Terri Schiavo's Husband: Jeb Bush 'Put Me Through Hell'

No you instead are making shit up that's not there . Liars like you can't seem to stop
Nah, you're just too retarded to comprehend that we have the freedom of religion as well as the freedom from religion.

If I want to choose to practice a religion, the government cannot prevent me -- freedom of religion.

If I want to choose to not follow any religion at all, the government cannot force me to practice one -- freedom from religion.

Savvy?

Or still stuck on stupid?
Hey dipshit CONGRESS cant ....Do try and keep up.
Dead wrong, you raging dumbfuck. It applies to the states as well...

EVERSON v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF EWING TP., 330 U.S. 1 (1947)

Second. The New Jersey statute is challenged as a 'law respecting an establishment of religion.' The First Amendment, as made applicable to the states by the Fourteenth, Murdock v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 , 63 S.Ct. 870, 872, 146 A.L.R. 81, commands that a state 'shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.'

[...]

The 'establishment of religion' clause of the First Amendment means at least this: Neither a state nor the Federal Government can set up a church. Neither can pass laws which aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion over another. Neither can force nor influence a person to go to or to remain away from church against his will or force him to profess a belief or disbelief in any religion. No person can be punished for entertain- [330 U.S. 1, 16] ing or professing religious beliefs or disbeliefs, for church attendance or non-attendance.

The government cannot force anyone to practice a religion. Period. Freedom from religion.
Thanks for proving that you don't read the Constitution
:lmao:

What part of that Supreme Court decision are you incapable of understanding, dumbfuck?

"The First Amendment, as made applicable to the states by the Fourteenth, commands that a state 'shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.'"
The supreme court doesn't get to rewrite the Constitution. Besides that court also gave us the dread Scott decision so they have proved many times to be wrong
 
Nah, you're just too retarded to comprehend that we have the freedom of religion as well as the freedom from religion.

If I want to choose to practice a religion, the government cannot prevent me -- freedom of religion.

If I want to choose to not follow any religion at all, the government cannot force me to practice one -- freedom from religion.

Savvy?

Or still stuck on stupid?
Hey dipshit CONGRESS cant ....Do try and keep up.
Dead wrong, you raging dumbfuck. It applies to the states as well...

EVERSON v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF EWING TP., 330 U.S. 1 (1947)

Second. The New Jersey statute is challenged as a 'law respecting an establishment of religion.' The First Amendment, as made applicable to the states by the Fourteenth, Murdock v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 , 63 S.Ct. 870, 872, 146 A.L.R. 81, commands that a state 'shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.'

[...]

The 'establishment of religion' clause of the First Amendment means at least this: Neither a state nor the Federal Government can set up a church. Neither can pass laws which aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion over another. Neither can force nor influence a person to go to or to remain away from church against his will or force him to profess a belief or disbelief in any religion. No person can be punished for entertain- [330 U.S. 1, 16] ing or professing religious beliefs or disbeliefs, for church attendance or non-attendance.

The government cannot force anyone to practice a religion. Period. Freedom from religion.
Thanks for proving that you don't read the Constitution
:lmao:

What part of that Supreme Court decision are you incapable of understanding, dumbfuck?

"The First Amendment, as made applicable to the states by the Fourteenth, commands that a state 'shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.'"
The supreme court doesn't get to rewrite the Constitution. Besides that court also gave us the dread Scott decision so they have proved many times to be wrong
They didn't rewrite it. You really are retarded enough to believe that. That ruling established the First Amendment applies to the states because of the 14th Amendment.

How is that "rewriting" the Constitution, dumbfuck?
 
Hey dipshit CONGRESS cant ....Do try and keep up.
Dead wrong, you raging dumbfuck. It applies to the states as well...

EVERSON v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF EWING TP., 330 U.S. 1 (1947)

Second. The New Jersey statute is challenged as a 'law respecting an establishment of religion.' The First Amendment, as made applicable to the states by the Fourteenth, Murdock v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 , 63 S.Ct. 870, 872, 146 A.L.R. 81, commands that a state 'shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.'

[...]

The 'establishment of religion' clause of the First Amendment means at least this: Neither a state nor the Federal Government can set up a church. Neither can pass laws which aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion over another. Neither can force nor influence a person to go to or to remain away from church against his will or force him to profess a belief or disbelief in any religion. No person can be punished for entertain- [330 U.S. 1, 16] ing or professing religious beliefs or disbeliefs, for church attendance or non-attendance.

The government cannot force anyone to practice a religion. Period. Freedom from religion.
Thanks for proving that you don't read the Constitution
:lmao:

What part of that Supreme Court decision are you incapable of understanding, dumbfuck?

"The First Amendment, as made applicable to the states by the Fourteenth, commands that a state 'shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.'"
The supreme court doesn't get to rewrite the Constitution. Besides that court also gave us the dread Scott decision so they have proved many times to be wrong
They didn't rewrite it. You really are retarded enough to believe that. That ruling established the First Amendment applies to the states because of the 14th Amendment.

How is that "rewriting" the Constitution, dumbfuck?
You need to read your own links . You are showing all of us how ignorant you really are
 
Dead wrong, you raging dumbfuck. It applies to the states as well...

EVERSON v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF EWING TP., 330 U.S. 1 (1947)

Second. The New Jersey statute is challenged as a 'law respecting an establishment of religion.' The First Amendment, as made applicable to the states by the Fourteenth, Murdock v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 , 63 S.Ct. 870, 872, 146 A.L.R. 81, commands that a state 'shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.'

[...]

The 'establishment of religion' clause of the First Amendment means at least this: Neither a state nor the Federal Government can set up a church. Neither can pass laws which aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion over another. Neither can force nor influence a person to go to or to remain away from church against his will or force him to profess a belief or disbelief in any religion. No person can be punished for entertain- [330 U.S. 1, 16] ing or professing religious beliefs or disbeliefs, for church attendance or non-attendance.

The government cannot force anyone to practice a religion. Period. Freedom from religion.
Thanks for proving that you don't read the Constitution
:lmao:

What part of that Supreme Court decision are you incapable of understanding, dumbfuck?

"The First Amendment, as made applicable to the states by the Fourteenth, commands that a state 'shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.'"
The supreme court doesn't get to rewrite the Constitution. Besides that court also gave us the dread Scott decision so they have proved many times to be wrong
They didn't rewrite it. You really are retarded enough to believe that. That ruling established the First Amendment applies to the states because of the 14th Amendment.

How is that "rewriting" the Constitution, dumbfuck?
You need to read your own links . You are showing all of us how ignorant you really are
The link I posted states...

"The First Amendment, as made applicable to the states by the Fourteenth, commands that a state 'shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.'"

Feel free to prove otherwise.
 
The link I posted states...

"The First Amendment, as made applicable to the states by the Fourteenth, commands that a state 'shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.'"

Feel free to prove otherwise.

He's obviously confused.
 
The link I posted states...

"The First Amendment, as made applicable to the states by the Fourteenth, commands that a state 'shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.'"

Feel free to prove otherwise.

He's obviously confused.
Obviously and thoroughly.
 
tumblr_njt6wgbJHu1rhkttmo1_500.png
 
I agree.

So long as you serve-up a similar poster for the Clintons.

America doesn't need any more Family Political Dynasties just now, or anytime soon, on either side of the aisle.

We don't need to continue down the path of anointing a small autocratic circle of American Ruling Families.

Time to give somebody else a turn at-bat.
 
I agree.

So long as you serve-up a similar poster for the Clintons.

America doesn't need any more Family Political Dynasties just now, or anytime soon, on either side of the aisle.

We don't need to continue down the path of anointing a small autocratic circle of American Ruling Families.

Time to give somebody else a turn at-bat.
We did that in 2008 and you righties haven't stopped whining since. Might as well bring back the Clintons. :thup:
 
rev_schiavo.jpg


CLEARWATER, Fla.—Sitting recently on his brick back patio here, Michael Schiavo called Jeb Bush a vindictive, untrustworthy coward.

For years, the self-described “average Joe” felt harassed, targeted and tormented by the most important person in the state.

“It was a living hell,” he said, “and I blame him.”

Michael Schiavo was the husband of Terri Schiavo, the brain-dead woman from the Tampa Bay area who ended up at the center of one of the most contentious, drawn-out conflicts in the history of America’s culture wars. The fight over her death lasted almost a decade. It started as a private legal back-and-forth between her husband and her parents. Before it ended, it moved from circuit courts to district courts to state courts to federal courts, to the U.S. Supreme Court, from the state legislature in Tallahassee to Congress in Washington. The president got involved. So did the pope.

But it never would have become what it became if not for the dogged intervention of the governor of Florida at the time, the second son of the 41st president, the younger brother of the 43rd, the man who sits near the top of the extended early list of likely 2016 Republican presidential candidates. On sustained, concentrated display, seen in thousands of pages of court records and hundreds of emails he sent, was Jeb the converted Catholic, Jeb the pro-life conservative, Jeb the hands-on workaholic, Jeb the all-hours emailer—confident, competitive, powerful, obstinate Jeb. Longtime watchers of John Ellis Bush say what he did throughout the Terri Schiavo case demonstrates how he would operate in the Oval Office. They say it’s the Jebbest thing Jeb’s ever done.

The case showed he “will pursue whatever he thinks is right, virtually forever,” said Aubrey Jewett, a political science professor at the University of Central Florida. “It’s a theme of Jeb’s governorship: He really pushed executive power to the limits.”

Read more: Jeb Put Me Through Hell - POLITICO Magazine

I remember this case very well. It was supreme government overreach by Governor Bush and President Bush.
It doesn't surprise me that this murderer is a liberal.
 
15th post
rev_schiavo.jpg


CLEARWATER, Fla.—Sitting recently on his brick back patio here, Michael Schiavo called Jeb Bush a vindictive, untrustworthy coward.

For years, the self-described “average Joe” felt harassed, targeted and tormented by the most important person in the state.

“It was a living hell,” he said, “and I blame him.”

Michael Schiavo was the husband of Terri Schiavo, the brain-dead woman from the Tampa Bay area who ended up at the center of one of the most contentious, drawn-out conflicts in the history of America’s culture wars. The fight over her death lasted almost a decade. It started as a private legal back-and-forth between her husband and her parents. Before it ended, it moved from circuit courts to district courts to state courts to federal courts, to the U.S. Supreme Court, from the state legislature in Tallahassee to Congress in Washington. The president got involved. So did the pope.

But it never would have become what it became if not for the dogged intervention of the governor of Florida at the time, the second son of the 41st president, the younger brother of the 43rd, the man who sits near the top of the extended early list of likely 2016 Republican presidential candidates. On sustained, concentrated display, seen in thousands of pages of court records and hundreds of emails he sent, was Jeb the converted Catholic, Jeb the pro-life conservative, Jeb the hands-on workaholic, Jeb the all-hours emailer—confident, competitive, powerful, obstinate Jeb. Longtime watchers of John Ellis Bush say what he did throughout the Terri Schiavo case demonstrates how he would operate in the Oval Office. They say it’s the Jebbest thing Jeb’s ever done.

The case showed he “will pursue whatever he thinks is right, virtually forever,” said Aubrey Jewett, a political science professor at the University of Central Florida. “It’s a theme of Jeb’s governorship: He really pushed executive power to the limits.”

Read more: Jeb Put Me Through Hell - POLITICO Magazine

I remember this case very well. It was supreme government overreach by Governor Bush and President Bush.
It doesn't surprise me that this murderer is a liberal.

He loved and respected his wife's wishes. Why don't you?
 



Did you know it's a myth that there was a 'Native American genocide'?

True story.


1. " However, the arrival of the white man precipitated what was probably the worst
demographic disaster in history. It wasnot warfare but diseasewhich played the majorpart.TheIndians had no resistance to tuberculosis, pneumonia, cholera, typhus, smallpox and other European ailments, with the result that their population declined by about 90 per cent between 1492 and 1650, disappearing altogether in some areas."
"Wild in Woods: The Myth of the Noble Eco-Savage,' by Robert Whelan, p.29-30




Or....was this 'genocide,' too?

2. "The Black Death arrived in Europe by sea in October 1347 when 12 Genoese trading ships docked at the Sicilian port of Messina after a long journey through the Black Sea.... Over the next five years, the mysterious Black Death would kill more than 20 million people in Europe–almost one-third of the continent’s population." Black Death - Facts Summary - HISTORY.com
 



Did you know it's a myth that there was a 'Native American genocide'?

True story.


1. " However, the arrival of the white man precipitated what was probably the worst
demographic disaster in history. It wasnot warfare but diseasewhich played the majorpart.TheIndians had no resistance to tuberculosis, pneumonia, cholera, typhus, smallpox and other European ailments, with the result that their population declined by about 90 per cent between 1492 and 1650, disappearing altogether in some areas."
"Wild in Woods: The Myth of the Noble Eco-Savage,' by Robert Whelan, p.29-30




Or....was this 'genocide,' too?

2. "The Black Death arrived in Europe by sea in October 1347 when 12 Genoese trading ships docked at the Sicilian port of Messina after a long journey through the Black Sea.... Over the next five years, the mysterious Black Death would kill more than 20 million people in Europe–almost one-third of the continent’s population." Black Death - Facts Summary - HISTORY.com

Oh, so now you're attacking Native Americans on a personal level. Is it too hard to stay on thread topic?
 
Back
Top Bottom