What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Tunguska disaster a nuclear explosion?

whitehall

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
55,558
Reaction score
18,689
Points
2,260
Location
Western Va.
Pop history tells us that the explosion in a remote section of Siberia in 1908 was the result of a meteor which left no trace. The explosion left radiation residue and the blast was identical to 1945 American nuclear tests. Secietific geniuses were in no short supply in the late 1800's and a New Zealand scientist was experimenting in nuclear energy in the UK in the early 1900's. Nobody knows what was going on in the relatively closed society of Russia in the early 1900's and it is reasonabe to suspect that a nuclear test lab located in a remote area might have gone up in the first big one. It's a better theory than a meteor which conveniently picked remote Siberia instead of New York City and left no trace.
 

uscitizen

Senior Member
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
45,940
Reaction score
4,922
Points
48
Location
My Shack
I was just showing off for some chicks. Never activate warp drive that close to the surface.
 
OP
whitehall

whitehall

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
55,558
Reaction score
18,689
Points
2,260
Location
Western Va.
Ah . new research reveals.... Well I saw the planes crash into the World Trade Center and some people are trying to tell me that ...new research reveals something else happened. Research is sometimes like beauty. It's in the eye of the researcher. What's the chance of a comet hitting the most remote area on the globe? Pretty convenient and lucky.
 

percysunshine

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2011
Messages
34,270
Reaction score
9,751
Points
1,330
Location
Sty
'Secietific geniuses were in no short supply in the late 1800's'

Unquestionably.
 

daveman

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
75,913
Reaction score
28,685
Points
2,250
Location
On the way to the Dark Tower.
Ah . new research reveals.... Well I saw the planes crash into the World Trade Center and some people are trying to tell me that ...new research reveals something else happened. Research is sometimes like beauty. It's in the eye of the researcher. What's the chance of a comet hitting the most remote area on the globe? Pretty convenient and lucky.

Well, given that there are more remote areas than heavily-populated areas, I'd say the chances are pretty good.
 

Unkotare

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2011
Messages
112,145
Reaction score
17,720
Points
2,180
Hey, don't spoil the fun with rational thinking!
 

Toddsterpatriot

Diamond Member
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
78,146
Reaction score
21,980
Points
2,180
Location
Chicago
Ah . new research reveals.... Well I saw the planes crash into the World Trade Center and some people are trying to tell me that ...new research reveals something else happened. Research is sometimes like beauty. It's in the eye of the researcher. What's the chance of a comet hitting the most remote area on the globe? Pretty convenient and lucky.

Well, given that there are more remote areas than heavily-populated areas, I'd say the chances are pretty good.

Statistics are difficult for some people.
 

dilloduck

Diamond Member
Joined
May 8, 2004
Messages
53,240
Reaction score
5,796
Points
1,850
Location
Austin, TX
Exactly where was Oppenheimer and his buddies when this happened? Eots --we need you.
 

daveman

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
75,913
Reaction score
28,685
Points
2,250
Location
On the way to the Dark Tower.
Ah . new research reveals.... Well I saw the planes crash into the World Trade Center and some people are trying to tell me that ...new research reveals something else happened. Research is sometimes like beauty. It's in the eye of the researcher. What's the chance of a comet hitting the most remote area on the globe? Pretty convenient and lucky.

Well, given that there are more remote areas than heavily-populated areas, I'd say the chances are pretty good.

Statistics are difficult for some people.

Apparently.
 

Moonglow

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
186,647
Reaction score
35,319
Points
2,220
Location
sw mizzouri
i thought it was from lighting farts.
 

zzzz

Just a regular American
Joined
Jul 24, 2010
Messages
3,080
Reaction score
530
Points
98
Location
Yountsville
Hmmm. You need to enrich uranium first and how do you think they would do that back in the day.
 
OP
whitehall

whitehall

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
55,558
Reaction score
18,689
Points
2,260
Location
Western Va.
I saw the planes hit the Towers in NYC and yet people on the board try to tell me the planes didn't take down the buildings. Nobody saw the explosion in Russia and there is no physical evidence and yet everyone seems to know for sure that the source was extra terrestrial.
 

techieny

Conservative
Joined
Jun 19, 2011
Messages
2,553
Reaction score
622
Points
48
I saw the planes hit the Towers in NYC and yet people on the board try to tell me the planes didn't take down the buildings. Nobody saw the explosion in Russia and there is no physical evidence and yet everyone seems to know for sure that the source was extra terrestrial.

Please try to induce vomiting and call poison control.
 

Toddsterpatriot

Diamond Member
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
78,146
Reaction score
21,980
Points
2,180
Location
Chicago
I saw the planes hit the Towers in NYC and yet people on the board try to tell me the planes didn't take down the buildings. Nobody saw the explosion in Russia and there is no physical evidence and yet everyone seems to know for sure that the source was extra terrestrial.

No physical evidence?
How do they know anything happened?

You might want to rethink your post.
 

American Horse

AKA "Mustang"
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
5,746
Reaction score
908
Points
153
Location
The Hoosier Heartland
Ah . new research reveals.... Well I saw the planes crash into the World Trade Center and some people are trying to tell me that ...new research reveals something else happened. Research is sometimes like beauty. It's in the eye of the researcher. What's the chance of a comet hitting the most remote area on the globe? Pretty convenient and lucky.

Well, given that there are more remote areas than heavily-populated areas, I'd say the chances are pretty good.

Whitehall needs to acquaint himself with Occam’s Razor.
 

American Horse

AKA "Mustang"
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
5,746
Reaction score
908
Points
153
Location
The Hoosier Heartland
There were witnesses to the actual event.
A dirty snowball (comet) has long been the most likely explanation, since it would be disrupted by the heat and impact with the lower more dense atmosphere and disintigrate well above the surface of the earth, and would leave very little except steam and dust dispersed by the explosion and the shock wave produced.
 
Last edited:

martybegan

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2010
Messages
63,490
Reaction score
19,154
Points
2,260
9459771.jpg
 

editec

Mr. Forgot-it-All
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
41,421
Reaction score
5,666
Points
48
Location
Maine
Radiation traces?

News to me.

As to how a gigantic ICEBALL could leve no trace?

Easy to understand that.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$240.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top