Obama handed off increasing deficits.
- 2016 - $585 billion budget deficit
- 2015 - $439 billion budget deficit
- 2014 - $514 billion budget deficit
US Budget Deficit by Year Since 1969
Obama has been Trumped by $ Trillion deficits and rising. Donald Trump doesn't appear to understand that cutting taxes increases the deficit.
Revenues went up. How does more revenue increase deficits?
They barely went up during a strong economy. They should have increased a lot. Are you really this stupid? Deficits are a trillion and we aren’t even in a recession.
Deficits have never had anything to do with recessions. It has to do with over spending.
In the 1920s, Coolidge had a recession that was actually worse in terms of economic decline, than the 2009 sub-prime recession.
But if you look at the deficits, they actually fell. Because they cut spending. And unsurprisingly, the economy recovered extremely fast, which resulted in the roaring 20s.
The 'roaring twenties' accelerated the evolution of organized crime in the USA much like the Trump regime is doing by engaging in blatant criminal behavior enabled by a corrupt Attorney General. Organized crime was the biggest growth industry of the 1920s.
Not true that cutting spending in the 1920s was responsible for the economic boom of that time. The devastation of Europe from WW1 left the US in a dominant posiiton in worldwide manufacturing capacity rapid innovation and growth of manufacturing was the driving force which induced rapid economic growth.
Bit a of a ridiculous claim. So now the economic growth and the rise of the standards of living and wealth in the country, caused crime. By that logic, we should destroy the economy like Venezuela, to avoid crime?
Claiming that exports from the 1910s, is not really supportable by the data. First, your timing is off. WW1 was from 1914 to 1918. The increase in exports from 1890 to 1910 would account for most of the increased export.
https://www.dartmouth.edu/~dirwin/docs/Surge3wp.pdf
Page 4 says clearly that while exports did increase due to WW1, the real increase was in the 2 decades prior to WW1.
Additionally, while world war 2, due to mass bombing and wide scale looting in some cases, clearly caused mass damage to manufacturing and infrastructure across Europe, WW1 was far less of that. If you doubt that, all you need to do is look at German which was back to a world war military industry strength in barely 20 years, and that's with the hyper inflation of the Weimar Republic.
So what we can see is that as much damage was done, the biggest damage was the loss of life. Once you had people to run those manufacturing plants again, the plants were open and running.
This is very much unlike the Europe of WW2, where there were no factories left standing, whether you had people to run them or not.
So having read numerous papers on the roaring 20s, I have yet to come across anything anywhere, saying that a war that was over years prior, was why the economy in the roaring 20s did so well.
Further, your position isn't even logical. How did a war that was over in 1918, result in an economic boom after 1923? There was a recession in 1921. If it was the exports caused by the war that ended in 1918, is the cause of boom in 1923 through 1929... then ... why didn't those exports prevent the economic recession of 1921? Logically the exports should have been highest at the end of the war and been declining as all the men returned from the military to run the farms and manufacturing plants across Europe. Exports to Europe should have been higher in the early 20s, when they had a recession, rather than in the late 20s, when you had a boom.
So, Not buying that claim, unless you can actually back it up with some evidence. I'll consider whatever you have to offer.