Texas "fetal heartbeat" law to be NATIONAL MODEL

[BlindBoo]

What compromises would the Feminazis agree to? Not any that I have ever heard. They want abortion on demand.

**** man, I'm not up on my Feminazis stats........wtf is a feminazi? Sister of the eco-fascist?

Well safe to say you are disgusted by them. Why do you want them to procreate?

 

[Flash]

**** man, I'm not up on my Feminazis stats........wtf is a feminazi? Sister of the eco-fascist?

Well safe to say you are disgusted by them. Why do you want them to procreate?

The Feminazis are the ones calling the shots for a national abortion policy. None of the Moon Bat politicians would dare piss those dykes off by suggesting anything less than abortion on demand.

But lets find out your convictions.

I would allow abortion for any legitimate medical reasons.

I don't think a child should be killed because the father was an asshole but I would be willing to compromise and allow abortion for rape and incest if the woman can't find an adoption family.

Absolutely no abortion for the sake of convenience.

What is wrong with that?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

My concern is that "vigilante laws" will go far beyond just abortion cases. If that Pandora's box is opening, which it appears to be, who knows where it will end.

Seems just as reasonable to allow anyone to sue gun owners if constitutionally protected rights are on the table.

 

[Blues Man]

But we are debating the Texas Bill...not your feelings....

You said a 6 week old fetus is viable you were wrong.

 

[Blues Man]

Totally unscientific and arbitrary. And simply not true. At least you said “IMO”.

You'll also notice that I said that after conception the resulting zygote is a genetically unique set of cells.

That doesn't mean its viable outside the womb.

 

[marvin martian]

Ok if Eve and Adam were the first two and only humans on the planet, they made more humans with their children.

The only humans that existed on the planet were Eve, Adam and their children.

Who did their children have sex with to make more humans?

If Eve, Adam and their children didn't have sex with one another to make more humans, humans would have died out with them. Yet there are literally billions of humans on the planet.

So if the Eve and Adam story is true, humanity came from incest.

Personally, I don't believe the Eve and Adam story is true but I'm not a christian.

If you claim to be a christian, you believe that story and the fact that humans came from incest.

And by the way, if Eve and Adam were the first and only 2 humans on the planet, who developed a language and who taught it to the snake?

OK, I take it back, you actually are that ******* stupid. It's not an act. LOL!

But you still didn't answer the question: when does life begin?

 

[Blues Man]

It doesn’t matter. Viability is not what makes someone a human being. that is totally unscientific and arbitrary. But let me ask you this… is it your claim that preborn babies who survive outside the womb are indeed human beings?

By definition a preborn baby is in the womb.

A baby is born when it leaves the womb.

 

[Blues Man]

Probably a good thing, right?

The anti abortion crown doesn't like those pills.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

But it is viable...that's where you are behind the times and void of new fetal technology...in other words you have become a knuckle dragger....

Viability is at 23 weeks, dope.

 

[dudmuck]

You are blaming God only to curry your holier than thou secular worship for leftist thugs. God gave people free will to live as they choose. You chose to tear down God. Don't come crying to me for telling the truth to you when you account your upping the ante on millions of murdering human beings by way of abortions on judgment day. You have made your choice to support the wanton dismemberment of little bitty human beings in their first stages of human development. I frankly don't believe the heinous method of killing a developing child is good for the development of morality in human beings in their sexual maturity stages. It destroys any goodness in the mothers who cravenly demanded to be relieved of responsibility of patenting a child for the love of never having to deal with someone as miserable as the self. Devour the human race is what misfortune abortion brings to those who declare war on a weak little baby who unfortunately cannot takecan AK-47 on the freaks who conspire to kill its precious little chance to continue it's life to maturity like big people who think a little human life doesn't matter in the least little bit although the ugly truth of the abortion is that it hurts its victim to death. And there is documented evidence that its victims try to escape the killing instruments of abortion weilded by wealth-seeking abortionists and their assistants in this heinous taking of the life of a hapless and helpless little human being. Life of someone else regarded as nothing but a parasite will come back to its practioners who will be called out for it one fine day in the spirit.

God seemed to have no problem with taking developing child, as demonstrated by the ordeal of bitter water. The bible states a woman who is suspected of adultery can be made to miscarry.

 

[BlindBoo]

The Feminazis are the ones calling the shots for a national abortion policy. None of the Moon Bat politicians would dare piss those dykes off by suggesting anything less than abortion on demand.

But lets find out your convictions.

I would allow abortion for any legitimate medical reasons.

I don't think a child should be killed because the father was an asshole but I would be willing to compromise and allow abortion for rape and incest if the woman can't find an adoption family.

Absolutely no abortion for the sake of convenience.

What is wrong with that?

I support the current compromise under the R v W decision.

 

[whitehall]

It's not an observation nor is it backed up by real political analysis. It's a threat by somebody named Reid Wilson of "The Hill" designed to elicit an emotional response by pro abortion lefties. Why isn't "The Hill" twitter account cancelled for misinformation?

 

[Rawley]

Legislative definition. The activity can be seen at around 6 weeks.

Is a 'fetal heartbeat' really a heartbeat at 6 weeks?

What exactly do we mean when we talk about a "fetal heartbeat" at six weeks of pregnancy?

www.livescience.com

??? Six weeks is not in the definition in the legislation. A heartbeat can be sometimes be seen at six weeks, sometimes it's three months.

 

[buttercup]

You'll also notice that I said that after conception the resulting zygote is a genetically unique set of cells.

That doesn't mean its viable outside the womb.

We are all a genetically unique set of cells. The fact of the matter is that by the time surgical abortions occur, a genetically unique human being is being killed.

Viability is irrelevant, because viability is not what determines our humanity. The preborn is not supposed to be viable in the early stages of pregnancy. The preborn is precisely how he or she should be at that stage of life.

 

[Rawley]

The anti abortion crown doesn't like those pills.

Some don't like condoms. BOth are better than abortions.

 

[BlindBoo]

??? Six weeks is not in the definition in the legislation. A heartbeat can be sometimes be seen at six weeks, sometimes it's three months.

Doesn't matter. The embryo or fetus is not viable in at 6 or 13 weeks.

 

[Blues Man]

We are all a genetically unique set of cells. The fact of the matter is that by the time surgical abortions occur, a genetically unique human being is being killed.

Viability is irrelevant, because viability is not what determines our humanity. The preborn is not supposed to be viable in the early stages of pregnancy. The preborn is precisely how he or she should be at that stage of life.

Viability is very relevant.

Which is why I have no issue with abortion in the early stages of pregnancy.

Most miscarriages take place in the first 8 weeks of pregnancy so So i see no reason to get all worked up over abortions performed in that same time frame.

 

[Rambunctious]

Viability is at 23 weeks, dope.

Are you a doctor?...pediatrician?...how about where you got that 23 week BS from...any doctors there?....I'm not a doctor but in Texas they decided a fetus with a heartbeat deserves civil rights protections...you can disagree but that's the law now....you can argue when you think a fetus is viable...but Texas disagrees with you....

 

[Rambunctious]

Doesn't matter. The embryo or fetus is not viable in at 6 or 13 weeks.

Says who?....you?....are you a doctor?.....

 

[buttercup]

By definition a preborn baby is in the womb.

A baby is born when it leaves the womb.

Well you didn't really answer my question. Let me try again, I'll put it in a different way. If you're claiming that the new individual is a human being or "baby" simply because of location... would you then agree that frozen embryos that are used in embryo adoption are indeed babies? I mean, they're outside the womb, and that seems to be your criteria.