What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The 9/11 conspiracy theory in under 5 minutes..

LA RAM FAN

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2008
Messages
40,897
Reaction score
9,199
Points
2,030
For those with short attention spans.

9/11: A Conspiracy Theory - YouTube!

dont expect the official conspiracy theory apologists to watch this video.you got to remember,they only see what they WANT to see.proof of that is already abond on this thread.16 views and no replys which means they dont want to comment on it since they know they cant refute it or stopped watching at after the the first few minutes when they knew they could not refute those facts.
 

RetiredGySgt

Diamond Member
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
48,989
Reaction score
11,013
Points
2,040
Location
North Carolina
9/11 conspiracy theory, requires idiots, fools and morons to make and uneducated fearful people to perpetrate.

The basic argument made by the theories is that explosives were ladened in the skyscrapers. Yet no one can explain how those extensive explosives that would require construction work on the pillars were seen by NO ONE.

No one can explain how those explosives survived the impact of the jets, the ensuing fire and collapsing floors and still managed to go off.

If the argument is that explosives were in the basement area and not the high rise, how come the survivors reported debris FALLING on them, not falling into the basement?

In WTC 7 no one can explain how the supposed explosives survived HOURS of intense fire and still managed to not only not go off early but still be supposedly controlled by an external source.

One of the arguments is that free fall could not have been obtained by the collapsing buildings. Which would imply that explosives were at the base of the buildings. Not in the high rises. Yet there is absolutely no evidence that the bottom collapsed BEFORE the upper floors crushed them.

Why fly planes into the buildings at all if one is going to use explosives? 93 proved that properly placed explosives could do the trick, why get 19 Arabs to hijack aircraft and fly them into the buildings? Just use the same trick as in 93, claim explosive loaded vehicles brought the buildings down? Easier, believable and if our Government somehow conned 19 Arabs into doing their dirty work with the planes how hard would it have been to convince them to use vehicles?
 

Wicked Jester

Libsmackin'chef
Joined
Aug 4, 2009
Messages
11,924
Reaction score
1,890
Points
153
Location
So. Cal, Malibu!
9/11 conspiracy theory, requires idiots, fools and morons to make and uneducated fearful people to perpetrate.

The basic argument made by the theories is that explosives were ladened in the skyscrapers. Yet no one can explain how those extensive explosives that would require construction work on the pillars were seen by NO ONE.

No one can explain how those explosives survived the impact of the jets, the ensuing fire and collapsing floors and still managed to go off.

If the argument is that explosives were in the basement area and not the high rise, how come the survivors reported debris FALLING on them, not falling into the basement?

In WTC 7 no one can explain how the supposed explosives survived HOURS of intense fire and still managed to not only not go off early but still be supposedly controlled by an external source.

One of the arguments is that free fall could not have been obtained by the collapsing buildings. Which would imply that explosives were at the base of the buildings. Not in the high rises. Yet there is absolutely no evidence that the bottom collapsed BEFORE the upper floors crushed them.

Why fly planes into the buildings at all if one is going to use explosives? 93 proved that properly placed explosives could do the trick, why get 19 Arabs to hijack aircraft and fly them into the buildings? Just use the same trick as in 93, claim explosive loaded vehicles brought the buildings down? Easier, believable and if our Government somehow conned 19 Arabs into doing their dirty work with the planes how hard would it have been to convince them to use vehicles?
They also CANNOT explain why it's clearly seen when the first building falls, that the top above the impact zone falls to the side, and DOES NOT freefall straight down.....Nor can they explain why massive amounts of debris fell OVER trade 7, and took out over a third of the buliding. That would not have happened in a controlled demolition, or freefall.

They also CANNOT explain why no explosives were found. No evidence of controlled demolition was ever found. No witness as to the placement of controlled demolition materials has ever been found.

They can't explain where all the passengers of the planes are. Can't find any of the hijackers still alive. Can't come up with even one person out of the thousands who would have had to have been involved in the conspiracy.

And these are just a few examples of many that they absolutely CANNOT explain, or find ANYTHING to back up their ridiculous assertions.

What these people are, is a very small collection of very ignorant, gullible, paranoid fools, PERIOD!
 

rightwinger

Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2009
Messages
224,342
Reaction score
50,007
Points
2,190
Where is the actual theory?

I didnt see the part where you actually say what you think happened

Can you tell me in less than five minutes?
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$280.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top