Did the Court bring Clarity and Simplification? With Congressional District Maps looking more like Picasso's than Impartial Redistricting Maps, is it really even Possible to be fair to all here? Actually no. Has not even more Chaos being created here? My District is more like Chop Suey. It doesn't represent me.
By Law the Redistricting is done once every 10 years, in compliance with State and Federal Constitutions. The Controlling Party does within reason get it's way.
Using the Courts to obstruct that process in some ways may be interpreted as Unconstitutional. If you have a good cause and argument to back it up, let it be heard. The Case should stand or fall on it's own merit. The boundaries set up by the lower Court in Texas, just fell on their own lack of merit. It is for the Legislature to do it's job in drawing boundaries.
1. Nothing in what you posted would prevent electing congressmen using proportional representation. What it does do is prevent the existence of both districts and at-large seats.
2. States can redistrict as often as they like, they just have to do it at least once every ten years.
1. Proportional Representation, by design should not discriminate against the Majority Either. It is about Equal Representation, not Reverse Discrimination.
2. Redistricting, by design, takes place after the States receive the Census Information, every 10 years.
