s nothing in that article about why women are getting their abortion. Where are you getting that stat?
Me thinks that once again you’re full of shit
abortions of convenience or for any reason other than for medical emergencies are rare. It's far from the norm. You can pretend otherwise, but what evidence do you have?
![]()
What the data says about abortion in the U.S.
The U.S. abortion rate has generally declined since the 1980s, but there have been slight upticks in the late 2010s and early 2020s.www.pewresearch.org
The stats that I cited with respect to how many and when abortions are performed. It's relevant to what I was referring to and you apparently are unable to comprehend it.
I said late-term abortions of convenience are rare. The vast majority of late-term abortions are for medical reasons. You need to improve your reading comprehension skills.that’s not you saying abortions of convenience are rare and that most abortions are for medical emergencies? Do you post so much BS that forget what you posted 20 minutes ago?
I quoted what you said.I said late-term abortions of convenience are rare. The vast majority of late-term abortions are for medical reasons. You need to improve your reading comprehension skills.
What stats are you referring to? Despite whatever you're saying the facts are that 93% of abortions are performed before the 15th week of pregnancy, and abortions of convenience or for any reason other than for medical emergencies are rare. It's far from the norm. You can pretend otherwise, but what evidence do you have?
![]()
What the data says about abortion in the U.S.
The U.S. abortion rate has generally declined since the 1980s, but there have been slight upticks in the late 2010s and early 2020s.www.pewresearch.org
Then again why are these States going overboard and protecting abortion for any reason right up to the moment of birth?
I personally don't believe late-term abortions should be permitted other than to prevent a serious medical emergency. My main objection to the pro-life position is the fact that so many conservatives claim to be so concerned about the life of embryos and fetuses in the wombs of strangers but then support politicians that defund social programs that help single mothers raise their children. Food, housing, healthcare, job training, daycare, school lunch programs, school supplies, clothing..etc. These supposed defenders of life (i.e. "pro-life"), flippantly dismiss the needs of single mothers and their babies, yet are incredibly concerned about embryos and fetuses. No no..If you're going to genuinely be pro-life, then be pro-life, not just in the womb, but outside of the womb as well. Don't just defend and support the lives of embryos and fetuses, while completely disregarding the needs of single mothers and their children. That's hypocrisy. Many of these "pro-life" people claim to be disciples of Jesus Christ, yet they support government policies that hurt single mothers and their children.
If you're going to be pro-life, be pro-life both inside the womb and outside of it. Don't just be a champion and defender of fetuses, also be a champion and defender of single mothers and their babies. Not just embryos and fetuses.
Most states with compromise by having abortion available with restrictions.As such, there will be people on both ends of the issue unhappy.Since we no longer know how to reasonably compromise, this issue was destined to become all-or-nothing, my-way-or-no-way.
That's how compromise often is. Give and take.Most states with compromise by having abortion available with restrictions.As such, there will be people on both ends of the issue unhappy.
I quoted the whole thingThe right defunds programs and infrastructure that support single mothers and address homelessness, which creates more societal
Life in the womb is alive, but that life isn't necessarily a human being or person. At least not in the early stages of pregnancy.